Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (2025)

Table of Contents
OCR TXT MD

OCR

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (1)3‘ ‘*1 V..A«-_-I}‘,_«,'éf"a-xi
I ~‘ 2. ‘K. ‘x "7’
. - .% A E”

FILM GRAPHICS P/L 102 CHANDOS ST. CROWS NEST, SYDNEY 2065 439 4233

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (2)Bolex announces the H16EL,

with a new kind of meter that
is ultra sensitive to light changes

and built for hard use.

A built-in light meter once turned even a
ruggedly built pro camera into a delicate
instrument. I

Enter the H16EL, with a silicon cell instead of
the conventional CdS cell. Results: 1. Instant
response to light variations. Shift from blinding
light to deep shadow with perfect results. 2. No
sensitivity to temperature variations. 3. No
corrections needed,[...]ts straight
response curve. 4. Equally responsive to all
colours from blue to red.

Manual light measurements are made through
the lens in the body of the camera so the
camera can be fitt[...]xtension
tubes. For extreme changes of light, use a lens
with built-in automatic exposure adjustment.
Bayonet lens mount for quick and precise
changes. So strong that you can carry the
whole camera by the lens.

Film speeds 10-50 fps, single frame, reverse and
crystal control are electronically regulated and
are coupled automatically to the meter, with a

selector knob rated from 10 right up to 63OASA.

The motor is electronically controlled. When
you stop, it stops. And the shutter closes. You
can use your original film without having to
cut frames from both ends of each take.

The viewfinder has high brightness and 13x
magnification, plus built—in comfort with either
eye. Two red light diodes in the viewfinder
indicate correct aperture. No waiting for a
needle to settle down. The diaphragm of the
new Vario-Switar 12.5-100mm f2 lens is fully
open for accurate focusing and closes down
automatically when you squeeze the button.
Power is supplied by a Ni-Cd battery. Take
your choice of two power packs, two

chargers.

With the usual Bolex attention to detail, a

full range of accessories is available, including a
removable 400 foot magazine that is used with
a take-up motor providing constant film
tension.

The whole unit is built like a tank. It is a
rugged and reliable piece of gear that is as fail-
safe as Bolex know-how can make it, despite its
light weight (about 7lbs for body and power pack).

The Bolex Shoulder brace provides
excellent stability with good weight
distribution, and frees the camera-
lman’s hands to operate camera and
ens.

E$|_E)(

Contact Photimport in your state for

further information or a demonstration.

Photimport (Aust) Pty Ltd
Melbourne 38 6922

Sydney 26 2926

Brisbane 52 8188

Adelaide L H Ma[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (3)The Film, Radio and Television Board
of the ’

AUSTRALIA COUNCIL

(formerly Australian Council for the Arts)
will hold

PUBLIC MEETINGS

in all states

so that proposed new policies
for its Creative Film and
Television Production Funds
can be discussed with
interested parties

SYDNEY BRISBANE MELBOURNE
April 7th 8.00 p.m. April 10th 8.00 p.m. April 22nd 8.00 p.m.
Australian Government Centre Australian Government Centre Theatrette Playbox Cinema
Theat[...]urne

Chifley Square
Watch daily media for dates and venues in other capital cities

The Board intends to abolish the current Experimental, it] is alio planned that orientation seminars followed by’

and General Production Funds; to be restructured as: plrgldrfigtigig ezgfgglefisaggdfiifiegi 0211:, Igfiillgieogffqgrggigg

inexperienced persons prior to them applying to the Basic
Production Fund.

THE BASIC PRODUCTION FUND All applications to the Basic Production Fund will then

and besu ortedb ok ° 1r ltd.
THE ADVANCED PRODUCTION FUND Copies of £32 draft p’o1l"cy‘m§§°l,‘é"éi¥a§,‘L‘3"i,fi§r to the
incl. Alternative Production meetings by writing to:
The Secretary,
- Film, Radio and Television Board,‘
The SCRIPT DEVELOPMENT FUND[...]0

Quarterly Assessments for applications to ?r.Jareative Production in 1975
CLOSE on —- 24th March 23rd June

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (4)The South Australian Film Corporation
is a total film enterprise involved in
film research, production, marketing,
distribution and library services
established by the State Government
and operating both nationally and
internationally.

In the first two years of operations, film
of every type, total film, has been
produced (won Awards), and is being
sold by the South Australian Film
Corporation.

If you want to talk film, total or in part,
talk to us—soon.

Contact: The Director,

South Australian Film Corporation

64 Fullarton Road, Norwood, S.A. Telephone 42 4973 (S.T.D. Code 08)
G.P.O. Box 2019, Adelaide, S.A. 5001. Australia.

Psssssst.’ wanna get your name on
a A.S.1.0. file......??

I RUN BY FILMMAKERS
FOR ALL FILM LOVERS

SPECIALISING IN FIRST RELEASE INDEPENDENT
PRODUCT. INTERESTING CO[...], _/ ..l. /
lW' -

‘ \\\

/' {I U‘:

SYDNEY‘S MOST SELECTIVE LATE SHOWS EVERY
FRIDAY AND SATURDAY AT 11.30 PM

MUSICALS AND NOSTALGIC FILMS EVERY
' SUNDAY AT 2 PM

SUNDAY SP[...]LE
FEATURES EACH WEEK

THE MANLY SILVER SCREEN IS I enclose $6.00/$12.00 for 13/26 issues of the fo[...]og " Please make cheques or postal orders payable to Hightimes P/L
PREVIEWS AND SEASON RUNS. oua '
CINEMA IS A 650 SEATER WITH I6 MM and cmss them not n°g°mble'
MAG OPT. EQUIPMENT ANDTo Us _ 1" 5 ........... ... .......................[...]H MANLV "05 977-5503 next twelve months by paying now for the next two, three, four or

however many years you're willing to risk. We would stress that

these multiple year subs are speculative because we cannot guarantee
to fulfil them!

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (5)[...]2984 or 347 3450
Tel: 36 3359 Perth (Embryo Co-op only)
S.A. Media Resource Centre 1 c/- Ian McLay
Sydney Fnmmake.-3 Co-op (Union St, Adelaide) c/- Perth Institute of Film and
(St Peters Lane, Darlinghurst) PO BOX 33 3[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (6)[...]eras, video tape.
Plus post production facilities in-
cluding film to tape (35mm and
16mm), time code, editing and audio
facilities.

iflhris Newark, General Manager,
Royce Smeal Film Productions.

Complete 35mm and 16mm film
production and creative services.[...]ervices Australia
Pty Ltd. Complete range of 35mm and
16mm film cameras and accessories.
Panavision. In fact everything — from
a battery pack to a camera crane.

Allan Martin. Manager, Samuelson
Film Lighting. Everything from a tiny
little inky dinky to a great big brute
arc. Plus mobile blimped generators
up to 1,000 amps.

ROYCE SMEAL

‘ FILM PRODUCTIONS[...]NATIONAL FILM THEATRE OF AUSTRALIA
Box 1780 GPO, Sydney, NSW 2001.

SEASONS FOR APRIL-MAY

Sixteen Japane[...]rom Austrian Archives
Carl Dreyer

USE FORM BELOW TO SUBSCRIBE NOW

SURNAME(S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .lnlt.[...]. . ..Init . . . . . . ..

PLEASE PRINT CAREFULLY to ensure correct delivery of notices.
Groups of two[...]................................. ..

I declare. that I (we) have attained the age of 18 years. . 1 é

I enclose $5 each in payment of the joining fee.

snemxruae ..........[...].......... .. For enquiries about screenings open to the public.
New Member Renewing write to Box 4934, osgydney or Phone (02)

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (7)K,‘ ‘W
‘x;

\. Book Reviews

\

‘I.

- - Design and Layout Printing
oard . Keith Robertson Waverley O[...]don 3. Gotcn Ltd

Manag
Peter Beliby

Articles and Interviews

Disaster Films Philippe Mora
Disasters’ Mr. Success: An interview with Jennings Lang

David Stratton.....[...]ey
SurfFilms: The Quiet Industry Albie Thoms
We know where we’ve been, but. . .Tony Buckley

Restrictive Trade Practices Legislation and The Film Industry

Antony Ginnane
Raped, Slapped, Ignored: Women in the Movies Tricia Edgar. . . . . . . . . . . . .39
A Matter ofFact Ken Hall
Brian Probyn: Director of[...]. . . . . . . . . . . . .73

Ross Wood: Producer and Director of Photography: An interview
Graham

Features

The 8
The 1974 Australian Film Awards
Top 10 of1974
Filmography: Charles[...]ntre Pages
Picture Previews — Inn of the Damned and Sunday Too Far Away . . . . . . .60
Production
Co[...]........................52
Flesh for Frankenstein and Young Frankenstein Sue Adler .. .. .. .. .. .53[...].................................63

Vi-Iollywood and After Bruce Hodsdon
'Elie Filmgoers’ Companion[...]arrett Hodsdon.............................81

Sydney: Sue Adler; Tel. 26 1625

Assistance
Andrew Pecze

ing Editor

Contributors

Sue Adler is a regular contributor’to
Cinema Papers. Tony Buckley is a film
producer and editor; vice-president of the
Sydney Film Festival; ex-president of the
Australian Film Council and leading In-
dustry spokesman. Virginia Duigan is a
script-writer and ex-film critic for The
National Times. Patricia Edgar is a lec-
turer in media sociology at La Trobe
University's Media Center. Ms Edgar is
co-author of the recently published book,
Media She. Tony Ginnane is a Melbourne-
based film critic and independent
producer-distributor. Kerr C. Hall is a
prominent Australian director of the
Cinesound era. Mike Harris is resident
film critic for The Australian. Barrett
Hodsdon is an economist and has studied
film theory in Britain and America. He is
presently engaged in a series of research
projects for the Film, Radio and Television
Board. Bruce Hodsdon is a tutor in film
with the Council of Adult Education, a
program co-ordinator for the NFT A, and
a regular contributor to various film socie-
ty bulletins. Ross Lansell was a critic for
Nation and is now a scri t-writer. John
0’Hara is the Melbourne ii m critic for the
ABC and lectures in film at the RMIT.
Andrew Pike is an authority on Australian
film history and is currently conducting
research for the Films Division of the
National Library. Mark Randall is a
television writer and actor and has been
accepted as a student of the Film and
Television School. Graham Shirley is an
independent filmmaker and a graduate of
the Film and Television School. He is
currently conducting research on the

American director Norman Dawn. David .

Stratton is the director of the S dncy Film
Festival and runs a radio llm review
program. Albie Thoms is a director of the
Sydney Filmmakers Co-op, a filmmaker,
TV producer and regular contributor to a
number of periodicals. Meaghan Morris is
a regular contributor to Cinema Papers
and The Digger. Eric Reade is a film
historian and author. He has recentl com-
pleted a third volume in a series ealing
with Australian cinema. John Tittensor is a
teacher and a regular book reviewer for a
number of newspapers and magazines.

'RecornineiIded price only.

© Cinema Papers. March-April. 1975.

Editorial[...]y Ginnane

Signed articles represent the views at their authors and
not necessarily those of the Editors. Whilst every care is
taken of manuscripts and materials supplied tor this
magazine, neither the[...]oss or damage which may arise.

This magazine may not. by way of trade. be reproduced

Maurice ;i?fer.e[...]Angeles: Dave Hay

Graham shme ’ écretar I . I in whole or in part. without the prior permission oi the‘
nod Bishop y genda Dogd cinema Papers is produced with linanciai °°""'9'" °‘”"°". .

» W ’ i t ' -I - Cinema Papers is published every three months by

. _ as s ance rom the F: in, Radio and cmema pa 9,5 143 The S, ‘ M ‘b

B.‘-“W953[...]ged
from original 20cm x 25cm color transparency. An exclusive interview with Byron Haskin
appe[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (8)/Le Q

FILMS COMMISSION

The Australian Films Commission Bill
was adopted on March 6, after a long
and stormy passage through both
Houses. But it has yet to receive Royal
Assent.

The Bill now provides for the establish-
ment of a Commission aimed at en-
couraging the promotion, production,
distribution and exhibition of Australian
movies. This Commission will:

0 Take over the Gorton government-
instituted Australian Film Develop-
ment Corporation;

0 incorporate a number of recommen-
dations made by the Tariff Board
report into the industry; and

e incorporate Film Australia, the
Government's movie production arm.
But as Liberal Senator Gullfoyie

pointed out however, the Bill does
nothing to remove the dominance of the
prime exhibition outlets and restructure
the industry to provide a greater number
of alternatives and inject the necessary
measure of genuine competition.

Much debate on amendments to the
Bill concerned the need or otherwise for
the Commission to be autonomous In its
decision-making processes. Senator
Steele Hal[...]upervision of
the Commission by Parliament, noted
that in his view the South Australian
Films Commission, set up by the South
Australian government. would be
operating far more efficient[...]re
under direct supervision by Parliament
than it is at the moment.

The redrafted version of the Bill
provides for parliamentary supervision of
direction to the Commission by the
Minister for Media and enables either
House of Parliament to disallow
regulations establishing levels of
Australian content in local cinemas.
(Another Opposition pooh bear—th[...]im Board of the Commission includ-
ed such people as Hector Crawford
(Crawford Productions) and Graham
Burke (Village Theatres). Clause 20 of
the Bill restricted membership of the
Commission to people who are members
of an incorporated company with more
than 25 members, thus restricting
membership to those movie producers
involved in larger com panles. This clause
was negatlved by a vote on October 23.

With the Act about to go into
operation, large scale funding will be
av[...]ction. Further
the Act gives the Commission power to
seek and obtain industry statistical infor-
mation otherwise unobtainabie and
should give rise to a more informed and
educated industry. AG

LES AUTEURS AUSSIE

Australian movie and TV producers
will benefit from last year's exploratory
trip to Cannes by Tom Stacey, executive
officer of the Australian Film Develop-
ment Corporation. The AFDC has
successfully lobbied the Department of
Overseas Trade and this year both the
TV Festival MIP-TV (April 21-26) and
Film Festival (May 9-23) have official
status as trade promotion events. This
means the Australian government's new
Export Development Grants Act (1974)
applies and that producers attending will
receive 85 per cent tax rebate on eligible
expenditure.

Further, the AFDC and the Department
of Media have combined to provide a
number of free or assisted facilities for
accredited producers. A stand in the

8 —- Cinema Papers, March-April

Carlton Hotel and a hospitality suite in
the Martinez Hotel, with cassette
playback equipment and translators, is
being provided. A group of Australian
producers is being flown to Cannes at
the AFDC's expense. These include
Richa[...]skimo
Nell); Tim Burstail (Petersen, Alvin
Purple and Alvin Rides Again); John La-
mond (Australia after Dark); David Baker
(A salute to the Great Mccarthy); Paul
Witzig (Rolling Home) and Michael
Thornhlii (Between Ware).

The AFDC are following the Canadian
format and have hired the Regent
Cinema for daily grind screenings of
assisted Australian movies. A Sydney ad
agency has been briefed for publicity
and promotional material production.

The Australians[...]view this
year more prominently than ever before
and some international sales are likely.
But there are some doubts and mis-
givings. A number of other Australian
participants at Cannes have, over the
past few ye[...]s Trade joint ven-
ture. Tales of audiences of 10 and 11
watching reruns of some of the Canadian
films,[...]ld have been followed
where government assistance is strictly
‘back-up‘ and individual producers
arrange their own screenings and slot
their promotions to fit in with the movie's
feel.

The absence of provision for 16mm
proiection at the hired Regent Theatre is
also causing problems. Certainly
producers will be augmenting and
sidestepping some of the ‘free’ facilities.

Other visitors to the Festival
accredited to the delegation but not
funded by AFDC will include David Roe
(director A[...]Papers); Silvie ie
Ciezio (Perth Film Festival); and distribu-
tion people like John Fraser (BEF),
Andrew Getty (Seven Keys), Robert
Ward, Mark Josem and Leon Boyle
(F_iimways), Richard Walberg and Dr. D.
Killen. A full report on Cannes in the next

issue.
PB

WOMENS FESTIVAL

A festival of women's movies made by
or about women will be held in six
Australian capital cities later this year.

Movies to be screened will include the
latest work of Susan Sontag, Agnes
Varda and Marguerite Duras as well as
movies by Ida Luplno, Nelly Kapian,
Dorothy Arzner, Leni Reifenstahl, Mai
Zetterling and Shirley Clarke. Almost all
the material to be shown will not have
been screened in Australia before.

Also to be included in the festival are
video-taped discussions with Kapian,
Sontag, Varda, Duras and Clarke as well
as many lesser-known British, American
and European women filmmakers.

The idea for such an ambitious and
wide-ranging festival was first mooted at
the “Womenvlslon” conference early in
1974, and its purpose has been describ-
ed_as a “. .. springboard (for) an ex-
ploration of female consciousness
through mov[...]e festival has
proved difficuit. The Film. Radio and
Television Board has offered a loan of
$20,000 to cover some costs, and the
international Women's Year Committee
has promised the festival a $35,000
guarantee against loss — however
organizers are expected to raise the
finance for movie purchase and hire,
transport, publicity and administration
from advance subscriptions. A raw deal
from both bodies to say the least.

Dates of the festival in each capital city
and addresses for subscriptions are
listed below.

SYDNEY — August 9-17
P.O. Box 245

Broadway, NSW, 2007[...]sbane, Old. 4000
Phone: 21 0987

RATES: Melbourne and Sydney: $16.00
All other cities: $8.00

PB

NEW BOARD POLICIES

The Film, Radio and Television Board
of the Australia Council (formerly the
Australian Council for the Arts) is
currently circulating a policy document
which precis all discussions to date con-
cerning the administration of the board's
Creative Film and Television Production
funds.

The recommendations maintain that
they are based on the experience of the
last five years of[...]ll establish two
prerequisites for new candidates to
receive monies from either fund. The
new and inexperienced applicant will
have to participate in an orientation
seminar to be conducted quarterly in
capitals and country centres. in addition
to providing applicants with basic ex-
perience in handling of equipment, the
board expresses the hope that
applicants who might come into the film
arena wit[...]‘graduates’ of the seminar
would be eligible to attend quarterly
workshops for further experience -— par-
ticularly in the use of 8mm equipment
and other facilities which the board plans
to make available.

Completion of both seminar and
workshop will also make them eligible for
either[...]ants or
Advanced Production Fund loans.

Meetings are currently being
programmed in all capitals for board
representatives to discuss these policies
with interested parties. Filmmakers who
feel that:

e The policies exercise unwarranted
rest[...]tinction the board draws
between ‘art’ movies and ‘commercial’
movies needs to be challenged;

e The board's monies would be bet[...]t:

or who have any gripe with the scheme at

all are urged to attend the meeting called

in their State.

All enquiries should be directed to The
Secretary, Film, Radio and Television
Board, Australia Council, PO Box 302,
North Sydney, 2060. HG

NOBODY’S PERFECT

Over the last 12 to 18 months film ex-
hibitors in Melbourne have been riding a
cloud of gold-lined successes with
movies like The Sting, Live and Let Die
and That's Entertainment chalking up
extremely successful seasons. in fact,
visiting American executive Jennings
Lang noted at a press conference here
that on a per capita basis Meibournltes
go to more movies than people in any
other city in the world.

Moreover movies like Mame, Lost
Horizon, The Great Gatsby and
Sunshine which have had mediocre runs
in many instances overseas have ex-
perienced better seasons here than most
countries in the world.

But as the famous last line from Billy
Wilder's Some Like it Hot runs:
“Nobody's perfect". Everyone has their
flops and a few weeks back ‘now
Melbourne saw a monster. The Great
Gatsby on a Village Drive-in splash —
with a revamped advertising campaign
—~ was yanked out of the multl-theatre
release after only one disastrous night
and replaced throughout the circuit with
a hurried return of The Dirty Dozen.

Nobody seems to have the answer for
what went wrong but apparently opening
night took less than $2000 which on a
seven night splash has grossed upwards
of $200,000 on the circuit.

At any rate don't try to blame the
publicity man. As American Nat Segoioff
points out in Film Commenf‘s latest
issue, the publicist has got enough on his
plate. To give his comments weight,
Segaioff listed 50 reasons why a movie
might fail — Here's a random 20:

1. It's a shitty movie.

2. it's a good movie — not a great
one, but a good one — only the
shitty reviews killed it.

3. it's a great movie with great
reviews and audiences like it when
they see it — only we can't get
them to come to the cinema.

4. The reviews were so great that the

public got the impression that the

queues were too long, and so they

waited. Meanwhile it died. .

it's a fag movie.

it's a kid's movie.

it's a women's movie.

It's a men's movie and the women

won't come.

Black audiences don't want to see

a white movie.

10. White audiences don't want to see
a black movie.

11. The movie opened at the wrong
t[...]. The movie opened at the right
time of the year, but so did a lot of
other good ones and It got lost in
the crowd.

13. The weather's so good, who wants
to see a movie?

14. The weather's so bad, who wants
to see a movie?

15. The weather's going to be so
good, who wants to cancel a
weekend‘ trip just to stay home
and see a movie.

16. People are waiting until the movie
hits the suburbs.

17. They showed too much of it in the
coming attractions.

18. Leads were better than the movie
turned out to be, and word of
mouth killed it.

19. That bitchy critic kept pounding
away.

20. There's nothing
musicals only).

59 !-7°.“S”.‘"

to hum. (For

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (9)«(Sections 137 and 138),

it seems the industry still hasn't found
a Deiphlc Oracle. But there'll be a swell
job waiting for him when he comes

knocking on someone's door.
AG

GOLDEN REELS

Presenting the 1974-5 Australian Film
institute Awards at the Sydney Opera
House with Glenda Jackson presiding
was a calculated attempt by the institute
to focus both local and international
attention on the now burgeoning
Australian film industry.

Immediate local media response
suggests the gamble largely paid off.
What the international trade press will
think of the event remains to be seen.

, Certainly the showmanshlp of the even-

ing was marred by early projection and
compare gaffes.

The awards themselves (published
elsewhere in this issue) were the subject
of much discussion, as might be ex-
pected, but the only general thumbs
down seemed to land on the choice of
best screenplay which went to David
Williamson's Petersen. However there
was general approval for the awards
given to the South Australian Film Cor-
poration productions, particularly Sun-[...]was also some discussion sur-
rounding inclusion in the awards of
movies made specifically for television,
and it was pointed out by some that the
TV industry already has its own award
system (Logies, Penguins and TV Society
Awards). However with productions like
Scenes from a Marriage, Duel etc. the
boundaries between TV and movies have
definitely become blurred.

HG

HOLLY[...]gs Lang, made
some interesting points on the size and
Importance of Australia in the world
market.

Australia ranks third in Unlversal's top
grossing foreign nations — with UK and
France heading the list; italy and Japan
taking fourth and fifth’ places.

Variety gives us second place (moving
up from fifth position in 1973), with a film
hire of $21 million for the first six months
of 1974.

Asked If he felt that Universal had a
responsibility to help support the local
industry in view of the large amount of
cash it took out of the country, Lang was
evasive, preferring to comment on his
company’s investments in local cinemas.

Under the Income Tax Assessment Act
preferential
treatment is allowed to foreign-owned
movie companies, who have to pay only
10 per cent of their gross income in tax.

Lang said he was against any move for
compulsory reinvestment of a part of
the film rentals, but expressed con-

SPECIAL OFFER

BOUND
VOLUMES

VOLUME 1 1974

NUMBERS 1-4

slderabie interest in ‘international’
productions.

He pointed out, however, that in the re-
cent co-productlon Sidecar Racers,
Universal expected to drop a million.

David Stratton's in-depth interview
with Jennings Lang appears in this Issue
of Cinema Papers.

GROSS TROUBLE

HG

Talk to a cinema manager or a dis-
tributor until recently about the film in-
dustry here and he would automatically
assume you were referring to the exhibi-
tion or distribution machine. Look
through the pages of The Australasian
Cinema until recently and you would be
forgiven for thinking the same. it's only
now that production has become a con-
sideration in ‘the trade’s eye’. But the
doors are opening . . . slowly.

For a producer to assess the market
he intends to compete in he needs to
know its size and comparative figures. in
the US, UK, France, italy, Spain, Ger-
many and Japan and doubtless
elsewhere, gross box-office figures are
regularly published in the trade press.
This is not done in Australia, but it is
common knowledge that such figures
are regularly swapped throughout the
distribution-exhibition network.

Here again the producer is the odd
man out. Until he has access to such
material he is unable to assess the
potential of this, his market place, and is
at a disadvantage in dealing with dis-
tributors and exhibitors.

With a view to providing this informa-
tion Cinema Papers, over[...]ths, has been approaching
producers, distributors and exhibitors to
draw up a continuing list of the gross
box-office and gross film hire of
Australian movies since 1950. By and
large co-operation has been forthcoming
and we hope to have the first listing set
up in the next issue. One of the two
largest exhibition outlets, however, has
so far refused to release any information.

The new Australian Films Commission
Act has provision for compulsory ac-
qulsition by the Commission of such
items as box-office figures. No doubt if
this organization continues to refuse
access to vital figures, local production
groups, starved of marketing information
they have every right to share, will be lob-
bying for this to be done.

QUALITY ROADSHOW

AG

Roadshow Distributors‘ and Village
Theatres’ decision to market the first
season of Ely Landau’s America[...]one of the most daring enterprises ever
attempted in the history of serious
cinema promotion here.

At a cost of over $500,000 in up front
payments and advertising, Roadshow

have invested in the seven filmed plays of
the initial series: Edward Albee’s A
Delicate Balance with Katherine Hep-
burn and Paul Schofleld, directed by
Tony Richardson; John[...]eros with Zero Mostel, directed by
Tom O‘Horgan and Kurt Weill; and Max
Anderson's Lost in the Stars with Brock
Peters, directed by Daniel M[...]can experiment had
teething troubles, due largely to com-
puter booking foul-ups and alleged
problems with American Express, who
with Landau and the French Canadian
television were initially partners in the
joint venture. The series, in its second
season in the US with a children's season
on the way, is now run exclusively by
Landau.

Roadshow, whose links with the AFT
organization are no doubt partially ex-
piained by their vice-president Norman

'8. Katz's previous position as head of
Warners — whom Roadshow handle
here — have options on the subsequent
seasons.

initial reaction to the movies overseas
has been varied but largely upbeat. The
main criticism has been their often
stagey reverence for theater with a
capital T, but the massed talent on view
makes them eminently interesting to say
the least.

There will be only two matlnees, two
evening and two school performances of
the movies before they are returned to
the US.

Programs will be played fortnightly
from 23 and 24 June. No individual
tickets will be sold, but season tickets will
retail at $21.

The organizer[...]need well
over 100,000 subscribers for the scheme
to make a profit.

AG

THE BANKFATHEFI

Up until the mid-60's a list of top
grossing movies of all time would in-
evitably have been headed by the
blockbuster Gone with the Wind, with a
few newcomers like The Ten com-
mandments and Ben Hur trailing behind
in second and third places. That was until
movies like The Graduate, Love Story
The sound of Music and more recently
The Godlather came along.

in fact the latest Var/ety iistln of “all
time box office champs" shows t at the
new super grossers have taken as much
in one or two years as it took Gone with
the Wind 20 years to run up.

After only three years The Godfather is
now at the top having grossed upwards

HANDSOMELY BOUND IN

THE QUARTER

of $85 million in the US and Canada,
followed by The sound of Music (1965)
with $83 million and Gone With the Wind
(1939) with a mere $70 million. Close
behind comes The Sting (1973) with $68
million, and The Exorcist (1973) with $56
million.

Other “champs" at the top of this
year's listing are Love story (1970), The
Graduate (1968), Airport ([...]), The Poseidon Adven-
ture (1972), Butch cassidy and the Sun-
dance Kid (1969) and The Ten Com-
mandments (1956). PB

GAMMA RAYS AND SEX AIDS

Melbourne has acquired two new in-
dependent cinemas in the last month
bringing the number in the greater urban
area to 41. This is at least nine more than
its northern neighbor Sydney, where
restrictive licensing regulations have, un-
til recently, kept a closed door on the
market. Melbourne's high cinema stan-
dards have contributed to the increasing
popularity of local movie going. For com-
fort and modernity, Melbourne cinemas
are world standard, unlike Sydney where
old barns still stand tall.

The larger of the two new cinemas,
The Total, conceived as a live theatre by
its owner, millionaire property tycoon
Gordon Barfield, was converted to a
cinema after a disastrous premiere run
of Guys and Dolls. initially programmed
by Dendy Theatres as a matinee house
for the day release of Benji and The
winners, the cinema is now being
programmed and controlled directly by
Barfield on a ‘quality movie’ plan. The
first movie in under the new policy is the
1973 Cannes award winner, Effect of
Gamma Rays on Man in the Moon
Marigolds.

Screenings at The Total are in 16mm
(with the sound quality in need of im-
provement) but this new cinema could
well fulfil a need if it puts into release
some of the major movies never screen-
ed in the town.

The other new entry — also 16rnrn —-
is at the opposite end of the scale. An 83-
seat shopfront operation run by Sydne
entrepr[...]will screen essentially sexploita-
tion products. Their opening attraction is
the controversial Australian sex educa-
tion movie sex aids and How to Use
them, directed by George Schwarz -
which by dint of its education tag In-
cludes some of the most objectively
hardcore material ever seen on a cinema
screen in this country.

Although the Barreil had early teething
troubles with the Health Department it
now seems to have settled comfortably
into the daily grind. Management’s inten-
tion is not to attempt any form of 'club'
structure but operate within Com-
monwealth censor controlled limlts. This
may of course mean that subsequent
attractions will be less ‘hot’ tha[...]sive interviews with producers, directors, actors and technicians
O valuable historical material on Australian film production

0 film and book reviews

0 surveys and reports from the sets of local and international productions

BOUND VOLUMES

STRICTLY LIMITED EDITION.
ORDER NOW.

$15 plus $1 postage.
‘Please send me .[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (10)xv--sr-9:-Ix.-vs:".:.:x-3'“-in IIu2{
---1;;n-&--:aa was
._ :1 I" '."lliII:"_VII"":_!"_Rf“'Qg~-uctI3§_";I!q
r‘-tr-In "wguI:su:-9"”. I"-~—
- _4 2'-9395' V ‘~,s,:x'in1.'.au'[...]- -..L 2 an-AA
2: g ,[ , -‘~ - I"9'""‘7-,M’Ir‘-w'f;l-ai[...]mu «
.. . . .. ’ V . . uI'vv- H. uv o-:-. ' -an.
E3953 r?. F‘ "f ”“‘ -~ - 1."
' 5555‘[...]- I. H“.-.. ;
Li 5:? um us 51 H.

. _.‘ 1
Inn toa

3i.=¥};\l

In ".10 ,3“-

' =‘.Vy_3bs_§
. I mag.
ll[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (11)[...]have been:
~ Hollywood has discovered this answer and is

At the end of the film, after the last flame ha[...]d
hulk of his skyscraper. He suggests allowing it to
stand as "a monument to all the bullshit" ofour
age. Probably "The Toweri[...]rport 1975,
Earthquake apart from total nonsense what
do these recent film subjects have in common?
Disaster. Catastrophe. Death. BOX-OFF ICE[...]equivalent of
Machiavellian precision. They exude a
remarkable confidence in their almost total
mastery of mass audience manipulation. The
audience is placed in the stance of a car accident
voyeur eating popcorn.

But maybe this is taking things too seriously.
Perhaps it is the glossy kitsch which is
appealing. For example, the climax of Earthquake
is Charlton Heston and Ava Gardner being

drowned in a sewer. That's entertainment!
Cecil B. de Mille, when asked why he continual-

ly filmed biblical subjects said: “What else has
2000 years advance publicity?” A reasonable
“human disaster.”

feverishly milking it. In the process, a new genre

(hot on the blistered heels of Kung Fu) is born:
Disaster films.
In an orgy of flood, fire, earthquake and

collision, God has suddenly become a Hollywood
star. God created the tidal wave that sank the
Poseidon. God created the Los Angeles earth-
quake in Earthquake. God starts fires, crashes
planes and generally creates havoc. But then,
perhaps I’ve got that wrong. Maybe its the Devil
creating all this cata[...]r all, why stop
with Linda Blair when you can try and kill Gene
Hackman, George C. Scott, Paul Newman, Steve
McQueen, Charlton Heston, Charlton Heston
and Charlton Heston . . .

Hollywood has been obsessed with evil ever
since virgins were tied to railway tracks by wicked
frotteurs in silent serials. But now, after 60 years
of murderers, perverts, sadists and rapists,
Hollywood has discovered the non-human villain.
Whether this villain is God on an off day or the
Devil on a good one, the basic element is the sheer
terror of catastrophe.

However, Hollyw[...]fused about
all this. One producer angrily denied that his film
was a disaster. “It’s making millions” he said.
Some connoisseurs of the new genre claim that
Deep Throat was the first disaster film. After all,
what greater disaster could befall one than being
born with a clitoris in one’s throat. But whatever

the origin, the enre is here to stay.

There have a ways been film subjects based on
catastrophe. For[...](1936),
War of the Worlds (1953), Titanic (1953), A Night
to Remember (1958) etcetera and ad infinitum.
The difference between the latest crop of “Ark
pictures" (as Variety calls them) and past disaster
films is the clear formula running through the re-
cent products. No training in mathematics is re-
quired to understand it.

Big star names + Absurd accident[...]cated film critics have always found it
difficult to rationalize the relationship between art
and money in the film industry. However, recent
disaster films leave no room for ambiguity. They
are quite clearly made to make money. Thus an
unexpected result of the new genre is a worldwide
flowering of abusive languge in film criticism.
Here is a typical example:

“Movies like Airport 1975, with their furious
mediocrity and their manifest cynicism about
their own mediocrity, represent American film-

DISASTER FILMS

The physiognomy of disaster: These peo le are under stress for

our_ entertainment. Disaster films, alt ough not exactly an

acting challenge, do require their stars to perform amazing
contortions of facial muscle tissue.

‘_

Movies like Airport ‘75 (above) have provoked a worldwide flowering of abusive language in film criticism.

Cinema Papers. March-April — ll

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (12)[...]iest, most unimaginative, most
exploitative.”*

But once a particular film subject becomes ex-
tremely popular and prevalent and is in effect, a
new genre, then the critic’s role is radically
diminished. What is the point of criticizing a
James Bond film, a Carry On film or a Kung Fu
film? Likewise, disaster films are carrying on
regardless.

Violence has always been a popular ingredient
of films. In Bonnie and Clyde (1967), Arthur Penn
introduced a new technique in screen vocabulary
to handle violence. This was violence-in-slow-
motion. Faye Dunaway’s slow motion writhings
as she was hit by scores of machine gun bullets inin with the Wild Bunch in 1969
and blood and guts in slow motion reached a new
high. In 1972, Stanley Kubrick, obviously tired
with chastity after years of working on 200],
leaped to the front of the ‘ ultra-violence ’ race
with A Clockwork Orange. By 1972, just about

*Jay Cocks, Time, 4 November, 1974.

Left: A scene from Clarence Brown’s The Rains Came (1939).

Another precursor to contemporary disaster films, it starred

Tyrone Power and Myrna Loy in a dull romance set against
spectacular Indian monsoon and earthquake sequences.

every human muscle and organ had been stomped
on, cut, bashed, mauled and bloodied.

Disaster films are the natural extension and
development of the screen violence of the last
years. There is nothing more violent than the con-
vulsions of a hostile fate in the form of fire, earth
and water. The violence of the clenched list has
been[...]new
disaster films.

Of course, filmmakers have not entirely
neglected the human dimension. Most of the dis-
aster films are careful to include “human in-
terest” in the form of puerile characters worthy of
True Confessions. A foreground of banal
relationships heightens the impact of any extraor-
dinary disaster. In this regard, one recalls Alfred
Hitchcock’s The[...]e
human relationships, by virtue oftheir realism, in-
creased the horror of the ‘supernatural’ attacks
by the birds.

Perhaps the most obvious precursor to the
macroviolent films of today is San Francisco
(1936) starring Clark Gable and Jeanette
MacDonald. A reconstruction of the 1906 San
Francisco earthqua[...]human affairs when humanity or
Jeanette MacDonald is confronted with the

Modern lifts can be dangerous. However, do not be alarmed. These scenes are make-believe from Fox-Warner's $14
million Towering Inferno. I-lollywood’s most lavish contribution to cornball catastrophe.

DISASTER FILMS

destruc[...]Devil.

However, let Hollywood have the last say in the
form of these words by Jennings Lang, executive
producer of Earthquake:

Take a picture like Sunshine, which is going to
outgross Earthquake in revenue. It’s about two
kids with cancer — you could call it an internal
disaster, I guess, but it doesn’t fit any trends.” 0

Cinema[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (13)DISASTERS’ MR. SUCCESS

Jennings Lang: I got a report from
a friend named Paul Monash who I
worked with on Sla[...]en the National Theatre
version of The Front Page in London
and raved about it. He asked if 'I’d
like to turn it into a movie using Joe
Mankiewicz. I knew Joe Mankiewicz
so I called him up to find out if he
was ready to write a script. He was
interested in’ the material, but
because of his faithfulness to Charley
MacArthur and Ben Hecht he said
he wouldn’t dare write it. At[...]d if we went elsewhere for
somebody who’d write and direct it
and he said, “Not at all". I then told
Paul Monash I would try to get Billy

Wilder to do it.

Why did you pick Billy Wilder? I
think he is a great director, but his
last two films — “Avanti!” and
“Sherlock Holmes” — haven’t been
commercially successful.

Well, there are certain things one
is proud of. And one of the things
l’m proud of is that I really don’t
think a guy is as good as his last pic-
ture was successful. Take Coppola
for example . . . The Conversation
was a disaster at the box-office and
although we don’t know about God-
father II, I can assure you it will be
very, very successful. I know of no
filmmaker who has made more than
two movies that hasn’t had an un-
successful one. If you go through the
course[...]or Willy
Wyler or Billy Wilder — you’l1 find a
certain amount of unsuccessful
movies.

I picked Billy Wilder because I
thought he was the best fellow to do
it — and the best fellow is not often
the one who was involved in the most

successful movie.

“The Front Page”[...]nt company or separate company
involved?

No.

So in a situation like that you are
executive producer of the movie.

The answer is ‘yes’, but in this par-
ticular instance, Paul Monash is
listed as a producer, although he is
an absentee producer . . . it was
through Paul that I got the idea of

Jennings Lang:

Universal Studios’executive vice-president Jennings Lang was
recently in Australia to promote The Front Page, and take a

first-hand look at one of America’s most profi[...]s.

years Universal has maintained its reputation as
one of the world’s most shrewd and aggressive movie producing

The following interview, conducted by David Stratton
provides a revealing glimpse of the methods and attitudes of a
powerful Hollywood executive. Lang begins by describing how

The Front Page was set up.

doing The Front Page — it’s a kind
of finder’s fee.

In other movies where he is labell-
ed ‘producer’ he does far more work

than he did on this one. In the movies
that I’m labelled ‘executive

producer’, the amount of effort I put
in generally depends on whom I’m

Co-star Jack Lem[...]ge.

Opposite page: Producer-director Mark Robson and executive producer Jennings Lang hold a
meeting against the background of a devastatedstreet during the shooting of Earthquake.

working with. There are certain
producer-directors who enjoy func-
tioning in all areas including costs,
checking out advertising and hiring
draftsmen. There are some who con-
centrate on the actual directing and
are more interested in the script
preparation and the casting . . . and
there are others who are less in-
terested in the script preparation and
more interested in the post produc-
tion. So the labels overlap and-the
duties change and vary.

On The Front Page I advised Billy
Wilder and did anything he wanted
me to do that he didn’t want to do
alone. Billy and Izzy Diamond did
the writing of the movie. Needless to
say he allowed me to read the script
. . . listened to certain suggestions . . .
then took some and discarded others.
He was in final creative control. But
he was a listening creative director.
And when he disagreed he gave me
his reasons for it.

How is “The Front Page” running
in the US?

I was trying to look in Variety. I
would guess the movie has grossed
about $6 million domestically
between Christmas and now
which is very good although not in
the class of Earthquake, Towering
Inferno or Godfather II.

What did the movie cost‘?

I would say around $4 million —
which includes an overhead of ours.
And I would say that ifthe movie did
$10 million it’s a success — from
that point on everybody makes
money.

You’re talking about the United
States and Canada?

No, I'm talking about the world.
Ifl was to guess I’d say that it would
do $15 million in the world, before
television — which is a very
successful movie.

We have become very, very spoilt
in the days of block-busting hits.
There are very few minimal hits . . .
there are failures and there are some
that just go through the rooflike The
Sting, Airport 75 or American Graf-
fiti. But we have hopes for Waldo
Pepper, Hindenburg and Jaws.

I am interested in the relationship
between independent compa[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (14)JENNINGS LANG

r
J

'75 A /VA l//5/[7/V
PEI-“L EX

LQEWQ

Malpaso directo[...]Play Misty for

Me.

1pany*, The Filmmakers Group and

Universal. How do things work on a
project like “Earthquake” — which

was produced by The Filmmakers
Group — or some of the movies that
Clint Eastwood has made for Univer-

I.
sa Well, you’re not going to be very

happy with the answer because the
movie industry cannot be over-
simplified. If somebody says, “What
the hell do you do Jennings Lang?”,
I’d say, “I don’t know. I do
everything.” You know, if necessary
I’ll direct a test on the lot — if the
unions will allow me to do it — or I’ll
write a story.

Your actual position though, is
vice-president in charge of production
at Universal.

No, that’s not quite true. We don’t
have a vice-president in charge of
production. We are very careful not
to have it. If there is a so-called head
of production, he constantly in-
fluences the creator and restricts his
freedom.

We have tried, for the past several
years, to create an image based on
transferring controls —— particularly
the creative controls — to the film-
maker. Some guys work more with
the creators and others just work as
liaisons. I am the executive producer
on The Front Page because I’m the
only one who functions that deeply
with people. On the other hand I
don’t function as an executive
producer or the head of production,
for example, with Hitchcock or Hal
Wallis. They may ask me to help
them on a certain thing or I may
offer a suggestion, but I am not in-
volved deeply in the production of
the movie.

The Earthquake situ[...]e it was my idea. I func-
tioned much more deeply in every
detail, including selection of the cast.
I got Heston, went to England and
talking to Ava Gardner, suggested
George Kennedy, transferred the
parts and argued about the ending of

*The Malpaso Company is Clint Eastwood’s
production entity through which — on
movies in which he is either actor or actor-
director — he joins with other backers to
constitute a film production company.

16 —— Cinema Papers, March-April

the movie. I was there in the actual
making of the movie as a creator, not
only as an executor.
In connection with Hindenburg,
I brought the property to Bob Wise.
I disagreed with the writer he
selected, but he was in the creative
role and he took the writer. I
suggested George Scott and Anne
Bancroft who he agreed with, and I
helped him get them. I had much less
to do with the day-to-day production
of Hindenburg although I could have
been used if Wise wanted to use me.
Now with George Roy Hill it’s an
entirely different kind of function.
With The Great Waldo Pepper I
served very, very closely but didn’t
make as many of the creative
suggestions as I did with Earthquake.

Would that have anything to do
with the fact that George Roy Hill’s
track record of late has been[...]Mark
Robson’s “Happy Birthday Wanda

June”, and Robert Wise’s “Two
People” — were such fl[...]must have needed
some hits like “Earthquake” and
“Hindenburg”.

'I'hat’s not quite true. My dear,
darling, lovely, talented friend
George Roy Hill has had some flops.
As a matter of fact, Slaughterhouse
5, the first movie I made with him
was not a commercial success. The
second movie I suggested was The
Sting, which he thought was a pot-
boiler and didn’t want to direct.
Conversely I had less to say about
the making of Hindenburg after
I gave him the property.

This is the same point as you made
before, that it doesn’t influence you
what their last movie was like.

Not at all. Mark Robson had four
or five dry years before Earthquake
but I selected him for a specific
reason: There are very few film-
makers in the industry who could be
secure in making a movie with that
many special effects. Mark is one of
them and so is Bob — because they
come from the editorial department
tarlid they know about the handling of
1 m.

Universal in a sense then suggested
“Earthquake” and “Hindenburg” to
the Filmmakers Group. It doesn’t

work that way with Malpaso.
Malpaso must be a different set up.

Not true, Let's take the movie that
Malpaso has just finished — The
Eiger Sanction. The history of
this movie, in the shortest ver-
sion I can give you, is that David
Brown, a partner in the Zanuck
Brown Company — another in-
dependent company working under
Universal — came across the book
The Eiger Sanction and suggested it
to Universal, who in turn financed
the purchase of the book without
ever contacting me directly but con-
tacted Clint Eastwood’s agent. Clint
Eastwood read the book and was in-
terested in it but would not commit
until he’d seen a screenplay. At
which point Zanuck and Brown
made a judgment not to make a com-
mitment with Clint Eastwood on the
basis of his approval of the

screenplay, but made the decision to,

— i.e. Clint Eastwood —— to take
over the project.

I’d like to move onto another area
which will interest people here. Have
you seen any recent Australian
movies? ’

No, the only movie I saw was one
we made here — or at least our com-
pany made here — Sidecar Races.

It’s felt in some quarters that
American companies take a lot of
money out of the box-office in
Australia and don’t put- any money
back in through production. I noticed
in your list of credits that you were
involved inA ct of the Heart” which
was a Canadian movie with a Cana-
dian director and actors, and which
was a big flop. Did you make it
because of similar pressure in
Canada?

No. We made Act of the Heart
because a girl called Stevie Phillips, a
very good agent with CMA, came to
me and said: “You’ve always liked
Genevieve Bujold and it would be a

George Roy Hill with Robert Redford on the set o[...]ted friend George Roy Hill" on this movie.

go on their own. So they contacted
Newman. Newman was interested in
the book but convinced Zanuck and
Brown that if the book and the script
were rewritten and it satisfied him,
he’d make the movie.

Now after Newman, Zanuck and
Brown had scripts and scripts and
scripts written,it became an impossi-
ble venture. Newman withdrew and
there was $700,000 spent in develop-
ing scripts that nobody wanted to
approve. The studio was ready to
shelve the property and go onto
something else. I had heard this and
I said: “Now wait a minute, there’s
something wrong because at one
point a man called Clint Eastwood
was interested in The Eiger Sanction
— whatever the provisos. So, if
Zanuck and Brown would withdraw
as far as participants in making the
movie, I will see that they are
protected because they purchased the
property. We will call them executive
producers of the movie and they will
get a certain proportion of the
profits, and I will try to get Malpaso

great favor to me, to Genevieve and
to the Canadian movie industry . . .”
And I said: “Let me see the script.
We’re not in the favor business,
we’re in the movie business.” I read
the script. It had some very, very in-
teresting dramatic values and it had

something to say thematically that
interested me. I.t was a kind of con-
troversial subject.

But when I finally saw the movie it
was dreadfully long and boring — it
covered up so many good things. I
thought it could be measurably
helped by taking 25 minutes out that
just didn’t belong.

At this point the director, Paul
Almond, accused Universal of ruin-
ing movies, from a contractual point
of view and even a moral point of
view, because we had final control.
So after. thinking about it ver
carefully and talking about it wit
my esteemed chief executive[...]ok,
pay the $2. I’d rather have them very
happy and lose some money “than
have them scream and yell un-

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (15)necessarily.” So, unfortunately we
came over to Paul’s version of Act of
the Heart and it was very un-
successful —- but we didn’t have that
much money in it so it wasn't a terri-
ble loss.

Has that experience colored your
attitude or the company’s attitude,
towards backing completely in-
digenous movies in other countries for
local distribution and the option on
international release?

We have had bad luck with movies
that have been made away from the
supervision, or at l[...]office executives. The most
serious one was done in England,
where we lost over $30 million. A
marvellous guy from MCA got so in-
volved with the excitement and tradi-
tion of English moviemaking that he
had forgotten about the international
market, — and consequently he
made movies that had a very restric-
tive kind of audience potential. Th[...]rlie Bubbles, Countess from
Hong Kong, Boom, Love is a Four
Letter Word and on and on and on. I
thought Privilege would have been a
very successful movie had it been
released two ye[...]ahead of its time.

I think “Charlie Bubbles” is a
magnificent movie.

It’s a marvellous movie and it got
great reviews, but nobody went to see
it. These days we’re taking a more
primitive stand. We’re looking at
scripts, working out the best place to
do them and then making them
there.

Are you likely to be looking at
scripts or being given scripts, while
you are out here?

We’re given scripts all the time. I
haven’t received any here and if I had
I wouldn’t have the time to read
them anyway. But there’s a
marvellous story from an Australian
book about an older woman who is
in love with — or at least cares for --
a young retarded man . . . that could
make a fantastic success. But it
would need a grown man to play the
retarded person, to sell the movie to
the international market. It would
make an exciting project using
gfaéherine Hepburn and Robert Red-

or .

But then the point that would be
made here is that it would no longer
be an Australian movie. It would just
be one made in Australia.

Well then it’s the wrong subject.
You’d have to find if the making of
an Australian movie requires all the
cast to be Australian — then get a
subject.

What would your company’s at-
titude be to a project which had a
good screenplay, an Australian
writer, director and cast; one which
had been properly budgeted for
Australian conditions and which had
the support of the AFDC? If such a
project was put to you with a view to
C10’ distribution in Australia — and
first options on international distribu-
tion — would you be interested?

Oh yes. But I’m not an authority
on what would happen. I presume
the judgment would be made on
whether or not the movie would

‘Universal distributes through CIC in
Australia.

A thoughtful Walter Matthau, Slaying the managing-editor of a Chicago newspaper in The

Front Page, listens to director

illy Wilder explain a story point.

appeal to Australians; how much it

JENNINGS LANG

an English movie, but in order to

would cost to make; how much of have an international audience in-

that could be recouped in Australia;
and how much potential it has for the
rest of the world.

Well, as you probably know
feature films are being made here at
the moment from anywhere between
$250,000 and about $400,000.
Currently there are a lot of scripts
that have been partly financed and
producers are looking for the rest of
the money. In this sort of situation
how much control do you think
Universal would want? Presumably
they would want to put in an ex-
ecutive producer.

I really don’t know. I think
Sidecar Racers could probably
provide the answer. The only
difference was that there were two
Americans involved as performers —
the rest were Australians.

But it had an American director.

An American director and an
American executive producer.

And it was finished in the US. It_
was edited and scored there.

Yes, it was edited and scored in the
US although there was some editing
done here. The first cut was done and
then it was sent back — which is not
unusual even if it’s made in England.

Would you consider it an
Australian movie?
Yes, I think it’s 90 per cent

Australian. We make movies in the
US and Hollywood with Vanessa
Redgrave, or with an English direc-
tor — for example Karel Reisz made
The Gambler recently with Jimmy
Caan.

There’s an interesting situation
here. A lot of talented filmmakers are
lobbying very strongly for the Govern-
ment to take action to help the in-
dustry get going. The feeling on a

project like “Sidecar Racers” is that
the Australian filmmakers themselves
—— directors, writers, crews —— don’t
really benefit although the movie is
made here.

A very big problem exists in not
understanding that movies are made
for the world. I think that as
chauvinistic as we all are if our major
objective isn’t to make movies for
people all over the world then we’re
in the wrong business.

Now if in order to secure your jobs
you have to threaten us — the out-
side world — by not allowing the
Australian people to see movies that
are made elsewhere, you’re
retrogressing going backwards.
That’s building a wall around
yourselves. If I was a filmmaker in
Australia I would say: “How the hell
can I make Murder on the Orient Ex-
press in Australia?” -— then it
becomes an Australian movie. Just
the same as even though Sidney
Lumet, an American director,
directed Murder on the Orient Ex-
press, it’s predominantl an English-
made movie. It was ma e in England
and had an international cast -
Vanessa Redgrave, Albert Finney
and many other people including Sir
John Gielgud. It was predominantly

volved they used the best.

Now if I was to make the movie
we’re talking about, based on an
Australian novel, and I went with an
Australian director, there’d be
nobody in Australia that I could sell
internationally the way I could sell
Robert Redford in that role. ,

I’m for protecting the Australian
filmmaker. I think the best way to
protect a filmmaker is by letting him
make a very successful international
movie. Of course, he must not be told
that he can only use Australians to
make it work. That’s restricting him
much more than we do in the US. If
we think the best guy to play a cer-
tain role is Jean-Pierre Belmondo
then we try to get him to make that
movie. Or if we think Mastroianni is
a better person to play a role then we
try to get him. As a matter of fact I
thought Ava Gardner was the best
person to play an old movie star in
Earthquake . . . and she hadn’t work-
ed in years.

I think the goals you have are
great. I’m for that. If there is some
Australian talent 1et’s get it going.
Let’s invest money in this guy to get
him going. Let’s get the right proper-
ty so it’ll be not only a hit here but a
hit internationally. Rather than
saying, “Well, we’ll show them —
the only way they can get The Sting
to play in the Australian theatres is if
they guarantee to put up $8 million
to make eight movies with only
Australians, from top to bottom.” I
think that’s going backwards — in-
tellectually, culturally as well as
economically.

In your position at Universal you
are able to predict where American
movies are going. Universal is, at the
moment I think, the most successful
produ[...]here?

Well, I think the motion picture
industry is in the position where it
has to compete with other events.
For many, many years the motion
picture was a habit. Now that habit
has been removed and substituted by
the television habit, and along with
television there are very
sophisticated forms of audio enter-
tainment — which are also habits.
The movie now has to be a special
event. Consequently in selecting the
ingredients of a movie you have to
ask what it is that will draw people
away from other entertainment. S[...]ture of movies lies with
the ability of producers to make
judgments ranging from the basic
-piece of material to the way the‘
movie is made: To use stars that
can’t be seen on TV and to em loy
techniques. —- like Sensurrounda —
that can only be experienced in a
cinema. These judgments have to do
with timing and the need to appeal to
a broad audience.

A movie has to have an identity
that people will want to get out and
spend some money to see. And that’s
what we’re looking for in our line up.
All our movies will have, we hope, a
special event and an unusual image
that will make people want to see
them. And I think that’s the only
future of the business. 0

Cinema Papers,[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (16)BYRON HASKIN

The Australian crew of Byron Haskin’s Long John Silver
(1954) recall that their director worked with unflagging dedica-
tion against what at times seemed insuperable odds. Among
these wer[...]ity, the forsaking of two years’
development of a well-established career in Hollywood, and a
leading actor whose drink problems continually threatened a
halt to the production. Against these were set Haskin’s immense
skill as a morale-booster and an undisputed expert in the field of
special photo raphic effects. Dedication indeed, in a film
climate which ad not emerged from its eclipse by war. Haskin’s
directorial career at that time was only seven years old, and still
in the ascent. He had moved to direction in the late forties after

' a decade and a half in special effects; and now, unlike many who

left Hollywood for a year or more, he was able to return and
build his reputation as one of the most original, albeit stylistical-
ly variable, directors of the fifties and sixties.

Including the two years on Long John Si[...]f
Byron Haskin spanned almost 50 years. Beginning in 1919 as an
assistant cameraman for Louis J. Selznick, workin[...]ar', Marshall Neilan, Allan Dwan, Sidney
Franklin and Raoul Walsh, Haskin progressed through the
Metro and Goldwyn studios to become a leading cameraman for
Warner Brothers. In 1927 he had his directorial debut with
Matinee La[...]closely by Irish Hearts, The Siren for
Columbia, and Ginsberg the Great, again for Warners. After
photographing John Barrymore in The Sea Beast, Don Juan and
When a Man Loves, he accompanied Herbert Wilcox to England
as a production executive and an expert on multiple-camera
sound. With Tom Walls he brought several of the popular
Aldwych Farces to the screen, but reaping few of the expected
financial rewards, he returned to Warner Brothers in 1932.

Beginning afresh as a special effects process photographer, he
shortly afterwards succeeded Fred J ackman as department head
and held the post for eight years. In this period he worked on the
company’s most cos[...]including Captain Blood,
The Sea Wolf, Air Force and Action in the North Atlantic. In
1947 he accompanied Hal Wallis in his move to independent
production and went back to direction with Wallis’ I Walk

Alone, Too Late for Tears and The Crying Sisters. Over the two

decades that followed, Haskin directed a number of films now
regarded as minor classics. Among them were War of the

Worlds, an updating of the H. G. Wells story combined with
s[...]f Charlton Heston’s plantation by soldier ants; and
Robinson Crusoe on Mars, an effective transferral of the Defoe
original to a loneliest imaginable outer-space.

Since 1947, Byron Haskin has had very little personal involve-
ment in special effects. Yet the influence of his work in this field
has had strong bearing on many of his own productions, and the
most recent of these has been his last production to date, The
Power. While not able to recall in detail many of his own in-
novations, his claim is that after eight years’ retirement he is still

equal to any problems put before him.

The following interview was conducted at Byron Haskin’s
home in Los Angeles by Cinema Papers Contributing Editor
Graham Shirley during a recent study tour of the US.

Byron Haskin: I was top cameraman
at Warners, shooting the Barrymore
films and all of their specials, and by
then in my late twenties when I
should have had the break, I did. I
talked to Jack Warner and he assign-
ed me to a picture called Matinee
Ladies, with May McAvoy and
Malcolm McGregor. The writer,
who was also in charge of produc-
tion, had only given me half a script,
and with half the film and a rough
cut completed, I said to him: “Look,
unless we change the stride of this
thing, we’re going to have the dullest
film ever made. And I’m inclined to
think the best of it”.

“Oh don’t worry — we’ll have it",
he replied and the script he delivered
was duller than the first half. I,
sneaking fink that I was, knew that
I’d have to save myself and went to
see my personal friend Jack L.
Warner. He was sitting on the can in
his office and said: “I see what you
mean. I’ve always had an idea about
a party on board a houseboat that
breaks loose and floats out to sea”. I
jumped at that and said: “Let me
have a writer and P11 develop it”.

“Who are you going to get?”, he
asked. I said: “There’s a little guy on
the third floor of the old buildin[...]deas”. So
Zanuck rewrote this thing, we shot it
and it was a successful silent film for
all its confused, inept handling.
Mechanically, I was a good
director, but at this stage I really
hadn’t the foggiest notion of what to
do with actors.

The aftermath of this was quite
amusing. There was a guy called Roy
Del Ruth directing for Warners at
the time who had been a powder
fiend at Mack Sennett’s. He would
chuckle for 10 years if he could see
the biggest hotel in town blown four
miles into the air. A weird sense of
humor. Now the guy that I’d com-
plained about had been fired and
Roy said to me: “I've got a great
idea. We’ve got no executive
producer at the moment, let’s put
Zanuck in”. He roared and
chuckled, it was like blowing up a 20-
storey building.

The two of us talked to Warner
and worked it around that Zanuck

had saved the day with my film and
so forth. And —- boom! —— suddenly
Darryl Zanuck was announced as the
executive producer of Warner
Brothers’ film. And he came up from
the third floor back - of‘ the
laboratory, writer of dog stories for
Mal St Clair and the other directors.

At this point in time, Darryl
Zanuck, flushed with success, in-
itiated what must have been one of
the first Hollywood econom[...]rner always screaming
about money, Zanuck decided that
the first section he should land on
was stories, and among these was my
second film as director, Irish Hearts.
He chopped the middle out, so it
made no sense at all. It was com-
pleted, became a dog, and Warner
took Zanuck on. He said: “You
bastard, you do that around here
again and you’re fired. Maybe you’re
fired now”. And Zanuck — my
friend —- sticks a sheath this long
into my shoulder blades by saying,
That dumb Haskin is the guy who
ruined it”. So we've been less than[...]Siren I did over at Columbia,
with Dorothy Revere and Tom
Moore, a famous old silent star.
Then I made George Jessel[...]bit right from the start.
Jessel has been playing in a thing
called The Jazz Singer with great
success o[...]arners signed him up, he
was under the impression that they
had signed him to do The Jazz
Singer, but not so. He didn’t read the
fine print. They put Al Jolson in The
Jazz Singer and put Jessel in this
crappy, cheap little story, to be made
as cheaply as possible. Now Jessel
was the original wooden Indian, and
he couldn’t react to anything. You
could face him with four tigers and
nothing would come out of his face at
all.

You couldn’t build him up as
another Keaton?

No, Buster Keaton needed special
tailoring and knew how to time this
deadpan thing. But Jessel was com-
pletely uncontrolled, and all he’d de-
pend on in The Jazz Singer was a

Cinema Papers, March-April —— I9

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (17)[...]ing on for years
—— he'd talk-talk-talk-talk, and peo-
ple had to break in on his lines. They
thought that was great in New York.

Moving to a more technical
approach, how did you become in-
terested in effects?

I don’t know, Ijust had a bent for
it. I remember driving by cliffs as a
kid and knowing that the rills left by
water were a scaled-down reproduc-
tion of the Grand Canyon. I had a
basic understanding of scale.

When I returned from working
with Herbert Wilcox in England, I
photographed two or three pictures
around town and went out to work in
the Warners special effects
department, doing process
photography. In other words, they
needed a lighting cameraman and it
was something to help recoup my
broken fortunes. I started in the
Effects Department under an old-
timer called Fred Jackman. Fred had
had much to do with the develop-
ment of the ‘yellow key’ travelling
matte process, and I confounded
Einstein 2 with this damn thing. I
photographed him and his wife in a
buggy, and half an hour later he
came back by and I said: “Now I
have you Professor, come in”. We
took him into the projection room
and screened Einstein and wife in
horse and buggy travelling down the
street of a small town. He thought it
was greater than relativity.

Back projection was just coming in
at that time and was replacing the
old yellow key process. Jackman had
it so arranged that the company
cameraman would get the day off
and our cameraman would take over
for the process scenes.

When did you take over the
department?

Jackman quit after I’d been there
for about a year. I didn’t particularly
want the thing, and I tried to get
Hans Koenekamp to take the job.
He was a genius with special effects
but he was very shy, and while he was
hiding from the studio people they
said to me, “You take thejob”, and I
did.

Warners, like most other major
studios at[...]e. I made the mon-
tage for Twenty Thousand Years in
Sing Sing (1935) which they used
time after time. It was an illustrative
montage that they were going to use
on the main titles, but they didn’t
know what to do with the end of the
picture, so that’s where it went. The
‘chase’ I made for a picture called
San Quentin (1937) was used in 25
pictures after that. God, it was the
chase to end all chases — under
railroad trains and off cliffs, ex-
plosions, dynamite, everything. All
the stunt guys in Hollywood got rich.

What scale did you normally use
for miniature work? -

This was a thing I established in a
picture called Air Force (1943). Peo-
ple at that time generally built

miniatures on a scale of ‘/4 inch to a
foot. This meant that one guy had to

20 —- Cinema Papers, March-April

bend over them and tie tiny knots
and it was a case of time meaning
money. If we opened out to the
bigger scale, five guys could work on
it and you got the thing finished in a
week instead of a month. Besides,
you can’t go below an inch with
water action and have anything that
looks legal.

This is even using high-speed
photography?

Yes, ofcourse, and you become in-
stinctive about speed. In the Bobby
Jones golf series we photographed
eight times normal speed and burned
up every Mitchell camera we used.

So with Air Force we had a
Japanese plane attack at sea, and to
have any reality with the water we
had to move up to an inch scale. We
could have done this in our tank but I
heard that the Santa Barbara harbor
had a very reduced scale of tur-
bulence and an unbroken horizon.
We got permission to use the harbor,
and by rigging wires to fiy the planes
across the battleships, we shot the
entire sea action of Air Force. When
we came to Action in the North
Atlantic, I knew exactly where to go
with our full convoy.

Action had started in Hollywood
under Lloyd Bacon, who's since
dead. Lloyd Bacon had reached one
of those disagreeable points in his
career where he’d made lots of
money, but as an option was due on
his new contract, Warner didn’t want
to take it up at an increased figure.
Bacon could have gone on at the
figure he was earning, but choosing
at this point in life to have a lot of
professional pride, he decided to give
the studio the goose. The picture.
which was to have been a big convoy
epic, was no longer the biggest thing
in the world, and Bacon didn’t help
by blowing the entire $500,00[...]irst sequence he shot.
It was the big fire scene and he
hadn’t even got into the story. It was
compl[...]l. Jerry
Wald was producing it. He called me
over and said: “My God, save my
neck!" The editor didn’t know what
he was doing. The fire sequence was
all chopped up, you couldn’t tell who
was burning or what was happening.
So when the film, which by then cost
several million, was finished, we fired
the cutter and employed George
Amy to take the film apart and com-
pletely re—edit.

The cutting in that fire sequence is
very impressive.

Well it was ajoint effort. Amy was
really good at this and I wasn’t too
bad myself.

As department head I was in
charge ofbudgeting and the choice of
effect to be used. I picked anything
up to six alternative ways of doing
the effect and judged the value of
that effort upon the story. I actually
had five speci[...]it, we’ll have special
effects do it”. I had a big expansion
deal going, everything that goes into
making pictures. I had a laboratory,
generators, a whole staff of
cameramen, soundmen, grips and

electricians. And as I told Don
Siegel, a friend of mine that I started
as montage director, “It would be a
great joke on Warner Brothers to
send my assistant onto the set and
say I needed Bogie, or Cagney, or
Bette Davis, and make the damndest
film you ever saw”. There was no
question about what I was doing. I
had the authority you wouldn’t
believe, and I was putting through
literally millions of dollars a year by
salvaging time from the set. It was an
ideal situation. I was finally given an
office up front to tell the producers
what could and couldn’t be done,
which way to go, and what
backgrounds to chose.

Did you strike trouble with the in-
troduction of color to effects work?

Yes I did. The back projection was
very limited and you were confined
to shooting in front of a 1.82m
screen. As a rebellion against this
limitation, I invented and built and
received an Academy Award for the
triple background projector. It
enabled you to film on anything up
to a 5.4m screen.

What was its principle?

It was built on a wedge principle,
using three projectors. Two of t[...]faced each other, the
other shot straight ahead, and you
had adjustments to ensure that the
three images stayed superimposed.

Didn’t Farciot Edouart, from
Paramount, have something to do
with its invention?

Yes, he did. By this time we had
reached a point of disastrous patent
brawling, and Herman Beatty, a
Warners attorney, had engineered an
agreement between the 12 major
studios to enter into a patent pool.
The terms of the pool stated that all
signatory studies could share in one
studio’s invention if they supplied
money toward its development. As
far as this project was concerned, I
had a breadboard model built with
the three projectors bolted to a piece
of wood. I needed to build a preci-
sion instrument on a single stand,
with the three projectors as units
variable by tightly regulated con-
trols, but when I approached Warner
he laughed in my face and told me
that the application of such a device
would be limited. Having now made

a few pictures with the old model, I.

called up Farciot Edouart to have a
look, and he persuaded Paramount
to split the cost of the machine’s
development. However, he also per-
suaded Paramount to finance his
building of the machine and, eight
months later, the head of our sound
department, who was on the
Academy Research Council, called
me up and said: “Didn’t you get
together that triple head projector?”
I said: “Yes, why?” And he replied:
“There’s an application from F arciot
Edouart for full credit of the inven-
tion". I told this guy that it was all
nonsense, and they issued the
Academy Award to me’.

You moved from Wamers in the
late forties to work with Hal Wallis.

Yes, I made a couple of films for

him, one of them I Walk Alone
(1947). And then he loaned me out
for a thing called Man-eater of Ku-
maon (1948), which was a hell of a
good picture. I went over to England,
did Treasure Island (1950) for
Disney, then I came back. I did a
western and I did a Tarzan, which
every director should have to do. Sol
Lesser had acquired the ‘Tarzan’
rights from MGM and this one
starred Lex Barker, with Dorothy
Dandridge as the queen of an
African village.

“War of the Worlds” (1953) was
your first science fiction film.

George Pal and I collaborated on
that film and I rewrote half ofit with
Barre Lyndon. A recent writer on
science fiction films‘ has said that
it was bad to have removed the story
from its identifiable background. It
was identifiable to Americans, and
that’s who we were making the pic-
ture for. In making our choice, we
did as Orson Welles had done. We
transposed it to a modern setting,
hoping to regenerate some of the ex-
citement that Welles had with his
broadcast. UCLA asked to screen it
as a film definitive of its category,
and of course they laughed at the
girl’s costumes and at Gene Barry
who in his first film was dreadful.

H. G. Wells’ conception of the
Martian spacecraft had been an old
tin-can with walls like a weather
tower and long legs mechanically
jointed. This was not what the
Americans were up to, so we created
an evolution of the flying saucer and
had it supported on luminous anti-
gravity legs. The craft had two
weapons —— a ray which would dis-
solve anything into flames, and a
blue dot-and-dash disintegration ray
which brought about the destruction
of Los Angeles. I’d originally intend-
ed to use many more creatures, But
Charlie Gomorrah had tied up more
than sufficient time and expense with
his one Martian.

We spent six months building that
Martian. We called him Louis
Lump-Lump. Charlie Gomorrah
worked him from the inside and
could handle any number of
movements, including veins that
pulsated and eyes that flickered. He
was on the screen for 18 seconds and
was very important. Technically.
War of the Worlds had a very am-
bitious itinerary. We had a technical
advisor called Werner Von Braun
and it was like a streetcar ride for
him to chart up figures like the
quarts of fluid required by the
spacecraft.

What scale were your models?

An inch to a foot.
What about actual photography?

One of the biggest problems we
had was in and around the space
station, which was built in the shape
of a three-spoked wheel and travelled
at 4.2m a second to’ create a
perimeter gravity equivalent to the
Earth’s. Much of the miniature work
involving space vehicles;docking and
sky jeeps heading from the centre of
the perimeter had to be done through
matting. The central axis was sup-

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (18)BYRON HASKIN

SEE Ho it Will Happ

swirl in attii anti - ::mzs"E‘iilt1:‘m i »1l.1?'v1]F:[...]Space was Haskin's second film with George Pal, a producer who had considerable experience working[...]rior visual effects achieved by clever
model work and high-speed photography.

Conquest of Space (1954): “. . . the whole film was a series of impressive
funerals.”

A-:-.7 - 1??-‘~,;<—t;
-.3‘ii?:''’§‘.‘r»-' 5-‘

Above: Long John Silver (i954): Shot in Australia purely for economy
and the English-speaking background.

Left: Byron Haskin demonstrating the hula to an actress during the
shooting of Long John Silver (1954).

posed to be weightless and was
revolved by studio hands concealed
behind blue backing. As he leapt
from the axis the guys in thejeep had
to grab him, and it became quite a
deal.

But the whole picture was a flop,
because the personal story was far
too intrusive. There wasn’t sufficient
balance between this and the internal
effect we were striving for.

“Con[...]e” (1955) was
another one for George Pal.

Yes, and our co-producer was
Macrea Freeman Junior, who in-
sisted that we involve this incredible
father-and-son neurosis. In our
story; the father is in charge of the
Martian expedition and the son is
one of the crewmembers. When they
strike groundquakes on Mars, the
father loses his cool and his son
threatens and kills him, thus saving
the expedition. Now a person chosen
to be an astronaut is not going to
blow his stack. He’s long since been
tested to prove that he’s not the kind
of guy that would succumb to that
kind of pressure. Another crewman
is lost in the lift-off toward the sun,
and if anything the whole film was a
series of impressive funerals.

I’d like to talk for a moment about
the two years you spent shooting the
feature and TV series “Long John
Silver” (1955). Why was this shot in
Australia?

Ideally, we needed a reduced
economy for making motion pictures
and wanted a locale with an English-
speaking background. Our producer
Joseph Kauffman travelled down to
Canberra, gave the politicians a load
of bullshit and then approached the
Commonwealth Bank, who said
“yes” with a 100 per cent collateral.
We had American finance which we
added to the Commonwealth’s ad-
vance, and also investment from
other Australian contacts.

Having found the Pagewood
studios unoccupied but in fair con-
dition, we refurbished them and
started out with the feature. I used a
great number of the people I had
used on His Majesty O’Keefe in Fiji.
Ross Wood and Carl Kayser5 were
two cameramen who seemed to have
all the technical knowledge there was
left in Australia, while on the per-
forming side we had Grant Taylor
and his son Kit, who played Jim
Hawkins. As Israel Hands we cast a
young radio actor called Rod Taylor.

Now it wasn’t a good film, but as
an adventure film it wasn’t too bad.
It ran into the general ill-fortune that
beset the whole project. Our
producer‘s chief neurosis was that he
was ill-satisfied with life unless it was
at the uppermost point of a destruc-
tive climax, that we were going to
lose everything — today! He made
deal after deal, and one day one of
his financiers reneged — a since-
inmate of a US penitentiary called
Louis Wclfsen. We could ne[...]because all of his
deals were made at 9,140m over in-
ternational water, and we ran up a
whacking overdraft with the Com-
monwealth Bank. That was the
beginning of their taking the thing
over. We figured out later that hav-

Cinema Papers, March-April — 21

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (19)[...]inst
all the odds beyond this earlhlone adventure
in a million that could hapoen- tomorrow!

normson
11305 on

Jtx[...]RRIDIG

,. ~AllTllENTlsCt
I rm orzagom-' srrp
mma as mass
nrarrrw

taxi!!!’ Iv

PAUL MAlllEE- VICTOR[...]ODLLY MONKEY-MJBREY Sflltlfl

TIC”. .'

Suibgu In

moamxm ttl-liltlllok ..J0'llll mscnnsmm-m......[...]ter for Byron Haskin‘s Robinson Crusoe on Mars, an effective transferral of the

M901? flunk port"! 45910!

Defoe original to a loneliest imaginable outer-space.

22 — Cinema[...]“For this I engineered over 300 special effects in the camera on Eastman-
color original negative.”

ing started with a budget of
$476,000, we had spent almost a
million dollars on the feature and the
26 half—h0ur television shorts. It was
a case of mortgaging the mortgages,
or like building a bridge and having
to mortgage the first half to build the
other. We never did get to shore with
It.

In spite of this, were the conditions
favorable at that time for production
in Australia?

Anybody could make pictures out
there. All you needed was a good
professional guiding hand and to
know where you were headed. Kauff-
man, who was never intendedvto be in
on the triumvirate/artistic side of
this deal, muscled in and dissension
set in among the rest of us. Robert
Newton started on the juice again
and was irrational. For the first few
months we were there, he was on the
wagon and we made some time. But
then he knocked a chandelier out
into Vaucluse Bay and would dis-
appear whenever I’d be trying to
work with him. The studio was very
close to the airport and when he left,
the whole crew stopped without
direction, looked at his plane rising
above the city, and prayed that it
would not abort until he got to Fiji.

How much optical camerawork did
you normally handle yourself?

Anything that was necessary. In
September Storm (1960) we went
over to Majorca and were on our
own. I did any effects required in the
camera and as we didn’t have a roll-
ing platform for the yacht, I rolled
the camera and cued the actors to
lurch this way and that. We used the
same thing on Captain Blood and if
the actors react accordingly, it looks
real. I did it on Treasure Island and
had a rear-projected horizon in the
background.

I did a film for the King Brothers

in Munich called Captain Sinbad
(1963). For this I en ineered over
300 special effects in t e camera on
Eastman-color original negative.
While I was working with the art
director in Vienna, the King Brothers
hired the Academy Award winning

cameraman from The _Hustler,
Eugen Schufftan. Now this rang a

bell and I remembered we had sent
effects work across to a German guy
called Schufftan in the twenties. I
thought, “This guy’s probably
related to the old man”, and when it
was time for him to arrive, it was the
old man himself. Eighty-something,
and he had long shoes and he looked
l.ike the balding professor from
Stuttgart: “Arrgh, vat ve got ’ere‘?”
And he didn’t understand one thing
about special effects, hadn’t the
foggiest notion of what the hell I was
doing with this mirror. “Vel, dat’s
vundervul”, he said, and when I pan-
ned he was standing in the shot. “Get
out of thercl”, I yelled.

A number of effects that I found
difficult to matte together I had Tom
Howard‘ complete in London. There
was no outstanding incentive for
sp[...]because the King
Brothers always made cheap films
and I don’t think our effects budget
went much beyo[...]lars. However, there weren’t 25
percent of them that I would have
approved as head of Warner
Brothers’ special effects department.
I would have called them a first test,
something we’d develop and run to
see what improvements were needed.

With Sinbad, all my so-called first

tests were in the picture.

So your shooting effects on loca-
tion and in the camera was a rever-
sion to the old silent method?

That’s right. Shoot your first ex-
posure, then back it up. Count your
footage to the nearest frame and roll

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (20)[...]ction packed pirate story about the,derring-do of a brave adven-
turer, Burt Lancaster.

it forward again. But a great many of
the composites were done through
the mirror. The hurricane that howl-
ed into Galgo’s laboratory I had
reflected in the mirror from a projec-
tion screen. Wind scattered papers
all over the set, so there was no need
in this case for a back-up.

What about “Robinson Crusoe on
Mars” (1964)?

I consider that film the best thing
I’ve ever done, because it had
basically one of the soundest stories
ever written — a man conquering a
hostile environment but finding that
when the pressure’s off he can’t con-
quer his own loneliness. Unfor-
tunately, the film did not become a
bit because of the bad [judgment of
the producer and the re easing com-
pany. I fou ht like a tiger to get rid
of that si ly-ass title. Robinson
Crusoe on Mars immediately brings
up a picture of Robinson Crusoe un-
der a broad umbrella, being enter-
tained by dancing dames on Mars.
And it wasn’t in that category. I
wanted it called GPI Mars, which
means Gravity Pull One — Mars.
We had John Glenn interested in
preparing the way in 12 major cities
around America, and the sales
mana er at Paramount said: “Aw,
they’lf think it's a documentary”.
And he hadn’t even seen the picture,
let alone knowing what the story
was.

Larry Butler, who did the effects
for Marooned over at Columbia, has
an optical printer that you wouldn’t
believe. He’s fantastic, he can put
anything together, and I had him do
Robinson Crusoe’s special effects as a
favor to me. He removed all our
skies.

You see, we had to convince an
audience dramatically that they were
not on Earth. They were on a planet
out in space somewhere. A blue sky

would be a quick giveaway, so he
matted in an orange-red color. The
skies up in Death Valley were very,
very blue and gave us good travelling
matte outlines. So that was shot
provided its own matteline and we
simply added the orange-red.

Death Valley has been shot 10
million times in movies. It has
always been the scene of westerns,
camel caravans and God-knows-
what, and has always been shot from
the bottom of the valley. I never got
to the bottom of the valley at all, but
,did all my shots across the ridge
tops, where th[...]eather
erosion. The crew pulled out all the
weeds in sight, and there wasn’t a
thing you saw in the whole film that
was alive. So there was the element
of suspense and fear that this guy
was under. He had conditioned
himself to go half an hour without
the oxygen mask, he had little pools
that he could bathe in, plants he
could eat, and oxygen he could ex-
tract from the rock. Then he yelled
and the echo came back to him, and
he became aware that this was the
only voice he was ever going to hear
again, and a hallucination of his
dead comrade only increased his
loneliness and sense of frustration.
Then he found beings from another
galaxy who had come over to do
some mining, and it seems that he
and his ‘Man Friday’ — the ape -
would become their slaves. The
beings were in the same category as
the cannibals in Defoe’s original
story.

So the format worked out
beautifully, and it worked out in a lot
of other ways. I’ve not forgotten this
format.

One of the most criticall[...]lllS° lillmms Exiliili

BYRON HASKIN

etsswa. as
(;)',00’L&, GW 3 NEDICT

TheAmazlnq if Pi
St[...]-,..' Q
. . ' T ' :r I:
i ‘._.'a\\“.\\

R’

23:20-set9wvN~MAvEs2 RELEASE ,, ,,,__,.

From the Earth to the Moon (1958): A scientist discovers a new source of energy and plans to
send a rocket to the moon — predictably the special effects take top honors.

Cinema Papers. March-April —- 23

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (21)24 —- Cinema Papers. March-April

AUSTRALIAN FILM AWARDS

Established in 1958 to provide a stimulus to Australian film producers
and to call public attention to the latest achievements of the nations
film indus[...]m event for Australia's film makers.

CASH PRIZES in the 1974-75 Film Awards total $11,000 comprising:—

u $5,000 from the Australian Film Development Corporation for the
best story f[...]Stout Awards) for the
three most creative entries in the competition

I $1,000 from Village Cinemas and Village Theatres for the Best
Direction

a $1,000 Hoyts Prizes for best performances.

a $1,000 from the Department of Media for the most imaginative use
of film techniques to depict an aspect of Australian life orendeavour

u $1,000 from Greater Union for[...]$500 from Kodak for the Best Photography

1974-75 AUSTRALIAN FILM AWARDS

FINAL JUDGES’ COMMENTS

An unprecedented sixteen feature films were among the 213 entries

for the 1974-75 Australian Film Awards.

'- rand Prix was awarded by the jury because no film attained
standards. Despite this. we feel that the
Australian cinema has reached a most exciting stage in its development.

the hi -+ international

Technically, quality 5Np{oduction was at an international level. The
standard of cinematograph5L\and the use of original music were
eral level of acting has also risen.
s weakness in Australian film
otable exceptions to the

particularly impressive.

Scriptwriting rema[...]were sorn

general mediocrity.

The judges noted a continuing preference for masculin
and male problems. Entries provided few significant roles fo

We were impressed by the restrained and succinct use of commentary
in the non-fiction subjects. The documentary preselectors detected a
new measure of assurance in works dealing with current, and often
it seems that Australian documentary film
makers can now be relied upon to pursue a commitment without
-- - 'nto stridency and heavyhandedness.

contentious, social issues.

Ho[...]The

» - l for short fiction felt that the subjects .

explored in this section were concep o .

Advertising film preselectors reported that Australian -r-

maintained flweir usual standard.

Final selection proved difficut

because production values were of a uniformly high quality.

The judges of the 1974-75 Awards conclude that Government support
of the Australian Film Industry has revitalised feature production: it
now remains for more_Australian films to reach an international

audience.

Preielectorsz

R[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (22)GRAND PRIX

Not Awarded.

FEA RE CATEGORY
Golden Reel: SU DAY TOO[...]L
Special Citation for the first featur film shot in Papua New Guin

with an all-indigenous cast:
WOKAB UT BILONG TONTEN

DOCUMENTARY CATEGORY
Golden Reel: MR SYMBOL MAN
Silver Awards: A STEAM TRAIN PASSES
STIRRING
ERAL CATEGORY
Golden Reel: BILLY AND PERCY

SHORT FICTION CATEGORY
Bronze Awards: MATCH LESS
WHO KILLED JENNY LANGBY?
Honorable Mention: LOVE IS HATE

ADVERTISING CATEGORY

Golden Reel: DRUM MAT[...]LTON 79ers LEAP

METTERS SUPER 10

é.|,~§
AUSTR A, IA,

[FILM /AIWAIRDS

SPONSORED AWARDS

AUSTRALIAN FILM I EVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SUNDAY TOO F ‘ FI[...]GE PRIZE OR THE BEST DIRECTION
John Power I BILLY AND PERCY

GREATER U ION PRIZE FOR BEST SCREENPLAY
Da[...]IZES FOR BEST PERFORMANCES

Shared: Jack Thompson in PETERSEN and ,
SUNDAY TOO FAR AWAY
Marlin Vaughan in BILLY AND PERCY

Actress: Julie Dawson in WHO KILLED JENNY LANGBY?

Honorable Mentions for Supporting Roles:
Barrie Humphries in THE GREAT MACARTHY
Reg Lye in SUNDAY TOO FAR AWAY

DEPARTMENT OF THE MEDIA AWAR[...]R BEST ORIGINAL MUSIC

Bruce Smeaton for THE CARS THAT ATE PARIS and
THE GREAT MACARTHY '

KODAK AWARD FOR PHOTOGRAPHY

Silver Medallion and $500:
Vincent Monton for THETRUE STORY OF ESKIMO NELL

Bronte Medallions: Geoff Burton for BILL AND PERCY
Brian Probyn for INN OF THE DAMNED
Dean Semler Ior A STEAM TRAIN PASSES

ALAN STOUT AWARDS

First Priz[...]Second Prizes of $250 each: 4
Ian Macrae for LOVE IS HATE
Chris Noonan for BULLS

AUSTRALIAN TOURIST COMMISSION "JEDDA AWARD‘
KANGARO[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (23)[...]e; Gidget Goes Hawaiian (l96|): Hollywood
cashing in on the sixties surfing craze.

The Quiet Indu[...]erial by Rod Bishop, Phil
Jarrett, Graham Shirley and Sue Adler.

There are currently about 15 surfing features being exhibited around Australia, half of which are
Australian productions. Four of these were produced last year with investment from the Australian
Film Development Corporation. In backing them the AFDC has acknowledged that the producers
are among the most experienced in the country — responsible for 24 features since 1960 — and the
only ones to have created an independent, vertically integrated film economy to control production,

distribution and exhibition.

It was from California that the first surf movies
came, brought here in the late fifties by Bud
Browne at the invitation of local PR man Bob
Evans.

Evans had been a surfboard rider from an early
age, and through a visiting American surf team,
he had heard about Browne’s movies Hawaiian
Memories (1945) and The Big Surf (1943).

Evans paid for Browne’s visit and arranged to
exhibit them in beachside surf clubs. For most
Australians it was their first glimpse of the giant
Hawaiian waves that have made ‘The Islands’ a
mecca for surfers.

Evans soon found that he was attracting as
many as 800 people a night to see Browne’s
movies and realized he had discovered a large and
expanding market among the thousands of
kids involved in the surfing culture. By renting
what licensed halls he could, and making an oc-

casional rental or percentage deal with an in-
dependent cinema, Evans discovered that for an
outlay of around $200 on rent and publicity he
could pocket as much as $1,000 a night.

From a surf movie exhibitor it was a simple
step to become a producer. Evans bought some
equipment, established a contra deal subsidv for
air tickets‘ and took off for Hawaii where he shot
the first all—Australian surf movie, Surf Trek to
Hawaii (1960).

Back in Australia, Surf Trek was put onto the
circuit that had been established with Browne’s
movies. Evans further expanded his market by
producing a magazine called Surfing World.

This was all at the time of the surfing craze in
California when the Beach Boys and Jan and
Dean began to top the charts with their songs
about surfing lifestyles, and Hollywood came up
with Gidget Goes Hawaiian. Evans capitalized on

Muscle Beach Party (1964): a manifestation of the fad opularity of the surfing subculture of the sixties which eventually
grew into a mu ti-million dollar industry.

Gidget and made Midget Goes Hawaiian (1961),
featuring local surf champion Midget Farrelly,
who the next year went on to win the World
Championships in Hawaii.

Evans eventually quit his job as a PR man and
went into full-scale surf movie production, turning
out a feature a year between 1960 and 1971. 2

Today, Bob Evans shares the bitterness of other
Australian producers over deals where dis-
tributors take all their expenses off the top and
leave the producers with nothing. He is equally
critical of deals with foreign-owned exhibition
groups and would prefer that the Australian
Government channeled its efforts to establish a
film industry into assisting producers gain access
to the large number of public halls that cover the
suburbs and coastlines.

Local surf star Terry Fitzger[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (24)[...]81%-8 I111 djbjdulfl

Poster for Rolling Home. An example of a hard—sell campaign
inspired by the success of Crystal Voyager.

This view is shared by Paul Witzig, another
force in the early surf film industry, and was the
basis of a submission to the Tariff Board enquiry
into the Motion Picture Industry in 1972. Witzig
told the enquiry of screenings in halls being
stopped after complaints from local cinema
owners, who initially refused to exhibit a movie,
then later wanted as much as 60 per cent of the
gate.

Witzig was introduced to surf movies by Bob
Evans. Like Evans he became involved in.distribu-
tion and exhibition. After meeting Bruce Brown in
California he brought Barefoot Adventure and
Slippery Wet to Australia. He also helped Brown
shoot ootage for the Endless Summer which
became a world box-office smash, grossing over
$10 million in the'US alone.

Witzig distributed the Endless Summer in
Australia and went on to make his own feature,

* “I:‘ife in the Sun (1966), which was released for a
year, then re-cut, added to and re-released as The
Hot Generation —— with just as much success.

In 1969 Witzig again trod the international sur-
fing path and came up with Evolution. The movie
was a success around the world, grossing more
than $150,000 in the US.

Since then Witzig has made Sea of Joy, Islands
and recently Rolling Home which takes a Leyland
Brothers-type expedition around Australia.

Albert Falzon joined Bob Evans’ Surfing
World as a photographer and layout artist and in
1967 went with Evans to South Africa to work on
The Way We Like it.

However, Falzon had ambitions to publish his
own surf magazine and produce his own features.
In 1970 he founded Tracks with Paul Witzig’s
brother John (a former editor of Surfing Inter-
national) and G0 Set editor David Elfick.

Following Evans’ example, Falzon and Elfick’

used the magazine to help produce and promote
their first feature Morning of the Earth -— the
biggest grossing Australian surf movie to date.’

‘ With Elfick as producer, Falzon as director-

photographer and a gold award winning sound
track by G. Wayne Thomas, Morning of the Earth
had a production slickness beyond anything
previously seen in surfing movies.

Opposite: Morning of the Earth: Chris Brock: (top) and
Stephen Coony (bottom).

The success of Morning of the Earth, made with
$20,000 from the AFDC led to Crystal Voyager
(1973).

Initially intended as a short to support the
summer release of Morning of the Eart[...]he most highly
acclaimed surf movie ever produced in Australia.

Since Crystal Voyager, David Elfick has sold
his interest in Tracks to move into the production
of non-surfing documentaries and features.
However his brief stint as a surf movie producer
revolutionized the Australian surf film industry,
and has forced other producers to adopt higher
standards and hard—sell promotional campaigns.

In the past, Australian producers have dis-
tributed their surf movies internationally through
reciprocal arrangements with their production
counterparts overseas. But following the disap-
pointing run of Morning of the Earth in the US,
Elfick took,Crystal Voyager to Cannes ‘, signed
an agreement with Hemdale, (the British com-
pany) and secured the release of a new 35mm ver-
sion in London.

Paul Witzig is also heading for Cannes this year
with Rolling Home, and it seems likely that Bob
Evans will follow suit with Drouyn.

Evans’[...]get for Drouyn (half of
which came from the AFDC) is a long way from
the maximum cost of his early movies, but today
his grosses are smaller and he notes that distribu-
tion and exhibition costs now consume some 80
per cent of his total box-office compared to about
50 per cent l0_ years ago.

Evans is currently involved in the production of
40 half-hour programs for a TV surfing series.
However, he is uncertain about making another
surf feature.

While Evans managed to sell his first nine
features to TV, he is bitter about the low prices
paid, particularly in the light of repeated
screenings in popular viewing time. Witzig, on the
other hand,[...]surfing movies on the cinema-roadshow
circuit he is probably right in assuming that they
could draw big audiences on TV. However, the
maximum price paid so far for a surfing feature. is
$5,000 —— low for a color feature.

Several non-surfing filmmakers have also made
surf features for TV. Peter Thomson and Bill
Fitzwater for the ABC in the sixties; Tim Burstall,
who covered the 1971 Australian Championships;
and John Phillips who covered the 1971 Smirnoff
Championships in Hawaii. None of these have
rated highly with the surf movie audience in spite
of the fact that they are highly crafted.

It is the personal involvement ofthe filmmakers
that has accounted for the success of surf movies
in Australia. The commitment of the producers
exceeds anything known in the rest of the industry
and has parallels only in the dedication of so call-
ed ‘underground’ filmmakers who have used
similar production techniques and marketing
procedures.

While most Australian surf movies have not
revealed sophisticated approaches to the craft of
film, nor made any technical advances that could
be considered innovatory (with the exceptio[...]ve
greatly extended the range of pictorial images in
Australian film, and closely observed Australian
lifestyles ignored by other filmmakers.

lt is not enough to see one surf movie and to
assume one has seen them all. They must be look-
ed at as a body of work, and the evolutions and
changes in them seen as part ofthe general growth
of both Australian surfing and Australian film-
making. They are, without doubt, the most
significant indigenous film development in this
country for many years.

Footnotes

1 Contra[...]an 50 per cent of
production expenses on Evans‘ and other Australian‘surf
IITOVICS.

2 With the exception of Ride A White Horse (1967) —- a com-
pilation from his earlier movies, scripted by Ted Roberts,
gidgl/:\FWhite Horse was enlarged to 35mm and distributed

y .

3 Morning of the Earth has grossed $200,000 in 16mm on the
local market.

4 Crystal Voyager grossed $120,000 in its initial l6mm run in
Australia and was released in London with Fastastic Planet.
In the first three months the movie had grossed 50,000
pounds and is expected to go as high as 100,000 pounds. It
has also been sold for distribution in Germany, Canada,
Spain and South Africa.

5 Refer John Flaus‘ review of Crystal Voyager, Cinema
Papers. July 1974.

Nat Young in Falzon and Greenough’s Crystal Voyager: the most highly—acclaimed surf movie ever produced in
Australia.

Cinema Papers, March—April — 29

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (25)[...], ,,l 3 “.7 .
' ’ ‘:45’; f f:.,“\.‘ ~ A‘ “* T i ' '. .~

‘. g ‘ , _. . __-.—[...]’llfiI'ANi. L I: *2: elormal, one " .
. - .4 A, year: », ,. __ . "
' - ~ ’ 1962-SURFING THESO[...];_~‘ I ..‘:963—l,iAwAllAmun_lLL la ~ ~ .' I A .iEvoisiandUepic.
, ‘ I964-THE vounio .wAv£ . - a surfing safari
along thaeast Just -1‘ ng and olhets.

1965-LONG {HAY ROUN ' er sal with a few
5) — Ag ‘ , surllng

_ _ - . i . V new laces and an
.> A - 196_6—HIGH ON A-COO
A . I lealurlnq Bob,McT

A LIFE lN,1'HE ' lg) — filmed mostly in
Queensland. . _ ‘

196?—1’HE WAY WE LIK =' _ 5} — Evo.'A.Ibie Falzon and .

_ . Tanya Binning in S0 ; .. - .5
THE H01’ GENER “: Wltzl ' leads; .0!
' Australian suri heroe .; ':-"‘-‘ -» ' '

' RIDE A WHITE HOB _ 2 Evans) hash of old footage o
in 35mm. » ,
WORLD CH - A ' '-. EN (Bo Evans) — a snorruslng

- old foolag _ ~
1968—--sPLASH -. waves, waves and more waves.
1969—EVOLU‘l' 512 : , ;- surllng in Australia and Europe.
- . with Na‘ ‘¢,,_ n" Way '5 rich. .[...]. ' 9:! '_K -1"
1971--SEA 0? (Paul Witzigsurllno and smlllng irune _ ' __ ' _ .' .
A. country; ‘ ' ' ~ A ,. -', ‘
_--. ANIMALS (Paul W“..zig) — ‘I[...]- ‘ FAMILY FREE (am. Evans ustrallan east coast an . _ . '

Australia. T - ‘ ._ . '

1972—MORNI[...]Falzon ~ ‘ , ' .- ' . - " ‘ '
Australia. Ball and Hawaii; - ‘ -‘ I . ,
THE ISLANDSlPauI Wi L vitzig' - '- A ' ~‘ . —

4 OUR DAY IN THE =. ard/U ' -

1973~A WINTERS T - . . '

IN NAT ,: __ __ .
:, -'~ ' I

. I’ ; ' - . .
‘on[...].
' 1965—sul#mc ovum __- avid Pri . 5&;..,_¢na~a:ed by
Ricnard Neville. -- . 1.,‘ 7.1‘ - «_»[...]DRIDERS (Bill Fllzwater) —'~re‘iian waves -‘and surfers
edited Ia Vivaldi tor ABC-TV. " . ._ '
19[...]tary for ABC-TV. _ ‘ '
1970——GE'r1'lNG QACK To NOTHING mm Burstall) — documentary
of (519 Australian surllngthamplonshlps.

' . 1972-8 ” G ODYSSEY ([...]— documentary of the
' . Smlmoll championships in Hawaii for 0- 10 TV network.

[vii - I‘in:ln;. l’.‘;[u- \h.-n.Il- ~\y‘-III

" .

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (26)[...]). directed by Ken G. Hall‘ The most successful and productive erain Australian cinema ——the
Cinesound _\'eai=s. A - ,

In 1967 Anthony Buckley, film editor, industry spokesman and authority on
Australian film history, wrote an article for the Sydney Cinema Journal in which he
traced the history of Australian film production from its inception, and commented one
the state of the industry. He concluded with the following remarks:

As matters stand at the present with the two main cinema circuits owned and con- I
trolled by overseas interests and conservative government apparently not willing to.
listen from afar, the situation is not. likely to change . . . a country with a population of;
l l million cannot compete in a laissez faire situation without some form of a quota at
long—term finance for indigenous films. It’s not a question of a lot of frustrated esoteric
filmmakers complaining. For the most part they would only be too happy to be given
the opportunity to be ‘commercial’. In reply to the assumption that Australians only

' want foreign films (as distinct from good films) one can question: How does the public

know whether it likes or dislikes what it hasn’t seen . . .? . u .

. “There are few genuine and creative filmmakers in Australia. There would be many‘

more if there was a film industry of a permanent nature no matter how small. Do we as

a nation really want our own indigenous cinema or are we to drift into the 1970’s with.

the memories ofa small, but once flourishing, industry becoming dimmer and dimmer.
Has the candle finally blown out?”

In the light of recent developments Cinema Papers asked Anthony Buckley to give
his impression of the situation eight[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (27).The only really positive thing about the
Australian cinema is at least we know where
we’ve been.

We know that Johnson and Gibson‘s Kelly
Gang (I906) is p_ossibly the worlds first feature
film. and that Raymond Langford made
Australia's premier classic The Sentimental Bloke
in I918 —- but died as a tally clerk on Sydney‘s
waterfront in I959. We know about the work of
the pioneers Franklyn Barret, the McDonagh
sisters, the famous Higgins brothers and about
Efftee Films, successfully built up/by Frank Thr-
ing in the thirties with the talents of Pat Hanna
and George Wallace. And we know that Ken Hall
was at the helm of what was probably the most
successful and productive era in Australian
cin_ema -— the Cinesound years.

We know that with World War 2 production
virtually stopped but did not prevent Charles
Chauvel from making one of AustraIia‘s most
successful films. 40.000 Horsemen — that Smithy
was Ken Hall’s last film and that Ealing came to
Australia to set up production .—— only to be
swallowed up by Rank and closed.

We know of the sporadic production of the
overseas companies during the sixties: of Lee
Robinson and Chips Rafferty’s attempts to set up
continuous co-production through their own com-
pany, Southern International Films.

And we know that by I967 there was virtually
nothing left — exce[...]e abortive 1927 Royal
Commission; the ineffective and somewhat absurd
Victorian and NSW Cinematograph Acts: and
the I963 Vincent Committee.

_ Since then the industry has struggled to regain
its feet. The Liberal Gorton government helped
with the establishment of the Australian Film
Development Corporation. And under the Labor
Whitlam government, the Australian Films Com-

32 ——,-;Cinema Papers. March-Apri[...]worlds first feature film.

mission Bill appears to have completed its tor-
tuous and protracted path through Parliament.
But do we have a plan and a policy for the future?
Unfortunately the answer is NO.

In 1975, the production of Australian films is
the same as it has always been. an ad hoc situation
with producers and directors going from one pic-
ture to another spending valuable time in trying to
raise the money for their next. then having made it
trying to find a distributor on favorable terms who
in turn Ii-as to find the right deal from the ex-
hibitor that will return all three parties some
revenue. particularly the producer. The one excep-
tion is Roadshow-Village. through their continu-
ing support of Hexagon.‘

Ken Hall was lucky. Stuart F. Doyle believed in
Australian films and backed Cinesound and
Hall all the way. but if one is to be practical and
businesslike you really cant blame Norman
Rydge f[...]s operations. When
Rydge took over Union Theatres in the late thir-
ties the group had not paid a dividend to its
shareholders since 1929. Why spend up to 20,000
pounds to make a'local film which would return
only 30,000 pounds when the group could get im-
ported films for 5000 pounds and get returns of
anything up to 45,000 pounds! This accounted for
the decline of Cinesound and Union Theatres’
strict bricks and mortar policy. Much the same
applies to. the American distributors operating
here. For them it is a far better proposition to dis-
tribute than to produce. Take last years figures
for example —— a cool $22 million in film rentals
from Australia to the US! This is where we seem
to have all our priorities in the wrong order.

We have moderate quota provisions for

‘Greater Union and BEF have also recently invested in the
features: The Man from Hong Kong, a co-production with
Golden Harvest Films (Hong Kong) and Picnic at Hanging
Rock. Peter Weir's latest film.

Australian pop and serious music on radio: there
are reasonable quotas to encourage local televi-
sion shows, but there is nothing to ensure the
production of Australian films. The Film and
Television Board receive $2 million from the
Council for the Arts, The Film and TV. School

82.5 million and the AFDC topped up with

S340,000‘l‘ —— $2.5 million to train people for an
industry that doesnt exist and has no direction for
the future!

Since I967 there has been an upturn in produc-
tion —— even in its ad hoc way —— but there has
been a severe decline in facilities and an even
sharper decline in the number of young people
coming into the indust[...]r sound
stages have closed — Pagewood long ago. and in
the early seventies A—jax‘s Bondi facilities. A»rtran-
sa‘s Frenchs Forest studios and two major
Melbourne facilities.

Most disturbing of all is the disappearance of
Fauna from the local scene. There are now on.I\'
three laboratories of international standard for
the processing of feature films and series —
Colorfilm and Atlab ‘in Sydney, Victorian Film
Laboratories in Melbourne. Laboratory costs are
becoming prohibitivefor local filmmakers and.
regrettably, release’ prints of locally—made films
are often made in overseas labs.

There is only one mixing and dubbing suite to
be found in Australia that measures anywhere
near to international standards —— United Sound.
Sydney.

We cannot think of an Australian industry in
purely local terms, we must think in international
terms. Film is international whether we like it or
not. The mere budget of a film nowadays dictates

+Thc AFDC has requested supplementary funds from the
Government and with the passage of the Films Commission
Bill through Parliament it has been reported that an ad-
ditional $l.3 million will be»..alloe[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (28)[...]um Ivnvorm. iv... .«......._...

7. TRIUMPH FOR AUSTRALIAN PRODUCTION-

and a Worthy Successor to “THOSE WHO LOVE”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

1 From an apprenticeship at Cinesound under [Keri l~lall, Tony
Buckley quickly established himself as a“ leading editor. both
overseas — through work in Canada and London — and in
Australia. _ _

Buckley has worked for numerous production houses — including
Cinesound as supervising editor —— worked on a number of features.»
cut numerous documentaries and made two movies: Forgotten
Cinema; a complete history of the Australian industry, and Sun
Sand and Savages. the story of Frank l-lurley’s life. .

Recently Buckley has been working for Film Australia, and has
edited Margaret Fink‘s production of The Re[...]as also
produced Peter Weir’s Whatever Happened to Green Valley and.

The Picture I
that Caused |
an Unheard of
Display of
Enthusiasm at
its Premiere[...]'e
\ 550$”: ' _

i 1'”.

‘Molly produced I
in tyiuslralia

-~1.c‘ 0 ’Prv_:dusuon
I-in.” ‘mi

A 1:, .\lARlE LORRAINE

T\.."’ 1

f/aslon cKet-v[...]ic cost

;::av§er_age Aiistralian feature; film is $300,000’
_ll_:ino.ve up to around—~$Zl-50,000 next year.
F a-‘Tp_iro.dtI.c.er; to: 1=lSt break even at the box-
ioffiee, the film must earn at least $800,000 — and
not many, "-films a ve,.—. that distinction_ in
Australiafz ~ ,_
Costs'?'a‘re an -important factor but don’t be
hoodwinkedj. Australian crew costs have gone up
but-not to:-'_t,.h‘e extent that some industry people
,3-would have one believe. For example directors of
photography. editors, soundmen and. other key
personnel are getting much the same now as they

B

5:1v'vere in 11970-7l. So let’s do away with“ the myth -

that [Australian crews are more expensive than
’ ' , t‘he‘i_r.overseas counterparts. ‘
TA-me.rican companies operating in Australia
must; be involved" in production of Australian
—’'films. It’s not unreasonable to ask for some of
_ that“ $22,million-_ to -be "reinvested! American
studios -must-be encouraged to back local- talent
” ‘land not :jus-tptechnicians, but also writers and
--.ect'or,s; It7;s’7‘iiea5r7vly,» 307;years since Columbia Ffic- i
tures backed Ken Hall in the making of Smithy
S (l?acific.*A;dventure in‘ the US), but since that
‘ e;on‘Iy overseas directors haverbeen used.on_in--
viternationalilyfliinanced features shot in Australia.
“‘:I:?t is admirable that MCA;reinvested monies earn.-;
t ed in =- ustrali-a, by in king Sidecar Racers but not
so admir.al;‘;le_~that%i they chose-aii“-Amerlican direc-
tor.-r"" " - .- « ‘
; We must also face up.to our.~sho.rtcomings. We
lack Eireative and financially-oriented producers.
7 We do -‘liay[e‘>di_i'{éetors andywriters, but are short on

.i

fpioductvion-.-ma_nagers ‘and ain Australia neither have gi say in the‘ production
; ‘ - V. gfdecision-making .[...]r arethcy cm-

.’ _'Po_w_¢f¢d_1o i.’nye_s>t-their companyfs nioheyjn local production.

incmii A‘pril ' _

Fll.lilS

Theatre.
Syd ney.

BOOKED
FOR
FIRST
RELEASE
IN

EVER Y
CAPITAL
CITY

BY
HOYTS
THEATRES
LTD.

Sydney

Now Proving
a Box Office
Attraction in
New South
Wales.

For Available
Dates Apply

to
B. UP.

305 PITT sr, I
SYDNEY.l
I

LTD. ‘tam:-:.:_::

Donald Crombie's The Fifth Decade. .
Buckley is currently trying to raise money to produce his own
feature Caddie. the story of a young Sydney barmaid in the
Depression, to be directed by _
Tony Buckley was also a founding member and chairman of
FEGA. a foundation member of the Sydney Filmmakers’ Co-op. a
board member of the AFI and is one of the vice-presidents of the
Film Festival. Until recently he was president of the

Donald Crombie.

Australian Film Council. —

‘American directors in Australia: Norman Dawn’s Tlie Adorable Qutcast

than two films or TV series are in productionat‘
any oneitime. We have to train and give more
chancesto people to fill these roles. j;

The pressing question iiow is — Can any
positive -plan be laid down which will fundamen-
tally change the course of the Australian film in-
dustry? The" answer is YES!

There hasto be a functioning Australian Film
Commission, there is no other way. Whatever
faults there were in t-he legislation —— and there
were many — the Australian Films Commission
has to become a reality and not a political foot-
ball. If any blueprint for the future is to be worked
out, if any continuity of. production is to be

-achieved then it has to be through one central .

organization with the powers to achieve the near
impossible. It must involve all sectors of the in-
dustry, whether on the Board or in a consultative
panel. Exhibitors, distributors and producers
?must be brought around the same table.

Heavy government, investment is top priority.
Not hundreds of thousands but nothing less than
$3 million should be ploughed into the industry by
next year and certainly nothing less than $5
million at any one time thereafter.

Reinvestment is the next priority. American
majors andAustralian producers have to be
brought together. [ifs-got to stop being a one-way
street in..terms_ of talent being brought in and
-,pr_ofi:ts being taken out. Compulsion is nota good
thing but a partrte-rsliip is and this can only be
achieved by: all parties facing each other head on
through the ‘Commission. Sense and sensibility
must prevail, There is no use in,the Government

Cr.-)’ing ‘constitutionalépr[...]to .

local ‘production:.

The third -priority is costs andfacilities. Firstly .

thegglaboratories: z-Their__costs are prohibitive and
out of all proportion to costs overseas";-in_ spite of

(1928). __ F _
heavy. . reinvestment. Government rilegislation to
enforce the bulk printing of all features shown
here would help increase laboratory turnover and
reduce print costs to the local industry. This has
been done before in the black and white days and
it can be done again. Distr.ibutors are already sav-
ing $800,000 a year in the repeal of the Customs
duties on imported films, a decision which defies
any explanation. Secondly,[...]s: All
the large studios have closed because they are too
expensive to run.The Commission must look at

V the viability ofstudios and further at the role Film

Australia plays in the commercial industry. Film
Australia is currently expanding their studios to
the tune of $2 million. Why not expand further to
provide studio and production facilities at low
cost to the private sector? While Film Australia‘s

, function as film producer is essential .to a viable

local industry as is the commercial or private sec-

tor. few_people u[...]rtment of the Media.* [5

Film Australia, through an Australian Films
Commission, could become a spearhead for local
production. Its sole function is not the production

of TV documentaries, butagoes further and

embraces the broad spectrum of filmmaking ac-
tivity that constitutes, Australian cilnema. Their
films, however, can only be exhibited properly if
they are given’ their own ’~library, ‘distribution

facilities and are more closely involved in the
"-commercial ijndustry. ’

Finally, its always easier to say something than
to do something, but if thereris to be a future. a
planfor thefuture, only the Government, through

the Films Commission, can leadthe way. It must,

lead with aggressiveness and m'oneys_co-operation
and consultation. 0

* This is intended as'constructive7'comment‘. not criticism.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (29)Restrictive Trade Practices Legislation

and the Film Industry as Part I

By ANTONY I. GINNANE

In a two-part article Antony Ginnane examines the Australian exhibition and distribution system, its
ownership, attitudes and practices. The local industry is found to be a giant duopoly fiercely antagonistic to
competition. Legislative attacks on the vertically integrated film industry are already history in the United
States and the United Kingdom. Attempts have been made in Australia in the past to break up the industry
status quo and indeed the Tariff Board Report recommended divorcement of distribution and exhibition in-
terests and the divestiture by the chains of some of their theatre holdings. These proposals have been shelv[...]w Federal Restrictive Trade Practices Legislation and the effects it may have

on the industry.

THE AUSTRALIAN FILM INDUSTRY - A DUOPOLY IN
DISTRIBUTION AND EXHIBITION

The Australian film industry, like film industries
all over the world operates at a three-tier level —
production, exhibition and distribution.
Traditionally these three branches of the industry
have tended to operate _as a vertically integrated
‘unit until courts or legislatures have chosen, for
reasons which will be examined, to intervene.‘
In Australia the production side of the industry
has[...]ly non-
existent until recently when it has begun to
reappear quite spectacularly in a fit of
government-led sponsorship and tentative private
financing. It is thus only marginally relevant to
this introductory section, but it will be argued
later that the origins of the ownership of the dis-
tribution and exhibition sections of the industry
have in fact been responsible for the non-existence
of production; and that the absence of a visible
production industry until recently is one major
result of the exhibition — distribution duopoly.
Two overseas-owned companies in effect con-
trol the exhibition-distribution scene in Australia.
One, the smaller of the two, Hoyts Theatres Ltd is
65 per cent owned and controlled by Twentieth
Century Fox Film Corporation of America. It
thus has exclusive access to Fox films in this
territory and has distribution arrangements with
Avco Embassy Pictures and control of the library
of the now defunct ABC Films and the largely
defunct (at least as a production entity) Cinerama
Releasing Corporation[...]ive
franchises for exhibition with United Artists and
Columbia Pictures, which latter, Twentieth Cen-
tury Fox handles in Australia since 1, January,
1975. It controls over 60 cinemas and drive-ins in
the Commonwealth and books for another dozen

01' S0.

The other, the Greater Union Organisation,
was originall_y an Australian theatre group,
known as Union Theatres. It is now 50 per cent
owned by the British conglomerate, the Rank
Organisation, and is the largest distribution-
exhibition group in Australia. Directly or indirect-
ly it controls the release in this country of films
from Paramount Pictures, MG[...]tu_res, Walt Disney Productions, EMI
Distributors and the Rank Organisation. Through
its_ subsidiary, BEF Film Distributors, it main-
_tains an almost total monopoly of English films
imported.

In Victoria, it is associated with the indepen-
dent Village Theatres Group (who, incidentally,
control the output of the only two other produc-[...]1. CIC (distributing Paramount.
MGM and Universal)

‘2. Twentieth Century Fox
(distribu[...]KS
O.

tion sources — the major Warner Brothers and
the mini-major American-International Pictures).
GUO appears to hold only 33-1/3 per cent in the
Village Group, but many of Village’s exhibition
outlets are operated on a joint venture basis with
GUO. Village maintain close top management
liaison with GUO, but state that they regard the
latter as their day-to-day competitors.

Victoria, too, has the small Dendy Group, as an
independent outlet, but of late they have been in-
volved in joint ventures with Village Theatres.
Until the Tariff Board Report, there was no in-
dependent activity of any sort in NSW. Even
Village, much to their chagrin, were prevented
from breaking in. Table 1 sets out the major
distributor-exhibitor links:

GUO

Hoyts

Village and GUO
GUO

Village and GUO
Hoyts

Hoyts '
Dendy Theatres[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (30)[...]TRADE PRACTICES

LOCAL PRODUCTION:

Australia had a substantial production industry
in the silent era, and in 1900 made the first full-
length film. During the l920’s the industry ex-
perienced difficulty in raising finance for larger
scale and then sound productions. At the same
time it found itself faced with more and more
competition from imported productions, notab[...]Commission
Report on the Motion Picture Industry in
Australia‘ referred “to the lack of success of most
Australian pictures; the limited return available
from the local market, and the need to secure in-
ternational distribution”. The Commission found,
however, “that although most of the distributing
companies in Australia were connected with
American producers, there was then no combine
in existence exercising ‘a stranglehold’ over the
local industry”.

In the early thirties Australia ventured into
sound production and the Australian production
company, Cinesound, enjoyed a unique
relationship with the major Australian theatre
chain, Union Theatres. Cinesound produced a
series of continuous features — a string of tightly
budgeted, largely folksy dramas and comedies
and Union Theatres gave them a guaranteed city
release and suburban runs.’

In 1937, however, the production oriented head
of Union Theatres, Stuart Doyle, retired and was
replaced by Sir Norman Rydge, who in one of his
reorganization moves closed Cinesound (osten-
sibly for the duration of the War, in fact for
good).* Union Theatres began its accumulation of
theatre real estate, and over the next decade the
Rank Organisation bought up its issues capital.
The same year saw Fox acquire their interest in
Hoyts Theatres.

For the next 20 years or more, both companies
abstained from any major filmmaking in-
vestment. The industry stagnated and ossified.
Both Hoyts and Greater Union now had not only
a guaranteed source of exploitable foreign box of-
fice product for their theatres, but moreover a
duty to protect the box-office potential of their
overseas owners’ productions. Thus, not only was
there no incentive for the exhibitors or associated
distributors to invest in further local production,
but there was a positive incentive to keep the local
industry nonexistent.

Thus, if local production is in the public in-
terest3 then some modification to the present
exhibition-distribution structure mus[...]US QUO:

Another disturbing effect of the present in-
dustry structure is the fate of exhibitors (and, to a
lesser degree, distributors) outside the net of the
two major concerns and the business dealings
which they must, perforce,[...]ributors. The distributors fill the central role in
the film industry in that they obtain the roduct
from filmmaking sources and hire it to ex ibitors
for screening in cinemas.

Overseas, a distributor is generally deeply in-
volved financially in funding film production. In
Australia, as the majority of films screened are
from overseas sources, the distributor is virtually
an agent, and little more, for the foreign
producer-distributor. Only Roadshow in
Australia has, since the Tariff Board Report,
become engaged in a full-scale production
program, although Filmways and BEF have now
ventured into funding. There are about 30 dis-
tribution companies in Australia but only seven of
them provide a significant flow of ‘product’ to the
commercial film industry. These distributors and
the product they handle are set out in Table 2:

*Cinesound’s last film was Dad Rudd MP (1940).

36 —— Cinema Papers, March-April

TABLE 2:

AUSTRALIAN DISTRIBUTORS AND

T H E I R PRODUCT

Distributor Product distriuted in Australia

Fox

20th Century

Fox, Columbia

Pict[...]oadshow

Warner Brothers: American

international and Independent product.

ClC
Seven Keys
Filmways

Of these seven, Filmways and Seven Keys are
totally Australian operations. The Roadshow
organization comprises t[...]Distributors which handles American
International and independent releases, and the
joint venture, Roadshow International, which
handles the Warners releases, and accounts for
some 75 per cent of Roadshow’s output. .\

Filmways is run by a small group of indepen-
dent Victorian exhibitors who own or control at
least six cinemas in the Melbourne area, and who
are still developing their outlets.‘

Seven Keys is a privately-owned venture which
has recently branched into theatre operation in
Melbourne and Sydney and operates closely with
Hoyts Theatres Ltd.

Roadshow was initially started by the Village
group to provide them with direct access to
foreign product and has been spectacularly
successful. Although the local industry does not
disclose its figures, it is believed that overseas con-
trolled distributors (including the[...]count for over 80 per
cent of box-office takings in Australia.

When dealing with independent exhibitors (i.e.
exhibitors not operated or controlled by their
overseas owners) the foreign distributors use a
“Standard Form of Contract” which is, to say the
least, an imposition of grossly inequitable terms
on the exhibitor party to the contract. This con-
tract is too lengthy to be reproduced, but the
clauses referred to in this article are reproduced in
Appendix A.

Clause 1 purports to set up an offer and accep-
tance for formation of a contract, but it seems in
reality that an exhibitor is presented with a short
list of films available at a certain rate of hire and
his signature obtained to the contract schedule im-
mediately. The deeming of the signing of the
schedule as an offer is a fiction that is belied by
the wording of a typical letter of acceptance from
a distributor which is set out along with the rele-
vant contract schedule in Appendix B. The ex-
hibitor has no choice in the films or terms offered
him, as he will only be able to obtain similar films
at similar prices from other distribution sources.

Clause 3 and 4 refer to termination or suspen-
sion on breach by exhibitor and distributor
respectively; but there are no reported examples
of the latter, although a number of controversies
concerning alleged exhibitor breaches are on
record}

Appendix C contains correspondence de[...]rsy from
the standard form of contract: the right to check.
Further clauses concerning deficiencies in the
number of films imported, substitute films,[...]ht charges, stamp duties, dis-
tributor’s right to check; all are heavily biased in
favor of the distributor. Some exhibitors had in
fact never seen the full standard form of contract,
and some believed the schedule (Appendix B) was
the w[...]e terms (i.e. the amount of
gross takings payable as hire by exhibitor to dis-
tributor) between independent exhibitors and the
distributors are excessive as opposed to deals done
with associated theatre groups. BEF may sell a
film to a GUO theatre on a 90/10 deal, which
means that after the theatre expenses (which in-
clude a built-in profit to the associated exhibitor)
have been deducted, the film hire is to be split 90
per cent to the distributor and 10 per cent to the
exhibitor. There would, of course, be a minimum
percentage payable, say 25 per cent, with a rising
formula in the event the theatre expenses were not
equalled by gross ticket sales. On the other hand
the same film may be sold to an independent sub-
urban or country cinema for a minimum film hire
of 50 per cent.

The independent exhibitor has no allowance
for profit, and must pay an exorbitantly high film
hire regardless of how the film performs. The dis-
tributors have attempted to justify this situation
on the grounds that independent exhibitors have a
tendency to ‘cheat’ in their film takings returns,
but the independents argue that many of them
have been forced to understate their returns to
stay in business.‘ (See Appendix C).

Further, the dist[...]ently
provided long clearance periods after which a film
has been played by the chains, before it can play
the independents. Fox or UA may release a film
to Hoyts city theatres where it may run for 10
weeks. At the conclusion of the run in the city, it
may transfer immediately to a suburban’Hoyts
cinema, or wait until it is programmed there,
which may be up to six to 10 weeks. Follow-
ing its run through the suburban theatre or
theatres, it will then rest for three to six weeks
before it plays an eight drive-in Hoyts splash for
one week. Then a further period of weeks,
generally four, must elapse before it is available to
an independent exhibitor; by which time, of
course, its money making potential is severely
diminished.

The Tariff Board Report’ commented as
follows: “Evidence was given by the MPDAA
(Motion Picture Distributors Association of
Australia — no Australian distribution company
has membership) that, bad debtors apart, no ex-
hibitor is ever denied access to a film. In theory
this may be so, but other evidence shows that _in-
dependents often have little chance of exhibiting
a film within a reasonable period of its first
release. One owner of an inde endent suburban
drive-in quoted the example oft e film The Secret
of Sant[...]iews. It was subsequently
played for three months in the city, and was ‘held
over’ for a further six months before being releas-
ed to the suburbs (in this case to Hoyts). After
that suburban release there was a further delay of
eight to 10 weeks before it was released to the in-
dependent for showing at his drive-in."’(l§pp.D)

Since the Tariff Board Report a number of dis-
tributors, notably CIC, Roadsl-iow?'Co‘lumbi’a and

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (31)UA, have relaxed this rule to the extent that many
independents are now granted access to a film
prior to its drive-in splash. Only Roadshow,
however, has allowed access of independents to a
title while it is still playing its first city run, the
normal pattern in the US and UK save for ‘hard
ticket’* releases.

Further distribution sales methods to in-
dependents include the procedure known as ‘block
booking’. This is a method used to ‘move’ the less
successful films on the distributor’s books along
with the more successful ones. It is defined as
“where the right to exhibit one feature is con-
ditional upon the licensee’s taking of one or more
other features”.

Cinema Center Group, a Canberra independent
exhibitor comments: “Conditions frequently in-
clude a requirement for ‘block booking’ or the
acceptance of a ‘package’. The ‘package’ in-
variably consists of one or more successful box-of-
fice films grouped with another product which has
an indifferent to poor rating at the box-office.“

Independent city houses are in a similar
situation. The tying-up of virtually all available
product for the major chains means that there is
in fact virtually no competition for films in the
Australian market. As I stated in my evidence to
the Tariff Board concerning the Capitol Theatre,
which was then a Melbourne independent house
with a prime location and an excellent box-office
record:’ “Subsequent to the amalgamation of
MGM with BEF (in July 1971) it has been im-
possible for this theatre to obtain first release
MGM products any longer. It is impossible in fact
for the Capitol Theatre to acquire any product
from any source. Four weeks ago, Capitol
Theatre did not know what film it would be show-
ing next. Fortunately it chased up the Australian
film Barry McKenzie and now it has a film to go
onto next.”

In the past 12 months Prudential Theatres, the
Capitol Theatres operators, were forced to tie
their interests to Village Theatres in a complex
deal which gave Village a 50 per cent interest and
booking rights. Another independent Melbourne
city theatre ceased to exist.

Discriminatory terms and indeed outright
refusal to deal have been reported by various in-
dependent exhibitors. Many Victorian indepen-
dent exhibitors have, for example, built a sizeable
business in the past few years by screening, either
in theatres or in school premises, film versions of
texts prescribed for upper secondary English and
other subjects. Recently one of the major chains
has bought into the school screenings market and
have attempted to secure exclusive use of various
text movies. Documentation concerning two ex-
amples of such practice are provided in Appendix
E.

As a result of such activities, the number of
Australian-owned cinemas has decreased rapidly
as Table 3 indicates. Table 4 com pares the present
ownership of those Melbourne cinemas indepen-
dent in 1966-67 with their ownership in 1971-72
and their ownership in I974. The trend in
ownership patterns is similar in other capital
cities.

‘Industry term for an anticipated high grossing release.

1966-67[...]TABLE 4: PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF CINEMAS INDEPENDENT
IN 1966-67 (MELBOURNE)

*9“-6 19"-72 T

Albany

Century (now Swanston)
Australia (now Australia 1)
Curzon (now Australia 2)
Palladium (now Eastend 1
and Eastend 3)

Embassy (now Eastend 2)
Capitol

Star with Village

The three main Australian chains in fact con-
trol over 75 per cent of the city locations in
Australia and as these account for the vast ma-
jority of first release houses, they have a strong in-
fluence in the exhibition field. In the past three

years Melbourne has acquired three new indepen-
dent first release houses, Sydney two, Adelaide

one and Hobart one. The three major_
chains have acquired three each in Brisbane,
Sydney and Perth, two in Melbourne and one in
Hobart. This trend towards an increase in the
number of city locations controlled by the three
major companies appears to be further on the in-
crease if plans already announced for 1975-76
come to fruition. Table 5 shows the actual number
of cinema seats controlled by the majors and is a
further indication of their strength.

CINEMA SEATS
THE MAJORS

City Total Seats

20,125
21,068
7,331
6.678
6,242
2,300

Melbourne
Sydney
Addame
Penh
Bflsbane
Hoban

Further, it is claimed that the effects of the
Theatres and Films Commission in NSW
(allegedly to be abolished in 1974) and in
Queensland — the former run by a former ex-
ecutive of Greater Union, Mr Hayward and the
latter run by the Queensland Lands Minister,[...]g requirements of the Cinematograph
Films Acts of their respective states. They are
concerned with the requirements for cinema
operation (in Victoria, SA and WA the field is
wide open). The notorious example of the propos-
ed cinema in the Oxford Square Development.

1974 Decrease

All now operated
by City Theatres.
a subsidiary of

Village Theatres

Independent
Operated in association

All now operated
by City Theatres:
a subsidiary of
Village

Operated in
association with
Village

}

Sydney, which was vetoed after Greater Union
lodged an objection with the Commission”, is an
example of their alleged bias. They operate in vir-
tual secrecy, and do not make annual reports.

One major effect as a result of the duopoly
programming policies is that much less choice is
available to filmgoers in a particular week than
would otherwise be the case. Village’s blanket
release policy in Victoria — virtually one
program a week on its drive-in circuit — has,
perforce, been followed by Hoyts (which used to
provide a choice of three different— programs).
Thus, instead of the choice of six to eight
programs which the public had to choose from in
an average week when the independent Bix 6
Chain“ were competing with Village or Hoyts,
there is now a mere two or three.

IN CAPITALS CONTROLLED BY

Total controlled Percentage controlled

Further, the power of the duopoly has forced a
continuous stream of reactionary thinking con-
cerning cinema activities on the Australian public.
They used every means at their disposal to prevent
the introduction of the ‘R’ certific[...]ught against the introduction of daylight
saving; and they fought against the introduction
of Sunday screenings (till 1971 Victorian cinemas
were unable to open before 8.30 p.m. on Sun-
days). They have resisted moves towards 16mm
installation. In short, they initially opposed many
ofthe progressive moves that have been mooted in
recent years in the Australian film industry.

Cinema Papers, March-Apri[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (32)RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

OVERSEAS REACTION TO FILM INDUSTRY MONOPOLIES

-THE UNITED STATES

History of Anti-Trust in the US

The Attorney-General’s Committee Report in
1955 stated that the general objective of the anti-
trust laws of the US is “promotion of competition
in open markets”. During the second half of the
nineteenth century the emergence and growth of
large industrial trusts and combines led to increas-
ing demands for legislative intervention to restrict
the ever increasing concentration of economic
power and the resultant restraint of trade, produc-
ing higher prices, production restrictions and
other market controls detrimental to the public
interest.

The original anti-trust statute introduced to
meet these demands was the Sherman Act of 1890
wh[...]lia: (1) Every contract
combination or conspiracy in restraint of inter-
state or foreign trade or commerce of the US; and
(2) the monopolization or attempt or conspiracy
to monopolize any part of such trade or com-
meree.

Offenders faced equity and/or criminal
proceedings at the suit of the Attorney-General
and private treble damages suits. The Sherman
Act was[...]the enactment of the
Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton
Acts of 1914. The former established a new ad-
ministrative body with wide investigatory powers
and the authority to issue orders directing
offenders to “cease and desist” from indicted
practices. The latter Act[...]which were outside the scope of the Sherman
Act, but would be prohibited if their probable
effect was “to substantially lessen competition or
tend to create monopoly”. Federal Trade Com-
mission could enforce the Act and again private
treble damages suits were provided for.

The growth of huge chains (not just in the film
industry, but also in retail selling) in the thirties to
the detriment of the smaller, independent
operators led to the enactment of the Robinson-
Patman Act of 1936[...]discrimination
whose effect may be substantially to lessen com-
petition or tend to create a monopoly in any line
of commerce, or to injure or destroy or prevent
competition with any[...]or with customers of either of them”.

Defences to actions could include a cost
justification for a price differential or an attempt
to show that the lower price was made in good
faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor.
Again enforcement rests with either the Attorney-
General and the Federal Trade Commissioner and
private treble damages suits are maintainable.

The motion picture industry
and Anti-Trust:

The motion picture industry in the US has
provided the courts with some difficult exercises
in applying the above acts and in distinguishing
mere similarity of action on the p[...]ajor
companies from collusion between them. There
are, of course, sound reasons for not treating all
cinemas alike. At the same time there are power-
ful incentives, too, to indulge in restrictive ac-
tivities. It is proposed firstly to examine the struc-
ture of the film industry in the thirties and then to
overview the pre-Paramount cases before ventur-
ing onto the consent decrees and, US v.
Paramount Pictures.”

During the 1930s t[...]major com-
panies which had substantial interests in produc-

38 — Cinema Papers, March-April

tion, distribution and exhibition in the US. They
each had their own studios which they used largely
for the production of their own films, and they
maintained their own ‘stables’ of artists,
producers, directors and technicians. They each
had important circuits of cinemas, the smallest of
which contained over 100 cinemas and the largest
well over 1,000. There were also thre[...]-
panies of importance, of which two were engaged
in production and distribution, and the other in
distribution only. The five integrated companies
have commonly been referred to as the majors
and the other three as satellites.

Various attempts were made, with limited suc-
cess in the thirties, to curb some of the excesses
of the majors. Concerted refusals to deal save on
certain restrictive terms were discussed in
Paramount Famous Lasky v. US" in 1930. The
defendant film producers and distributors agreed
that they would contract with exhibitors only un-
der a standard contract requiring exhibitors to
submit all disputes to arbitration or to post a $500
deposit with each distributor. An exhibitor’s
failure to comply with any one contract with one
distributor is grounds for all distributors’
suspending service on all their contracts with the
exhibitor. Holding that a violation of the
Sherman Act had been proved Mi: Justice
McReynolds said: “It may be that arbitration is
well adapted to the needs of the motion picture in-
dustry, but when under the guise of arbitration
parties enter[...]which un-
reasonably suppress normal competition their ac-
tions become illegal”.

A precursor to the Paramount case was Inter-
state Circuit v. US" in which there were two
groups of defendants —— eight motion picture dis-
tributors in one group, and two large cinema cir-
cuits operating in Texas and Mexico in the other.
The two companies were affiliated and run by the
same people. The Interstate Circuit had an almost
complete monopoly of first run cinemas in six
Texas cities. The Consolidated Circuit operated in
various cities of the Rio Grande valley and
elsewhere and in most of the leading cities had no
competition for first runs.

In 1934, the manager of both circuits sent a
letter of demand to each of the eight major dis-
tributors asking that they should set a minimum
admission price for subsequent runs of those pic-
tures which the two circuits took on first runs. A
second demand was that these pictures should not
later be exhibited as part of double bills. The pur-
pose of the demands was to protect the box-office
potential of the first runs as the public would
know they would not be able to see two programs
together later at a lower price. The letter was
worded so that each distributor knew the others
had received a similar letter. After some dis-
cussions the demands were met. The Su reme
Court held that a conspiracy by the distri utors
could be inferred from their course of conduct;

-Justice Stone said: “It taxes credibility to

believe that several distributors could, in the cir-
cumstances, have accepted and put into operation
with substantial equanimity such far reaching
changes in their business methods without some
understanding that all were to 'oin, and we reject
as beyond the range of possibility that it was the
result of mere chance.”

In 1938, the US Department of Justice began

litigation under the Sherman Act against the ma-

jors and the satellites. It sought to compel them to

abandon various allegedly unfair and
monopolistic practices. Also in the case of the five
majors it sought to divorce their exhibition in-
terests from their production and distribution in-
terests, as well as to divest the successor exhibi-

1

tion companies themselves of some of their
cinemas.

In 1940, the case was halted as far as the majors
were concerned, by consent decrees under which
the companies undertook to abandon a con-
siderable number of the contentious practice[...]dropped its
demand for divorcements of production and dis-
tribution from exhibition. In 1944, however, the
Government revived its demand for divorcement.

Oppenheim and Weston“ trace a number of
cases that occurred virtually simultaneously with
the crucial Paramount case. In US v. Griffith”
four corporations that controlled various cinemas
had 62 per cent of its circuit in closed towns (i.e.
towns in which there was no competing theatre).
In negotiating films for the circuit from the dis-

tributors, the cor orations lumped together towns
in which they ad no competition and those

generally licensed first run release for their
theatres of all films to be released by a distributor
in a year, and they frequently included second run
towns rental in their first run film hire.

The complainant charged “that certain ex-
clusive privileges which the agreements granted
the appellant exhibitors over their competitors un-
reasonably restrained competition by preventing
their competitors from obtaining enough first or
second run films from the distributors to operate
successfully”. These privileges included first
‘choice of available film. It was claimed that the
use of the buying power of the entire circuit in ac-
quiring these privileges violated the Act.

Mr Justice Douglas commented: “Monopoly
rights in the form of certain exclusive privileges
were bargained for and obtained. These exclusive
privileges being acquir[...]e unlawfully acquired.” He further
noted: “It is not always necessary to find a
specific intent to restrain trade or to build a
monopoly in order to find that the anti-trust laws
have been violated. It is sufficient that a restraint
of trade or monopoly results as the consequences
of a defendant’s conduct or business
arrangements.”

The matter was remitted to the District Court
which ordered an injunction restraining the ex-
hibitors from licensing films for their closed towns
and competitive towns in a single contract.

The companion case to Griffith is Schine Chain
Theatres v. United States“ where the court held
that a theatre circuit and subsidiaries conspired to
restrain trade. The court upheld the view that the
circuit’s monopoly power, represented by combin-
ing the buying power of its theatres in open and
closed towns which enabled it to deprive com-
petitors of first and second run films and to main-
tain long-term film rental agreements, had been
used. Schine had threatened to build or open
theatres to force sales of theatres or prevent
entries and obtained covenants not to com etc
from competitors it bought out. Further it ha cut
admission prices and engaged in other unfair
practices.

Mr Justice Douglas commented: “The combin-
ed .action was a conspiracy.”

Paramount and beyond:

The final 1948-52 consent decrees were brought
about via United States v. Paramount Pictures”
in which the major and satellite distributors were
held guilty of a conspiracy to restrain and
monopolize trade in the distribution of films. The

Continued on P. 82

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (33)Top: Rider on the Rain: Women are
present as background extras to
forbear, be ignored, slapped or raped.

Centre: T[...]all-male world of mythical rugged

creatures who are either indifferent or
hostile to women.

“Below: The Last Detail: celebrating
manhood — mateship and man against
the elements.

By Patricia Edgar

SLA[...]d for
the ‘Best Picture of the Year’ has gone to a film
without a major female role: A Man for All
Seasons, In the Heat of the Night, Oliver, Mid-
night Cowboy, Patton, The French Connection,

The Godfather and The Sting.
To this list could be added another series of

succe[...]all-male world of
mythical rugged creatures, who are either in-
different or hostile to women. They are: Easy
Rider, The Wild Bunch, Butch Cassidy and the
Sundance. Kid, Deliverance, The Candidate,
M*A*S*H, The Friends of Eddie Coyle,
Scarecrow, Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, Five
Easy Pieces and The Last Detail.

Then there‘s the super-cop se[...]tion, Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, The
Stone Killer and McQ. Film policemen have
become‘very popular subjects in the 70’s.

There are several themes included in this
cinema celebration of manhood — mateship, man
against the elements, the search for meaning in
life, competition, stability in a lawless society —

all of which are worthy themes. But they are all
being explored without women. The key
relationships are between men. Women, if they
are included at all, serve only as whores, mothers,
sisters and irrelevant wives. Women are present as
background extras to forbear, be ignored, slapped-
or raped.

There are, of course, a few exceptions. There
have always been popular songbirds in films
which are built around their talent —— like Barbra
Streisand and Liza Minnelli. They dominate their
films and their male co-stars are simply foils for
their vitality. As a result, Michael York’s perfor-
mance in Cabaret was much underrated by the
critics and, in praising Liza Minnelli, they failed
to recognize that her accomplished stage perfor-
mances were quite[...]inept,
struggling performer Sally Bowes was meant to
be. In Funny Girl, On a Clear Day You Can See
Forever, and Hello Dolly, Barbra Streisand runs
rings around her male co-stars.

But these films are no substitute for the
matching of minds that occurred when Katherine

Cinema Papers, Ma[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (34)RAPED & IGNORED

Hepburn met Spencer Tracy or Cary Grant and
Bogart met Bacall. In fact the prostitute seems to
be the only type of contemporary woman
scriptwriters and directors are now comfortable
with. She is the only female who has been allowed
to become the romantic interest in film roles with
some depth — Jane Fonda in Klute, Barbra Strei-
sand in The Owl and the Pussycat, Julie Christie
in McCabe and Mrs. Miller. These women are the
remnants of the tough heroines of the thirties and
forties.

Until now every period in cinema history has
had its female heroines such as Mae Marsh and
Lillian Gish, Mary Pickford, Theda Bara, Gloria
S[...]ey played
virgins, vamps, adulteresses, neurotics and
murderesses in parts that would not be
appropriate today, but they were worthy of a
competent actress. Today’s actresses are not so
fortunate. They are not even today’s sex symbols.
Streisand drools over Redford’s body in The Way
We Were and Jack Nicholson has the centre of
the screen, whil[...]s head lies ad-
miringly at the edge of the frame in the bedroom
scene in Chinatown.

Above: Barbra Streisand, a popular songbird.

Top: Liza Minnelli in Cabaret: a foil for the vitality of her
male co-star.

T has become fashionable to make the
claim that women are neglected _in current
movies. Joan Mellen, Marjorie Rosen,
Molly Haskell, Margaret Walters, David
Denby and Colin Bennett‘ have all done so
relatively rece[...]become unpopular, too. It’s always been
easier to send up the feminists’ claims than to con-
tribute further analysis which might add some in-
si ht.

gThis commentary on modern films doesn’t stem
from a desire to have screen roles with
women winning all the points.,_It doesn’t assume
that the filmmakers automatically endorse the
values represented in many of_ the films men-
tioned. It doesn’t see a conspiracy as the ex-
planation.

The fact that male roles outnumber female by

12 to l in current American films is worth deeper
study. How can we explain the dominance of men
and the disappearance of women in American
films today?

IOLENT adventure films ha[...]ver the years. One

of the popular myths has been that
women and violence don’t, or should not, mix. So
is the increase in films of violence part of the ex-
planation? The Western and Gangster genres have
usually treated women as ornaments but they are
now being written out of these films altogether —
unless of course they are needed to be murdered
or raped more viciously than previously.

Are women slowing down the action in such
films? According to David Denby, women are be-
ing written out to “avoid any slowing down of the
slam-bang stuff”. Such an argument doesn’t
wash. Not today when we have the Rose
Dugdales, the Price s[...],
Ulrike Meinhofs, the Symbionese Liberation
Army and Patricia Hearst: hi-jacking, kidnap-
ping, robbing banks and art galleries, throwing
bombs. There is ample evidence for scripwriters
that women in Western society can hold their own
and get to the top in crime.

Ifthe ‘women-don’t-commit-violence’ myth has
not been shattered yet, other myths have.
Conventional relationships, happy endings and
marriage are definitely out and since women are
usually associated with all those things, they’re
out too. Romance is gone but sex is in. Sexual
liberation makes conversation unnecessary, so all
the wit and wisecracks of the old romance films
have become redundant. A Touch of Class tries to
revive romance with a realistic modern touch; the
liberated woman takes on a lover for her own con-
venience and satisfaction. While the film is enter-
taining in parts, it is unconvincing. We are ex-
pected to believe that the vicious confrontation
between Glenda Jackson and George Segal, and
what it reveals, is forgotten once the two fall into

bed.

HIS so—called new realism in films is

simply a new myth. It is more ‘honest’ to

make films about deteriorating

relationships than fulfilling relationships,

because that’s the way it is. It is more
‘honest’ to make films about corruption, aliena-
tion and the complexity of life, for that’s the life
about us. But the ‘realism’ portrayed is Just as
fake as the myths that have long been shattered.
The America of Easy Rider, Midnight Cowboy
and other male epics is ‘nowhere land’, where men
are sublime when they are pathetic and noble
when they are absurd. The increased blood,
Obscenities, grubbiness, sweat and tears in these
films provide a cloak of neo-realism, but it’s simp-
ly covering a new myth. Part of the myth is the
depiction of a world without women; a vacuum
where women can’t intrude on the essential
masculine intimacy; where men are somehow
more divine than women can ever be.

Why is this new myth so popular? It’s hard to
believe that women’s liberation can be respon-
sible, that it “has paralyzed the film com-
panies”’ as David Denby claims. Looking from
Australia it’s even more difficult to accept that
claim. No one has proposed here that Barry
McKenzie, Alvin Purple and Petersen represent a
backlash against the rising militancy of
Australian women. Australian women haven’t
done anything.

Yet it is ironic that at a time when many women
have seized on a more productive and self-
actualising life style than ever before, the film
industry has turned away from reflecting it in any
constructive or analytical way. On one level[...]sick chauvinism of Policewomen, The
Female Bunch and The Doll Squad. On another
we have the masochism of Diary of a.Mad
Housewife, Play It as It Lays and Such Good
Friends.

Today's films provide no substitute for the matching of
minds that occurred when Bogart met Bacall.

While some women are pushing strongly for
social changes which will alter profoundly the
relationships between the sexes and having some
success, men and women are uneasy. Whether it is
a conscious or unconscious response by film-
makers it is a most opportune time to promote
masculine mythology. The myth represents the
fantasy some men want to retain. Whereas once
we believed firmly in marriage, motherhood and
the family, now we believe in rugged in-
dividualism, man against the world and,love
between men.

The cinema reflects social trends. The dis-
appearance of women and exaltation of men is no
doubt another passing phase. There should be
much to look forward to, for when the filmmakers
turn their attention to women there will be so
much virgin territory for the creation of new
myths:

One area is the Western. Jenni Calder in her
new book‘ on the realities and myths behind the
women of the Old West discusses the potential
legends that have been overlooked in the Western
genre.

The modern Western heroine has become more
versatile. She does as well as the hostess in an
evening gown as she does on a horse, and she’s
socially at ease with State governors and cow-
boys. But when the crunch comes she’s the symbol
of community and conformity.

The hero, fighter and drifter, has to ride off
womanless to retain his integrity, for the effect of
the Western heroine’s influence can only be
paralyzing. In the history of the West, of course,
there were women who did not negate their men.
Their stories are untold on film and they must
provide a bonanza for filmmakers. They are
necessary to regenerate the Western and only
women who share the mythic potency will protect
the legend.

HEN more women filmmakers

with a knowledge of their own

history and a political sense of the

present become integrated into

commercial filmmaking, there will
be a change. But the change will not come without
effort. Women need to articulate and establish a
claim to what is also rightfully theirs. If this is
done we can look forward to a new screen iden-
tity, and with it, perhaps, some fun will return to
films.

FOOTNOTES:

1. Mellen, Joan, Women and Their Sexuality in the New Film,
Davis Poynter, I974

Rosen, Marjorie, Popcorn Venus, l974

Haskell, Molly, From Reverence to Rape, Holt, Rinehart
and Winston, 1974

Walters, Margaret, “At Odds With[...], p.54

Ibid., p.54

Calder, Jenni, There Must be a Lone Ranger. Hamish
Hamilton, 1974

Pun

C[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (35)[...]. Melville)
Legend of Heilhouse (J. Hough)
Fever (A. B0)

Lady Ice (T. Gries)

The Neptune Factor (0.[...](J. Crawley)

Legend of Frenchls King (C. Jacque)
A Gunfight (L. Johnson)

Threesome (L. Beale)

Man[...]st (Clucher)

French Betty Go Round (Fieury)

Sex in the Office

FEBRUARY

14.
15.
18.
17.
18.
19.
20.[...]orld (Crichton)

Lady Kung Fu (Klang)

Dulet Days in clichy (Thorsen)
The Amazons (A. Bradley)

Naked Decameron (P. Vlvareill)
Jonatho[...]47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.

Tombs of the Blind Dead (A. De Ossorlo)
Dracula Prisoner of Frankenstein (C.[...]L. Johnson)

Man from Deep River (U. Lenzl)
Venue in Furs (Damiano)

The Exorcist (Friedkin)

Brian's[...]Canterbury Tales (Guerlnl)
Sex on Wheels

Ooh You Are Awful

Breezy (Eastwood)

Day for Night (Truffaut[...]Black Belt Jones (R. Ciouse)
Guess Who's sleeping in my Bed
Lea Olvidados (Bunuei)

The Don is Dead (Fleischer)
Massage Parlour (E. Schroeder)
B[...]e Tiger (J.G. Avlidsen)
Moo (Sturges)

Don't Look Now (Fioeg)

School Girl Report. Part 2

Dillinger (Mlllus)

Day of the Dolphin (Nichols)
That'll be the Day (C. Wetham)
American Graffiti (Luca[...]Throat Part 2

Cesar st Rosalie (Sautet)
Death on a Horse (Petronl)
Hammer (Clark)

JUNE

80.
81.
B2.[...]Chase (Bridges)

Kazsblan (Goiar)

Electra Glide in Blue (Guerclo:)

Last Detail (Ashby)

I Am Frigid, Vlhn (Pecas)

Tales That Witness Madness (Francis)
The Angry Dragon

Exposed (G. Wicklund)

Long Swift Sword of Siegfried (A. Haven)
slaves of Sex

Even Angels Eat Beans (Ciu[...]Winter Dreams (G. Gates)
The Midnight Men (Kibbee and Lancaster)
Love in 3D (Boos)

Don't Just Lie There Say Something (B. Keiiett)
Nearest and Dearest

The Butcher (chabrol)

42 — Cinema Papers, March-April

TOP TEN

In 1974 well over 300 movies were released in Melbourne and Sydney
many of which have never been seen anywhere else in the world outside Lon-
don’s West End, New York and Paris. A large proportion _of these were
cheap skin flicks. In fact, 1974 saw a number of wel established cinemas
switch to showing exclusively “R” releases and a record was set for the
number of soft and medium core movies on our screens.

Last year cinema attendances were once again on the increase and the
latest figures from overseas indicate that Australia is now America’s third
most important market after Britain and France (moving up from fifth place
in 1973).

As the number of entries in this year’s Australian Film Awards vividly. il-
lustrates (see pages 24 and 25) 1974 saw a dramatic increase in the production
of Australian feature movies, documentaries and shorts. Although some of
these have been released both theatrically and on television — with varying
degrees of success[...]will fall on the achievements of the
new industry in 1975. _ _

In this special feature Cinema Papers has invited Australia’s leading critics
to make a selection of the top 10 movies of 1974 from a listing of all theatrical
releases as well as through festivals and other non-theatrical screenings.

This list has been reproduced below. It should be pointed out that because
of erratic release patterns, many of the movies on this list may not have been
released in some capital cities.

SEPTEMBER

( stone (s_[...]Zorro (Friedman)
99. Love Hotel, 145. All The Way Boys (Ciucher)

100. Siddhartha'(Rooks) 146. Jory (J.[...]kkoty Yak (Jones)

103. Please Don't Touch me I'm a Virgin 149- W9‘ 9'03"‘! (MUlllDl8)

104. The[...]s) 151. The Stewardssses (Sll|man Jnr.)

106. The Teacher (Avldls) 152. Busllno (Hyams)

1o7_ 21A (storm) 153. The Pawnbrokers (J. Lindsay. L. Barn[...]Greene) 164. Matchless (Papadopouios)

. Carry on Girls (Rogers) OCTOBER

11B. Lonely Wives (Frank) _ _

119. Diary oi a Nymphomaniec (Brown) 165. Mari)uana: Possession a[...]tt) 168. Holiday on the Buses (izzaro)

123. Maid in Sweden 169. Sex Clinic 74 (Schroeder)

124. The Wickerman (Hardy) 170. Roommates (A. Marks)

125. Marianne's Temptations (Lerol) 171- Clan ol 77 (A. Marks)

126. Schloek (Landls) 172. Cars That Ate Paris (P. Weir)

127. sunshine (Sargent) 173.[...]pellberg)
. Optimists of 9 Elms (Simmons)

Man on a swing (Perry)

130. Sex at the other Woman (Long)[...]. Swmsln Wm! (Thorn)

137. witat will I Tell tits Boys at the Station? (O‘l-'teiiiy) 183. Andre: ubl-v[...]s innocence (wartield)
Hot Lips (Kalfon)

Zapata

AGirls

. The Gentle Sex (Casarll)

. Guilty Until Prove[...]M. Cambell)
Frustrated Wives (Arnold)
Pictures at an Exhibition
Vampire (Donner)

Dirty Mary crazy Lar[...]Hot Bed of Sex

Money.Money Money (Lelouch)
Love in the suburbs

Black Belt (Shing)

Girl from Petrov[...]w (Heffron)

School for Swingers

The Big Bird ca a (Hill)
Vlonderwomen( 'Na||l)

The Winners (Nofal)[...]er (Rosenberg)
Ericka's Hot summers (Novak)
Maria in Laos (Novak)

The Marssilie Contract (Parrish)
Be[...]47.
248.
249.
250.
251.
252.
253.
254.
255.
256.

That's Entertainment (Haley Jnr.)

War Goddesses (Young)

The Long Goodbye (Altman)

Girls with Open Lips

The Blockhouse (Reeve)

Haw Meat (Sherman)

Fright (Coiilnson)

Barry McKenzie Holds His Own (Beresiord)
Benji (T. Camp)

Full Time Females

T[...]Thunderbolt at Lightfoot (M. Clmlno)
Alvin Rides A sin (Bllcock & Copping)
The Odessa ile (R. Neame)

Piaf (CasarlI)

Nurses Report

FESTIVAL:
MELBOURNE 81 SYDNEY

Adult Fun (Scott)

Asylum (Robinson)

Belle (Dei[...]llumination (zanussl)

Invitation (Goretta)

Love in the Afternoon (Rohmer)
Mean streets (Scorsese)

o[...]et Games of Last Summer (Herz)
Themroc (FaraIdo)

That Sweet Word Lil-ierty(Jacakyavichus)
T'imon (Paplc[...]Wanderers, The (Ichikawa)

wedding. The (Walda)

And films seen at the Perth. Adelaide. Canberra or

Brisbane Festivals and N.F.T.A.

9

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (36)[...](Avildson) Mean Streets (Scorsese)

Don’t Look Now (Roeg)

The Long Goodbye (Altman)
Electra Glide in Blue (Guercio)
Kill Charley Varrick (Siege1)

The Conversation (Coppola)
Chinatown (Polanski)

Ladies and Gentlemen: The Rolling
Stones (M. Spector)

Serpico (Lumet) Themroc (Faraldo)
27A (Storm) Andrei Rublev (Tarkovsky)
The Wedding (Wajda)
5 Flesh for Frankenstein (Morrissey)
hfiitli AUSTRALIAN TELEGRAPH HHIATOG
. . i H I ill 5* ‘JJA
Mike Ha[...]os (Bunuel)
Blazing Saddles (Brooks)
Don’t Look Now (Roeg)
The Conversation (Coppola)
‘Amarcord (Fellini)

Three Musketeers (Lester)

Scott Murray

The Mother and the Whore
(Eustache)

Coup d’Etat (Yoshida)

Black Holiday (Leto)

Spirit of the Beehive (Erice).
Death of a Flea-Circus Director

(Koerfer)

Andrei Rublev (Tarkovsky)

Land of Silence and Darkness
(Herzog)

Blood Wedding (Chabrol)

The T[...]e (Andre Delvaux)

Mary Armitage

Don’t Look Now (Roeg) ;
The Last Detail (Ashby)

Else Mwemse[...]ists of Nine Elms (Simmons)
Piaf (Casaril)

Cries and Whispers (Bergman)
Return from Africa (Tanner)
Si[...]owie
Siddharta (Rooks)
Badlands (Malik)

The Cars that Ate Paris (Weir)

Amarcord (Fellini)

That’s Entertainment (Haley Jnr.)
Discreet Charm of[...]Speilberg)

Happiest Days of your Life
(Launder)

Australian
Broadcasting
Commission

John O'Hara
Love (Makk)
Day for Night (Truffaut)
Don’t Look Now (Roeg)
The Conversation (Coppola)
Amarcord (Felli[...]kovsky)
Goalie’s Fear of Penalty (Wenders)
Love in the Afternoon (Rohmer)

Colin Bennett
Day for[...]pany Limited (Ray)

Serpico (Lumet)

Don’t Look Now (Roeg)

Duel (Speilberg)

ii/uioii l2t‘\’l€[...]ht (Truffaut)
Los Olvidados (Bunuel)
Don’t Look Now (Roeg)
The Last Detail (Ashby)

Le Boucher (Chabr[...]an)

THE BI.|llE'|'IH

Sandra Hall

Don-’t Look Now (Roeg)
Day for Night (Truffaut)
The Last Detail ([...]Night (Truffaut)

The Sting (Hill)

Don’t Look Now (Roeg)

The Last Detail (Ashby)

Love (Makk)

The[...]Ivan Hutchinson

Badlands (Malik)

Don’t Look Now (Roeg)

The Conversation (Coppola)
Electra Glide in Blue (Guercio)
The Seduction of Mimi (Wert[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (37)Charles Chauvel stands with Raymond Longford
and Ken G. Hall as one of the three great
Australian directors of commercial entertainment
films. Although his body of work was relatively
small and spread over a period of nearly 30 years,
Chauvel emerged after World War 2 as the only
director of any note to persevere with production
in the repressive context of increasing foreign con-
trol of Australian cinemas. He maintained this
struggle until his death in 1959.

Chauvel was born in 1897 in rural Queensland.
He spent most of his boyhood on country proper-
ties before going to Sydney to study art and
drama. In Sydney he found work as a stable hand
on two Australian ‘westerns’ — The Shadow of
Lightning Ridge and The Jackeroo of Coolabong
— made by Snowy Baker.

When Baker went to Hollywood, Chauvel
followed him and spent two years writing articles
on Australiana and doing minor jobs in
Hollywood studios — as an extra in Fly by Night
and The Man From the Desert and as a hand in
the property department at MGM. Eventually he
became assistant director to Fred Niblo on
Strangers of the Night.

Chauvel returned to Australia in 1923 and
resolved to direct his own films. By 1925 he had
completed his first feature, The Moth of Moonbi.
This and his next film, Greenhide, were produced
under makeshift conditions in the Queensland
bush and in a small Brisbane studio.

After developing his skills on three more
productions, he reached maturity as a director
during the war with Forty Thousand Horsemen
and The Rats of Tobruk, both dramatically tight
and visually spectacular productions.

Probably Chauvel’s finest achievement was
Sons of Matthew (1949), an epic story of a
pioneering family. Working against the enormous
physical odds of locations in the wild rain forests
of the Lamington Plateau in south-eastern
Queensland, the film took him several years to
complete. His next and last feature, Jedda (1954),
again set his characters against a spectacular but
hostile environment, this time with a story about
the aborigines in central Australia.

With these last four films, Chauvel expressed
an intensely romantic epic vision of Australia. He
sought to present Australia to the world as a rich,
exotic land populated by spirited sons of the soil
a sincere vision, vigorously realised, which es-
ca[...]a Papers, March-April

The Moth of Moonbi (1926): A romantic melodrama in which
a young country girl sets off to discover life in the city. After
many bitter experiences she returns to her lover at Moonbi
Station.

Produced, directed and written by Charles Chauvel; based on the
poem“T[...]by M. Forest; Photography, Al Burne;
Presented by Australian Film Productions Ltd. Actors: Marsden
Hassall (To[...]ks),
Bille Stokes (Josephine).

Greenhide (1926): A romantic melodrama which is almost the
reverse of The Moth of Moonbi. A city socialite visits her
father's property in the bush and falls in love with the manager
‘Greenhide’.

Written and directed by Charles Chauvel. Photography, A] Burne.
Assistant Director, Edward Lyon. Titles and Art Titles, Frank
White. Art Furnishings, Arabian Art Salon. Presented by Australian
Film Productions Ltd. Actors: Elsie Sylvaney (Mar[...], lrma Dearden
(Polly Andrews), Billy (himself).

In the Wake of the Bounty (1933): Partly a narrative
reconstruction of the mutiny against Captain Bligh on the
Bounty, and partly a documentary on life on Pitcairn Island
where the descendants of the mutineers still live.

Directed and written by Charles Chauvel. Photography. T3S_m8l1[...], William Shepherd. Sound engineers, Arthur
Smith and Clive Cross. Cinesound recording. Presented by Ex[...]ck (Midshipman Young). 72 mins.

Heritage (I935): An historical reconstruction of the early
settlement of Sydney.

Directed by Charles Chauvel from his own novel. Photogra hy,
Tasman Higgins and Arthur Higgins. Assistant to Director, Cliick
Arnold. Sound recording, Alan Mi[...]Cracknell), Rita Pauncefort (Mrs Cobbold), David Ware
(‘Long‘), Kendrick Hudson (Morrison Jr). 96 mins.

Uncivilised (1936): The story of a white man living wild with
aborigines in northern Queensland and his relations with a
woman journalist who enters the unexplored jungles.

Directed and written by Charles Chauvel from a story by Chauvel in
collaboration with E. V, Timms. Photography, Tasman Higgins.
Assistant directors, Frank Coffey and Ann Wynn. Sound recordist,
Dennis Box. Film Edito[...], John Fernside, Edward Sylveni, Norman Rutledge, and
aborigines from Cape York Peninsula led by I-larri Weipa and
‘Booya'. 93 mins.

Forty Thousand Horsemen (1941): The adventures of the
Australian Light Horse in the Sinai Desert campaign during
World War I.

Produced and directed by Charles Chauvel from a story by Chauvel
in collaboration with E. V. Timms. Continuity, Elsa[...]ilm Editor, William Shepherd.
Sound, Arthur Smith and Clive Cross. Art Director, Eric Thompson.
Exterior Art Director and Special Effects, J. Alan Kenyon. Musical
Score, Lindley Evans in collaboration with Willy Redstone and
Alfred Hill. Additional Exterior Photography, Capt. Frank Hurley
and Tasman Higgins. Military advisors, Major G. H. Ferguson and
Sgt. Roy Mannix. Assistant Director, Ronald Whela[...]ith the co-operation of the Department of Defence
and officers and men of the lst and 2nd Australian Cavalry
Divisions. Actors; Grant Taylor (Red Gall[...]mett, Vera
Kandy, Iris Kennedy, Joy Hart (Dancing Girls). 99 mins.

During the war, Chauvel directed four short propaganda
films under contract to the Department of Information:
Soldiers Without Uniforms, The Power to Win, While There is
Still Time, and A Mountain Goes to Sea. He also assembled
another short film, Russia[...]ian newsreel
footage.

The Rats of Tobruk (1944): A tribute to the Australian fighting

spirit.
Produced and directed by Charles Chauvel. Screenplay, Charles and
Elsa Chauvel. Photo raphy. Geor e Heath. Sound, Jack Bruce and
L. J. Stuart. Editor, us Lowry. usical Direction, Lindley Evans in
association with Willy Redstone and Charles MacKerras. Settings,
Edmund Barrie. Filme[...]rding. Special
Designs, Eric Thompson. Assistants to the Director, Harry Freeman
and Roy Sebastian. Unit Management, George Barnes. Co[...]graphy, Anny Film Unit. Army
Liaison, Major G. K. A_ustin. Assistant Army Liaison, Lt. A. F.
Dunbar, M.M., andAn epic story of a pioneering family.

Produced and directed by Charles Chauvel — original screenplay by
Charles and Elsa Chauvel, ins ired by the books Green Mountains
and Culleribenbong by Bernar 0’Reilly; Collaboration by Maxwell
Dunn. Directors of Photography, Bert Nicholas and Carl Kayser.
Film Editor, Terry Banks. Art Direct[...]vel. Western Electric recording. Musical Director
and Composer, Henry Krips. Assistant Director, Julian[...]ford. Presented by Greater Union Theatres Pty
Ltd in association with Universal Pictures Pty Ltd. Acto[...]aurel Young, Nonnie Peiffer, Betty Orme. Released in
I949. 105 mins.

Jedda (1954): A story about the aborigines in central
Australia.

Produced and directed by Charles Chauvel. Screenplay, Charles and
Elsa Chauvel. Photography, Carl Kayser. Color, Ge[...]Pike. Unit Manager, Harry Closter. Music composed and con-
ducted by Isadore Goodman. Special Aborigina[...]Betty Suttor (Sarah McMann), Paul

Reynall (Joe, a half-caste), George Simpson-Little (Douglas
McMan[...]omeo, Boss

Drover), Willie Farrar (Little J 0e), and aborigines of various tribes of
north and central Australia. 96 mins.

In I957-8, Chauvel and his wife produced 13 half-hour
episodes for a BBC television series on the Northern Territory,[...]ith visiting American
producer Fred Niblo (right) and Lloyd Nozler.
Left: Charles Chauvel.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (38)A.|.F.! -

Above: Outdoor script conference in southern
Queensland for Sons of Matthew (1949). Left
to Right: Gwen Meredith (writer of Blue
Hills), Chauvel, Maxwell Dunn and Elsa
Chauvel.

Right: A scri t session on Forty Thousan
Horsemen wit E. V. Timms (right), Charlr
Chauvel. Elsa Chauvel is seated inand Grant Taylor as Australian
cavalrymen in Forty Thousand Horsemen (1941).

‘Cinema[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (39)A Matter of Fact

Ken Hall

The December issue of Cinema Papers carried an interview between Bill Shepherd,
veteran Australian film editor, and Graham Shirley, which simply must be
challenged.*

I am concerned only with the sections relating to Cinesound where there are so many
inaccuracies and gross distortions of the truth that -- with very genuine reluctance — I
am compelled to endeavor to put the record straight. Individually and in the sum total
Bill Shepherd’s statements leave a totally incorrect impression of the Cinesound
organization of the thirties and forties, who was in it and how it worked. There are in-
stances also where some individuals — and I do not include myself among them — got
no credit at all for the work they did and are not even mentioned in the recital. This
must be adjusted.

Anything I have to say is not intended as pointless criticism of Bill Shepherd. I have
always had, and still have, a genuine regard for him and a full appreciation of the work
he did for Cinesound as its chief film editor on all features, except Smithy, and after
Squatter’s Daughter.

But if what Shepherd, now in his eighties, has to say is left unchallenged it will go
down into the history of film production in this country as fact. And so much of it is just
NOT fact.

Cinema Papers is now the only record, to my knowledge, of film production in
Australia. Many of the still surviving members of the original Cinesound people of the
thirties have reacted to Shepherd’s interview and would want to have the facts on the

historical record with credit fairly apportioned to those who earned it.
I propose dealing only with major matters, discarding many minor incorre[...]irley: Malcolm
Squatter’s Daughter.
Shepherd: I know but he didn’t cut a foot of it.

gets a co-editor’s credit on

That is an untrue statement. Malcolm got
first editing credit on that film because that is
what he was. I worked with them both right
through the editing period, as I did on all my
films, and there is no doubt that Malcolm did the
major job and more. He went right through to the
fine cut, with Shepherd doing the sequences
allotted to him of course, and was engaged with
Shepherd and Phyllis O’Reilly, cutting assistant,
in matching the negative to the edited work print
when he was stricken with a serious respiratory
problem which troubles him to this day. Shepherd
and Phyllis. O’Reilly went on to finish the neg.
matching, made very difficult by the absence of
edge-numbers, especially in some bushfire scenes
shot without slate markings because of difficulty
and sometimes danger.

Bill Shepherd was still finding his feet in film
editing at that time. He had had no previous ex-
perience of feature sound film cutting. He
developed, I believe, into a first class film editor
and eventually became probably the best in the
country in the thirties. But he learned his trade at
Cinesound as we all did. And surely there is
nothing shameful in acknowledging the truth of
that.

I endeavored to give George Malcolm, whose
pioneering work in so many branches of
Australian film production has not been suf-
ficiently recognized, full credit for his work on On
Our Selection and Squatter’s Daughter and on
matters like building up from scratch the first_pro-

jection printer in the country, in a previous Issue

of Cinema Papers.

‘Cinema Pape[...]Cinema Papers, March-April

Sound

Shepherd takes a side-swipe at the efforts of
Arthur Smith and Bert Cross to get sound on
film, at the beginning of the thirties, by talking of
them disparagingly, as “mucking about” with the
problem. Their successful wrestle with the dif-
ficulty made it possible to found Cinesound and
make more than 25 feature films — 18 for
Cineso[...]two for Harry
Southwell, one each for Beau Smith and Joe Lipp-
man, besides innumerable ‘shorts’ and 1,300
weekly newsreels up to the time I left Cinesound
in 1956.

All said and done that seems to me to be a
satisfactory piece of mucking about.

Shirley: What was your feeling about the use of loca-
tion sound?

Shepherd: With all due respect I think you lose a lot of
atmosphere by trying to use an alternative. Tall
Timbers (1937) had the best outdoor sound we ever did.
In fact it’s probably the best outdoor sound that’s ever

been done anywhere.
Shirley: Why was that?
Shepherd: Because it was done in the clear blue yonder

This, apart from the obvious over-statement
that it was “the best outdoor sound ever done
anywhere", overlooks the fact that all Cinesound
outdoor sequences, with the exception of a
Wallace musical, were recorded in the clear blue
yonder. Looping or post-syncing were at that time
not available to us or to anyone else I should
think. The major factor in the recording of Tall
Timbers was the brilliant and frightening sound
on the Timber Drive. This was a manufactured
sound made, not in the clear blue yonder but in
the studio and environs through the resource and
ingenuity of Clive Cross and his assistant, Alan
Anderson, now of Film Australia. The sound unit
operated, of co[...]Engineer, Arthur Smith. Credit where

credit is due — these people made tremendous
contributions to the success of Cinesound on all
its films. Their most notable achievement, in my
view, was the splendid recording of the operetta
sequences of Broken Melody. There they controll-
ed — in one operation — more than 50 members
of the Sydney Symphony Orchestra jammed into
a space underneath the first floor dressing rooms
with the studio lavatories on one side and the
generator room on the other. The orchestra wa[...]could put wooden rostrums over
the concrete floor and the dressing rooms provid-
ed us with a wooden roof. The Sydney Male Choir
of about 40 voices was in the studio proper and the
soloists in another section of it, all walled in by
three-ply flats.

It was an incredible, almost impossible set-up.
But it worked. They made it work, recording all
three[...]s, choir —— together,
finding balance, light and shade and the real beau-
ty of Alfred Hill’s original mus[...]cial demands on you with
Broken Melody?
Shepherd: Only in getting the playback tracks ready.

Clive Cross brought Playback and all the
details of how to use it back to Australia in the
mid-thirties. He was in Hollywood (at his own ex-
pense) in 1935 while I was there seeking back-
projection. Clive was able to work for months at
MGM, in the sound department, and of course
every Hollywood musical, including those splen-
did examples now showing around the world in
That’s Entertainment, were made on playback.

It was the fact that, through Clive Cross, we
now had all the necessary gen on Playback, in-
cluding rhythm-punching,“ that influenced me
greatly in deciding to make Broken Melody.
Looking back, it was quite a shocking risk to take
back in 1937 — to make a film with a major
musical sequence upon which it was entirely
dependent for its climax. If the musical section
did not work we had no film. It had not been
attempted in Australia before nor has it since.

Clive Cross marked up all the playback tracks
on Broken Melody. If that film had failed we
would have been dead ducks. But it did not fail

due to the work of the whole team and especially
Arthur Smith and Clive Cross. '

Pre-preproduction

Shirley: How involved were you with pre-production?
Shepherd: 1 usually estimated the footage and we had a
pre-production conference of all concerned. There[...]n, myself — all the
key members of the crew — and we’d talk about the
script and thefilm as a whole.

Shirley: Were the shots planned before Hall went out to
shoot?

Shepherd: Oh yes, we all had a rough idea to start with.

Now let’s have the facts. There were NO pre-
produc[...]ny pic-
ture with the single exception of Smithy, and that

"*(Footnote).Rhythm-punching is the method under which the
sound engineer marks out the positive musical playback
tracks with a set of three, or four, punches equally spaced in
order to
made exactly on the last punch. The placement of these
punches, and there can be six or even moreTn one number, is
worked out with the director and put into the places where
he expects to change angles.

get rhythm so that the clapper sync marks can be.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (40)was abortive. The general conference idea just

«does not work. The discussions invariably get

side-tracked up a dozen blind alleys. Inter-
departmental rivalry is almost always injected -
like the never ending war between camera and
sound departments that has been going on in
studios all around the world since sound films
be[...]imes heads of two departments — like set
design and camera for instance. The film editor
was given the script to time — as far as any script
can be timed —— and two or more staff men, ex-
perienced actors like[...]Whelan, under the direction of
whoever was going to be dialogue director, sat in
to read the dialogue scenes at the right, or at least,
likely to be used, tempo.

Orphan of the Wilderness

The real bone of contention is Orphan of the
Wilderness, where Shepherd’s comp[...]gment of others involved, let alone
appreciation, is painfully obvious.

Shirley: You've often said that your favorite film at
Cinesound was Orphan of the[...]trees,
ferns, streams, kangaroos, rabbits, snakes and koalas
and let them settle in. Altogether we shot between 6,000

Production sti[...]6) . . . the real
bone of contention between Hall and editor Bill Shepherd.

I ..x- -

I

Ken Hal[...]“bushland“ sets for Orphan of the Wilderness as so
realistic that the animals behaved completely naturally, making it possible to

get “authentic" shots of Australian fauna.

A MATTER or FACT

. p

m and 7,000 m, and I didn't really know how it was go-
ing to work until I’d run the footage and decided how to
cut one shot with the next (sic). I wouldn‘t say the first
two reels were without a story but I certainly hadn't
been given a storyline for that section beyond knowing
the way it was going to start and end. We had footage
of a frog.

We had the ostrich being attacked by the kangaroo, the
rabbits being frightened by the hawk"‘, and while there
was nothing preplanned it all worked out
magnificently.

This is sheer stuff and nonsense. All films are
the result of a combined effort and a film editor
cannot be better than the material provided him

*It was in fact Chut, the joey menaced by the hawk and by
preplanning, not accident.

by the production crew. That must stand as a self-
evident fact.

Ifl were asked to nominate the technical star of
the film I would certainly name George Heath
whose photography stands up as really splendid
right to this day. I am sure I would be supported
in this by all living members of the old crew -
with[...]ath would come George Kenyon, who, with his
staff in the Art and Special Effects Department,
created a bushland setting complete with waterfall
and pool, which was so realistic that all the
animals were completely taken in by it. They

Continued on P. 90

Cinema[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (41)titles appear ina — articles

i — interviews

f — filmography[...]VOLUME ONE 1974

INDEX KEY
1. Film titles appear in bold type. Magazine, play and book

2. The following appear after index items ([...]SUE
Amarcord 375 (r)
AUSTIN, ARTHUR
NFTA 136-137 (a)
BEILBY, PETER
Alan Finney (ds) 123-125 (i)
Arthu[...]cis Blrtles — cyclist. explorer, Kodaker 31-35 (a)
Not Suitable for Children.
BISHOP, ROD
Tony Ginnane ([...]Great Gatsby 370 (r)
BOYES, PETER
Esben Storm (d) and Hadyn Keenan (p) 64-65 (I)
Sandy Harbutt (p, (.1.[...]63-266 (i)
BRENNAN. RICHARD
Peter Weir (d) 16-17 (a)
CLARKE, JOCELYN
Book review 379
COOPER, Ross F.[...]51
W. Franklin Barret Filmography 164-165
Towards an Australian Film Archive 217 (a)
Harry Davidson 218-221 (I)
McDonagh Sisters 261 (a)
EDGAR, PATRICIA
US Surgeon-General’s Report on Causes and Preven-
tion of Violence 112-116
You Don't Blow U[...]US, JOHN
Melville. Le Samourai 56-57 (r)
The Cars That Ate Paris 275 (r)
Crystal Voyager 277 (r)
Great M[...]Heavy 313
Bob Ward 331-335 (I)
GLENN, GORDON
Jim and Hal McEiroy (p), Peter Weir (d) 20-21 (I)
Jim McE[...]246-248 (i)
Vince Monton (c) 249-250 (I)
Franklin and Monton 253 (i)
David Baker (p, d) 356-359 (I)
HAY[...]Tariff Board Report on Motion Picture
Films 36-37
A State of False Consciousness — Australian Film 126-

127
HODSDON, BRUCE

Genre — A Review 336-341
JONES, DAVE

David Williamson (sc)[...]io Pulgar (d) 167-169 (I)
MACKIE, FIONA

Tidikowa and Friends 235 (r)

EX

Themroc 235-236 (r)
MATTHEWS[...]) 52-53 (I)
MORA, PHILIPPE

Notes on Comic Strips and Cinema 26-29

I've Also Quit Beating My Wile 176.
MORRIS, MEAGHAN

Asylum 372-373
MURRAY, SCOTT

Jim and Hal McElroy (p), Peter Weir (d) 20-21 (I)

Jim Mc[...]hinson (t) 146 (I)

Hal McEiroy (p) 148 (I)

Melb and Sydney Film Festivals 1974 227-234 (r)

Richard Franklin[...]-250 (I)

John Phillips (t) 251-252 (i)

Franklin and Monton 253 (I)

Perth Film Festival 1974 303-307[...]vid Baker (p, d) 356-359 (I)
NAGORCKA, RON

Sound In Cinema 157-159
OSBORNE, ALAN

Father of Kong — animation techniques of Willis

O'Brien 211-215.

PIKE, ANDREW

Tokyo Story 161-163
OUINNELL,[...]eeper 365-367 (r)
READE, ERIC

Pat Hanna 129-130 (a)

The Adventures of Dot 259 (a)
RICHARDS, MIKE

Dirty Pix — a Report of Film Censorship Meeting.

Canberra 1970 110-111

SHIRLEY, GRAHAM

Promised Woman 204-206 (a)

Bill Shepherd (e) 297-302 (I)
STONE, LUCY

Pete[...]nce 66 (r)

Ed Lewis (p) 152-156 (i)
TAYLOR, MAX

A Portrait of John Papadopoulos 207-209
TAYLOR, PHILIP

Ken G. Hall (in. d) 71-91 (I)

Arthur Smith (1) 131-135 (i)

Harr[...]lvin Purple 179 (r)

Exorcist 183 (r)

Don't Look Now 271 (r)

Cliff Green (sc) 309-311 (I)

Yak[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (42)General

Index
A

Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein 15
Above and Beyond 80

Ackerman, Forrest J. 215

Across Australia in the Track ol Burke and Wills 33, 34
Across Australia with Frances Birtles 31, 33
Across the Wide Missouri 339

Actors and Acting 54-5, 184-85

Adams, Phil 253

Adam's Woman 20

Admiral Was A Lady, The 152

Adorabls Outcast 78

Adventures oi[...]ory 7: 339-40
All Those Called All 306

All Turks Are Called All 239

Alvin Purple 20, 54, 55, producti[...]American Poet’s Visit, The 138

Amin 239, 307

And Hope to Die 41

Andrei Rublev 229

An Eye for an Eye, a Tooth ior a Tooth 111
Anger, Kenneth 381

Animation 13

Anna 307

Answer to October, The 168

Antonio Das Mortes 39

Ants in His Pants 86, 133 (st)

Apache 339

APG 54

Arabian Nights, The 376-7 (st)

Archive — Australian Film 216-17, 342-47
Ardeil, Graham 21

Arden, Eve[...]44-46 (I); 46 (1)
Armstrong, Robert 212

Arsenic and Old Lace 331, 379

Arthur Chubb and the Widow 31

Art Theatre Guild (Japan) 161, 153[...]Cells 51 (or)

Australia Marches With Britain 301
Australian by Marriage, An 51 (cr)
Australian Film 126-7 (a)

Australia’s Lonely Lands 33

Australia’s Pe[...]a, L‘ 375

Babysitter, The 111

Back projection and early Australian films 83
Back street General 348 (or)

Bad Compan[...]Biches, Les 230, 332

Big Risk, The 57

Bllcock and Copplng 123, 124, 249
Billabona 111

Billy Jack 43

Birds, The 248

Birthday Party, The 266

Birth of a Flivver 211

Birth of a Nation 88, 321

Birth oi White Australia. The 259[...]Mountains Mystery, The 51 (cr)
Blue Gum Romance, A 165(cr)j

Biundeli, Graeme (ac) 54-5 (I): 55 (ii[...]h, Peter 264

Bond, Graham 16, 17, 19; 248
Bonnie and Clyde 341

Bono, Sonny and Cher 264
Bookseller that Gave Up Bathing, The 103
Boorman, John 19, 267, 2[...]nn, John 266

Bourke, Terry 203

Bout de Souiile, A 66

Box, Allan 299

Box Car Bertha 341

Boy 161[...]-Boyd, Russell (c) 144 (I)

Boyiriend, The 266

Boys in The Band 263, 266
Bradbury, Ray 13

Bradman, Don[...]381

Brener, Sylvia 75

Brennan, Richard (p) — and Peter Weir, 16, Homesdale

17, 64; 200-206 (I): 2[...], 300
Bronson, Charles 322

Brother Can You Spare A Dime 171
Broughton, James 381

Brown, Kevin 16

B[...]9, 93

Bullocky 16

Burbidge, Richard 266

Burke and Wills 33

Burns — Johnson Fight 51 (cr)
Burstal[...]y, Peter 371

Carmen 146

Garrick, Noel 237

Cars That Ate Paris, The 16, 17, 18-26 (pr), 19(cr),

produ[...]357

Carter, Claude 77

Cassavetes, John 322

Cal and the Canary, The 16

Causes and Prevention of Violence, The — examination

oi US Surgeon-Generals Report 112-16
Celine and Julie Go Boating 227
Censorship — and exploitation (items 43), and K.G. Hall
74, Prowse (interview) 102-9 ratings/cl[...], report on Film Censorship Meeting
1970, 110-11. Australian 117, 120-1, 312-13 (a), 334

Cercle Rouge, Le 56

Chaifey, Don 15

Chai[...]n’s Cinema Council of Victoria 120, 121

Chille and Bert 348 (cr)

China 235

Christian, The 165 (cr)

Christie, Julie 271

Church and the Woman, The 51 (cr)

Cine-Action Australia 39[...]es 81

Citizen Kane 66; 159; 263

City’: Child. A 202

City Lights 331

Clair, Rene 381

Claire's K[...]eve 212

Clift, Montgomery 266

Clockwork orange, A 106 (st); 106; 109; and soundtracks

159: 330

Coe, Barry 172

Colombia 1[...]78; 134

Come Up Smiling 86, 90 (cr)
Comic Strips and Cinema 28-9
Commercial Film Labs. 251
Commonwealt[...]road 39
Community Films 259

Conditioned Response in Cinema 159
Coniormist, The 228

Conner, Bruce 381[...]Gary 361

Cooper, Merlan C. 212, 213, 214
Coorsb in the Island oi Ghosts 33, 34, 35
Corpse Grinders,[...]nt Associates 171, 172
Creelman, James 212

cries and whispers 249

Coward, Noel 75

Cross, Bert, 78, 8[...]Ancestors 211
Curtis, Tony 152

Dafl, Al 87

Dad and Dave Come to Town 85, 86, 90 (cr), 300
Dad Ftudd M. P. 81, 86.[...]Dean, James 266

Death By Hanging 161

Death ot a Flea Circus Director 304
Deep Throat 109; 239: 31[...]Dem, Bruce 370

Destroy All Monsters 161

Devil in Miss Jones, The 313, 334
Devils, The 109

Dexter Bob 74, 81

Diary oi a Chambermaid 332
Dietrich, Marlene 361

Dietz, Jack 13

Diggers 129; 128 (st); 130 (cr)
Diggers in Blighty 51 (cr); 129; 130 (st); 130 (cr)
Dignam, Arthur 141: 369

Diiienger 341

Dillinger is Dead 41

Dimboola 9

Dingwaii, John 309

Dinkum Bloke, The 51 (cr)
Dinosaur and the Baboon, The 212
Dinosaur and the Missing Link, The 211, 212
Dioramas 13

Direc[...]9

Director's Corn any 263

Dirty Dozen, T e 322; and violence 325-27, 330
Dirty Pix — report of Film[...]arty 7, 8

Don Quixote 20: 144, 146

Don‘! Look Now 66; 103; 175; 177; 270-71(r)
Doors 64

Dorgan, T. J. 259

Dorieac, Francoise 66

Double Suicide 161

Douglas. Kevin 15

Douglas, Kirk 152

Doulos[...]: 135
Dream Lite 39, 41

Drive, He Said 341

Duel in the Sun 339

Duiiy 66

Dunlap, Scotty 298

Durran[...]129, 219; 299

van Eiienterre, Bertrand 305

Egg and I, The 302

81/2 375

Electronic music in cinema 157, 159

Eliza Fraser 125

Ellis, Bob 16,[...]4, 314-5, 317, 318; 320(cr)
Every Man For Himsell and God Against All 317, 319.

320
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex But
Were Airaid to Ask 365

Evil Touch, The 64

Evolution at The Wor[...]n, Peter (t) 45; 251;'254-7 (I)

Film Archive — Australian 216-17: 342-347

Film archive legislation 343

Fi[...]s 209; Bill Shepherd 302; Peter Weir
17; revision to Ray Longiord 187,
Film and TV Board 136; 137
Film and Violence examination oi us Surgeon-
Generai's Rep[...]e Term oi His Natural Lite 77, 84

Four Nights at a Dreamer 303

Fox, James 66

Francis, Freddie 38[...]kenstein 212; 313

Franklin. Hichard(d) 246-8(l): and Monton 253(1)
Freckel, Jasmine 261

French connec[...]cl) 263-66 (i)

Friedman, David 313

227-236; — Sydney
303-307

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (43)to the Forum, A 177

Galley. Peter 17

Gallery, The 16

Game in the Sand 320(cr)

Ganster film genre 339, 341, 33[...]— 102-3
General ldi Amin Dada 239.307
Genre — A Review 338-41

Gentle Sex, The 335

Gentle Strangers 16.17; 201
Gentlemen of the Road — Captain Starlight, A51(cr)
George D. Malcolm Productions 80
Gerissimou[...]from the Family oi Man, The 138
Girl of the Bush, A 165(cr)

Girl with the Golden Eyes, The 379
Ghost[...]379

Gold Rush, The 367

Goldwyn, Samuel 70

Gone to the Dogs 86, 91(cr)

Gone with the Wind 84

Goodb[...]Good Times 263

Goodtlmes Enterprises 171

Goopy and Bagha 233-4

Gow, Keith 16, 19

Grade Organizatio[...]uniighter, The 340

von Gunten. Peter 304-5

Guns in the Aiternoon 340

Guy, George 259

Guzman, Patri[...]uture 32o(cr)

Hanl, Susumu 161

Hanna, Pat 128-9(a); 130(1)

Hannan, Brian 17

Hannant, Brian 16

Hansen, Gillian 16

Harbutt, Sandy (d, p, a) 184-85 (1): 273

Hardy, Frank 7

Hardy, Sam 212

Harmon, Cash 144

Harmony Row 51(cr) 129

Harold and Maude 152

Harryhausen, Ray 12-15, 70(1); -— wi[...]Higgens. Arthur 134: 298

Hlggens, Tas 299

High as a Kite 350(cr)

High Noon 331, 338, 341

Hill, Aifr[...]61

His Royal Highness 51(cr); 259

Histoires D‘A 307

History Lessons 305-6

Hitchcock, Alfred 16: 137-264

Hollywood is Like This 167

Hopgood, Alan 179, 246

Horeemen, The 155

Hound oi the Deep 33
How McDougal Topped the score 259

How Willingly You Sing 350(cr)
Howarth, Joy 133

Howe[...]. 341

Idaho Traneier 239

ii . . . 206

ii i Had A Million 224-6(st)
Illumination 232

Illusions oi a Lady 239

Importance oi Being Ernest, The 379
Impossible Object 155

In His Prime 64

In Old Arizona 132

in Production Surveys 151; 242-44; 348-51
In the ViIlain's Power 211

in the Wake oi the Bounty 86; 299

in which We Serve 75

Incident at Owl Creek 207

Inc[...]13, 70
it lsn’t Done 84, 85, 90(cr); 297

It's a Long Way to Tipperary 51(cr)
lt’s Not Enough To Pray 169
Iwashita, Shima 161

Jackal oi Nahuettor[...]ick 66; 175

J. Arthur Rank organisation 87
Jason and the Argonauts 13, 70
Jazz Singer, The 78; 132

Je[...]57

Killing oi Sister George, The 111
Kind Hearts and coroneta 331
King's Henry 340

King, Ross 45

King Kong 13, 15; production, effects etc. 211-15
King Kong versus Godzilla 15
King of Kings 213[...]e, Alexander 314

Klute 271

Knock, Don 131; 132

Know Thy child 165

Know Your Ally: Australia 301
Koerfer. Thomas 304

Kok[...]r, Burt 156

Lancelot du Lac 237

Land oi Silence and Darkness 314, 315, 319; 320(cr)
Landau, Saul 167[...]tlfiun, The 57

Last Sunset, The 153

Last Tango In Paris 106; 109; 263
Last Wombat, The 180, 181(st)[...]entura 263

Lazar, irvlng 154

League of Nation's and censorship 121
Lear, David 75

Lear, James 16

Learn to Swim 220

Leaud, Jean-Pierre 303

Lebrun, Francoi[...](st)

Let George Do It 83. 86, 90(cr); 301
Letter toand Adventures of John Vane, The Australian

Bushranger 51(cr)

Life and Flight oi the Reverend Buckshotte, The 16, 17
Lif[...]res 173

List oi Adrian Messenger, The 154
Listen to the Lion 349(cr)

Litten, Miguel 169

Little Caesar 338

Lom, Herbert 152

Loneliness oi a Long Distance Runner, The 202
Lonely Are The Brave 152

Long Arm, The 184

Long Goodbye, T[...]215
Love Affair 261

Love Epidemic, The 124

Love in the Afternoon 227; 230-1
Love Me Tonight 234

Lov[...]he 137

Love Story 370

Lovable Cheat 152

Loving and Laughing 333

Lovelace, Delos W. 212

Lovers and Luggers 300

Ludwig ll — Requiem for a Virgin King 229; 306
Ludwig Van159

Lure oi the B[...]tificate 102
Ma Hogan's New Border 51(cr)

Mccabe and Mrs Miller 102; 341
McClure, Ellie 248

McDarra,[...]cDonagh, Paulette 261
McDonagh Sisters, The 260-1(a); 261(1); 299
McElroy, Hal(p) 20-21(1): 148-203(l[...]4

McNeil, Chris 264

McQueen, Steve 173

Macbeth and soundtracks 159
Machine Gun, The 138

Machine Gun Mccain 39

Macon Country Line 239

Mad Dogs and Englishmen 65
Mafia 39

Mahler 237-239

Mahomet.[...]Malloy, Lliley 164(st)

Malone, Geoff 16, 17

Man and His Mate 15

Man and a Woman, A 264

Man from Deep River 109. 114(st)
Man from Ho[...]of Arrsn 31

Man oi the West 340

Man They Could Not Hang, The 51(cr); 259
Man who Died, A 227

Man Vanishes, A 161

Man Without a Star 339
Manchurian Candidate, The 154
Maori Maid‘s Love, A 51(cr)
Mann, Anthony 152; 340
Margaret Fink Produ[...]177
Matatabi 162(st), 163
Matchless 208-9

Mated in the wilds 297
Matsumoto 161

Meale, Richard 21

M[...]asons 306

Merrick, David 370

Message from Mars, A 165 (cr)

Metropolis 219; 223(st)

Metty, Russell[...]Moioney, Kevin 259

Mon Oncle Antoine 168

Monk and the Woman, The 165

Monkman, Noel 88

Montage 29

Montez, Maria 70

Monton, Vince (a) 249-50 (1); 253

Moon is Blue, The 331

Moor, Colleen 76

Moore, Stan 300[...]. James 205

Most Dangerous Game, The 213

Mother and The whore, The 227, 303-4, 315
Moulson. Miles 144[...]Breckinridge 379

Mysterious Island 13

Myth — (in genre 8 westerns) 339

Naked Bunyip, The 53, 54,[...]orth 88

Nash, Wyn 259

National Council of Women and censorship 120, 121
NFl 136

NFTA — organizatio[...]ational Library 137

Navigator, The 125

‘Neath Australian Skies 51(cr)

Ned Kelly 20. 66

Negatives 332

Ne[...]2

Nickel Queen 202

Nickel, Ride, The 239

Night and Day 332

Night They Raided Minsky's, The 263, 266[...]rth West Horizon 302

Northern Saiari 33

Nothing But the Best 177

Notorious Cleopatra 334

Not Suitable for Children — censorship 117-21
Nolti[...]iering, The 207

O Koku 163

Old Dad 220

Old Men and Dog 46

Olivier, Lawrence 152, 153

Oliver Twist[...]ack oi Unknown Animals 151

Once 239

One Hundred A Day 45, 48; 47(screenp|ay); 48-49(51)
100,[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (44)INDEX VOL 1, 1974

one Minute to Zero 16

1001 Nights 238; 240-1(st)

Orphan ot the Wilderness 84, 90(cr); 297
Orphans In the Wilderness 134

Orphee 57

Oshima 155

Oswald[...]7

Outlaw Riders 38

our Mother's House 324, 370; and violence 328-30
Over 70 club 299, 301

Overlander[...], Robert 66

Pasollnl, Pier Paolo 377

Pal Garret and Billy The Kid 341

Paths of Glory 152; 263

Peths[...]ick, Bert 259

Patrikareas, Theo 203, 204

Pearls and Savages 33; 74

Penal Colony, The 167

Pendragon[...]48 (cr)

Point Blank 57; 341

Point of Departure, A 350(cr)

Polililm 38

Pommy Arrives in Australia, A 51(cr)
Pommy the Funny Little new Chum 51(cr)
Pontius Pilate 171

Poseidon Adventure, The 41

Power and the Glory, The 51 (or); 88
Power Without Glory 30[...]Poultry 211

Pretre 56

Prior, Will 77

Producers and producing 20-21; 21-22; 64-65; 72-89;

148-49; 184-85; 200-03; 356-59
Production reports — Cars that Ate Paris 16-26;
Between Wars 141-50; True Story of Eskimo Nell
245-53; Salute to the Great McCarthy 353-59

Production Surveys 151[...]ue Hacer? 167

Queen Christina 234

Quick, Follow that Star 350(cr)
Quiet Man, The 84

Quinn, Anthony 15[...]ublic Died At Dien Bien Phu, The 239
Response — in cinema 159
Retribution 259

Return irom Africa 23[...]omance of Runnibede, The 298
Romance ot the Burke and Wills Expedition at 1080, A

165(cr)

Romantic story oi Margaret Cetchpole, T[...]; 203
Rothacker, Watterson J. 212

Rough Passage, A 165(cr)

Royce Srneal Productions 20; 203
Rozsa,[...]Ryan's Daughter 41

Rydge, Norman 87

Sale Place, A 341

St. Ledger, JM 259

Saito. Koichi 161

Salamander, The 234

Sally 76

Salute to the Great Mccarthy. A 353-59 (prod. report);

201; 355(cr)

Samurai, Le[...]est B. 213, 14
Screening the Sexes: Homosexuality In the Movies —

Book Review 379

Script-writing 6[...]onds 154; 156

Secret oi the Skies 77

Secrets 01 a Door to Door salesman 103(st)
Seige of Pinchgut, The 87[...]154

Service, Robert 246

Seven Days

Seven Days in May 154

Seven Keys 39

Seven Little Australians[...]:25 —- interview with Al Flnney 123-25
Sex Aids and How to Use Them 313
shalt 307

Shane 338, 341

Shannon,[...]Shore, Harvey 208

Shorter, Ken 185; 273

Should a Doctor Tail? 261; 297

Should a Girl Propose? 296

Should Girls Kiss Soldiers? 261

Signs of Life 304; 314; 317,[...]33,

134; 300

Silent Witness, The 165(cr)

Silks and Saddles 259

Sills, Milton 76

Silver Lode 339

S[...]4

Sinbad‘s Golden Voyage 13, 14, 15
Sinderella and The Golden Bra 111
Sinful Dwart, The 334

Sisters[...]87. 91(cr); 135; 301

Snow White 121

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs 103
So Big 76

solaris 60-62(r)[...]The 216 (st)
Solo Flight 351(cr)

some Strangers in the Land 16, 17
Song ot Bernadette, The 84

Song oi Songs 234

Sons of Matthew, The 71, 73, 87; 135
Souls in Bondage 220

Sound In Cinema — towards a theory of 157-59
Sound in early Australian films 78

Sound recording 25-26; 131-35; 251-52
Soundtracks and conditioned response 159
South West Pacilic 91 (o[...]e Door 307
Sporting Proposition 348 (cr)
Squatter'a Daughter, The 76, 71, 81, 83, 89 (or); 133,134;[...]Slander, Lionel 66

State of False Consciousness, A — article on Australian

Film 126-7

Stats ol Seige 332

Stavisky 237

St[...]wberry Statement, The 341
Streetcar Named Desire, A 172; 365
Streisand, Barbra 173

Strike 66

Strike[...]Superliy 307

Supreme Sound Studios 17
Surrealism and Soundtracks 159
Sutherland, Don 66; 156: 271; 322[...]ry 51(cr)
Switchboard Operator 239
Syberberg 306

Sydney Film Festival 1974 227-236
Sydney Filmmakers Co-op. 17
Sympathy tor Summer 38

Symp[...]One Plus One) 38
Synaesthetic Cinema 157, 159

T

Take the Money and Run 365

Taking His Chance 51(cr)

Tall Timbers 51(cr); 78, 82(st[...]ry — recommendations by Filmways,

Studio Films and independent Theatres 42-43
Tarlft Board Report on[...]63

Testament of Orpheus 206

Thar She Blows 131

That’Il Be The Day 171

Themroc 39, 41; 227; 235-36

Therese and Isabella 111

They Live By Night 237

They're A Weird Mob 141 202

Thiet oi Badghdad, The 14, 70[...]3, 84, 89(crl; 297

Those Who Love 261(cr)

Three To Go 16

Three Worlds 01 Gulliver, The 13

Three Directions in Australian Pop Music 17
Thrlng, Frank Snr. 71; 129; 219 (st); 229

Through Australian Wilda: Across the Track of Ross

Smith 33
Through Central Australia 33
Throw Away Your Books and Go into the Streets 42(st);
160(st)

Tide of Deat[...]369

Timor 233

Toeplitz, Jerzy 45; 37:

Tortoise and the Here 13, 14

Touch oi Evil 358

Toula 16; 205[...]i Love, The 298

Trooper Campbell 51(cr)

Trouble in Paradise 137

True Story or Eskimo Nell, The —[...]aros 39

Twelvetrees, Helen

Twenty Million Miles To Earth 13, 70

27A 64-65

Twin Beds 74
Two-Lane Blacktop 341

Two Mi[...]lence 261 (or)

Two Thousand Weeks 124: 253
2001: A Space Odyssey 263
Tyler, Parker 379

Typhoon Treasure 88

U

Unciviliaed 86
Underground Film: A Critical History 381
Underworld 137
Unlciad Popul[...]ire Happening, The 38, 43

Vaughan, Ray 77

Venus in Furs 107(st), 108(st)

Victorian Censorship 01 Fi[...]379

Village — see 75: 25(l); 123-25

Violence and Film — U.S. Surgeon Gen‘s. Report 112-16
Virg[...]Waddington's Pictures 73

Wages of Fear 331

wake in Fright 88

Walkabout 66; 174(st); 175; 176(st); 1[...]ad or Alive (TV series) 173
War Game, The 323 — and violence 327;28; 330
War Lord, The 358

Warburton[...]0

Watkins, Peter 330

Watson, Peter 52-3(1)

Way To A Man’s Heart, The 220

Weaver, Jacki 369

Webb,[...]3

Weir, Peter (d) 16-17(i); at Film Aust. 16. 17 and Three to

Go 16; and Homesdale 16, 17, 17 (i), 20-21 (i); 45;-
148, 275

Weich, Raquel 15

Welcome to Hard Times 340

Werner, Oskar 155

West, Mae 379[...]s 338-41

Westward the Women 339

Wet Dreams 334

What /I I Died Tomorrow? 7, 9

What The Censor Saw 102

Whatever Happened to Green Valley? 17
What's New Pussycat? 365

What’: Up Doc? 39; 179

Wheels Across the Wilderness[...]ms, Malcolm 64

Williamson, David 7-9, 93(l); 368 and another theory 7;

with Burstali 7, 8; scripting;[...]Destiny 51(cr)

Wind From the East 38, 43

Woman in a Dressing Gown 202
Woman in the Case, The 165(cr)
woman Sutters, The 51(cr)

Women in Love 332

Wombat, The Last 180, 161(st)

W[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (45)‘"THE NIGHT PORTER’

IS ROMANTIC
PORNDGRAPHY. ..

a hectic love affair. Among

the fi|m’s various definitions
of decadence is a strong
preference to do on a floor
what most other people would
do on a chair, table or bed...
what a kinky turn-on! ”

—Vmcenl Canby. New York Times 1

The Joseph E. Levine
film being released
in Australia by

United Artists.

Directed by Lilian[...]ogarde
Charlotte Rampling

With Gabriele Ferzetti
and Philippe Lerot.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (46)[...]end of Roman Polanski’s Chinatown
Faye Dunaway is shot in the head while escaping
from the police down a dark street in a flashy
yellow convertible. A warning shot is fired, then a
shot at the car. The car slows to a stop, the horn
starts to blare.

Held in a wide-shot that seems to last a long
time. It is the best moment in the picture —
simple, clean, and powerful. It is complete, but
Polanski moves in to mop up.

He directs our attention to Dunaway’s minced
back of head, then, not satisfied, he turns her over
for a close-up of an exploded eye. A lot of scream-
ing and breast-beating accompany what we see.

None of this is new. It’s all very fashionable to
bleed a lot in action movies these days, but like
anything fashionable it has become obligatory
and boring. Physical violence is fast losing its
heart-storming value. A slight iolt — what Pauline
Kael calls ‘zapping’ the audience — and
everyone settles down again to the story.

To combat their loss of ‘zap’ power —— and
Polanski has used it many times in the past — the
director pores lovingly over the human meat left
behind. Long after the ‘zap’ we are still being in-
vited to appreciate blood-caked close-ups. We are
asked to find entertainment values in it. Enjoy,
enjoy! We are encouraged to watch with the am-
bivalent, "voyeuristic attitud[...]yummy -- look, isn’t it horrible — oh,
yummy, how gory!”

Humor, or rather, cynicism passing for wit, is
often added as a palliative — a spoonful of sugar
to make the medicine go down; something to
render our feelings toward what we see even more
ambivalent. No matter, just detach and enjoy.
From the director, all it takes is cynicism, artistic
myopia, or no faith in the dramatic content of his
story.

Polanski’s handling of Dunaway’s death is ar-
tistically indefensible. He destroys his best mo-
ment in Chinatown for a bloody head. Why? It is
maddening, but then so is the whole film.

Chinatown has a script by Robert Towne. He
was special consultant on Arthur Penn’s Bonnie
and Clyde, so we assume he knows something
about the thirties. Unfortunately, he doesn’t seem
to know enough about films and the exacting
genre he has chosen to work in.

The basic story of one man controlling a city’s
water supply, turning it off, and buying up land at
bargain prices, is both interesting and timely.
Where Towne gets himself into trouble, and ul-
timately sinks his script to the level of the average
television whodunit, is in his dogged attempts to
be both ‘entertaining’ and ‘meaningful’. His script
is so obviously a salute to John Huston’s The
Maltese Falcon, but Towne wants it to be more.
He wants to make points — about men and cor-
ruption, men and women — which is fine if you
can do it, but he can’t. He tries hard, and it shows.
The script remains a thing of parts.

Chinatown —— the film’s metaphorical title for
all the evil in the world you cannot beat
(Chinatown = Catch 22) — does not crackle like
Hammett, Chandler, Furthman or Hecht. It lacks
polish, style and wit. The script is alternately
banal, bland, turgid and often plainly derivative.
One has an uncomfortable feeling of déjfi vu when

a few good lines register, and the customary red
herrings of the genre frustrate your involvement
rather than demand it. Towne is outclassed by his
predecessors.

J .J . Gittes (read Sam Spade) played by Jack
Nicholson, and the poor little rich girl (read
Brigid O’Shaughnessy) played by Faye Dunaway
are the Bogart and Mary Astor roles from The
Maltese Falcon.

As an actor, Nicholson has some of the tension
Bogart c[...]hings
working deep inside the man, so many things not
shown, just echoes. He commands your attention
when he is on. We watch him closely in this one,
but he walks through it. A great deal of personal
magnetism, but still a walkthrough. The script
gives him nothing to play till the very end when

Faye Dunaway, the oor little rich girl in Roman Polanski’s
treatment of a t irties detective thriller Chinatown.

Dunaway is shot. He is a defeated man, beaten by
an ineffable and all-encompassing corruption.
“It’s no use. Nothing you can do. It’s
Chinatown,” mutters an associate as he leads
Gittes away.

Everything and everyone is crooked, we must
lose. The element of choice has been removed, we
don’t stand a chance, we give in. Sam Spade says:
“I won’t because all of me wants to,” and he
preserves his integrity, he makes his choice, he is
responsible for himself and others. Likewise,
Philip Marlowe when he shoots T[...]end of Robert Altman’s film The Long Good-
bye. But J .J . Gittes is told: “It’s Chinatown”, and
he walks away. No choice, no integrity, no
responsibility. It is the ultimate pessimism of our
age and this is the script’s and film’s bleary-eyed,
maudlin message.

Faye Dunaway is an actress with a capital ‘A’.
She is always ‘turning it on’. Nicholson’s
economy and Dunaway’s actorish, badly controll-
ed shifts in emotion — “Which gear am I playing
in now?” -— sit uneasily side by side. Nicholson
always just is . . . Dunaway acts. It just doesn’t
jell.

When Huston finally appears in the film, you
know things have really gone wrong; that no one
— least of all Polanski —— really knows what sort
of film they are making. It is Polanski’s ultimate
self-indulgent conceit to cast Huston as
Dunaway’s father, an embarrassing in-joke, and
damaging to the film.

Huston is everybody’s grandfather — a jaun-
diced Walter Brennan with a knowing twinkle in
the eye — and no one can believe for a moment
that here is a man denying water to hundreds of
orange farmers, shaping the destiny of a city with
City Hall in one pocket and the police department
in the other, and that he had made love to his
daughter. Dunaway tells Nicholson that her
father is a dangerous man One look at Huston
and we begin to doubt Dunaway’s sanity.

The film is set in 1938. Sure enough, there are
the suits, the hats, the dresses, the limousines with
their white-wall tyres, but it is all so unlived in.
Nicholson is so dapper he looks like a pimp. The
cars are so clean. The decor so ‘right’. The reality
of everyday objects is made faintly ludicrous by
their pristine glamor. The art direction is self-
consciously 1938, but it could be 1968. Polanski’s

Chinatown: J. J. Gittes (Jack Nicholson) defends his profession against an attack by a bank employee.

Cinema Papers, March-April — 5|

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (47)ESKIMO NELL

direction does not create a mood, does not evoke
the period for us (compare it with Bertolucci’s
superbly evocative The Conformist). In Chinatown
the trappings are there, but not the skill or inclina-
tion to utilise them as anything more than proper-
ties.

Polanski’s direction is functional. He is content
most of the time just to keep the thing moving
from one incident to the next. There is no feeling
for pace or rhythm. The film just seems to plod
on. Where the script seems to falter or flag — too
many talking heads speaking soggy dialogue -
Polanski seizes the opportunity he can to ‘zap’ the
audience back to full alertness with violent sound
and/ or violent visuals.

It is also a great way of giving the impression
that the film is really starting to zing along.
Polanski himself (playing a small uncredited sup-
porting role) cuts a spurting slit in Jack
Nicholson’s nose with a flick-knife. This
guarantees him at least another[...]l
concentration from his audience while they wait in
vain for something memorable to happen.

Chinatown is no advance on Polanski’s earlier,
more inventive, and visually richer work. It isn’t
memorable as -a detective thriller or as a serious
drama. It has elements of both, but it fails to be
either. The film is a hybrid, a bastard child with
no co-ordination. You remember the violence,
you remember the bits that didn’t work
(Nicholson telling his associates a dirty joke while
they try to tell him Dunaway is standing behind
him), and you remember the ruined, phony
‘significant’ ending, but very little else.

When we finally make it to Chinatown in the
last five minutes of the film we are a little disap-
pointed. It looks like Little Bourke Street or Dix-
on Street, only twice as wide and not as well lit.
After the countless ominous references to it
throughout the film we feel cheated.

Anyway, Dunaway is shot by a crooked cop.
Nicholson walks off into the darkness, Huston —
God bless him — walks off with a fat cheque for
his next project, and Roman Polanski walks off to
accolades and applause from quite a few critics.
Just goes to show how subjective criticism really
is. There are no truths — just opinions.

Oh, well, that’s Chinatown.

CHINATOWN. Directed by Roman P[...]ay by Robert Towne. Director of Photography,
John A. Alonso. Edited by Sam O’Steen. Sound Recordist[...].

THE TRUE STORY OF
ESKIMO NELL

John Tittensor

A womper, as any self-respecting male
chauvinist will tell you, is the ace root, the number
one shit-hot shag, the o[...]s the world
for, because when you’ve fallen for a womper
other women are nothing and vour life becomes a
holy thing — a pilgrimage at the end of which lies
the apocalyptic screw that will make it all
worthwhile. Especially if you’ve only got one eye,
a perpetual week’s growth, underwear that is
rotting on your body and an encroaching case of
middle-aged virginity. If, that is to say, you’re
Deadeye Dick, the anti-hero of Rich[...]Nell.

The false story of Eskimo Nell, of course, is
enshrined in the ballad named for its voracious
heroine, an epic renowned throughout the

52 — Cinema Paper[...]Dead Eye Dick (Max Gilles) hesitantly approaches a prostitute in one of many adventures during his search
for Eski[...]oreplay (Nell’s
capacious vagina can be readied only by a
preliminary gunshot) and for the bent Baron
Munchausen implications of lines like, “The men
grew sick as Deadeye’s prick uncoiled along the
bar”.

Tho[...]ver they were) when
men were men many times over, and a woman’s
place was on her back; and when, for such a fear-
some and darkly romantic thing is sex, you could
never be sure that lurking somewhere in the future
was the womper who, in giving your life a pur-
pose, might destroy you altogether,

But all that is mere legend. The truth, it
appears, is to be found somewhere in a nineteenth
century Australia that has odd overtones of the
Wild West; and it will be revealed to us by
Deadeye Dick (Max Gillies) himself and Mexico
Pete (Serge Lazarefl) in the course of their travels
from town to town, from brawl to brawl, from bar
to bar, from brothel to brothel until, in some
remote and sleet-ridden mountain township, they
reach the lo[...]ell’s Saloon.
It‘ takes them 80 minutes or so to get that far, and
what follows is a bit of an anticlimax all round;
but for a number of reasons, and it’s gratifying to
be able to say it, Eskimo Nell is not the utter waste
of time that, say, Alvin Purple was. Although, it
should be said, its virtues reside more in what it
promises for the future than in what it delivers
now.

In itself the story neither promises nor delivers
much at all, pointing up once again what is
probably the most nakedly obvious single
weakness in local commercial cinema: the un-
abashed thinness of the scripting. There is no plot
as such: the womper waiting at journey’s end is no
more than an excuse for a series of escapades,
whose only connection is their chronological

«order. This is a perfectly legitimate technique, but
-to succeed it needs, as a substitute for conven-

tional dramatic or comic unity, a spirited and
tireless bang-bang-bang impact which this script
never looks like attaining. Too often there is a
reliance on the time-tested and the obvious; too
often is an incident extended far beyond the
sustaining power of its material; too often is

flashback used to pad a narrative already
hampered by having its resources spread too
thinly. What was needed, as script collaborators
Franklin and Alan Hopgood should have realized,
was more body or a shorter film.

As it stands Eskimo Nell’s inadequacies in this
regard have the double effect of creating longish
periods of tedium out of episodes that would have
responded well to crisper treatment and of robb-
ing the film, as a whole, of the necessary buildup
to its final extended sequence in the saloon. It’s
rather like watching a man earnestly stepping
sideways when his goal lies straight ahead because
he doesn’t know how he would cope if he actually
reached the goal. (This in fact is precisely
Deadeye’s reaction when he finally claps his eye
on Nell; but it’s doubtful that the f1lm’s structure
is meant to prefigure his dilemma as narrowly as
this.)

For years Australian television has got away
with inflating five-minute plots into hour-long
shows, but this is a gambit with a limited future in
the cinema: a 100-minute film that you get off
your backside to see is expected to give a hell of a
lot more. Quite apart from which there is no
reason at all why commercial cinema should not
be good cinema; and good cinema owes an obliga-
tion to a craft of which sound scripting is an essen-
tial component.

Integral to the scripting of Eskimo Nell, too, is
a brand of more or less juvenile humor which,
while never especially illuminating or open to in-
novation, has already been done to death in local
films and drama: anality and debased eroticism
are no substitute for real wit, least of all when pur-.
sued to the virtual exclusion of all else.

It’s no longer inherently funny, if indeed it ever
was, to watch people taking a piss or threatening,
in the most unambiguous terms, to cut each
other’s balls off. Being funny, as distinct from be-
ing vaguely daring in a popular idiom, calls for
something more than this. A film like Eskimo
Nell can survive all sorts of defects, but bad jokes
on top of a weak script make the going that much
harder. —

Its structural problems notwithstanding this is
still, in many ways, an enjoyable piece of work,
and one that gives cause for a fair degree of op-

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (48)FRANKENSTEIN

timism. On the professional level it is undoubtedly
the best local feature of its type yet to appear: the
direction has an assurance, and the cutting a
smoothness that augur well for their application
to more substantial and more deserving material.
While Vince Monton’s color camerawork is a
continuing high point, revealing an ability to get
the most out of every shot, without ever slip[...]le or the clichéd. Even the music
(by Brian May) is good, which in itself must be
some kind of miracle.

Yet, if the film belongs to anyone, it must be to
Max Gillies as Deadeye. The role is hardly a dis-
tinguished or original one, with a script that gives
as little assistance as the gracelessly laconic per-
formance opposite by Serge Lazareff, so that
Deadeye in more ways than one is going it alone.
Gillies’ handling of the part is not faultless, but it
is he, of all the gallery of more or less stereotyped
characters, that really comes alive: fantasizing,
reminiscing, sulking, joyously overplaying, a kind
of Long John Silver combined with Gabby Hayes,
he shows a verve and a versatility that go a long
way towards rescuing Eskimo Nell from the worst
of the perils to which it exposes itself.

We need more of Max Gillies, more of Richard
Franklin and Vince Monton because we need
more good films that the public will pay to see,
films that offer something over and above skin
and fucks and farting and expanded polystyrene
plots. A culturally valid commercial cinema, in
other words. Hopefully they’ll be able to do it for
us.

THE TRUE STORY OF ESKIMO NELL.[...]104 mins. Australia 1974.

FLESH FOR FRANKENSTEIN
and YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN
SueAdler

‘I wou1dn’t go as far as to say that Morrissey
has taken Boris Karloff, cast him in a six-inch
plastic mould and for the sake of discretion
slapped a fig leaf over his nuts and bolts — the
same way that purveyors of fine kitschware have
vetted Michaelangelo’s David —— but there is a
parallel.

The David’s more recent multifarious
appearance in leprechaun form is, however one
may feel about it, an attempt to graft something
which reaches a popular modern sensibility onto a
classic. In the same way, Frankenstein (James
Whale 1931) represents a high point in the
cinema, and although Paul Morrissey has taken
this all-time great and updated it in a similar way,
in doing so he demonstrates rather more art. The
result of this transmutation is haut kitsch. A
modern sensibility, however, is not enough to con-
stitute kitsch. The magic ingredient is good old-
fashioned bad taste — the more awful the better
and Flesh For Frankenstein absolutely abounds
in awful taste. Yet Flesh, although its humor is
definitely noir, is a very funny movie — kitsch
with panache I rather think.

We find the Baron Frankenstein (Udo Kier) in
the process of working off that supreme anal fix-
ation: “Ze creation of ze pe[...]. . look at Hitler.
Actually Udo’s performance is not without its
Hitlerish overtones. Through most of the movie
he shouts as he delivers his dialogue (or as he
makes it up — it is, after all, a Warhol movie) and
he definitely moves with a pronounced goose step.

The story follows along these lines: Herr Baron
is disgusted by the degeneration of the human
race, and his own private version of Genesis starts
with the creation of a male and aand
haff babies”.

Frankenstein (Udo Kier) examines his ‘perfect creation‘ (Dalia Di Lazzaro) in Paul Morrissey’s Flesh for Frankenstein.

.f~'.[...]tein’s monster (Peter Boyle) out making friends in
Mel Brooks’ latest comedy Young Frankenstein.

The title reads Flesh For Frankenstein, and it is
this ‘flesh-getting’ that constitutes a lot of the ac-
tion. The Baron and his assistant Otto trip about
the countryside, sn[...]ecimens
of people’s bits. One of the very funny but
dubious scenes shows them tracking down the
owner of the perfect nasum—needed to complete
the male monster—with a large pair of scissors.
We are then treated, in colorful detail, to the ‘big
snip’. It’s this ‘colorful detail’ (spilling entrails,
dismemberments) which seems to have put a lot of
people off the movie; but it’s all just too ex-
aggerated to be taken seriously. After a while the
outrageous becomes the norm and a dark sort of
humor evolves — one finds one’s self chuckling as
the blood spurts.

When asked early in production what the movie
would be about, Morrissey said it was going to be
one for the family. Well, so it is: the Baron is
married to his sister (Monique Van Vooren) and
they have two beautiful children who, it would
appear, have a lot of their father in them. The
Baroness is a nymphomaniac, which explains
what Joe Dallesandro is doing in the movie — but
narrative-wise he actually plays a role as well.
After being engaged as a member ofthe Baroness’
household staff, he starts to suspect something
fishy when he sees his best fr[...]shoulders. Apart from playing ‘resident stud’ and
just being in the movie for no reason other than
he’s always in Warhol-Morrissey productions,
Dallesandro is used as a sort of Everyman figure.
His reaction to all the gore and guts is what 1 im-
agine ours is supposed to be if we could take it all
seriously.

The end of Flesh For Frankenstein looks
how the last act of Hamlet would have if
everyone had used real swords. Otto tries to
‘enter’ the female zombie as we had seen the
Baron do it earlier . . . “To know life, Otto, one
must first fuck death in ze gall bladder”. But Otto
is too clumsy and bungles it — ripping her entrails
out. Well, that really starts the ball rolling. Blood,
guts, lung[...]erything everywhere!
The really interesting thing is that nobody dies in
a normal ‘movie-type’ way. They seem to just
break up or spill open. The male zombie, mortally
anguished at being trapped in a strange body, ends
it all by unpicking his stitches and letting it all
hang out.

Thinking about it, the comparison with Hamlet
is quite strong. Remember how Hamlet keeps
talking long after he should be well and truly
dead? Well Ud-o, considering he’s run through
with a barge pole and has what looks suspiciously
like his heart impaled on the end of it, a full

Cinema Papers, March-April — 53

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (49)[...]two feet away from his body, keeps talking too,
and takes a positive age to die.

The final effect, visually, is rather like a Rubens
grouping with too many red tones. In fact there is
a strong sense of composition and grouping
throughout the whole movie. Unlike the h[...]provisé of earlier Warhol-
Morrissey, this movie is beautifully made (shot at
Cinecitta, Rome). Great attention has been paid
to decor and artifact, the score — yes there is one
is quite haunting and beautiful.

The old Morrissey stamp is still there though —
improvised dialogue, effete characters etc. The
beautiful look of the movie does have a sort of ex-
quisite preciosity about it which, though definitely
camp, is not unpleasant.

While Morrissey is preoccupied with the more
unnatural, bizarre aspects of the Frankenstein
legend, Mel Brooks is interested in it as a
Hollywood icon. Young Frankenstein was shot in
black and white and has been treated so it has that
Hollywood ‘sfumato of the thirties’ look. Much
attention has been paid to recreating the at-
mosphere of the James Whale or[...]aboratory scenes for example.

Brooks, when doing a movie, seems to skirt
maniacally around the edges of Hollywood, look-
ing at its legends and, rather like Frankenstein
himself, he exhumes and snatches the images and
kudos he likes and with them creates his monsters
— his films. The humor of Young Frankenstein,
like that of Blazing Saddles, comes from parody
and filmic ‘injokes’. The spontaneous craziness of
Blazing Saddles has given way, however, to a con-
trolled, cohesive, more thought-out sort of humor.
It is obvious through his meticulous reference to it
and his faithful recreation of its mood, that Mel
Brooks has a great deal of affection for the thirties
masterpiece, but he just can’t resist the temptation
to crucify it. The character of Frankenstein, in
this case played by Gene Wilder, is Freddy, a
noted young American neuro-surgeon who,
professionally and socially embarrassed by his in-
famous background, insists on being addressed as
‘Fronkensteen’. It’s interesting to note here that
of the three Frankensteins I’ve mentioned, Freddy
is the only one to have got through medical
school.

Storywise Young Frankenstein is, in a tongue-
in-cheek way, in the tradition of the Son of
Frankenstein genre. Freddy, as the grandson,
goes to Transylvania to claim only his inheritance
to the Frankenstein estate, but is drawn into
carrying on with his grandfather’s work. He
creates a monster (Peter Boyle) with an abnormal
brain — traditionally Frankenstein’s assistant is
always sent to snatch a brain for the monster and,
traditionally, he blows it and brings back an ab-
normal one. Instead of stitches and the customary
monster neck hardware, Brooks’ monster is fitted
with zippers. The movie is full of these exquisite
touches. When the monster[...](Madeleine Kahn,
her Marcel wave frizzes up into a streaked ‘Bri e
of Frankenstein’ spectacular — a la Elsa
Lanchester, and they even smoke cigarettes in the
dark afterwards. Yes, madness will out.

There is a scene of sublime insanity where Fred-
dy, in demonstrating his achievement to the
Bucharest Academy of Science at a glittering
soiree in top hat and tails, goes through a song
and dance number with the monster to ‘Puttin’ on
the Ritz’. Marty Feldman as the hunchback
assistant Igor is supposed to be funny, but apart
from the running gag on his hump changing from
one side to the other, the only remarkable thing
about his performance is that his goitre condition
has got much worse.

As in the original, there are angry villagers, led
by a police inspector (inspired, I’m sure, by Von
Stroheim in La Grande Illusion) with a
mechanical wooden hand which he uses as a
cigarette lighter, and whose German accent is so
comically gutteral that when he makes speeches
the typical German folk crowd, uncomprehending
and stupefied, roar back in chorus: “What?”

54 — Cinema Papers, March-April

The significant ‘new’ thing that both these
Frankensteins of the seventies have in common,
apart from being funny, is sex. Undeniably there
was a tacit sort of sexuality about Boris Karloff,
but in the thirties it just wasn’t done to be graphic
about it or even to explore it. Whether or not the
demystification of the sexual mystique in the
cinema is always a good thing is another question
altogether, but the sexual possibilities have always
been there and Mel Brooks has brought them into
the open. Although there is a lot of fucking in
Flesh For Frankenstein, none of it is done by the
monsters — in fact that’s the big joke of the
movie. Instead of the tra[...]ain), the
Morrissey version of the abnormal brain is one
with no sexual drive. That, for him, is the
deviation. There are, of course, brothel scenes and
those depicting necrophilia and sadism. They are
there not for commercial value or for shock or
titillation value, but simply because decadence is
to Morrissey as Death Themes is to Bergman,
Catholicism is to Pasolini and Great Composers
are to Keri Russell. But Brooks brings out the sex-
uality of his monster in a way that is fascinating
and titillating. And once it’s revealed, you almost
feel naughty for thinking about it.

Doctor Freddy and his assistants are sitting
round discussing how the monster’s components
must be much larger than normal for the experi-
ment to be a success, and Inga, his pretty young
assistant, exclaims that (“oh my gosh”) he would
have an enormous schwanstucker. That really
fires something in the imagination, and from the
moment the monster is animated he really does
have a stron sexual presence. The scene where he
seduces Ma eleine Kahn, although not sexy in the
usual way, really is electric. This, I think, is due to
the fact that the Frankenstein’s monster (Brooks’
monster, unlike the beautiful-but-vapid creatures
in Flesh For F rankenstein, has the traditional look
based on the Boris Karloff prototype), has almost
come to be regarded as a sacred institution, in-
violable and solidly there. And to have it revealed
to one that he’s got a big dong is rather like being
a convent schoolgirl discovering that Mother
Superior eats babies and drinks her bath water —
but the idea excites you.

FLESH FOR FRANKENSTEIN. Directed by Paul
Morrissey. Produced by Andrew Braunsberg. A CC-
Champion and Carlo Ponti-Jean Pierre Rassam pi-oduction_
Scree[...]cted by Mel Brooks.
Produced by Michael Gruskoff. A Twentieth Century-Fox
production. Screenplay by G[...]nn (Mr Hilltop), Gene Hackman

(Blind Man). Black and white. 108 mins. US 1974.

THE MEAN MACHINE

Anto[...]chine (original American title:
The Longest Yard) is Robert Aldrich’s first major
studio-backed prod[...]become the first American director since
Griffith to own a studio. Associates and Aldrich
— partly funded at first by the ABC TV[...]Late The Hero, The Grissom
Gang, Ulzana’s Raid and Emperor of the North
(the latter two for Universal and Fox release

respectively). Regrettably — and to some degree
incomprehensibly — all were box-office disasters.

Aldrich sold his studio and temporarily retired
from the field, badly in need of a project to
resurrect his fallen star. .

The irony of the seventies for major American
directors of the fifties and early sixties is that
while many younger filmmakers have been given
their heads for the first time in the wake of in-
dependent production and the partial demise of
the studio system, the established. group have
been, in a large number of instances, unable to
make use of their new found freedoms. Directors
like Minnelli, Ray, Vidor, Boetticher and Fuller
have been in the main unproductive since the mid-
sixties. Tru[...]with aplomb using the new openness of
the studios to his advantage. Robert Aldrich, too,
appeared to have bridged the gap and with The
Legend of Lylah Clare (1968) and Ulzana’s Raid
(1973) presented arguably two of the greatest
movies of the sixties and seventies.

But the box-office is a stern mistress and
Aldrich must have been more than pleased when
he managed to team with Albert S. Ruddy
(producer of The Godfather) for The Mean
Machine. Initial results in the US and elsewhere
indicate The Mean Machine may well reestablish
Aldrich’s ‘bankableness’ with investors, but as a
movie it is disappointing.

The problems are not evident at the straight-
forward level of surface narrative. Burt Reynolds
plays a former American pro-footballer thrown
into prison on a short-term sentence for a series of
acts of typical Aldrich hooliganism. The prison is
a complete social universe with a neatly defined
power structure. The football-cra[...]ie Albert) encourages his Guard’s football team
to seek ever more acceptable results; and in new
inmate Reynolds he sees the key to his team’s
success in the upcoming competition series.
Under threat of a longer prison sentence for a
trifling misdemeanor (he’s rovoked into
assaulting a guard) he is persua ed to coach the
Warden’s team and then to field a team of con-
victs for a pre-season warm up match against the
Guards.

The preparations for the match and the match
itself make up the second half. of the movie.
Here Aldrich is offering us upon reflection his
archtypal situation, albeit somewhat modified. If
The Dirty Dozen and Too Late The Hero stood
for the proposition that the only type of person
who can effectively operate and succeed in war is
the criminal, then The Mean Machine, using the
football match as a metaphor for western
capitalism, says that only criminals using ‘dirty’
techniques (Reynolds has his players check out
the guard’s X-rays and medical reports for details
of easy to break bones, weaknesses etc; and uses
sex and bribery to obtain information) can exist
successfully therein.

This is Aldrich’s post-Watergate cynicism. Of
course, this core meaning (as in most Aldrich

films) is hidden beneath a superficial surface plea 3
for the rights of the individual. Reynolds may ;

decide not to throw the match at the last, depriv-

ing the Warden of his cherished win, but his abili- ‘

ty to be in the position to make that choice is

totally the result of his dirty tricks preparation. ;

The Guards and the Warden’s prison system are
the rules machine. Without Reynold’s band of dis-
sidents their system would grind to a halt. Yet,
these very dissidents use the Warden’s own techni-
ques —— only more successfully.

The movie’s first main problem is the casting of =

Burt Reynolds. This is the second Aldrich movie
of late to be partially wrecked by inappropriate
casting. (C[...]the other ex-
ample). Admittedly Aldrich manages to pull a
better performance out of this beefcake star than I
would have thought possible, but Reynold’s pinup
cover boy status points the fin[...]lt.
Critics have rivetted on Aldrich’s skill at in-

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (50)i

‘I. C
In --' nuns "'- um
III Imam -9 .19!!! ...._-i

The Mean Machine: Burt Reynolds receives first aid during a break in the final moments of the football match — a
bloody clash between prisoners and guards.

/. "

K‘ _ tall‘;
47- §os¢—3_e ~

’~'v<;e.

Paul Crewe (Burt Reynolds) wrestles in the mud with N: fellow prisoner in a scene from Robert Aldrich’s The Mean
achine.

jecting personal violence and nastiness onto the
screen. It was that viciousness and gut hurt that
burned off the screen in Attack, Kiss Me Deadly
and simmered beneath the surface in The Big
Knife. This violence of style has reiterated
Aldrich’s cynicism; given substance to his com-
ment, his critique of the ‘win at all costs’ syn-
drome of American populist philosophy that
permeates patriotism, crime, war, sex and death.
Here Aldrich has copped out on nastiness. His
usual no holds barred treatment has been sub-
merged in an attempt to prop up the movie’s
superficial capital ‘S’ significance: the rights of
the individual and the dignity of the human spirit
— real Richard Brooks or Stanley Kramer
material that. Capital letters choke The Mean

Machine.

By dow[...]e violence of the situation,
hinted at, promised, but never shown, Aldrich’s
prisoners and guards both become basically nice
guys and the audience couldn’t care less about the
struggle, save at a basic ‘Will Reynolds win?’
level. Thus the amazing response in all quarters
labelling the movie as a comedy. There has always
been a caustic hip existentialflavor about the
dialogue and behavior of Aldrich’s characters, but
never before have his acts of aggression had
audiences chuckling with hilarity, as do most of
the maimings during the climactic match.

Sarris notes Aldrich’s violence even in genres
that subsist on violence. Not so here. Thus it is
harder than usual to follow the distaste with which
local Aldrich detr[...]been hypercritical of

IMMORAL TALES

violence and bloodshed. Long before Peckinpah
began rubbing our noses in gore, Aldrich has been
hitting audiences with heavy doses of violence as a
deterrent par excellence.

Attack was the foundation for Aldrich’s anti-
war feel. An early sequence has Jack Palance,
who has failed in a bazooka attack on a tank,
sprawled on the ground screaming while the[...]himself along the
ground racked with pain, trying to fulfil his
promise to his dead psychotic Captain Eddie
Albert who sent Palance and his men to the front
with unfulfilled promises of support.[...]alive
pumping bullets into Albert’s body which now lies
over Palance’s corpse. The uselessness and insani-
ty of war has only rarely been more excruciatingly

visualized than in these scenes.
The classic sequence in Kiss Me Deadly, where

Mike Hammer wakes after a vicious working over
to hear the screams of his girlfriend being tortured
and her naked legs ilaying in the background,
presents an edge of futility peculiarly original in
the normally laconic Hammett-Chandler milieu.
The mania of war to total insanity comes over to
the conflict between Cliff Robertson and Michael
Caine in Too Late the New and permeates
Aldrich’s most famous anti-war movie to date:
The Dirty Dozen. This movie, loaded with
animalistic behavior and gratuitous vicarious
violence, pummels home the n[...]gative use of
violence spans his career.

Perhaps now reestablished on the commercial
scene, he will be able to return to the bleak,
scarred lifestyle that his characters have until now
endured.

THE MEAN MACHINE. Directed by Robert Al[...]Pictures. Screenplay by Tracey Keenan Wynn.
From a story by Ruddy. Photographed by Joseph Biroc.
Edi[...]ntroversial point about Contes Im-
moraux appears to be whether Charlotte Alex-
andra, in the second ofthe tales, masturbates with
zucchinis or cucumbers. After serious consulta-
tion with a friend who knows both films and
vegetables, I vote for the cucumber.

These fine distinctions assume an unusual im-
portance when you see a film which, in a most dis-
concerting manner, combines an extraordinary
visual beauty with a thematic content of sheer
corn, it is jarring to even think of corny movies in
connection with the work of such a determinedly
regal director as Walerian Borowczyk.
Nevertheless, I’m afraid th[...]n has fallen flat on its flawless face.

The film is a set of four stories, each the kind of

tale that is the stuff of rumor, myth and folklore.
They are linked only in that the film as a whole
leads us through the conventional gamut of oral
sex, masturbation, lesbianism/sadism (a persis-
tent equation, that one) and then group sex com-
bined with incest. There was originally a fifth tale
along the lines of Beauty and the Beast, but that
was suppressed by Borowczyk himself.

The first tale, “La Marée” (The Tide) is
adapted from a story by the French novelist,
Andre Pieyre de Mandiargues, and is the only
deviation from Borowczyk’s normal preocc[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (51)IMMORAL TALES

tion with the past. A young man takes his
younger — and therefore submissive — cousin to
a deserted beach. He tells her that he is going to
honor her with some ‘instruction’, which turns out
to be that she must suck him off while the tide
rises. He has elaborately engineered the situation
so that they are caught by the tide, but are on
some rocks where they will only be splashed when
the tide reaches its peak. While she sucks him off
— lengthily —- he gives her a lecture on the
motions of the tide. He exerts self-control to
release his life-giving liquid at the very moment of
high tide. He has a watch placed on the rocks to
be sure. This is what they do for the rest of the
segment, and at the vital moment the young man’s
shouts of ecstasy merge, appropriately and predic-
tably, with the crashing of the waves.

“Therese Philosophe” (Philosopher Theresa)
takes an 1890 newspaper report of a request for
the canonisation of a local girl who was raped by a
tramp, and imagines how she spent the time
before the dreadful event. She has been in church,
is turned on by the seductive voice of God who
wants to “enter her”, and fingers the organ pipes.
She is late home, and is locked in a room with
only a couple of cucumbers for sustenance. Left
alone, she produces a pornographic book and
proceeds to masturbate heartily with a cucumber.
She splits it open in her passion, but quickly sets
to with another. At the moment of climax, she
abandons the cucumber for fervent gazing and
clutching of a portrait of a man (no undiluted
solitary pleasures for Borowczy[...]e
wipes the stains of cucumber from the eiderdown
and wanders outside, only to be seized by ugly
reality in the form of the tramp.

Tale Three is “Erzebet Bathory”, and the
Hungarian countess of that name is visiting the
villages of her subjects in 1610. She rides around
on her horse rounding up young girls to take away
with her. When the girls are assembled the
countess — played by Paloma Picasso — pulls
aside their_dresses one by one to examine their
pubes. She promises the distressed villagers that
the girls will be looked after, and once a month
they will be permitted to touch the pearls on her
gown.

Back at the castle, there is much bathing, giggl-
ing and preparation of bodies, supervised by the
countess’s page who is probably supposed to look
androgynous but doesn’t. The countess enters,
naked beneath a gown on which are sewn the
promised pearls. The village girls are overcome
for a moment; then the countess lies down and the
girls not only stroke the pearls but also her, un-
derneath. They start to tear the gown apart, shove
the precious pearls in their vaginas and mouths,
then turn viciously on each other trying to get
more. As it begins to get hectic, the countess
leaves and the page draws her sword. Flash to the
countess in a foaming bath of blood. The page lets
down her hair and reveals her femininity and the
two women retire to bed. Then comes the
heterosexual salvation; the page-girl calls in the
police, the countess is arrested, and the girl falls
into the arms of a soldier who seems to have been
in the cupboard all along.

The last tale is “Lucrezia Borgia”, and con-
forms to the usual version of the ways of this in-
teresting woman. Husband Sforza is summarily
despatched early in the piece, by being snatched
from behind a bust of Lucrezia’s mother. Scenes
of Lucrezia enjoying herself with both her father,
Pope Alexander VI, and her brother, Cardinal
Cesare Borgia, alternate wi[...]rola, making speeches of denunciation,
attempting to stir the populace against the
decadence of the high clergy. He, too, is carted
off; then there is a christening of Lucrezia’s
dubious baby.

It is all too easy to be flippant at the expense of
this film; but one of the serious problems with
Contes Immoraux is that in itself it is not amusing
at all, though the tales have obvious comic poten-
tial. There are one or two exceptional moments,
particularly a very funny scene in the beginning of

56 — Cinema Papers, March-April

Comes Immoraux: The Pope (Jocope Berinizi) and his daughter. Lucrezia Borgia (Florence Bellamy).[...], refuses some
biscuits which the Borgias proceed to eat under
his hungry nose. But on the whole, the film
collapses under a weight of solemnity which the
tales can’t carry; and in spite of the visual perfec-
tion and the. glorious music, the pomp and
ceremony of Borowczyk’s filming, so successful in
Blanche, works to just about destroy the film.

A clear case of this is Borowczyk’s conception
of the visual images of[...]nning with the first
tired equation of sexuality and the sea. However
beautifully photographed, waves breaking during
an erotic scene are still waves breaking once again
in another erotic scene.

After the first tale, the film is virtually a stately
procession of conventional phallic objects and
sexual symbols — organ pipes, crosses,
cucumbers et al; the page-girl wields both pen and
sword, the countess a riding-crop. From horses to
stallions, specifically in “Lucrezia Borgia” where
the family laughs over drawings of stallion erec-
tions. Therese wears a white dress, but fondles a
scarlet religious sash — she also wears a necklet
with a red jewel, as a close-up makes sure we
notice. The wicked countess is wearing black
when we first see her, but sports a scarlet boot.
The girls in the countess’s bath-house scribble
Obscenities on the wall; and she, with all the
serious grace imaginable, scrubs them off in
stereotyped lesbian distaste.

It is mainly this imagery which creates the cor-
ny dim[...]he film. Contemporary French
artists of all kinds are fond of making collections
of clichés deliberately, but if irony is intended in
Contes Immoraux, it has not been‘ permitted to
peep through properly. Too many close-ups are
devoted to these ‘sexual’ objects — most of them
quite desexualised now through long usage. The
camera dwells too long and lovingly upon them,
and they are always carefully placed in a total
design laboriously created to complement them.

Contes Immoraux is also a very cold film, and
its titling raises some peculiar questions. In an
early interview in Cahiers du Cinema (No. 209,

February 1969), Borowczyk talked about his at-
titudes to the medium in relation to his first long,
non-animated film Goto l’ile d’amour; and neither
Blanche nor Contes Immoraux show much
evidence of a change in his ideas. He sees no fun-
damental difference between his animated films
and films with actors; people, dolls or paper are
all material to be worked on and controlled to
achieve total precision and coherence in the finish-
ed product. He achieves that all right, but his forte
becomes almost exclusively catering for the pure
aesthete’s delight in composition in the most
abstract sense. But why, then, “immoral tales”?
How can a set of beautiful objects, exquisitely
arranged, and beautiful people, harmoniously
placed or faultles[...]ever?

Borowczyk’s technique worked brilliantly in
Blanche, since the motivation of that film seemed
to be partly to create an exercise in composition
geared to an aesthetic polemic. Blanche sets out as
though to defy all the books ever written this cen-
tury on the death of western tragedy, and com-
poses what might be a classical five-acter (with
just a tinge of gothic), complete with fatal flaw to
tip off a perfectly traditional tragic denouement.
Borowczyk succeeds because.Blanche is a con-
sistently and superbly irrelevant film. It doesn’t
really bite at anyone’s immediate social or
political concerns, and it certainly isn’t the kind of
film that performs itself an obvious social func-
tion or fulfils a need. It exists in a grand disloca-
tion from everything else but the inevitabilities of
its own form.

Unfortunately you can’t really bring a sense of
tradition and the eternal to explicitly sexual
matters and get away with it at the moment. In his
interview, Borowczyk expressed a dislike of art
focussed around contemporary issues; that is the
province of the journalist (like Godard), not the
artist, because only in interpreting the past can the
artist avoid mistakes. This time Borowczyk has
taken on a current issue in his cinema, and using
mainly period settings and music and ‘timeless’
tales cannot disguise the fact that it is a current

issue; but the attempt at disguise weakens the
film.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (52)[...]Young virgins swarm around the countess Erzsebet in a scene from Walerian Borowczyk’s Contes Immoraux.

It could be argued that the titling of the film is
ironic; that its effect of the-irrelevance-of-ethics-
to-statues empties the word ‘immoral’ of all
meaning. But there is a seriousness about it that
defies that hopeful suggestion. Part of what I have
called the coldness of the film is created specifical-
ly by the camera which is immobile for a con-
siderable amount of the time, while people walk
around it or perform assigned tasks in front of
it. There are very few tracking shots; otherwise,
the camera zooms in to examine at length a
selected object or area of flesh, or there are close-
ups connoting ‘examination’ in the film itself, par-
ticularly of portraits which are placed staring
down everywhere, and of eyes (especially Paloma
Picasso’s beautiful brown ones). The overall im-
pression this creates is that there is a specific
phenomenon called ‘immoral behavior’, of fixed
definition, and this behavior is being clinically
surveyed and recorded. This is emphasized by the
immense seriousness with which all the characters
in the film take themselves and their activities;
also by the gradual build-up during the film, of the
relation between religion and sexuality. A confu-
sion of the two in “Thérése Philosophe” becomes
a flagrant contradiction, which is more or less
condemned in “Lucrezia Borgia”.

Contes Immoraux could have a purely formal
meaning; the stories all have the f[...]al ribald tale. (Borowczyk enjoys both

folktales and the work of Pasolini.) But here again
we come up against the problem of the lack of
humor. Clearly the film is interested in the ritual
side of the traditional immorality — from the
careful timing undertaken by the young man in
“La Marée”, to Lucrezia Borgia’s considered
positioning of her body across a couch shaped like

a crucifix. But any decent sexual ritual worth the I

name has two sides — a traditional scheme ofjoy
and sorrow, humor and solemnity, sin and
redemption. What’s a sense of wickedness worth
without a sense ofhow much fun it is‘? This film is
just too earnest and over-awed by its own beauty;
in filming a set of folk stories as though they were
high tragedy, Borowczyk converts his own
mastery of ritualistic style in Blanche into just a
highly mannered technique.

It’s curious that Borowczyk does this, because

in the short that goes with the film, “Une Collec-
tion Particul[...]out of the official
sense of wickedness involved in censorship. The
short is especially funny when pornographic pic-
tures flash onto the screen, only to be ‘censored’
by the equally swift intrusion of an official finger-
tip to obscure the vital parts.

I wondered after seeing the film whether Contes
Immoraux is taking a sly dig at the films of
Rohmer. Except for the seriousness, which is as
all-pervasive as that of Contes Moraux but
without the same basis for it, Borowczyk’s film is

the opposite of those of Rohmer in almost every
respect. There is none of the anguished mulling
over of morals, none of the difficulty at con-
ceiving, let alone performing, an ‘immoral’ act
that marks Ma Nuit Chez Maud or L’amour
l’apres-midi; and instead of taking six long films
to examine aspects of human sexual behavior,
Borowczyk does four in a film. It’s an interesting
idea, if only Contes Immoraux itself had succeed-
ed internally. Besides, Borowczyk certainly seems
to share Rohmer’s sense of the temptations ofim-
morality, being firmly located in female flesh; and
while there is no psychic block about immorality
in any of the characters, they certainly have to go
to enormous trouble in their physical preparations
to get themselves worked up.

In spite of everything, there is a repressed aura
about this film that begins in the first tale, when
the young man walks ahead of the girl so that he
can forget her and will be correspondingly more
excited when he sees her again. He also com-
mands her to come to him over the rocks on all
fours.

Contes Immoraux has been mainly praised as a
film about sex which is not pornographic. This is
probably true, but unfortunately it is not really
erotic either. There is none of the skin-flick
technique of endlessly photographing mouths and
genitals dissociated from bodies, or of giving you
a quick look, leaving you to imagine the rest ac-

Cinema Papers, March[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (53)ll HARROWHOUSE

cording to fancy. It’s all very tasteful, etc; but
after an hour or so of lovely angles, you start to
feel just as jaded as if you had watched a dozen
identical skin-flicks in the same time — because
the whole thing is so unmitigatedly joyless.

I wonder whether it’s possible any more to
make a positive film about sexual behavior, which
doesn’t humiliate women and doesn’t reduce
human sexuality to one or two key organs, but
which is more than a classical exercise in form,
line and color. If there is such a film Contes Im-
moraux isn’t it; it’s beautiful, but just awfully, aw-
fully dull.

CONTES IMMORAUX (I[...]wc-

zyk. With the first of foursketches based on a story by Andre ‘

Pierre De Mandiargues. Photog[...]urt, Guy Durban, Michel Zolat, Noel Very. Editing and art
direction by Walerian Borowczyk. Costumes by[...]974.

11 HARROWHOUSE
Mike Harris

The vagaries of Australian film distribution
resulted in Aram Avakian having two films con-
currently in release — ll Harrowhouse and Cops
and Robbers. Tempting though it might be to
make a comparison between the two films, he did
after all make them separately for two different
masters, and honestly, any one film should be able
to stand on its own: it’s really only the critics who
inflate a series of jobs into that ghastly collective
pretention, “oeuvres”.

ll Harrowhouse gives the impression of being a
rather pleasant conceit (in the Jacobean sense),
and it engenders in its initial sounds and images, a
receptivity that is seductive. Gently wry
narrations are rare enough, when at the same time
they are witty and pertinent (as they are definitely
not in Frankenheimer’s 99 and 44/100 Per Cent
Dead), then it seems worthwhile, and perhaps ul-

timately rewarding, to pay attention. _
The in st clue that all is not going to be well with

the film comes in an early sequence. Avakian and
Charles Grodin (who stars and did the adaptation
of the Gerald Browne novel) have set up the fact
that Chesser (Grodin) is persona-barely-grata at
the denominative London a[...]lling System, which
appears on the face of things to have a virtual
global monopoly in the sale of diamonds.

There is an economical, but fairly amusing, se-
quence which sets up the pecking order very
neatly. Chesser lights a cigarette which is evident-
ly non de rigeur. The security guard (Jack Wat-
son) engages him in a war of wills that Chesser, an
American diamond dealer and part-time
schlemiel apparently, of course loses to the
other’s impassive insistence. Either through a
stroke of totally brilliant subtlety (which I dou[...]dited
costume advisor, has Grodin nattily attired in a
decent Ivy League, Brooks Brothers’ gear, but
with a Brigade of Guards tie which he is patently
not entitled to wear. What more awful way could
there be to get the backs of the Brits up?

John Gielgud play[...]thless
head of the Harrowhouse syndicate. Meecham
and his advisors maintain total control of the dia-
mond traffic and make sure that the supply is suf-
ficiently in arrears of the demand to keep up
prices. So Grodin is one-upped by some deft
Lifesmanship, and retires hurt. A multi-multi-
millionaire, Clyde Massey (Trevor Howard) con-
tacts him and the intrigue we’ve been expecting all

58 — Cinema Papers, March-April

James Mason (Watts) executes an ingenious robbery in Aram Avakian’s ll Harrowhouse.

along begins. B[...]with
his mistress, Maren (Candice Bergen). Maren, a
rich widow, drives extremely badly. That she is at
the wheel of a Ferrari doesn’t mitigate how
recklessly she handles the car, but evidently the
filmmakers thought that hair-raising thrills and
near-spills were needed at this point to enliven the
exposition. It is clearly stunt driving, and at no
frame was I convinced that Ms Bergen (for whom
I harbor delirious fantasies in spite of having met
her and found she lives up to her forename) ac-
tually was at the wheel of the car.

By this stage the flaws are becoming more fre-
quent and insistent and can no longer be ignored.
All one’s hopes that the film will remain a bit of
attractive whimsy are being systematically
attrited — although ‘systematically’ might
perhaps be too generous a word for what goes on.

And the real story hasn’t yet begun. Trevor
Howard of the fiery visage, looking and acting
more than somewhat liverish, hires Grodin to
purchase a diamond worth a million. Grodin and
Bergen go to Amsterdam to carry out his bidding.
Complications ensue and the end result of a lot of
talk is that Trevor Howard blackmails Grodin
and Bergen into setting up The Incredible Dia-
mond Theft Caper — which is what the picture’s
all about anyway.

It is at this stage that we are made better ac-
quainted with James Mason.

He plays a terminal cancer patient named
Watts, who is being treated badly by his
employers who own “ll Harrowhouse” and the
fortune in diamonds under its floor. Watts is a
trusted employe. His employers are stingy about
pensions, so his family will be going a bit short if
he doesn’t join in the scheme. Grodin offers him
$250,000 and he agrees to help. He accepts the
offer and the gem snatch is on.

The film then takes another directional veer.
Bergen and Grodin are transformed into deft and
crafty professional thieves, apparently with years
of commando training and a knowledge of
electronic security systems, architectural wiring
and the habits and gastronomic preferences of
Blatella Germanica, the European domestic
cockroach.

If you still have disbelief to suspend, prepare to
suspend it now: Grodin sends a cockroach down
the electric conduit to where Mason is waiting
with a piece of chocolate cake.

Having determined which conduit leads from
the roof to the vault, the men are free to substitute
for the electrical wiring, a large diameter rubber
hose which is introduced down the pipe into the
vault at one end. The other is connected to an in-
dustrial vacuum cleaner in a van parked in the
street. This method of stealing is as ingenuous as
it is ingenious: my own slight knowledge of
electrical wiring leads me to believe that wires
lead from the mains via a fusebox to a wallplug,
not from some convenient junction box located on
a roof. But, I guess, that’s their story and they are
stuck with it.

Candice Bergen, snappily attired in workman’s
overalls by Halston, is in the truck. She turns on
the motor. Mason then mov[...]vault
with the nozzle end sucking up $20 million in
diamonds. The daring duo get away but when they
rendezvous with Trevor Howard, they discover
that he’s going to double-cross them. There is the
obligatory destruction derby (though here it
resembles more a steeplechase) and, with the
villains bested, your happy ending.

What the film overlooks soon after the start is
the intelligence of its audience. What makes this
more offensive is that for the first few minutes the

.audience is led to expect adult treatment.

Originally the film was longer than the 95-
minute version shown here. What went with the
deleted 13 minutes one can’t even guess, but I
doubt it contained anything to make me modify
my views.

It is a very average film both technically and in
its dramatic performances. Gielgud disguises any
distaste for his role by acting it out as his distaste
for the Grodin character. Mason is called upon to
be a dying man, and his performance reflects it.
Howard strides about the place and shouts, but he
never _gives one the impression that he is paying
attention to what he is saying. It is almost as
though he is acting irritable because he feels

'irritable, not the character. Ms Bergen appears to
have decided to relax and try to enjoy it, but her
mind seems at times to be wandering to other,
more pleasant, experiences.

There are many things that can erode a film-
maker’s original intentions, and if Avakian had
the kind of stars to deal with who were reputed to
be wilful, unprofessional, demanding or
troublesome in some way, I could readily unders-
tand how 11 Harrowhouse got out of hand. And

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (54)Emmanuelle: Emmanuelle and Bee (Marika Green).

since Jeffrey Bloom did the screenplay from
Grodin’s adaptation, it seems unlikely that
Avakian had script problems to harass him.
Who then — other than the director — must take

the blame? _ _

It’s my guess that the film went funny because
of Grodin. It’s only Avakian’s third film and he’s
star-struck. Who else has he had to work with

before? Shepperd Strudwick?

S0 gradua[...]or,
Grodin the former director, Grodin the author
and Grodin the pain-in-the-ass combine to usurp
the helm and the film loses any direct course it
might have been on. Add to this the irresistible
impression that by the time everybody got
together to make the picture they were fed up with

EMMANUELE

it — and you might as well have named the
production company Titanic Limited.

Still, I hope the exercise is a salutary one for
Aram Avakian. I hope it has taught him not to
listen to advice from his writer.

Art Murphy’s review in Variety has this amus-
ing note: “It is fortunate that Grodin has some
non-performing credits built up in showbiz, for it
would be cruel to think that an acting career lay
ahead based on this infantilism[...]ay by Jeffrey
Bloom. Based on the novel by Gerald A. Browne. Adapted by
Charles Grodin. Photographed[...]LLE
David J. Stratton

Emmanuelle isn’t so much a film as a very
trendy and rather expensive-looking set of images
that look as if they’ve strayed from Viva, directed
by a former fashion photographer (with the un-
likely name of Just J aeckin) and starring a limpid,
baby-faced heroine called Sylvia Kristel who is
apparently a former Miss TV of Europe.

Once upon a time, France had a reputation for
making sexy movies. Along came Roger Vadim in
the mid-50’s and introduced the world to Brigitte
Bardot, and the impression was intensified. Then
somehow France lost its reputation first to
Sweden and Denmark, then to Italy and finally
even to Britain and the US. French censors
would never allow Deep Throat or High Rise.

Emmanuelle has been a box-office success of
monstrous proportions in France, probably
because it is sufficiently ‘artistic’ to fool a lot of
people into thinking it’s something it isn’t. Just as
Tim Burstall with Alvin Purple managed to per-
suade vast numbers of mums, dads, aunts, uncles
— even granddads and grandmas — that the film
was funny and naughty, so Jaeckin has provided
such pretty photography (by Richard Suzuki) and
exotic locations (Thailand), that audiences are
able to justify to themselves that they’re not really
going to see a sex film. Those cheerful souls who
need no such justification will go anyway; get the
others and you’ll make a fortune.

If one is to believe 20th Century Fox’s handout,
the project started out rather differently. Jaeckin
apparently set out to make‘a genuine 100 per cent
‘art house’ film, but once he got to the Far East
and experienced at first hand how erotic life can
be in Bangkok, the film became somewhat more
uninhibited. If you’ll swallow that you’ll swallow
anything.

The film opens in Paris. Emmanuelle waits to
join her new husband Jean (Daniel Sarky), who is
in the French diplomatic service and has been
posted to Bangkok. Once the credits are out of the
way, the film cuts abruptly to her arrival in
Thailand. According to the film, diplomatic life in
the Thai capital consists mainly of screwing
around, so the lissome newcomer is welcomed by
males and females alike. Before we get much
further the‘re’s a quaint flashback in which we’re
regaled with Emmanuelle’s in-flight activities en
root. Soon the tarnished innocent is introduced to
the mad social whirl, and quickly forms a strong
attachment to an archaeologist named Bee
(Marika Green). Bee eventually spurns her, and
she returns to Jean who in the meantime has been
dallying rather forcefully[...]olletin) who had already seduced
Emmanuelle after a nimble game of squash.

Cinema Papers, Mar[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (55)Above: Rapist—murderer Biscayne (Robert Quilter) is a prize quarry
for American bounty hunter Cal Kincaid, After losing his stolen Above: Caught in a storm on a lonely road, Beverly Millington (Carla Hoogeveen) and her stepmother Andrea Millington (Diana
horse ll'l a creek crossing, Biscayne heads for a waterfall, unaware Dangerfield) are forced to cross a creek and seek refuge in a coachhouse run by a sinister old couple.

that a friend has turned him in to the bounty hunter and a trooper.

Below: Tony Bonner as an ill-fated trooper in Inn of the Damned. Unable to stop a
bounty hunter trom shooting a handcuffed prisoner, Trooper Moore spends the
night at a nearby coachhouse, and is soon missing.

Director . . . . . . . . . . . .Te[...], Louis Wishart, John Morris,

Above: Stranded at an overni ht inn by a storm, and without their ' '
buggy and driver, Andrea Migllington (Diana Dangerfield) and her Graham Corry’ Phll Avalon’ Llonel
stepdaughter’: Beverly (Carla Hoogeveen) are compelled todsplend the Long.
night away rom home. Lazar Straulle (Joseph Furst) an is wi e . '
Caroline (Dame Judith Anderson) have “[...]1l'lVCS 1ga 6
Below: Cal Kincaid (e.t(\!lex Cord) and gofodtimle girl Peachei_(Lint:a the mysterious disappearances of
Brown) are interrupt by the arrival o a po ice party see mg t e
body of a criminal shot dead by Kincaid. The police troopers break travellers on a lonely Stret,Ch of
into l(incaid‘s hotel room. Gippsland coast. An eccentric old

couple operating a Cobb & Co over-
night house provide the bizarre
events that follow.

60 — Cinema Papers. March-April

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (56)[...]STORY: Outback drama depicting events
leading up to the 1956 shearers’ strike.

a game of “Unders and Overs".

Above right: Arthur Black (Peter Cummins) front. looks confident when he and Foley (Jack Thomp-
son) prepare to add another sheep to their ‘tally’ in the race for honors as top shearer in the shed.

Above left: Moments of comic reliefare few and far between in a shearer‘s life . Tom West (Robert
Bruning) prepares to give ‘Basher‘ (Jerry Thomas) a ‘short back and sides‘ with the sheep shears.

Left: Shearing contractor Tim King (Max Cullen) waits for a young rousabout to open one of the
gates leading toa brief period of relaxation between shearingjobs, in

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (57)THE FRONT PAGE

However, Jean is off to Vietnam and he leaves
his lonely wife in the safe keeping of the venerable
Mario (Alain Cuny) who tells her that “it’s the
erection not the orgasm that counts” and takes
her out for a typical Saturday night’s entertain-
ment which proves to be both humiliating and
fulfilling. Here the film ends rather abruptly,
almost as though the director had said, “a la Dick
Lester, hold on we’d better not let them have too
much first time around; let’s save something for a
sequel.”

I can’t say I found the film boring, not for one
moment. Others have found it so. Maybe th[...]y Ms Kristel’s Winsome
charms. It’s certainly a silly film — not one worth
wasting much time and effort on. It really is like
flicking through the pages of some glossy soft-
core magazine. The heroine seems to turn on
everyone she meets, male and female, and she in
turn seems perfectly happy to enter into any kind
of sexual combination. Brigitte Bardot would
never have dreamed of that!

The moment in the film that reached my libido
most strongly came early on when a baby-faced
young lady called Marie-Ange (Christine
Boisson) pulls out a photo of Paul Newman and
then masturbates — in public, too. Hope
Newman gets to see the picture. I-Iow fantastic it
must be to rate that kind of immortality. Being
masturbated to (or at) in a French sex picture.

EMMANUELLE. Directed by Just[...]GE

Virginia Duigan

One should say at the outset that anyone who
has ever served time as a journalist or wandered
into the deranged, grime-encrusted world of a dai-
l_y newspaper, will find this movie irresistible. Ben

Hecht and Charles MacArthur’s play The Front

Page is one of_ the few attempts ever made to
capture this uniquely bloodshot atmosphere, and

Billy Wilder has transferred their inspired version
to the screen with a tact and finesse comparable to
Michael Blakemore’s stage production—seen in
Australia during the recent tour of Britain’s
National Theatre.

Finesse is, strictly speaking, misleading. From
the opening titles, set against a frenzied collage of
newspapers belting off the ro[...]all the ink-stained guile of
the men it purports to satirize.

But my thesis, suitably seductive and insidious,
will be that the movie is not so much a satire as a
brilliantly distorting mirror, fastidiously em-
bellished, on an enclosed and incestuous world
which to the uninitiated (represented here by the
wet-behi[...]of hell. The Front Page, for all
its exaggeration and flamboyance, ultimately
wickedly enshrines the truth.

Well, such will be any ex-journalist’s view, and
journalists are always ones to jealousy guard their
reputation. As Hecht and MacArthur
appreciated, it is a curious fact that the status of a
newspaperman in any country, though low, is in-
variably endowed with a certain frisson.
Reporters, in the public eye, are faintly risque,
disreputable characters, hard-drinking, venal,
profane — or in the words of Molly Malloy, the
big-hearted whore in The Front Page, ‘a lot of
crummy hoboes full of dandruff and gin.’ It is an

62 — Cinema Papers, March-April

CALL BOARD

The boys in the criminal court pressroom have a final drink with Hildy Johnson (Jack Lemmon) after he has announced
his retirement from the newspaper game in Billy Wilder's The Front Page.

image that every self-respecting journalist
cherishes, nurtures and encourages brazenly.
After all, without it and its deep tap-roots, the
pressman would be just another back.

The causes of this purple reputation are set out
in the movie with a raunchy, Copybook elegance.
Newsgathering by its very nature is grubby, com-
petitive, irreverent of people and places. It is also
an occasionally cut-throat affair. The slow but
steady decline of the printed word as a source of
hard news means that Wilder’s Front Page is, to
some extent, a reconstruction of a world that has,
unhappily, faded from its former grandeur.
Television and radio have cruelly usurped the
newspaper’s preserve. His movies enable us to see
it how it was and still should be — paunchy,
ruthless and crafty.

But in the Chicago of 1928, with its prolifera-
tion of daily papers,the newspaper business was in
its element. It was spectacularly devious, sec-
tarian and predatory. This is the blackly comic
scenario of Hecht and MacArthur, and it is one
which Wilder has respected splendidly and in-
terpreted with a tactician’s ingenuity.

One has only to look at two main sets in the
movie —— the magically disordered press room at
the Chicago Criminal Court, and the main news
desk at Walter Burns’ Chicago Examiner —' to
realise that reporters put up with some of the
worst working conditions in the world. And to
realize that it doesn’t matter, because they never
notice. To put a journalist in a creative adman’s
office, with its deep-pile ca[...]esy.

Necessarily, the biggest items of furniture in a
newsroom are desks, typewriters, filing cabinets
and rubbish bins. The supporting props are equal-
ly indispensible: smoke, screwed up paper,[...]s, glasses with solidified whisky
dregs.

Again, in any press room — especially this one
at the Criminal Court where the messenger-

carrion are gathered to report on_th_e imminent ex-
ecution of cop-murderer Earl Williams _— there is

a deceptively languid, wisecracking atmosphere.
Bel[...]oil crackles with
intrigue. This movie architects that slovenly,
shambling allure. It also captures the cramped in-

toxication of a reporter’s life. Anyone who has in-
habited the newsroom attached to a major story
knows that the genial, jokey companionship
masks a very real and potent rivalry. To get onto
something the other fellow misses . . . the heady
smell of a scoop; the new angle; the unscrupulous
knavish tricks of the Judas sitting next to you.

Thus Hildy Johnson, managing editor Walter
Burns’ longtime ace reporter, is a man to be
guarded, and if he seems like getting away (to
become an adman in his future father-in-law’s
bluechip agency in Philadelphia, for crissake) then
all manner of scoundrelly skulduggery is in order
—— provided it is done with style. And if nothing
else, Burns’ fairy godmother endowed him with a
plethora of that at birth.

As the rascally Burns, Walter Matthau finds
himself[...]dest piece of casting
he has had the good fortune to come across for
some time. His towering bulk, his malignantly
funereal and intimidating pomposity, his small,
sneaky shifts in expression . . . all are breathlessly
accurate. His maniacal lust for an exclusive is
matched only by J ohnson’s fanaticism, the kind of
single-minded devotion to duty in the face of dis-
traught fiancee’s pleas of which only the truly big-
time reporter is capable.

To suggest that these men are unnatural,
rapacious or blatantly untrustworthy is to miss
the point mulishly. In the newspaper half-light the
great operators are born, and rarely made. Like
Western heroes, they are a race apart; for whom
talk of morals is a patronising irrelevancy. As
such, Jack Lemmon’s Hildy Johnson becomes
every journalist’s wistful dream — a swell guy,
one of the boysand when it comes to the nitty
gritty, a swaggering, swindling bastard:

The true villains of the piece are neither Burns
nor Johnson, and certainly not the unfortunate
waifs Williams and Malloy, They are, naturally,
the Sheriff of Chicago (Vincent Gardenia, with a
marvellously contorted, eyeball-popping visage)
and his Mayor (Harold Gould, suave and
Machiavellian), who are as collectively bitter and
twisted as their folklore archetypes. Hecht and
MacArthur were certainly getting-at corruption,
and their tribe of artlessly ingenuous reporters
provide both a focus for the action and a slippery
smoke screen for the real targets. Screenwriters
I. A. L. Diamond and Billy Wilder have had the

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (58)ANDREI RUBLEV

wit to see this, and their additions to the original
unobtrusively place the ambiguity wh[...]f the play, where the
action takes place entirely in the press room.

The screenplay is studded with gems »— fast,
frenetic and visuallyeinventive. The merger of play
and movie has been achieved with such
smoothness that it is almost impossible to guess
where one starts and the other leaves off. Hecht
and MacArthur’s outrageous use of coincidence
(the[...]all entry
into the press room when Johnson, about to join
his fiancee, isan ambulance and hurtles along
the street on a stretcher, dodging a phalanx of
police cars, for example) but the excesses, as a
rule, are forgiveably in character.

But if all this is inclined to make one maudlin,
nostalgic for a past where ethics are in no danger
of triumphing, there is solace at hand. Today’s big
stories may not quite compare with the florid ex-
travaganza of a hanging, but for the encircling
newshounds there is the same scene of blood, the
same sleight of hand. All is not lost. And in its
glorification of such essentially human
fascinations, The Front Page may finally be view-
ed as a tranvestite romance, a flagrantly apposite
paean of praise in the guise of a devilishly sly dig
at the forces of evil.

THE[...]y
Paul Monash. Executive Producer, Jennings Lang. A Univer-
sal Pictures production. Screenplay by Billy Wilder, I. A. L.
Diamond. From the play by Ben Hecht, Charles[...]ial
releases, Andrei Rublev, lasted just one week in
Melbourne, and according to its distributors, was
a total box-office disaster. Even so, it’s 10 years
late coming to Australia. Made by Andrei
Tarkovsky in 1966, it was shelved by the Soviet
government for[...]unhistorical’. When it was released by
Columbia in the US, nearly a quarter of the movie
was cut, although even at this length, it runs for
142 minutes.

Andrei Rublev is the greatest of the Soviet icon
painters, although very little is known about him.
He lived in the early fifteenth century under bar-
baric conditions of plague, famine and Tartarin-
vasion. The movie, of his life and times, is made in
eight episodes, which fall between the years 1400
and 1423, with the four central stories taking
place in one year. It's not a documentary, a
biography or a tribute to social realism, but con-
centrates on moments in the life of the artist in
order to understand his art. Tarkovsky illustrates,
at the most profound and moving levels, the kind
of bitter personal experience, the suffering that’s
necessary to faith, the inner life of the artist that
issues in the most finely achieved painting.

It’s difficult to account for the overwhelming
authority of the movie, its power to evoke com-
passion and pity and to order these feelings into a
sense of destiny, unless the movie is related to the
icons themselves.

Tarkovsky has created a work of art on screen
that reproduces the rhythms and composition of

the icons. His movie reflects the[...]ld: the sacred
figures, the horses, birds, rocks and mountains;
the chalice, bread and crucifix. It brings to life
and dramatizes, through one fable after another,
the inner experience of sufferin , faith and joy
that gives significance to these figures. And it’s
clear why the Soviet government for so lon[...]Old Russian art.
Tarkovsky shows us the suffering and personal
anguish that gives strength and authority to those
marvellous faces in the icons — many of them il-
lustrations of scenes from the New Testament.

The film is shot in an epic style that immediate-
ly brings to mind Eisenstein, although there are
significant differences as well. Characters are shot
against empty space, the wide plains, endlessly
flowing rivers or stark white church walls. The
black and white photography stresses the simple,
everyday materials like timber, rock, snow, paints
and brushes — even apples. You’re not so much
aware of these things as objects, but in a more
deliberately artistic way, Tarkovsky captures
their texture, as though concentrating a richness
of experience into the most simple materials.
Peasants munch rotten apples (the only food they
have); monks chop down wood and stack vast
walls of timber; an artist slowly extinguishes a
flame by wrapping his hand round a torch — all
these momentary shots create a complex impres-
sion of a simple, yet profound urgency, of lives liv-
ed close to the bone.

The contrasts in lighting reinforce this sense of
a spare, yet dramatic, existence. Much of the
movie is shot in grey half tones, against drifting
smoke or falling snow or rain. But there are
moments of brilliant clarity, of sunlight dazzling
across snow or lighting up the interior of a
cathedral. These contrasts echo the startling
luminous quality of the icons themselves, and es-
tablish a visual and pictorial tension. The camera
returns often to long close-ups of deeply ex-
pressive faces, and these pauses break up the
restless sequence of violent and barbarous events.
Similarly many sequences give way to long-shots
of water flowing or rain sweeping over the
countryside. This is quite unlike the sharp
rhythms of Eisenstein’s editing, and the effect is to
dissolve each episode of Rublev’s life into a more
abstract and complete reconstruction. These
photographic and editing rhythms, together with
sudden richly toned black and white colors, help
to unify apparently random and often chaotic ex-
perience.

Slowly, throughout the film, Tarkovsky draws
together different influences and incidents in
which Rublev’s own religious faith was forged.
His rival is the icon painter, T-heophanes the
Greek, whose work emphasizes the justice of God,
an overbearing, relentless, even cruel figure.
Rublev, though, comes to centre his art on man
and to stress qualities of love and forgiveness. His
struggle is to break down the rigid traditional
pieties and artistic conventions that stand between
his painting and his experience of Soviet history
and society.

So the movie constantly recurs to scenes that
are highly dramatic or even tragic, and yet very
formal. When the Tartars, for instance, raid the
town of Vladimir, the people flee to the church.
The Tartars swing a battering ram a ainst the
door, while inside swarms a throng of istraught
men, women and children. The camera slowly
pans across the crowd, picturing them in attitudes
of supplication and terror. The massed horror of
the scene makes formal, for a moment, the kind of
grouping that might remind you of Brueghel. The
doors then burst open and the camera picks up at
ground level the charging horses as the Tartars
sweep into the cathedral. Abruptly the carefully
composed scene is broken down and several in-
dividual threads in the epic are taken up again.
Rublev kills a Tartar attempting to rape a
woman; a peasant is vilely tortured after the in-
vaders melt down a.crucifix into boiling lead.

This sort of rhythm in the movie’s composition
works in two ways: it lends a formal strength and
gravity to the narrative, as though you’re seeing
through the eyes of the painter what happens to
the men and women around him, as well as l'l1S
country; it also leads to an understanding of the
spiritual energies that enrich the art.

Rublev confronts murder, rape, destruction —
he even kills a man. Yet he neither goes mad nor
turns to despair.

Instead he takes a vow of silence and retreats to
a monastery in a small village. Then, in the
movie’s final sequence he meets a young lad, the
son of a bell-caster whose father had died in the
plague. The son discloses that his father passed on
the secret of bell-making before he died and is
carried off to cast a bell for the Duke. The boy
searches alone for the right sort of clay and trusts
to a secret instinct that he will cast the bell.
Rublev watches the preparations and finally the
bell turns out a masterpiece. The boy collapses
and reveals, sobbing, that his father had in fact
never told him the secret. Rublev’s own faith is
restored and they establish a pact: he will paint
icons and the boy will cast bells.

The episode is intensely moving. This is ex-
perienced in the nervous energy of the boy and the
epic quality in reconstructing the process of bell
casting. And to make it complete there is the
brilliant photography, with its strongly-grained
contrasts between the earth and the day; the blaz-
ing fires and molten silver.

From this sequence the movie passes into a full
color display of Rublev’s icons. The camera
moves slowly across a range of figures, brilliantly
colored and perfectly composed. The authority
and strength they represent is irresistible, and you
begin to feel that you understand something of the
experience that underlies this gravity and pity.

The style and sweep of the film creates an im-
pression of the vastness of the country itself, its
long and bloody history of oppression and suf-
fering. But Tarkovsky hasn’t simply reproduced a
surface of social history. He has concentrated on a
religious and deliberately artistic form, a
profound response to the stress of famine, inva-
sion and disbelief.

ANDREI RUBLEV. Directed by Andrei Tar[...]i Tarkovsky. Photogra hed by Vadim
Yusov. Editor, not available. Sound by I. Ze entsova. Music
by Vyach[...]ergeyev (Theophanes the Greek), Irma Raush (Deaf-
and-Dumb Girl), Nikolai Burlyayev (Boriska), Rolan By[...]Kononov
(Fomka), Yuri Nazarov (Grand Duke). Part in color. 146
mins. Original running time 185 mins. USSR 1971.

SCENES FROM A MARRIAGE

Ross Lansell

Ibsen wrote A Doll's House in 1879; a com-
patriot Ingmar Bergman‘s Scenes from a
Marriage (1973) is a variation almost 100 years
later on the original trials and tribulations of
Nora Helmer, the women’s libber[...]r, after Ms Emmaline
Pankhurst, Ms Germaine Greer and the
‘Monstrous Regiment’, our latter-day heroine
Marianne (the marvellous Liv Ullman, if only un-
der Bergman’s and Jan Troell’s direction and no
others) has made some partial progress at least in.
her liberation from her late twentieth century
Torrald Helmeg one Johan (Erland Josephson, a
Swedish stage actor) . . . but with some significant
reservations.

In her present reincarnation Goethe’s ‘Eternal
Feminine’ has become a 35-year-old divorce
lawyer in the making and to rub in the irony, in
the words of her 42-year-old ‘psycho-technician’

Jiusband, a pretty obscure person all round.

Cinema P[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (59)SCENES FROM A MARRIAGE

Liv Ullman and Erland ‘Josephson in Ingmar Bergman's Scenes from a Marriage.

Events indicate, if not vindicate, her ‘Innocence
and Panic’, or more to the point, her ‘Art of
Sweeping under the Carpet’ (two of Bergman’s
early title cards) —- in one of several key close-ups
of Marianne, her expressive eyes artfully enlarged
by spectacles, she is shocked to her core when her
philandering screen husband shows his true colors
by disclosing that she’s bored him stiff, especially
sexually, for the past four years. So much so that
he’s running off with a younger woman to Paris.

This connubial abandonment leads to some
serious stock-taking of Marianne’s hitherto
carefully fostered naivety which she eventually
rises above, though not quite transcends, to
emerge from middle-class Chrysalis-coffin, to
become, in Ms Ullmann’s description, Bergman’s
‘new woman’ —— “a woman who is really free and
can live without the help and support of a man”.

But like her foremother Nora, she yearns not to
do without men, save for procreative purposes in
the manner of the fabulous Amazons, but as Nora
originally spelt out, for ‘real wedlock’[...]sychological state 10 years later at
curtain fall but, in another of Bergman’s
numerous present ironies,[...]ed
The Ultimate Irony of Marriage would’ve been a
more appropriate title, though in retrospect one
suspects that at base the much married and
divorced Bergman doesn’t care for the marriage
institution at all.

Johan still remains the adolescent that he
perhaps always was but Marianne has become, in-
stead of his lap-bitch, not some mythologically-
dimensioned ‘Great Mother’ but simply someone
no longer predetermined or inhibited by middle-
class mores.

In the intervening century since Nora shut that
famous door at the end of Act III and so struck
out for what she described as “the most wonderful
thing of all”, some progress has been made: in
fact our 1973 heroine has her husband shut the
door as he goes off after the other. woman.
Marianne is compelled to go in for some ‘con-
science examining’ and ‘consciousness-raising’ via
psychiatry. By play’s end on what would’ve been
their 20th wedding anniversary, she’s able to find

64 —— Cinema Papers, March-April

\

‘real wedlock’ with her by now ex-husband of a
rather peculiar sort. They have experienced so
much together that it becomes obvious they can
neither live with each other nor without each other
. . . only being able to get together in hotels or a
clandestine weekend at a friend’s hideaway — ‘In
the Middle of the Night in a Dark House
Somewhere in the World’ as Bergman’s title-card

puts it. _
In the meantime there has been no magical,
mutual transfiguration of souls — just a

realization, and more importantly, an acceptance
of their mutual limitations and shortcomings.
Like seeing your lover, not through the initial
rose-colored spectacles any more, but warts and
all, and still going on with the relationship.
Tolerance r[...]though. No
great heights were ever really stormed in Scenes
from a Marriage, but rather the minutiae of every-
day life, ‘for better, for worse’, slowly, steadily
and sometimes (literally) painfully accumulate

into a middle-aged Darby and Joan type of affair.
Their eventual mutual accommodation, both

mental and sexual, may be bland and prosaic, but
even this ‘demi-hemi-semi-paradise’ of a sort is,
according to Bergman, unattainable within the
marriage institution but needs the freedom, the air
of an extra-marital relationship — at least in this
particular instance.

Marriage versus true love, passion versus socie-
ty (to employ Denis de Rougemont’s well-known
polarity) in an eventually rather boring middle-
class setting where the problem seems to be one of
compassion rather than passion. The situation is
partially redeemed by Bergman’s relentless,
seemingly remorseless attention to detail.

The dramatic structure is perfunctory — the
hoary boy meets girl, boy los[...]e, or rather, prosaic semi-introspective
musings, as well as their pseudo-philosophical
cross-examinations of each other is a curious
structure to say the least — more akin to clinical
case histories or documentaries rather t[...]taxonomist rather than
the author of the Poetics. But it works, provided
that the audience is patient and prepared to do
some of the analytic work themselves instead o[...]man’s erstwhile
dramaturgy.

It could be argued that Scenes from a Marriage
is sophisticated soap opera. Its actual television
origins are indeed significant. Bergman originally
conceived the project as a television series, in six
50-minute episodes. These have been editedvdo[...]for the rambling, episodic nature,
of Scenes from a Marriage: its claustral, but not
quite claustrophobic, concentration on close-ups;[...]l nature of the entire project
transforms it into an extended essay rather than a
compact drama.

lt’s no Doll's House in other words, nor for that
matter a masterpiece. The two leading characters
are just not cast in the heroic mould, in spite of
their comparative verbal fluency. They are just
two rather ordinary, almost mediocre characters
discoursing almost ad Iibitum as television allows,
indeed encourages, in order to try and fill in the
void. '

Scenes from a Marriage basically is an acting
tour de force for Ms Ullmann as Bergman’s Anna
Karenina (rather than Nora Helmer) as Stig
Bjorkman* has characterized her. It’s an in-
vestigation of (her) feminine psychology as she
metamorphoses from a 35-year-old dutiful wife,
mother and career woman into — much to her
screen husband’s obvious displeasure, then
chagrin and wounded male chauvinist pride — a
45-year-old woman of independent psychological
Eesources, able eventually to stand on her own

eet.

Mr Josephson more than holds his own acting-
wise, particularly in the second part as he, too,
metamorphoses — or, rather, as his “machismo”
image and self-esteem crack and collapse back
into the adolescent self-pity that was implicit at
the outset.

It could be argued that the ‘coming out’

character that Ms Ullmann created owes just as
much to her own experiences of middle-class
repression° as to Bergman’s methodical, clinical
script and restrained, sparse direction.
_ Yet, behind the anatomy lesson there’s a new
lower-keyed, more specifically ‘humanistic-
oriented’ element in his work; but bereft of the
metaphysical or theological scaffolding of before,
it seems more philosophical but less energized,
less highly wrought and less dramatic.

We still don’t really know, of course, what went
on in Johan and Marianne’s minds, though we
have a fair idea of their strengths and weaknesses
after almost three hours of what amounts to
group therapy with them, with the audience
necessarily as the would-be therapist. Admittedly
some of the au[...]e ‘plethora’ of
behavioristic details waiting to be interpreted, and
walks out on Bergman. But most remain. Middle-
class masochists, apparently acutely embarrassed
by all these home truths. '

*Sight and Sound Summer 1973.
° Time, 4 December, 1972.

SCENES FROM A MARRIAGE. Directed by Ingmar
Bergman. Executive Producer, Lars-Owe Carlberg. A
Cinemato ra h AB roduction. Screen la
Berg[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (60)[...]__ ‘ti

Your senses willeeve be the same.

The Australian Film Development
Corporation is proud to be associated

with THE GREAT MACARTHY

and THE REMOVALISTS
and wishes them every success

Above: Jackl Weaver and Peter Cum-
mlns In The Ramovahsls.
Right: Barry Humphrles In The Great
Macarlhy

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (61)LET TH E LA B
WHERE ITS ALL

_ % A T % _ A TOTALiN+HeUsE FA<:ILITr:Es
L‘ M-Co[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (62)[...]hn Ewat, John Waters, Justine
Saunders.

Story of a truck driver and a hitch-hiker on a long
cross—country haul.

Running time: Two hours (approximately).
Budget: $300,000.

Being shot in Panavision.

Starting date: 25 April.

BACK ST[...]ector of Photography . . . . . . . ..Gary Hansen

A feature film script in its final stages. No further
details.

CADDIE

Di[...]. . . .. Peter James

Based on the true story oi a young woman and
her two young children during the 1920's and the
Depression.

Feature film on a $386,000 budget.
Preproduction stage.

CHILLA AND BERT
(Tentative Working Title)

Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .Not Known

Distributor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]esting characters from opposite
ends of the globe and their relationship.
Length: Feature

Budget: $250,000-$[...]. .. Val Udovenko.

Nick Faulkner,
David Denneen

An animated_fiim. A cubic from “Transversai"
goes to see the world — visiting "Angleviiie".

“Letters" and “Numbers".

Length: 30 minutes.
Budget: $22,000.
Preproduction.

HELG-A’S WEB

Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]Based on John Cieary's book He/ga’s Web,
about a Sydney cop who uncovers a massive
political scandal.

Length: About 100 minutes.
Budget: $275,000.
Preproduction_

LISTEN TO THE LION

Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]. . . . . . . . . . . . .Damian Parer,
Bob Hill

A surreal sci-fi study of a dereiict's last two days
on earth and the day after. Set among a group of
Sydney metho-heads and using the Van
Morrison song as a background.

ST. JOHN’S CHAFIIOT
(Working Title[...]Diddiey, Cookie Vee.

Jeff St. John's magic chair is the vehicle for a
musical fantasy featuring Jeff St. ‘John, Bo
Diddiey and Cookie Vee.

Running Time: 30-40 minutes.
Budget: $15000.
Editing stages.

35mm IN PRODUCTION

BO DREAM
(Working Title)
Director . .[...]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..AF’A

Cant: Bo Diddley, Cookie Vee, Jeff St. John.
Kah[...]HRH Queen Elizabeth.

Opening of the Opera House and the variety of
entertainment and events celebrating it, as seen
through the eyes of Bo Diddiey. A musical fan-
tasy.

Length: 3.040 metres

Running[...]Assistant . . . . .ingrid Hecheneerger
Secretary to Producer . . . . . . . . . .. Veda Curray

Screen[...]racy Mann, Luigi Viilani,
Robin Ramsay, Keith Lee and Graham Kennedy.

A full-length feature based on the 0/10 Network's
l[...]Russel Bradden
novel beginning with the murder of a young
hitch-hiker on Melbourne's Maroondah Highwa[...]ilng, Frank Thrlng, George
Lazenby.

The story of a Hong Kong cop coming to
Australia to extradite a prisoner.

Budget: $450,000.
Editing stages.

Above: Jack Thompson as Foley in Keri
Hannam's Sunday Too Far Away.

Cinema[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (63)[...]. . . . . . . . . . . .. David Copping
Assistant to Art

Director . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . ..Chris Webster
Consultant to the

Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .[...]Christine Schuler, Margaret Nelson, ingrid
Mason, Jenny Lovell. Janet iviurray, Bridgite
Phillips, Jackie Weaver, A. Llewellyn Jones.
Frank Gunnell. Martin Vaughan, Jack Fegan.
Set at Woodend (Victoria) in 1900 — Story of the
mysterious disappearance of[...]irls
trorn the exclusive Appleyard College during a
picnic to the nearby Hanging Rock.

Length: Feature

Budget[...]Clarke

Color process . . . . . .. Eastman (Atlab Sydney)

Gaffer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]cGuire. Sid Plurnmer, Robbie McGregor,
Gina Davis and Jill Argate.

Feature- length sex—comedy set in Perth, relating
misadventures of a bumbling private eye in his
efforts to close down the Pussycat Escort Agen-
cy. The local police cause havoc with their inept
pursuit oi Piugg and the agency's beautiful girls.

Budget: $100,000.
Final editing stages.
Release planned for June.

A SPORTING PROPOSITION

Director . . . . . . . . .[...]th, Robert Battles, John Meillon,
Michael Craig.

A Sporting Proposition is set in the Australian
bush in the late 1920's and is an adventure story
about a boy and his Welsh pony. Based on
James Aldrich's book.

B[...]. ..Rod Hay
Color process .. Eastman (Colorfilm, Sydney)
Sound Recordists . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .[...]orses, carriages . . . . , . . . . . . . ..Graham Ware

Stills . . . . . . , . . , . , . . .. , . . . .[...]onel Long.

1896. American bounty hunter sets out to in-
vestigate the ,mysterious disappearances of
travellers on a lonely stretch of Glppsland coast.
An eccentric old couple operating a Cobb & Co.,
overnight house provide the bizarre events that
follow.

Length: 118 minutes.

Budget: $420,000.

Release: By Roadshow on a national basis in
July.

Co-production between Terryrod Productions,
Australian Film Development Corporation, TWV-
Channel 7 (Perth) and Medich Holdings (Liver-
pool. NSW).

68 — Cinem[...]ssimou, Kate Fitzpatrick, Darcy Waters.

Story of a Greek migrant who comes to
Australia to face the harsh realities or an arrang-
ed marriage.

Budget: $70,000.
Length: 10[...]zpatrick, Chris Heywood. Martin
Harris.

Story of a furniture removalists‘ contact with a
suburban police station.

Budget: $240,000.

THE[...]Dyer, Max Gillies, Peter Cummins,

The career of a brilliant Australian Rules full-
forward — from his country recruitment to his
final league game. Based on the Barry Oakley[...]$260.000.

Above: Tim Burstall, Betlnda Giblln and
John Waters discuss a scene during the
shooting of End Play.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (64)[...]mlns, John
Ewart, Sean Scuily.

Events leading up to the 1956 Shearers' Strike.

35mrn IN RELEASE

ALVIN RIDES AGAIN

Co-directors . . . .[...]l
Ferrler, Briony Behets, Abigail. Vanessa Leigh.
A gangster-adventure story set around a casino
robbery. Graeme Biundell returns to play the tri-

ple roles of Alvin Purple, “Balis" McGhee, and
Alvin impersonating "Bails" McGee.

Budget: $250,000.

BAZZA HOLDS HIS OWN

Producer/Director . . . . . . . . . . . . Bruce[...]Little Nell, Nancy Blain, Prime
Minister Whitiam and wife.

Barry McKenzie‘s adventures in Europe, Paris
and behind the iron Curtain. An original script
based on the comic strip character.

Above Left: A cheesecake pose from

Cheryl Rixon, who plays the lead role of

Kelli Kelly in Piugg, the latest feature from
Terry Bourke.

Above Right: Mexican Peter and Dead Eye

Dick cover their tracks in a scene from

Richard Franklin's The True Story oi[...], Gunter Meisner. Brian
James.

The life story of a doctor between World War I
and World War ll.

PETERSEN

Director . . . . . .[...]David Phillips (Heinz), Belinda Glblin (Moira).

An electrician goes to University and gets per-
sonaliy involved with a Professor and his wife.

THE TRUE STORY OF
ESKIMO NELL
Dlrector[...]writer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .A|an Hopgood
Director of

Photography . . . . . . . .[...]ginal poem by Robert Service.
about Dead-Eye Dick and Mexico Pete’s search
for the infamous womper Eskimo Nell.

Budget: $240,000.

in view of the rapid growth of
Australian production the co-
ordinator of this column would
be greatly assisted by in-
dividuai producers and direc-
tors sending their production
details and stills to:
Production Survey
Cinema Papers,
143 Ther[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (65)[...]VEY

16mm PRODUCTION SURVEY

ANTONIO GAUDI — TO A DANCING

GOD

Director . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]. . . . . . . . . .. David Rapsey

Documentary on a Spanish architect Antonio
Gaudi (1854-T926): his works and philosophies.

Length: 31 minutes.
Budget: $5,000[...]Bob Thornycroft, Joe Boiza.
Length: 20 minutes.

A co-operative effort by the director and cast to
create a satire on our daily commercial ‘televi-
sion diet’ and its viewers. Mime and movements
are the main characteristics of this comedy.

Editing[...]Daryl Evans

Cut: David Leahy, Beverly Sluiter.

A film of ritual and of confrontation between an
artist and a woman.

Length: 25 minutes.
Budget: $3,000.

CHIL[...]. . . . . . . .. Lloyd Carrlck

Cast: John Duigan and Alan Money.

Short feature. A young man retreating from city
life meets a Magus and undergoes substantial
emotional and spiritual change.

Release print stage.

DON’T TALK TO ME
ABOUT THE BLUES, BABY

Director . . . . . . .[...]Location services . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Box and Dice

Camera assistant . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]cast: Janet Collins, Colin James, Graham Pitts.

A young housewife leaves her husband and
children after a violent fight and is raped by a
hitch-hiker.

Length: 30 minutes.

THE ELUSIVE GE[...]Heimans

Film portraying the geishaa of Japan — their art,
function and future (for the 0/10 Network).

Length: 50 minute[...]rmody, Chris Mcouade, Max Gillies, Bruce
Spence.

A middle-aged businessman Joins a mysterious
super business organization known as "The
Firm". The firm is in fact a political organization
engendering certain changes in its members.

Length: 100 minutes.
Awaiting relea[...]Mowanjum Tribe

Made with the assistance of the Australian Coun-
cil for the ‘Arts, Floating examines the clash
between white and black cultures in the Northern
Territory.

Length: 75 minutes.
Release print stage.

HIGH AS A KITE
(Working Title)

Director . . . . . . . . .[...]t: $28,000.

Length: 50 minutes.

Preproduction.

HOW WILLINGLY

YOU SING
A film by Garry Patterson.
Production assistant . .[...]. . . . . . . . . .. ‘inner Circle’

Written and performed by Garry Patterson, lsaac
Gerson, Jim R[...]eter Weinlger, Pat
Wooley, Spence Williams, Mandy and Joey
Munro.

“it is a long, semi-autobiographical comedy of
sorts; more like a personal, illustrated, comic-
strip novel than a production-line film. it is not a
consumer product." (Garry Patterson).

Budget: $1[...]. ., Carlo Tachi

Cast: Arthur Dignam, (remainder not cast).

Film chronicles the after-life of the main
character Jog. A born loser, he goes through the
process of changing his self-created hell into a
personal paradise. He becomes a dead winner.
delighting in tormenting his former self.

Length: 45 minutes.[...]rg, Robert Kimber, Geoffrey
Pullan, Bruce Rosen.

A political fantasy, set in 1976. Six months after
the US has gone fascist, American radical Kelly
Bryant comes to Australia, the press and police
coverage on her proving yet again that We Shall
Not Overcome.

Length: 23 minutes.
Budget: $2,500.

In release.
LARGER THAN LIFE

Directors . . . . . .[...]Studios

Seven episodes about the life of insects and
spiders of Australia.

Length: 50 minutes per epi[...]s Robertson,
Maureen Sadier.

Twenty—four hours in the life of a crime writer, in
which he confronts the characters in his latest
noveL

Editing stages.

MELANIE AND ME

Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]h Robertson

Documentary investigating sightings, a drop-
ping, footprints and a photograph which cannot
be attributed to known native fauna.

Budget: $5,000.
Length: 50 m[...],

Garry Archibald,
_ Mark D’arcy-irvine
inking and painting

supervision . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]er Newcomb

Animated cartoon satirising the world and its
constant plight of destroying Itself by nucle[...]eg Robinson, who
has built 16mm cameras, printers and projectors
for the last 50 years. Among other achievements
he directed a film in 1926 entitled The Shattered
illusion, and recently has built a super 16mm
camera with Vincent Monton.

Editing s[...]hn
Busheiie, Mason Williams, Bob ‘Wolf’ Ahwon and

Rusty Miller

Sound . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Mlxed by Les McKenzie
and Dan Dillon (APA)

Surfing by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Reno Abeiiira

Cast: Joan and Reno Abellira, Judy Bray, David
Lourie, Robbie Newman, Mindy Plater, Michael
Simmons, Ian Watson, Paul and Marianne Wit-
zig.

A surf movie in which wave-riding only con-
stitutes 10 per cent of the picture.

"There were 10 of us that year who left the city far
behind and headed west we had heard
stories of aboriginal tribes, of huge mountain

Above: Don’! Talk to Me About the Blue.
Baby, directed by Jean[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (66)ranges, of vast deserts and plains, of perfect surf

,on hidden beaches. Our journey was a quest into

the beyond; a search for new people, new places

and r)1ew experiences . . .' (Paul Witzig and Judy
ray .

Length: 95 minutes.
Budget: $72,000.

in release.
SCHOOL’S OUT

Director . . . . . . . .[...]. . .. John Sullivan

Documentary about students and teachers trying
to break through the conditioning of traditional
education at three radical alternative schools in
Melbourne — Brinsiy Road, Collingwood and
Swinburne Community Schools.

Length: 40 minutes.[...]na Russell, Don Barker, John Ley.

The longing of a woman to escape the rigid
framework of her everyday world and the
limitations placed on her freedom by human
society and human relations.

Length: 90 minutes.
Release print stage.

STIRRING
Direction and research . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jane Oehr

_P..rpduction company Australian Department of

Education and Film Australia

Producer . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]thy Read
Photography . . . . . . . .. Mike Edois (and others)
Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Warwick Hercus

Step by step examination of an experimental
method of teaching in a classroom which reveals
student and teacher attitudes to an issue (cor-
poral punishment) and to themselves as well as
showing the development of a unity within the
students where there was none be[...]t,

Gairden Cook

Animated film about two surfers in a world
stopped by pollution.

Length: 23 minutes.[...]. . . . . . ..Simon Scott

Abovo Left: Ceremony: a film of ritual and
confrontation.

Above Right: Julie Dawson in Who Killed
Jenny Langby.

Script . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]ist . . . . . . . . . , .. Bob Gardiner

Study of a young man's persistence in a one-way
love relationship and his subsequent realization
of the existence of ch[...]episodes on the people of the Northern
Territory and their lifestyles. Each episode ex-
amines a different character, e.g. a cattleman,
buffalo hunter, nurse etc.

Length: 50[...]nan, Robin Bowering, Graham Pitt, Ivar
Kants.

A film within a film and what transpires when ac-

tors don't reiate to a situation as the director
believed they would." (Eric Luighal).

Length: 90 minutes (approximately).
Budget: $24,000.
in pre-production.

WILDLIFE
Director . . . . . . .[...]sistant Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Co|in Beard

Script . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]raphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Co|in Beard

Color . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]e: 1 hour

Budget: $20,000

Editing stages.

FILM AND TELEVISION BOARD
GRANTS: GENERAL PRODUCTION
FUND AND SCRIPT DEVELOPMENT.

LILIAS CASTLE (NSW) — S[...]ldren's
program $500

AYTEN KUYULULU (NSW) —— To direct and
produce The Golden Cage; 90 minute feature
film a[...]00

SIMON TOWNSEND (NSW) —~ Supplementary
grant to complete television pilot for children's
current affairs program $1,000

IAN BARRY (NSW) — To direct and produce
narrative feature Sparks $20,400

TELEMARK PRODUCTIONS (GORDON
GRIMSDALE) (NSW) — To direct and produce
Child's Play, pilot episode for televisio[...]children $13,720

BALLARAT PRODUCTIONS (NSW) — To
produce Rate of Exchange, pilot episode of
proposed television series Frood $20,159

JOHN BIRD (VIC) —— To direct and produce This
Other Eden; documentary based on McC[...]LARK (NSW) — Develop screenplay
for one episode and story lines for subsequent
episodes for televisio[...]for episode of television series Dinkum
Micawber and three subsequent story-
lines $1.200

CHRIS McGlLL/TIM READ (NSW) — Develop
screenplay and prepare music/lyrics for
children's feature film[...]$1,800

RENATE YATES (NSW) -— Develop treatment
and first draft screenplay for 50 minute television
p[...]e of script
supervisor $1,200

SUE FORD (VIC) — To research series of films
on women artists $1,000[...]on Huelln‘s book Keep
Moving $3,000

E. C. HAM/A. K. FOWLER (OLD) — Research
and document source material and prepare
treatment for film documentary on licensed
slaughter of koalas in Queensland in the
19205 $1,800

RICHARD RUDD (OLD) —— Research and
develop script for dramatized documentary film
on[...]Mrs. Watson$200

WILLIAM EDGAR (WA) — Research and
develop historical television series Moondyne,
wi[...]r one episode of television series
Dan the Dogger and synopses for subsequent
episodes, with assistance of script editor $850

FILM AND TELEVISION BOARD
GRANTS: EXPERIMENTAL FILM AND
TELEVISION FUND.

NEW SOUTH WALES

Kenneth Amb[...]l Louez, $1,020:
Garham Dyson, $1,550.

VICTORIA

A. L. Badrock, $524; Martin Bartfieid, $1,92[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (67)[...]th agency represen-
tatives, producers, directors and
technicians, and represents a selection of
ads currently being screened in cinemas
and on national television. The commer-
cials selected for publication in this sec-
tion demonstrate merit in one or more of
the areas listed.

KENT
TITL[...]99

vonm cnoss SIIIO

30 CHANDOS ST. ST LEONARDS. SYDNEY, NSW. 2065
PHONE: 43 6100

Congratulations to the South Australian Film
Corporation on the forthcoming release of it[...]k Thompson
Max Cullen
Robert Bruning
Jerry Thomas
and Peter Cummins

Executive Producer: Gil[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (68)Brian Probyn is an English cameraman with an impressive list
of credits which include Poor Cow, Downhill Racer and Innocent
Bystanders.

Probyn has been in Australia recently shooting two features
for Terryrod Productions, a local comnanv headed by director
Terry Bourke and editor Rod Hay.

Inn of the Damned was Probyn’s first project, taking him into
the Australian outback to shoot a western style-horror—action-
adventure which is scheduled for release in July.

After an interlude, in which Probyn shot Monte Hellman’s
latest movie Shatter, for producer Michael Carreras in Hong
Kong, Probyn returned to Western Australia to shoot Plugg, his
second feature for Terry Bourke.[...]s correspondent Eric Reade took the opportuni-
ty to talk with Probyn and drove to Perth for some of the
shooting. The following interview was conducted in the closing
stages of production.

according to the dictates of the story
and the scenes in that story. Which,
of course, means that each film is
treated differently.

How did you find the Australian crew
you worked with on “Plugg”?

I was most impressed with the
crew and the backup. It came as a
big surprise, because I was led to
believe in England that there were
only a couple of operators and a few
focus pullers in the whole country --
and if you didn’t get these people,
you were in trouble. I had never
heard of the ones I worked with, but
they proved to be first class. The only
department in which they are not
completely conversant is lighting for
feature films, although most of them
had considerable experience in mak-
ing commercials. The technique of
lighting for color in features will

robably take two to three years to

e fully understood — then they will
be able to hold their own anywhere.
However, there are a number of
documentary cameramen who are
ready and able to take on that task
right now.

Do you have a basic approach to
lighting a feature?

In broad terms, I like to approach
lighting as an artist rather than a
technician. I was a mural painter
before I found the screen as another
wall to work on. I am concerned
more with the mood of the film, as I
feel that the lighting should be
governed by the content and should
flow accordingly. I don’t believe in
an automatic ratio of fill to key light
and so much backlight. That's
alright in an emergency, but general-
ly one should approach everything

BRIAN PROBYN: Cameraman

As a lighting cameraman, my real
challenge is to go into black space,
like a studio or hangar, and with a
few pieces of cardboard and hessian,
re~create a mansion or Babylonian
temple. Exteriors are another story.
Whereasartificially I have complete
control in the studio, outside, that
control is lessened, as half the scene
is already provided. I merely rein-
force what Nature has supplied.

Take Inn of the Damned as an ex-
ample. Here I worked on a plan of
getting the exteriors rather soft and
green. I didn’t want the usual con-
cept of the Australian outback. In
the early days, settlers were concern-
ed more with the coast and not with
pushing inwards into inhospitable
country. Consequently the greens
had to be lush, and in order not to
make them too green or violent, a
number of ideas were used to keep
control over the coloring — fog
filters, over exposure or a stop down
in printing.

Left: Director of
Photography Brian Probyn
checks a light heading with a
Spectra meter during the
shooting of the main title se-
quence for Plugg.

But when it comes to lighting
itself, again it is the mood that
counts. In Inn of the Damned, I was
against the purely technical
approach of white light -— because it
is color in itself — and everything
has to be 3400° Kelvin. Everyone
knows that there is a variation of
light from morning to night. And
where you have a period film like Inn
of the Damned, it would be fatal to
have white light — all people had in
those days were candles and oil
lamps.

I prefer to work as a painter with
warm and cool ——with slightly
quarter blues in the shadows — and
orange light. On an exterior, I like a
quarter blue on the light coming in.
By this means you can turn an or-
dinary set into something three
dimensional.

Then one really feels that it’s
daylight outside, or that it’s oil
lighting within. Conversely one can
climb to the top of a building, set up

Director Terry Bourke and camera operator Frank Hammond during the s[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (69)BRIAN PROBYN: cameraman

lights, and if it’s all at 3400° Kelvin,
it ends up like an artificial studio.

I work on things in the round, and
work them, not in terms of black and
white, but by cool or warm colors. If
your key light from the fireplace is
warm, then your shadows are blue. If
there’s a cool light from the window,
other colors in the room are warm. I
like to combine them with diffused
lighting as I am a great believer in
the modern conception of il-
lumination.

I am not knocking the older film-
makers, because the stock that they
were using was so slow that you had
to shoot with the aid of great power-
ful horizontal beams to get an ex-
posure. That in turn meant shadows,
and finally, lighting out those same
shadows. The techniques they used
must have been fantastic to achieve
the results they did. Today it’s_ a
simpler process — even though 1t’s
still important to have the right type
of lighting, directed from the right
area. I prefer to work with softer
light which does not intrude and
provides a more realistic effect.

74 — Cinema Papers, March-April

Brian Probyn (far left) checks the path of a cloud during an early shoot on Plugg.

How do you feel about the way Ben
Hecht used a minimum of sets in his
films, featuring indistinct
backgrounds and a constant use of
the close-ups and two-shots?

It depends on the type of film. If
it[...]ns, great plains or
huge sets —— one must use an expan-
sive approach. But in a «human
drama, which in a way can be more
exciting, the cameraman might as
well get the main characters
together. In television for example, it
is definitely an advantage to play
things tight. My theory is that on a
set, only a minimum number of
dressings should be featured, because
the screen could get too crammed. In
the background, I am inclined to
agree that if there is a good lighting
man he can create a mood that is
sensed in the film itself.

What role should cinematography
play in a film — should it be
remembered as in “The Third Man”
or “Lady from Shanghai”?

It’s a question of taste and
judgment. It depends a lot on the
story and the actors. If the latter
aren’t very experienc[...]xteriors can be used or lighting
tricks employed. But if they are good
actors, and it’s a dramatic story, you
may not have to go to the expense of
employing these devices. Basically,
it’s a philosophical question. It’s the
content that counts, the visual
approach is somewhat secondary.
The director creates the plateau from
which the actors take off. If they are
good, you can have a first class scene
. . . but you can’t create such a scene
solely with visuals.

Photography certainly doesn’t
create a film that’s wholly beautiful
to view.

Take for instance The Great
Gatsby which did not succeed in
people’s minds because there was not
enough human relationship: there
was in the novel, but it did not come
over in the film.

However beautiful the interiors,
costuming and elegant Rolls-Royces,

they are no real substitutes. Good
lighting won’t hel the lack of good
drama . . . the reaficore is the actors.
If you can create a moody scene, ac-
tors are not indifferent. They are
human and do react to their environ-
ment — they are very sensitive to it.
So, if you can create the right en-
vironment — and don’t use too many
lights to avoid making it too hot for
the performers — one will succeed.
It’s no good preparing a masterpiece
that no one can act in, simply
because you are frying your actors to
achieve an effect.

Now to The Third, Man. You
remember it for a number of reasons
— the acting, the tension of the ferris
wheel scene, the chase in the sewers
and the musical theme. All these in-
gredients, carefully blended together,
made an excellent film. It’s no good
having first class camerawork alone,
or good acting and poor
camerawork, or a marvellous
musical theme, but a hopeless film.
You may make money on recordings
of the music, but you won’t make a
great film. Everything has to take its

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (70)place, and be in its right perspective.

There is a tendency these days for
directors — and cameramen — to
work a lot in close-up.

I don’t like to push in as close as
possible. I feel everything should be
handled with restraint. But if there is
a strong reason dramatically — say
when someone is being shot and the
director wishes to see the horror in
the actor’s eyes — then a tight close-
up is necessary.

In television one can go in much
closer than for films. But it’s
irritating to be too close in films for
too long. I like to place people in the
setting, so however close you go,
even on a wide screen, there’s always
a‘ left and a right — there are things
in the room, or even something in the
background, to put the audience in a
specific situation.

The opening shot in “Inn of the
Damned”, of the Cobb & Co. coach
— with horses at full gallop and Reg
Gorman hanging on grimly — was an
impressive piece of photography.
Where exactly di[...]wheels spinning, backed with clever
use of music. In fact the success of
the sequence depended not so much
on lighting and exposure, as the
selection of camera positions. Here it
is essential to work closely with the
director, and Terry was very good at
choosing exciting positions so that
there were plenty of cuts to provide
the right type of action. When the
coach was on a straight run, a wide
horizon was used and bends came
into their own in providing exciting
visual effects.

Many Australian photographers use
an Airriflex 35 BL but have many
problems with its sound. What is your
opinion of the Arri?

We are using a 35 BL on Plugg
because perfect sound is not the most
important thing. The film is on a
tight budget and allows for only four
weeks’ shooting. However, Plugg is a
visual picture and far greater scope is
provided by a hand-held camera. The
big thing about a 35 BL is that you
can hand-hold it in sync. You can
easily sit in cars, whereas to use a
heavy sync camera, an enormous rig
is required plus a large number of
people -— and that’s an expense we
can’t afford on this film. I feel
that the BL is most suited for
Australian conditions. If the film
was entirely in the studio I wouldn‘t
choose that camera because you have
to dolly, and here complete silence is
an advantage.

BRIAN PROBYN: Cameraman

FILMOGRAPHY

BRIAN PROBYN AS DIRECTOR OF

PHOTOGRAPHY

Jemima and Johnny (Lionel Ngakane) UK 1962
Poor Cow (Kenneth Loach) UK 1966
A Long Day’s Dying (Peter Collinson) UK l967
Downhill Racer (Michael Ritchie) US and Europe I967
The Revolutionary (Paul Williams) UK[...]onster From Hell (Terence Fisher) UK I973
Dracula is Dead and Well and Living (Alan Gibson) UK I973
Dracula is Dead and Well and Living in London (Alan Gibson)
UK I973
Man at the Top (Mike[...]Top: Alex Cord in a scene from Inn of the
Damned. To capture the mood of the period in
this picture Probyn worked with warm tones
avoiding the harsh quality of “white“ light.
Centre: Shooting a travelling shot for Plugg

resented Brian Probyn with a few problems, and
orced soundman Phil Judd to ride in the boot
(left). Gaffer Derek Jones had to lean out of the
moving car to position his light (right). The
cameraman and director rode inside.
Left: This Arabian dance se[...]nk Hammond with the help of grip
Ralph Gosper — is one of the main title se-
quences. The 25 lb Arri BL allowed most of
the titles to be shot hand-held.

Cinema Papers. March-A[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (71)[...]Shirley

The camera floats subjectively through a towering kingdom of cups and
silver tea-service; the camera as a billiard-ball whizzes subjectively across a
table; and at the deceptively real conclusion to an airline commercial, it soars
beneath a model jet and into a sunset created by the artful dodging of con-
dens[...]rom the
expertise of veteran cameraman Ross Wood. As lighting cameraman of the
more distinctively Australian features of the fifties, as the winner of many
awards with associate Graham Lind for his work at Ross Wood Productions
Ltd, and as co-director of that company and more recently an investor in the
feature film Stone, Wood remains an intriguing blend of master-technician
and executive.

An auspicious entry into his company’s second decade came with the an-
nual presentation by the Television Society of A[...]in Awards. Ross Wood Productions scooped
the pool in that category, and much of it was thanks to the skill passed on by
Wood to Graham Lind.

The two milestones of Ross Wood’s early work are the features he shot for
Cecil Holmes in the 1950s. The first was Captain Thunderbolt (1951), dress-
ed into an exercise of considerable style from a basic ‘radio’ script by
Creswick Jenkinson. As if seeking to peel the pasteboard from their players
and give every line a new emphasis, Holmes and Wood set their camera
prowling. Overall, the feeling of the film is starkness — the moody dusk
shots, the bare trees among the boulders of the hillside — and the interiors
are mostly low-lit, and shot from low angles. With its three episodes and
varying shades of naturalism, Three In One (1956) is less hurried than Cap-
tain Thunderbolt and seems less out to impress. Undoubtedly the best seg-
ment is A Load of Wood, remarkable for the night shooting achieved with a
minimum of equipment. Having established their depression-struck town by
day, Holmes and Wood 0 t for such night detail as looming barb—wire and
isolated weatherboard wal s. One of the characters is startled to see a truck
creeping out of the evening mist like a white-eyed monster. Later as the
timber thieves freewheel downhill in a stalled truck, the forest around them
takes on horrendous proportions. Only back in town with its welcoming lights
and grateful widows, is the unease dispelled.

The Movietone News team, Sydney, c.1935. Ross Wood standing on truck to right of
camera.

76 — Cinema Papers, March-April

Ross Wood started as an office boy with Movietone News in 1933. During
the weekends he was allowed to carry equipment on location, and among
those he worked with were Bill Trerise and Wally Sully, who in the twenties
had shot some fairly important featu[...]elped the 19-
year-old Wood set up his first shot as cameraman. Between 1936 and 1939
Wood attended art school four nights a week at the East Sydney Technical
College. With few illusions about his ability as an artist, he claims the ex-
gerience gave him an essential grounding in tonal balance, composition and

esign.

5.: :

E43’
1 .

\'-.

I on
s
«I

___[...]i _.J
Shooting Bitter Springs (1950) near Quorn S.A. Camera crew includes: Ralph Smart
(seated), Ross[...]Wetzel, Mike Furlong, Jack Ricks, Michael

Pate (as policeman).

in the early 1940s, Wood moved to Cinesound where he spent several

years as a war correspondent. In 1946 he joined Video Studios, a small con-
cern founded by theatre showman Bill Maloney to produce television com-
mercials and short subjects.’ Among the documentaries, Wood shot his first
color film, Blue Water And Big Fish, on_16mm Kodachrome. He was director
of[...]sole venture into feature film production Strong Is
The Seed (1949), and operator to George Heath on Bitter Springs (1950). If
art school helped foster the basics of a good visual sense, then George Heath
added considerably more with his knowledge of filters and lighting. Since that
time Wood has become an expert in this field, and some ofthe more realistic
effects have come_from the way he’s enhanced his image. A green-yellow
filter brought dominance to the tumbling skyscapes of Captain Thunderbolt,
wh[...]tens the ultra-sharp effect of
coated lenses with a piece of nylon net.

Long John Silver (1954). From left to right: Manuel Del Campo, Carl Kayser, Ross Wood,

After Captain Thunderbolt came work as operator for Winton Hoch on
Mark Robson’s Return To Paradise, filmed in Samoa in 1952. Then came
King Of The Coral Sea, and John Heyer’s award-winning Back Of Beyond

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (72)Shooting Long John Silver (1954). From left to right: Kit Taylor, Bill Constable
(background), R[...]Keith Gow, Bobby Wright, Ross Wood, Byron
Haskin (in chair).

(1954). On his return from Beyond, Wood signed on as an operator for Byron
Haskin’s Long John Silver. I-Iaskin planned to shoot a Cinemascope version,
a standard ratio version, and 26 half-hour episodes. Carl Guthrie was im-
ported as director of photography, but had to return to the U.S. after two
months for another engagement. Wood now inherited Guthrie‘s position, and
with it the problems of CinemaScope. Nevertheless, many limitations were
overcome by Haskin's dedication and his background in special effects. A
miniature ceiling and an earthquake added interest to one of the episodes,
while high on the dunes behind the Pagewood Studio, cameras and characters
were tilted on a half—built ship to give the illusion of sloping decks. Fades and
dissolves were shot on location in the camera, but became even more difficult
when the ship’s mode[...]72 frames per second. The project took
two years and with its completion, Wood moved onto Three In One.

Some of the cast and the crew of Three in One (1956). Includes: Bill Constable (behind
boom), Cecil Holmes (in chair) and Ross Wood (at right of camera).

On Smiley (1956) and its sequel Smiley Gets A Gun (1957), Wood operated
for Anthony Kimmins and Ted Scaife. By the time Stanley Kramer arrived to
shoot On The Beach (I959), Wood’s extensive experience made him a natural
choice as operator for the film’s director of photography Guiseppe Rutonno.
The first few months on the film were, as Wood put it, “bloody hard work”,
but quite consistent was his admiration for Stanley Kramer. “He was”,
Wood recalls, “a dogmatic sort of man who did his homework and never took
‘no‘ for an answer. But he was always looking for a different approach.”

With the onset of the early sixties, the production of indigenous features
dwindled to almost nothing. In spite of the more recent opportunities, one
discovers with a sense of great loss that as lighting cameraman, Ross Wood
has not shot a complete feature since 1956. Perhaps the emergence of Ross
Wood Productions Limited is part of the reason. In this interview, Ross
Wood talks about the formation of the company, its operation and his plans
for the future.

ROSS WOOD: Cameraman/Producer

Ava Gardner and Gregory Peck in Stanley Kramer‘s On the Beach (1959). shot entirely in
Australia.

Ross Wood: While I was still at
Pagewood, I had the offer of good
money to take me across to Artran-
sa. I didn’t knock it back. At
Artransa[...]ctor
TV series. Then I joined Visatone
Television and was mainly shooting
commercials. The industry was a bit
shaky at that time, but there were a
group of us virtually running the
company. After six months we
started tp show a profit. We went up
to management and asked if we
could permanently join the company
as a unit, but they didn’t feel we
could handle it. I had the feeling that
they were trying to sell out. I think
the parent company was in property
investment and they didn’t want to
have any more to do with the film
business. So I freelanced for three
months. In October 1965 I gathered
the Visatone team together to form
Ross Wood Productions. It’s been
quite difficult at times, but from
there it’s carried on quite
successfully. Sometimes it‘s almost
come to the point of straightening
nails.

Have you prima[...]mmer-
cials?

Yes, most of the time: We’ve done a
few documentaries, but documen-
taries have hit a bit of a plane out
there. There’s either the promotional
film or the government documen-
tary, and the only time anyone comes
to us with a promotional film is if

they've got a big budget. We can’t af-
ford to work on the smaller ones.
Every documentary takes three
months to shoot, and it’s six months
before you get it off the ground.
You’ve got to wait that long for your
money. You can shoot an advertising
film in one or two days and have it to
air within two weeks.

What sort of documentary budget
makes it viable?

It varies, of course, and depends to a

large extent on locations and how far.

you‘ve got to travel. If you were
shooting at a factory in Sydney, it
could cost you $20,000 for between
15 and 20 minutes’ duration.

And for the commercials?

For a series of seven commercials,
some of them can go‘ as high as
$40,000. Certain others are made
below $1000, but you’ve got a good
turnover if you do two or three a
week at between $4000 and $6000
each. We've got technicians’ wages
to pay, we pay Equity rates for
talent, and we either build our own
sets or pay location hire. You won‘t
use somcbody’s house for below $200
a day.

We supply all the technical staff-
cameramen, sound recordist, editor
and although our directors work
on a freelance basis, we like to have
three of them working here at any
one time. They’re not obliged to stay
here. They can use the place as their

Cinema Papers. March-April —- 77

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (73)ROSS WOOD: Cameraman/Producer

Ross Wood and Cecil Holmes behind the camera for Three in One (I956).

home and just walk in and out. In the
long run we’d like to work with as
many directors as possible. On the
technical side we’re a bit camera-
minded. There’s Graham Lind, John
Lowry and myself, and I shoot com-
mercials if a client wants me to.

As a cameraman, how much visual
control do you have over the commer-
cials you shoot?

That depends on the director. Some
directors like to take full control, but
quite often I’ll suggest we shoot a few
additional angles. In the case ofa re-
cent watch commercial, I suggested
we shoot a transition from the watch
face to a polo ball. On the day of the
polo game the director couldn’t be
there, so I directed that sequence
myself. Normally, while shooting, I
disc[...]rector.
This includes the movement, com-
position and basic continuity.

The old idea of a ‘story-board’ has
nearly disappeared. Where you used
to stick rigidly to what the agency ar-
tist had drawn, is now more often left
to the initiative of the director,
producer and cameraman. You
could always accurately cost your
production from a ‘storyboard’, but
within the last 10 years this has
changed.

Why d[...]’s changed?

Possibly economics. Also the trust
that builds when people have been
working together and can deliver the
goods. Usually you have a con-
ference before you start shooting.
The agency people sketch their ideas,
and I do a lot of drawing to illustrate
camera positions and framing. Then
we know how to get on with it.

What other aspects of film advertis-
ing have changed?

The agencies themselves have chang-
ed a lot. The film producer attached
permanently to the agency has
almost disappeared -— we’re now

78 — Cinema Papers, March-April

Do you think there's a tendency to
compromise on Australian produc-
tions?

No, I don’t think we compromise
very much. We tend to compromise
by using lighter equipment, and this
makes us more flexible. We can use
the camera more dynamically.

What light-weight equipment are you
using here?

Were using Cine-60 cameras, which
although they’re a bit noisy, are
ideally suited to the zoom and can be
supported from our Gimbal crane.
The crane, which we made here, is
really a hand crane. It’s supported
from above and you can slide over
the top of a table without encounter-
ing the difficulties of a dolly. I did a
shot the other day which started right
down on a table and went tightly up
to a kid’s face as he picked up a piece
of bread. As he took a bite, we froze

Then I made a flip lens which
Graham used on Stone. We used the
distortion lens as well. I did some
shooting for Stone in the Domain,
and used the distortion lens in con-
junction with a color infra-red film
we imported from the US. By using a
12 filter, which is yellow and a weird
one to start with, we turned the grass
red and the skies a richer blue.
Graham used the flip lens in a smok-
ing scene, so that evey time they took
a drag the entire scene would start
stretching. Nobody commented on
these combinations, but one critic
said: “Other than a few trendy
effects, the camerawork was ex-
cellent.”

You also won two awards for the
snorkel lens. What’s the principle of
that?

It's like a periscope, but both the
snorkel and the camera are hung up-
side down from the Gimbal. The

Above: S[...]ing of Stone.

more associated with art directors
and writers. These people are closer
to the production than ever before,
and often they’ll get out and form
their own little service agency. Some
of them are doing quite well.

Speaking broadly, what is the best
work you consider you’ve done
yourself?

It’s hard to say. I’ve been happy with
some things. There are others I wish
they’d go out and bury. Oc-
casionally, . something goes wrong
with the last shot of the day, and
you’ll be tempted to say, “Oh that’ll
do —— it’ll have to do.”

on him. We had to be right. over the
table to get that shot. There’s no way
you could do that on a normal dolly.

What other inventions have you work-
ed on?

Well I work on them when I’m not
lazy. I made up some distortion
lenses which won a photographic
award. It’s roughly similar to a
vaselline effect, but there’s distortion
at the edges rather than a blurring. I
made one for the zoom, which is a
monstrous thing but it works, and
the other one fits onto a two-inch
lens. You can hand-hold the two-inch
version and do all sorts of things.

Arriflex lens is down the far end, and
inside you’ve got an aerial image lens
and a relay lens. It actually amounts
to a three-foot lens, and you lose
about three stops. Near the camera
I’ve got a knob which controls a
Meccano chain leading down to pull
focus. With an 18 mm lens I can
focus from within an inch to infinity.
In this way I can fill the screen with a
postage stamp, then in a fraction ofa
second, pull focus on your face.

What can you tell us about the
Overseas Telecommunications ad
that won the awards?\

Well the billiard balls in that ad were

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (74)Above: A camera is mounted on the back of a motor cycle to capture some ofthe fast action
in Stone.

marked with figures representing a
spaceman, the Eiffel Tower, and
other landmarks like Big Ben and the
Statue of Liberty. The idea was to
show how OTC could bring “you and
the world a little closer”. The OTC
ball rolls up and stops exactly beside
the ball with ‘the world’ map on it.
The snorkel allowed us to ride along
behind the billiard balls, so that in-
stead of trying to separate things for
the camera to move, we were gliding
through them with the lens.

The Americans have a system
where they shoot with the lens
pointing directly down. Below this
they have a mirror which pivots to
give the effect of the camera tilting.
They take a full second to get focus,
but mine takes a fraction of that
time.

And,‘ of course, you must be pleased
with your succ[...]d
for British Airways. We won music
awards for ‘A Bigger Dobba Butter‘
and ‘Ripple Sole’, which I felt should
also have got an editing award. And
for Singapore Airlines we won the
best series, the photographic award,
and the best color award.

The color in that commercial has
something of a pastel quality.

It was a drink commercial for
Singapore Airlines. With the distor-
tion lens we got the necessary move-
ment and blending of color. We were
using a high-key, dominantly white
background for our exposure index,
but the print we owe to the
laboratory as much as to the applica-
tion of color in the film.

We don’t normally enter these
competitions, but Lex Meredith* got
a letter from Ian Batey of Batey

‘Lex Meredith is a co-director of the com-
pany: also its resident producer.

Advertising Pty. Ltd., in Singa-
pore. lan handles advertising for
Singapore Airlines, and in a very
tongue-in-cheek way, he had written:
“Seeing you fellas seem to be able to
win awards all over the place, how
about having a couple ready for us
about the end of November." We
thought there was no chance of
getting anything, but we decided to
try and get an award for him
somewhere.

Is ‘Stone’ the first feature you’ve in-
vested in?

Yes. Firstly, we saw it as an oppor-
tunity for Graham Lind to do a bit of
feature work. Secondly, we felt that
being in the film business, we should
put our money where our mouth was.
When we get a return from Stone. we
want to reinvest it in another
feature. But it won’t be invested in
the same way.

ROSS WOOD: cameraman/Producer

How was it put into ‘Stone’?

When we spoke to Sandy Harbutt
about our investing as well as supply-
ing crew and equipment, the
Australian Film Development Cor-
poration had already given him
something like $65,000. We agreed
to contribute $38,000, then the
Government came in with more
money. To start with, we didn’t come
off too well because we put up about
30 per cent and paid an additional
$22,000 when the film went over
budget. Strictly speaking, this wasn't
our responsibility but we didn’t want
a hold-up in production. When the
film was released, we got ou[...]ts at
exactly the same time the AFDC
were getting their 50. In this respect,
the AFDC have been very good to
us.

Do you still intend to shoot features
yourself?

I wouldn’t mind doing a feature
again. A series bores me a bit. A
series is usually under budget con-
trol, and once you’ve set a pattern of
operation, another cameraman can
take over quite easily.

What sort of feature would attract
you?

I wouldn't mind doing a western
style or a bushranger style of film. I
did enjoy working on Captain
Thunderbolt, although it was a bit of
a drag trying to get a horse to stand
in the right place. But I like the ac-
tion, with all these coaches and the
mad gallops.

Would this extend to financial in-
vestment?

Oh yes. and l wouldn’t mind doing a I

good mystery. I’ve always been keen
on Hitch[...]es Tingwell (BlaI(<e£)’5fr§)m Cockatoo Island in Captain Thunder-
bolt I I .

EILMOGRAPHY

AS DIRECTOR OF
PHOTOGRAPHY

I949 Strong is the Seed (Video Studios)
Director: Arthur Collins[...]nd Pic-
tures) Director: Byron Haskin

1956 Three in One (Australian Traditional
Films) Director: Cecil Holmes

I959-[...]erican Film
Festival. Received awards at Antwerp,
and from the Australian Film Institute.
By 1970 had received II awards in six
different countries.)

I973 Tomorrow 21 Mile (Australian Film and
Television School) Director : Ross
Hamilton

AS CAMERA OPERATOR

I950 Bitter Springs (Ealing) Dir[...]art; Director of photography:
George Heath
Return to Paradise (Aspen Productions)
Director: Mark Robso[...]ctor of

photography: Ted Scaife
I957 Smiley Gets a Gun (Canberra Films)
Director: Anthony Kimmins; D[...]or of photography was
Graham Lind.

AWARDS

Since their formation in October I965. Ross
Wood Productions have won many awards.
Some of them are:

1968 Television Society of Australia
Commercial[...]ed Kleenex ‘Falling Pack’ —

‘Phffft’.

Australian Film Awards. Australian

Film Institute —— Hon- Mention, Adver-

tisi[...]'.

Kodak Trophy —- R. Barrington Scott’:

And Then There Was Glass’.

I973 Chicago Int[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (75)£2

HOLLYWOOD AND AFTER

Jerzy Toeplitz (Translated by Boleslaw Sulik

Geo. Allen and Unwin -— Recommended price:
Hard cover $13.60.)[...]20 years head of the
Polish film school at Lodz, is now director of the
Film and Television School in Sydney. He has
previously written several books which have not
been published in English, including a monumen-
tal five-volume History of Cinema as Art.
Hollywood and After apparently stems from
Toeplitz’s first ha[...]the American
film scene during the sixties, both as researcher
and visiting professor at the Theatre Department,
UCLA.

The book opens with a brief survey of the
changing face of the American film industry
following the demise of the studio system, and
describes the control of the majors progressively
passing into the hands of faceless, impersonal and
remote conglomerates, whose chief interest seem-
ed to be in the diversification of their operations
and the acquisition of existing assets rather than
in film production per se. Drastic cuts in produc-
tion allied with the prevalence of ‘run[...]erican-financed productions shot outside the
US) are seen to have taken the centre of activity
away from the Hollywood sound stages.

Toeplitz argues that the weakening of the ma-
jors’ monopoly and the end of what remained of
the old studio system is linked, not only with the
long-term effects of television and enforcement of
anti-trust legislation (separating production‘and
distribution), but‘ also with the failure of most of
the multi-million dollar blockbusters in the late
sixties.

Further, modestly budgeted films by indepen-
dent producers —— of which Easy Rider is the
archetypal example — are supposed to have large-
ly supplanted the blockbuster syndrome and there
has been a shift in the concentration of restraints
from production to distribution. Evidence of this
has been provided by the growing number of low
and medium budget films which have been inade-
quately distributed or ‘canned’ in accordance with
the distributor’s assessment of[...].

However, the recent difficulties of the larger in-
dependent production companies, ABC and
Cinema Centre, as well as unsuccessful attempts
by some producers to arrange distribution in-
dependently of the majors, seems to suggest a
rather different picture from that drawn in the
book. David Gordon, in the autumn 1973 issue of
Sight and Sound, argues that the finance-produc-
tion-distribution nexus is still very much with us
and Toeplitz’s conclusion that the monopoly posi-
tion of the majors has been weakened now seems a
bit premature.

After a useful chapter on the changing
character of the production set-up — particularly
in the roles of producer and director — the central
section of the book comb[...]nic
sociological observation, critical evaluation and
data on the industry and surveys the way in which
commercial cinema has reflected and projected
political issues, sex and violence. The book
however, does not offer anything especially new or
controversial. The chapter on the underground
cinema resorts too often to assertion rather than
evaluation and is liberally supported by out-of-
context quotes from such idiosyncratic observers
as Parker Tyler — with the spectrum of films be-[...]c.). One

80 —- Cinema Papers, March-April

can only suggest, as antidotes, Sheldon Renan’s
Introduction to American Underground Film and
David Curtis’s Experimental Cinema for basic in-
formation and to Adam Sitney’s recent Visionary
Film (reviewed in the last issue of Cinema Papers)
for detailed cri[...]considering the ‘interaction between
television and film production, a brief survey of

the cable and cassette revolution fails to provide
any directions beyond the ‘leap into the un-
known’. In a book ranging so widely over the
American Cinema i[...]which offer the
same flexibility for mass access as books and
records.

The last chapter, in which some threads are
drawn together, is perhaps the most interesting in
the book, particularly with the notion that
Toeplitz uts forward of a dialectical relationship
between t e information-giving and myth-making
roles of commercial cinema and television. This,
however, is only sketchily developed and tails off
into a brief discussion of some independently
made polit[...]arrative — free
wheeling, open-ended structures and the sym-
biosis of fictional and documentary material —
Toeplitz attributes to the influence of television
commercials and the underground cinema.
propositions both in need of more detailed ex-
amination. No consideration is given to the in-
teraction between the American and European
cinema, particularly with the French ‘New Wave’.

In adopting a broad approach in Hollywood
and After, Toeplitz has undertaken the difficult
tas[...]g cross relationships. No doubt
the intention was to raise questions rather than to
provide answers. What is disappointing about
Hollywood and After, is the failure to explore any
of the questions in sufficient depth to ensure
further engagement.

THE FILMGOER’S COMP[...]5.

Graham Shirley

Three more editions have come to pass since
1965, when Alfred Hitchcock, in his foreword to
the first edition of The Filmgoefs Companion,
wro[...]done his homework
rather better than the villains in my films, who
always seem to get found out sooner or later.”
The three subsequent editions have farmed out
quite a few errors, but author Leslie Halliwel1’s
emphasis has remained resolutely on the film in-
dustries of Hollywood and Britain. As the
forerunner of its field, The Filmgoer's Companion
in 1965 was welcome indeed.

If you remember the sickly film fare ladled
through your local cinema and the cries of
“Whatever happened to the film as art‘?”,
Halliwell was certainly doing his best to give you
the birthdate of Doris Day, and to support your
lamentations that the heydays of Clarence Brown
and Carol Reed were long gone. The changes of
the last decade have left Halliwell far behind. He
seems not to recognise that your local cinema
might be showing more substantial and varied
fare —— such as a double-billing of Stolen Kisses
and Fellini-Satyricon — and that while nostalgia
is on the rise, more people are flocking to film
festivals and giving commercial scope to the still
intact personal expressions of Bergman, Fellini,
Truffaut, and Luis Bunuel.

As if to match the opulence of such descendants
as The International Encyclopedia of Film, has
now opted for the inclusion of stills, advertising
matter, and in the wake of a December 1972
deadline, an addenda. But in spite of these ad-
ditions, I can’t help wishing Halliwell would
become more ‘international’ in his outlook. The
Filmgoefs Companion might more rightly be
called ‘Shuffle Back to Burbank’, for its cover
contains a purely Hollywood pastiche from
Walsh’s The Thief of Baghdad to The Godfather,
and inside little attempt is made to tip the balance
away from America and the sort of film-
buffoonery that might appeal to lovers of old
MGM,Films and Filming, and tiresome re-runs of
the Marx Brothers and W. C. Fields. Australia, of
course, has little chance beyond the usual
representation by Charles Chauvel, and Chips
Rafferty, but if you’re skimming the pages you
might recogniz[...]like Judith Anderson,
Marie Lohr, or Rod Taylor.

In his introduction, Halliwell justifies continued
publication with, “. . . it covers, however briefly, a
much greater range of subject matter than any
other book, and because it is fun to read”. I can
only relate this to his precocious survey of such
topics as bathtubs, nuns and nymphomaniacs, and
if you disregard this (as you should), there
remains only the most fashionable selection of
stars, directors, writers, the occasional producer,
and even more occasional technician.

It’s gratifying, at least, to notice that Halliwell
is starting to recognise more work from the silent
era, but at the other end of the scale we have his
rather[...]ith, “. . . I find few films of the seventies to my
taste, their explicitness being no substitute for the
imagination and skill which were poured into the
studio products of Hollywood’s golden age”.
While in some ways this is valid enough, the state-
ment eliminates an approach to some of the more
refreshing aspects of years gone by. Where, for in-

stance, are the names of Japanese director Tasaka _

Tomotaka[...]New Wave directors Armand Gatti or
Marcel Hanoun? A random and esoteric selection
I’ll admit, but they do appear in Peter Graham’s
modest but useful A Dictionary of the Cinema,
and in terms of recent films there are glaring
omissions in the case of Makavejev, Gall, Has and
most conspicuously, Fassbinder.

A Dictionary of the Cinema and The Inter-
national Encyclopedia both have a titles index,
but instead of this much-needed starting point,
The Filmgoer's Companion now gives us “My
favorite hundred films” and “Index of Actors and
Actresses featured in illustrations”. Halliwell
claims that an index to enable cross-referencing
would double the size of his publication. In his
book, Peter Graham has got away with 620
numbered entries in an index that occupies only a
quarter of his volume. By looking up, say, the
en[...]ds, you can find four
references which will lead to its director, star, co-
star and producer. If you’d turned, simply with
title in hand, to The Filmgoefs Companion, you
would have had nowhere to look.

As Graham’s guide is now out of print, who
would Halliwell see as his main competitors?
Most certainly The Internat[...]others. Also The World Encyclopedia ofFilm,
which in its spare, blunt style, .offers more infor-
mation on specific careers, with a listing of their
films and their dates. Like Ha1liwell’s book, it
lacks a cross-reference index, but it makes up for
this with a massive listing of features andand alternative titles.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (76)If again, for curiosity’s sake, you go in search
of a reference to Australia, you’ll find that under
‘Flynn, Errol’, Herman F. Erben and not Charles
Chauvel is credited with the direction of In the
Wake of the Bounty. Quite inaccurate, of course,
but apart from an occasional lapse, The World
Encyclopedia of Film is refreshingly thorough.

The Australian entry in The International En-
cyclopedia of Film occupies a full column. I went
a little cold when I saw that Roger Manvell’s sole
source of reference was Baxter’s The Australian
Cinema, but Manvell manages to avoid Baxter’s
more obvious errors, and the only false note com-
es with his ‘hopes’ for the formation of the Film
and Television School and the Experimental Film
Fund (the latter was actually in existence by 1969,
three years before the book’s publication).

To quibble nationalistically, however, is irrele-
vant in the face of the book’s comprehensive
coverage of film as both an art form and an in-
dustry. While it makes no claim to examine in
depth the technology of film production, it con-
tains entries under such headings as ‘Archives and
Film Preservation’, ‘Avant-garde and
Underground Film’, ‘Cinematography’, ‘Editing
Film’, ‘Publicity’, and ‘Screenwriting’. There are
30 entries for ‘National Cinema’ — from ‘Arab
Film’ to ‘Yugoslavia’ —— a chronological outline
to the development of the film, an encyclopedia of
personal entries, and a 15-page series of frame
enlargements giving key e[...]ncyclopedia of .Film gathers its information
from a multitude of proven works, which if called
upon to replace this volume, would occupy an
average-sized library.

Next toand the
nymphomaniacs (bless their hearts) represent a
scissors-and-paste job as limited as it is ill-
considered, and set beside the spare detail of the
International's still captions, Halliwell’s are self-
indulgent to the extreme. Take the following for
example: “Laurel and Hardy. An unusually
youthful shot (circa 1927) of the funmakers who
later became everyone’s favorite uncles”. A bit
much, I thought, but then I came across “Ingrid
Bergman. A radiant star of the forties proved in
Spellbound that men may even make passes at
girls who wear glasses” . . .

As accessible as it is, another edition of The
Filmgoer’s Companion will always be welcome.
But, I can’t help hoping that Halliwell would pick
on a fetish that was at least widely entertaining. If
this is not possible, then the book should be reduc-
ed by at least two-thirds of its size and sold at a
rate which the $3-a-ticket filmgoer can afford.

FILM AS A SUBVERSIVE ART

Amos Vogel, Wiedenfeld and Nicholson 1974 —
Barrett Hodsdon. Recommended p[...]on

Amos Vogel, founder of New York‘s Cinema
16 and director of the New York Film Festival,
has produced a book which attempts to classify
that filmmaking is considered subversive because
it challenges existing social mores and the status
quo of political and social institutions.

The main part of the book is divided into three
sections, under the heading, ‘Weapons of Subver-
sion’. They are (a) The Subversion of Form; (b)
The Subversion of Content; and (c) Forbidden
Subjects of Cinema.

The final section, ‘Towards a New Con-
sciousness’, attempts to place ‘Subversive
Cinema’ (as defined) into relief, so that its func-
tion in society is not overstated.

Since Vogel sees subversive cinema as existing

in opposition to the mainstream commercial
cinema, there is a perpetual problem of dis-
semination to a wide audience. Subversive cinema
ranges from avant-garde formalist exercises to
anarchist and anti-puritan tracts to social and
political critiques. Because these movies rely on
alienation or confrontation devices, they may not
reach the audiences they would most like to
assault. Thus captive audiences are often those
disposed to a particular point of view expressed
within a work.

Vogel believes the 16mm non-theatrical mar[...]test possibility for exposing sub-
versive cinema to a range of audiences.
Nevertheless, many movie titles cited by Vogel
have remained in limbo in terms of general
recognition.

Although Vogel’s book is ambitions in scope,
he does not try to develop any theoretical or
analytical issues in depth. From this perspective‘
the book appears to be intended as a reference
work.

In the section ‘Subversion of Form’, Vogel
broaches a whole series of topics relevant to
current theoretical discussions — ‘Destruction of
Plot’, ‘Narrative’, ‘Destruction of Time and
Space’, ‘The Assault on Montage’, ‘Triumph and
Death of the Moving Camera’, ‘The Subversion
of Illusion’ — but he does not really explore the
issues he raises under those h[...]tenor of-
discussion here invites such questions as

What was the true nature of ‘classical’ cinema?

Why have the last 15 years been so vigorous in

the assault of filmmaking on the canons of

classical cinema?

What is the relevance of research in semiology

to understanding of communication processes

in cinema?

What is the value of Marxist thought on the

ideology of representation?

How has subversive cinema been influenced by

the crises in commercial filmmaking and vice-

versa? Changing social fashions have deemed a

number of past movies no longer to have sub-

versive connotations.

Thus, one remains with the impression that the
book is apparently profound rather than actually
so. I am not suggesting that Vogel’s book should
have been an academic text book on film theory.
Yet the scope of Vogel’s concerns, initially im-
pressive, are ultimately a little perfunctory in
respect of the author’s desire to encapsulate issues
and make them subservient to the referential pur-
pose of the book. In spite of these criticisms,
‘Subversive Art’ is certainly useful for its concise
and often perceptive commentaries on a whole
range of titles presented in Vogel’s classificatory
system. Moreover, the book is lavishly produced
with an intelligent selection of stills.

BOOKS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW

Confessions of a Window Cleaner Jessie Mmmews

Tlm°ll1)lB I-5: Mi[...]Shipman
MacMillan & Co
Distributed by MacMillan

A Library of Film Criticism —
American Film Direc[...]Distributed by MacMillan
$4.95

‘ _ John Cary

An Appalllng 'l ulent Hami n

John Baxter Distri ute[...]lson (This series reviewed next issue)
51000 This is Where I Came In

50 Superstars T. E. 8. Clarke

John Kobal Michae[...]Sons 59.95

$16.20

Torn Perlmutter

ADDE-NDA AND CORHIGENDA
December Issue: David Baker stills by Virginia Coventry.

BOOKS

NEXT ISSUE

I
‘.AV‘\J as-tun.

«st-e::it::..'.ir.;...;.$:)s?;;' "

2
5
I if
1

Political Cinema

A special feature by John O'Hara which examines
notions of Political Cinema and explores the work
of Bernado Bertoiucci, Costa Gavras.

Also in the next issue:

0 Special feature on animation with extracts from
an exclusive interview with Donald Duck.

0 Facts ab[...]Burke of Village, David
Williams of Greater Union and John Mostyn of
Hoyts.

Revealing conversation wit[...]ng
composer Bruce Smeaton.

Everything you wanted to know about Restrictive
Trade Practices Legislation and, the Film in-
dustry but were too afraid to ask . . . Part 2.

Latest Australian feature films reviewed: Sunday
Too Far Away, Inn of the Damned, The
Flemovalists, A Salute to the Great Mccarthy
and many others.

Don’t miss out — subscribe now!

.o.o_ ~p 3' » I

Havingitrouble with your image?
Then turn to page 84

Cinema Papers, March-April —— 81

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (77)[...]nued from P.38

provisions of the consent decrees as far as they

concern us here are set out in the Report of the

English Monopolies Commission into Films.”

They included:

1. Distributors may not stipulate admission
prices.

2. Distributors may not agree with other dis-
tributors to ‘maintain a system of clearances’.
The term ‘clearance’[...]iod of time
which must elapse between runs within a par-
ticular area, or in specific theatres. The provi-
sion does not outlaw clearances, but is aimed
at preventing anything in the nature of an
agreed master list of clearances for use by all
distributors and exhibitors.

3. Distributors may not enforce clearances ‘in ex-
cess of what is reasonably necessary to protect
the licensee in the run granted’; i.e. a clearance
must be reasonable and the burdening of
sustaining its legality is on the distributor.

4. Distributors may not “further perform any ex-
isting franchise” or make any franchise in the
future. A franchise is a licensing agreement
with an exhibitor covering more than one year,
and the purpose of this provision is to prevent
permanent trading relationships or
associations between particular exhibitors and
particular distributors.

5. Distributors may not make ‘master
agreements’ or ‘blanket deals’. These terms are
synonomous and mean licensing agreements
with whole circuits.

6. Distributors may not make the licensing of one
film contingent upon the exhibitor taking
others (full line forcing).

7. Distributors may only offer to license a film to
an exhibitor ‘theatre by theatre’, solely upon
the merits and without discrimination in favor
of affiliated theatres, circuit theatres and
others.

Appeix A

M9I_|0N__P_1§LU_RE i
DISTRIBUTORS Assocui-rloh '

is OF AUSTRALIA A

STANDARD FORM OF CONTRACT IN RELATION TO THE HIRING
OF FILMS BY DISTRIBUTORS T0 EXHIEITORS
IN VICTORIA AND/OR TASMANIA

(operative as ii-om ist september I967)

AGREEMENT made between the Dtstrlbultor nlmed in Lhe Schedule hereto of
Lhe one pr! Ind lhe Exhlbllnr named In Lhe Schedule oIlJ1e other part
WHEREEY IT IS AGREED ll (allow: —

roririatimi 1. la) The ExhIbImr'n signature to the said Schedule shall constitute the
or document arr nfler to hire illi-its on the terms or this Agreement.

°°‘“""" (b) such otter shall in consideration or the promise by the Distributor
contained in subciause id) or this clause (i-lotwllhszzndlng subsequent negotiations
between the Distributor and Exhiblmr) be irrevocable by the Exhibitor and
capable oi acceptance by the Distributor tor the[...]igning at the otter by the Exhibitor ii the otter is so signed in the
metropolitan area oi Melbourne or in the cities or ilabart or tsuncsston or
the suburb[...]igning or the otter by the Exhlhllcr ii the oiier is so signed in any other port
or Victoria or Tut-iiaritn. unless[...]he expiry oi the said
period ol‘ I4 or 21 days (as the case may be) rejects Ihz otter. ii tiieotisr
be not accepted wllJilrt the said period the same shall be deemed to be relectetl.

(i:) ii the Distributor desire to accept such otter acceptance shall be
made by the Distributor beiore the expiry oi the period mentioned in the
preceding subclaiise by posting by prepaid post or delivering to the Exhibitor
a copy at the said otter signed by its managing dir[...]l sales manager. secretary. or otiicsr authorised in writing to accept
otters to hire l'lli-tie: and it the nlstributor desire to reject. such otter betore
the expiry oi the cold period such relectlari (subject to subciause id) at We
clausel shall be made by posting by prepaid post or delivering to ma Exhibitor
a notice in writing at such rejeclloti signed by its managing[...]t or branch manager, or
DIIICEI’ lo nullinrlned In writing.

(d) in consideration or uie puer remaining irrevocable as above provided
the Distributor shall not. while me otter la irrevocable and has not been rejected

otter tor exhlblllorl in any opposition theatre any or the illma which are the
subject matter or this otter and the otter shall be deemed to be rejected ii and
when tlis Distributor does In otter any or such ttlrns.

(el Any turn or advert[...]the

Eldilhllar wlille llile document t-ell-illns an oil! Ililll be deemed to be

supplied pursuant to this Agreement If the truer be accepted but i1 the otter

he not accepted such iiim or advertising matter shall be deemed to have been
hired or purchased as the clue may be upon auch at the terms at this Agreement
as may be applicable.

period 2. the period during which the turns to be supplied under this Agreement
ol iililll be supplied and exhibited shall be the period oi hire set out in the
niic schedule.

82 —- Cinema Papers. March-April

8. The five major companies were required to
divest themselves of their exhibition holdings
(divorcement).

9. Their exhibitor successors were required to
divest themselves of a considerable number of
cinemas; in some cases particular cinemas
were designated, and in others particular towns
were designated in which one or more cinemas
were disposed of (dives[...]gu-
ment for divorcing exhibition from production
and distribution was that all parts of the industry
were said to be effectively controlled by the five
vertically integrated major companies. Although
each company owned a considerable number of
cinemas, none had nationwi[...]films the company produced, it also needed access
to the other circuits for full national distribution.

It was alleged that this was so important to the
film companies that each gave preference to films
from other companies in order to avoid possible
reprisals against its own films. This system of
reciprocal preference, it was claimed, was the
principal factor which in substituting competition
for co-operation enabled them to control the in-
dustry and prevent independents from breaking in
and competing. Although it was possible to out-
law certain trading practices, the Department of
Justice felt that it was impossible to be certain
about the motives of booking and the qualities of
films, and the only way to break reciprocal
preference was by divorcement.

It has been argued that divorcement was largely
responsible for the decline in American film
production in the fifties by depriving producers of
an assured market, just when they were beginning
to feel the pinch of television. The ‘death’ of the
major studios and of the ‘star system’ have been
laid at its feet. It seems more correct, however,
that it was the advent of TV that radically chang-

ed audience demands for cinema, and even
without divorcement the movie moguls’ heyday
was over. Further divorcement gave rise to the
great wave of inde endent producers in the late
fifties and sixties w 0 would have never been able
to flourish in pre-divorcement days.

As to divestiture, the aim was to reduce the size
of the circuits particularly to attack the closed
town situation, not to destroy them altogether.
Control of booking methods was rather seen as a
way to mitigate circuit booking power. The
Paramount case saw the introduction of a system
of compulsory competitive bidding for available
films. The idea was that distributors would be
forced to accept the best bid made on a film and
not discriminate in favor of a certain exhibitor.
However, the impreciseness of[...]yles
of bidding (higher percentages of box-office take;
higher minimum guarantees; higher fixed
payments) and the difficulty of comparison led the
court to largely withdraw from supervision. Some
competitive bidding still takes place, but it is
suggested its purpose is largely to prevent private
anti-trust suits by aggrieved exh[...]rimination.

Certainly theatre-by-theatre booking and com-
petitive bidding have led to modernizations and
improvements of cinemas (now that exhibitors
believe they can make a reasonable return on their
investment); but some exhibitors claim dis-
tributors use competitive bidding as a ruse for
securing higher film rentals. Distributo[...]ion between exhibitors
may make for lower bidding and film hire. They
also allege that theatre-by-theatre booking forces
the distributor to invest in more prints of a film
than might be strictly economical in order to
secure a substantial splash release.

There seems to be some evidence that post-
Paramount booking methods are unsatisfactory
for a variety of reasons, but there is no doubt that
the goal of competition is now a much more real

.i

-rerminaiion I la) ii the Distributor
i All ii i ii ta'ito d hru h into remedy any bi each by the W " "3"“' "“ °“"[...]m l-:ahibiipr oi Ilw provisions nl this Agreement as regards nlstrlbutor "" "’”"” °' '"'"' "‘ °""“'"°"' "“ ”“““"°" ""°" °'
into the theatre and records. copyright. ceasing (ll) be giitity pi persistent breaches as this Agreement;
de I be ob at A t .
::";:’|':::‘:3"::::::" D'”::::':J specm’:;)""°‘ E ' (ill) be guilty oi any breach going to the root at this Agreement;
then in any at such events the izrihlblior may by notice in writing slthsr
ill) commit any breach 01 WI AEFHI[...]e wrva-e. suspend the acceptance at all the iilms to be supplied under any or all or
manner. time or place in. .-ii. rri tor which. my film my this Agreenita-it and other lllm agresmenta (ii any) between the saints
or may not be used. parties until such datauli shall cease or be remedied or may iarmlnats
all or any at this Agreement and such other ttlm agreements (ll siryl.
' be i l i * b h pi th A t.
‘“” 3"‘ " ” ‘’"''“‘°"' "“ '5 " ’m""" (Is) it the Exhibilar duly suspend the acceptance 11 iiliaia under
(iv) be guilty (ii any lricach going to the root at this Ag'reemenl' this clause he may upon notice in writing by him to the Distributor rcdues
' the number at lilms to be supplied by the number which in the ordinary
(V) become insolvent or be adiudicaied bankrupt or execute anin the case (C) it the Diihibitor duly suspend deliv[...]4 C"YT‘l*3|'I)' lw into llniuidnliuri or suffer a iecelver in he hereunder and such deiaiiit continue ior or be not remedied within two
flilvmnlud l'R0\'|Da[) imwgvgn that where a reach!!! 0! weeks (mm the dale at such suspension the Exhlbllar my by notice In
liquitidtui is avllfiliiled he shall have the option isuch notion writing to the Distributor terminate this Agreement and all or any it such
in be noiiiied to IM Distributor \ail.hll'i iourteen days at his nlrm. .g,,,,,,s,.,g
ilppotnli-iirnil to ticcnpl responsibility under the Agreement _
MW” wcjudm M W Mummy “meander D, mg 5. This Agreement shall not operate so as to derogata train any rights
Emhlmn W. W N. W on __mmm me Agreement “ms or the Exhibitor or the Distributor. as the case may be. arising irom the
sugwndm m lflm[...]Ippommem respective agreement between them either In receive notice or a greater
|,,.;O\.mED “so um um prayisinns 0, ms mnmp,‘ “mu period at notice or any breach which may be a ground at suspension or
am apply ioa company whic[...]dation inn gins termination within this Agreement in a case where no notice or a lesser
pumwc 0‘ means“ Wm“ only‘ or period at notice is provided tor by clauses J or 4. as the case iriay be.
(vi) either voluntarily iii liy opelailtin oi law should cu“ In operation 6. A notice nl suspension or termination under cl-uses :l or 4 shall
of notice. take effect immediately upon service oi the notice.

have cuniiol ni the theatre (ll only one theatre ‘is herein
speciiied tor the purposes oi exhibition) or the majority
(II the theatres In \|lIlChI|Ill15 are lo be exhibited so Lhal
Illms cannol be Exhlbiled llierc under this Agreement;

impossibility 7. la)
is per-tornisncs action based upon any present or iu[...]tate at the commonwealth or at any state or

then and in any at such events the nistritiuior may by notice in wrlllhg
either suspend dellvi.-rv at all the lilms to lie supplied under any or all at
this Agreement and elite: illm agreements lit anyl between the same[...]ed. or may terminate
all or any'oi this Agreement and such other lili-ii agreements iitanyl
PROVIDED THAT the Distributor shall not terminate or suspend iora
trivial breach within paragraph (ll) oi this siibciause unless aiter notice
in writing the Elililbitol tall r-irthwith In remedy such iiivlal breach.

ibi ii the Distribut[...]nd ilclivuiy under this clause
it may upon notice in writing by II induce the numbe. or iilrns to be
supplied by the number which in llli: or-iiinarv course would have been
exlilhlle[...]ereunder ilrlll sucliilci-iuli continue tin or he not rem.-died
(“min N-n “pkg I||)n\ |I|1'lIiIII"II h|J.~|ll'l|.V’Ii|lI Illt- Distributor may by
notice in K‘fIIInL{|UIIll'I':AIIII3II1‘I I(‘l‘l'Ill[...]putiuc
disorders or abnormal conditions attaching to lorsign uclrangte it is not

or will not be commercially practicable tor the Distributor to carry out
its iilm ag-rsenienis in the commonwealth or (L! the disability exists iii

the state or slates to which this Agreement relates) in that state. than

the Distributor may terminate this Agreement by not less than one month's
notice in writing to Ill: Exhibitor PROVIDED THAT III III DllLrlhulor'l
other current llli-ii agreements in Australia or in the Slate or Slates In
which this Agreement xelnles (u the case may be) are Iarmlrtuled Irlihln
one malilli LII LIN‘ le|'mI[...]supply such iilrna the eubjecl or this Agreement as are then in Australia
and which it can legally supply without breach or contract.

(cl Provided nevertheless that it the Distributor has pursuant
lo this EIIIISE l[...]d Igreemaile la!‘ eflilhlilen Ill Auelralll
or In lhe Stale nr Slzlzl In which lllls Agreement relates (in Lhe cue Illly
be) and it Lhe Dlatrlhuiar ihereailsr within : aerial d six months make
any agreement tor the exhlhltlon oi itlrns in Australia or in the male or

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (78)[...]Inc.“ where the refusal of ma-
jor distributors to license features first-run for a
newly-constructed Pennsylvania drive-in was held
to be a restraint of trade and a decree was issued
requiring the distributors to give the plaintiff an
equal opportunity with the operators of conven-
tional theatres to bid for pictures on first run. The
evidence had included the fact that the district
managers of. each of the distributors testified that
their companies would not license first run
features to the Boulevard (the drive-in) even
should the plaintiff offer to pay a rental in excess
of that offered by one of the downtown theatres.
Thus ‘consciously parallel practice’ amounted to
conspiracy.

On the other hand in Fanchon and Marco v.
Paramount" tried in California before Mr Justice
Jankwich, where the complaint was the denial of
first runs by distributors to a modern cinema in a
suburban area of Los Angeles, it was held that on
the facts the action of the individual distrib[...]parallel, conscious or unconscious, can overcome
a finding of reasonableness,” the court said.

The Supreme Court in Theatre Enterprises v
Paramount” accepted evidence of the Fanchon
and Marco sort to explain denial of first runs to a
Baltimore suburban cinema. Business reasons
were[...]ous parallelism,” Mr
Justice Stone said, “has not yet read conspiracy
out of the Sherman Act entirely.”

It is clear, therefore, that the attempt to extend
the meaning of ‘conspiracy’ to cover parallel

Appendix B

$71 bsnunv F1T[...]nsw-dlw

inn . X970

near 3,,

re hue pleasure in Advising the ncceptanee Syizntar
Hen-I ecnce of the eomi-acts recently enter: a
lay your road self with this Corporatim f°r=

5 (tin) run to be sham At the " ' Cinna-

Gontx-Ict lo.

Your copies duly signed, an enclosed luenevith, and
we wish to fshnli you Ia:-_ your valued nsociattnn.

‘nth[...]uly yours,

courses of action has largely fai1ed._A meeting of
minds is still required, and parallel activity is of
evidential value only.

Finally in 1962 in US v. Loews Inc.“ an
attem t was made to block sell a series of feature
films or TV exhibition. It was held to be an illegal
package transaction that violated the Sherman
Act. There were no grounds for distinguishing
between films and TV here. Further it was noted
that a price differential between films offered in-
dividually and as part of a package was only
prohibited when “it has the effect of conditioning
the sale or licence of a film upon the sale or
licence of one or more othe[...]erentials.

FOOTNOTES

1. “Motion Picture Films and TV Programs": Tariff Board
Report 1973 at p.32. _

The Night of the Living Dead: The Australian Film In-
dustry; Filmways Quarterly No. 6. Ginnane, A. at P.7.

“Advantages of a Local Film Industry”: Showbusiness
Magazine. Ry[...]controversy. Reprinted Showbusiness: 7, 21, July, and 6.
August.

6. “Everything you wanted to know about film distribution
but were afraid to ask”: Burke, G.W. (Executive director,
Village[...]ence between Dr Killen of the Cinema Center
Group and the author.

Supra fn 1 at p.49.

“Our two big[...]1»... v

| i /.-‘no r"
I
1

11. The Big 6 were a group of independent suburban drive-In
owners centred around the former Palladitim-T_ivol_l Cit)’
circuit which, save for Sandringham Dnve-in which is still
independent, have, since 1966, been taken o[...]16. “Federal Anti-Trust Law”: Oppenheim SC. and Weston
G.E. 1968 at p.281.

17. 334 US 100 (1948)[...](1944) 319 US 231

19. 334 US 131 (1948)

20. “A report on the supply of films for exhibition in
cinemas”: HMSO 1966. Monopolies Commission. p.1[...]scent Amusement Co

NEXT ISSUE

Overseas reaction to film in-
dustry monopolies: The UK,
Australian Restrictive Trade

Practices legislation —
emergence, growth and
relevance.

A typical letter of acceptance from a distributor and contract schedule.

| ~

|«3Zl@lElil[...]..m.....n.—.....—.p-u.—.ii(;~-mar ., 4'17/. A-...£.a.....a<..r._..
........................................_..:, A'aa..z... .:»u. (L
nu.-..a..-an-Iruv-I-yo-._in—4-I--21-2:-.11.
-.---.-um‘--I--—-'-—-in...-.—u.ua—c.i-—m
......n.....-:..-..[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (79)[...]A Aa
Cinema Papers T-Shirt

Limited number available[...]g
clue" Gillies, Serge Lazareft,Graha
%9Ul Vachon and Abigail 35

Directed by Richard Franklin
Written[...]Co-produced

Music by Brian May and released
Filmed in Australia and on |gca[i0n in Montrea| and by 'nnIn-----u-----uncann---I-----unnu-unnnnnnnnn[...],25 MARCH, 8.30 PM mg ong "I s "M L $3.50 5
Come an see t e stars of this great film arrive at the cinema | ' _ y :
Now Proudly Showing At SEASON COMMENEES E P'°°5° 5[...]] E] E
599 daily fleW$PaPel'S for Group bookings now open, I I
I
sass,-0,, ,,-mes Phone 663 3303 : |:][...]E Postcode E
E ‘Price Includes postage anywhere in Australia. . :
: Cinema Papers 143 Therry Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000 E
In--uunnununnuinunnnI--I-I-u-IIunuunuuun-iunn[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (80)[...]s Film Archives Officer,
Ray Edmondson, published in the
December issue. The National Library con-
tri[...]overseas visits made by the Library's film
staff In the past two years) because it was
conscious of the need to become familiar
with both the more advanced practices of
film archives and the latest technology of
film preservation. Mr Edmondson's obser-
vations. especially of methods and techni-
ques usefully recorded in his report, will
certainly promote the developmen[...]Indeed. several ideas discussed by Mr Ed-
mondson are already being Implemented.

At the same time. the report is mis-
leading in that its generally accurate, but
rather simple, description of the activities
of fllm archives suggests that these were
not previously known of in Australia nor
being performed here, and In its assump-
tion that Australia should copy these ac-
tivities without qualification. The report is
not revelationary to the Library. which is
already providing many of the general ser-
vices of film archives and is aware of the
need to develop others. Film preservation
has been a responsibility actively pursued
by the Library for 35 years. What It has
been able to achieve is largely dependent
on the level of resources made available
by the Government.

Readers may be interested to learn of
some recent developments undertaken
with[...]s
of today.

Nitrate copying: The copying program is
now running at 121,600m a year (costing
$80,000). More trained staff are necessary
if this rate Is to be lifted.

Storage facilities: A convenient site in
Canberra for a nitrate vault has been made
available to the Library. Plans are un-
derway for a design which will hopefully be
built in 1975-76. The preservation acetate
film is now held in a cool room (constant
14°C, 50% RH) at the Library.

Film study resources: Following a
seminar at the National Library in
September and a series of meetings
arranged by the Film and Television
Board, the resources for film study
available from the National Library are be-
ing developed. Expenditure in 1974-75
would be about $70,000 and should be
considerably higher in 1975-76. This
development is being directed, taking ac-
count of resources available elsewhere. by
Mr Andrew Pike, a consultant to the

~LIbrary. Also. the Library is negotiating
with a major distributor for the retention
here for stud[...]ms which
have recently been on commercial release
in this country.

Staff: it has been the Library's ex-
perlence, as the pioneer In film archive
work In Australia, that the lack of staff with
appropriate training has b[...]nt of
its archival activities. The formal courses in
various aspects of film and television now
becoming available will provide a variety of
professional qualifications which the.[...]een energetically
developing its staff resources, and.
through this staff, its wider ties with related
organizations both in Australia and

overseas.
Regional offices: The Library hopes to

open regional offices in the metropolitan
centres where material restricted by their
copyright owners to use on the Library's
premises could be viewed. Video copies
would be employed for much of this
research use as they offer advantages as
being cheaper than 16mm film, easier to
prepare and the equipment needed is
cheaper than for film.

The past few years have been
significant, not only for the development of
the National Film Collection but also for the
Australian film Industry and for the study of
film in Australia. I am confident that the in-
terest of and the contact with this vital and
creative enterprise will continue to
stimulate the full and proper development
of the national archlyal responsibilities of
the National Library in film and television.

G. Chandler, Director-General, National
Library of Australia.

Dear Sir,

We were pleased to see the summary of
Ray Edmondson's report on film archives
in the last issue of Cinema Papers.

We are some of the members of a new
body — the Association for a National Film
and Television Archive — designed to en-
courage the Government to set up a single.-
comprehsnsive national archive on the
lines of film archives as they are under-
stood and as they function elsewhere in
the world. Our first activity has been to
present a submission to the Committee of
Inquiry on Museums and National Collec-
tions.

The preservation of films and television
programs in Australia is in urgent need of
overhaul and expert planning. At present
there is virtually no overall plan and policy,
and no single location. Archives are
fragmented between many bodies. The
Federal Government alone has the
National Library, the Australian War
Memorial. the Australian Archive, the
Australian Broadcasting Commission. Film
Australia, the Film and Television School.
the CSIRO, and possibly others. The
various State governments hold archival
films. Bodies such as the Australian Film
Institute and the National Film Theatre
hold film collections of their own. Produc-
tion units and private collectors hold

others. All these are separate from lending
libraries.

The National Library In Canberra refers
to its historical collection as ‘the film
archive’, and, thanks largely to the
pioneering work of Red Wallace, Larry
Lake. Flay Edmondson and others, it has
managed to rescue some remnants of
hundreds and hundreds of feature and ac-
tuality films made In Australia In the silent
era, the majority of them lost for ever.
(What an outcry there would be If 90 per
cent of the books published in Australia
between 1898 and 1930 had disappeared
without trace!)

Preoccupied[...]from the nitrate era
before they deteriorate (up to 1950). the
Library has neglected the post-1950 are.
There is still no policy of buying a copy of
every film professionally made In
Australia, or of requiring producers to
deposit copies of their films. The Film Divi-
sion of the Library has been starved for
funds, and administered by a Library
helrarchy whose training and Interest are
geared to book librarianship.

The National Library's film archive ac-
tivities take place only as an adjunct to its
film lending function. These dual activities
are a source of confusion within the film in-
dustry, the film trade. the film societies and
other would-be users of archival
resources.

Furthermore, there is little material of
overseas origin in the National Library. Yet
prints In good condition or feature films
from many other countries have been and
are being destroyed in great numbers by
the film trade because they are no longer
considered commercially viable. These
could have. and could still, with the right
negotiation, form part of a great national
collection for film study purposes.

As the Edmondson report revealed, the

National Library falls far short In other
ways of the functions of a national film
archive as they are understood in most
other countries of the world. The physical
isolation of the National Library's collec-
tion in Canberra. which has a tiny popula-
tion and no film industry, is not only un-
democratic, it is a severe handicap to
scholars. filmmakers and educatlonlsts.
This handicap will become increasingly
obvious and a source of much frustration
as our film industry and film education and
training develop.

Film archives overseas have played a
vital role in the education and creative
stimulation of filmmakers. Think of the
Cinematheque in Paris, publicly
acknowledged by the creators of the New
Wave as the major factor in their film
education; the British Film institute, with its
vital contribution to the intellectual and ar-
tistic life of the English; the Museum of
Modern Art in New York. where Orson
Welles and. many years later. Peter
Bogdanovich saturated themselves in
films of the past before embarking on their
first features.

The film archive should be in the largest
centre of population and in the largest
centre of filmmaking, with regional
branches In other capitals. Producers,
directors. scrlptwrite[...]s, history students, film teachers
should be able to go to the archive and use
its resources without the expense and
time-wasting of plane journeys to
Canberra and enforced stays overnight.
Our filmmakers and their products are
already suffering through lack of easy
access to archival films.

The logical centre for the archive is
Sydney, with initially a branch in
Melbourne. The archive should also be in
proximity to the Film and Television
School, because the School is concerned
not just with the training of its 25 full-time
students per year, but with spreading
knowledge and raising standards
throughout the industry and all teaching
bodies.

We recognise that the National Library's
staff have achieved a great deal over the
years in the face of governmental and
public lack of interest. The Association
hopes that the National Library's Council
will see our submission as evidence of
growing needs within Australia, and. rather
than expend its energies on defending
itself against criticism. the Library will lend
its experience to help establish a truly
effective national archive in the centre
where it is most needed.

Anyone wishing to participate in the ac-
tivities of the Association or obtain a copy
of the submission to the Committee of In-
quiry can contact either: Barrie King, 137
Fiive[...]lop, Anthony Buckley.
Graham Shirley.

Dear Sir,

In June 1974 I wrote to David Stone
(head of Program Sales and Procurement)
asking him if he‘ would be interested in
viewing a film of mine -— Joker — with a
view to purchasing it for the ABC. I waited
three months for a reply but did not
receive one.

Having heard numerous tales about
David Stone's contemptuous attitude
towards Australian filmmakers I decided to
write to Graeme White and see if he would
be Interested In purchasing.

After waiting a month I rang his office to
inquire whether he had received my letter.
Mr White was not available and his
secretary told me that she had no

knowledge of my letter but that if I would
like to leave my telephone number my call
would be return[...]istence) of my letter had been
determined.

After a few days, in which I received no
reply, I rang Mr White's office again and
this time another secretary asked me to
leave my name and address and details of
the film.

A month later (13. November), I received
a letter from Colin Dean (Mr White's
assistant) ask[...]ils of the
story Iine" before supplying them with an
audition print. I wrote to Mr Duckmanton
complaining that it had taken five months,
two letters and two telephone calls to get
any reply at all from the ABC. A few days
later I received a letter from David Stone
claiming that he had not received the letter
I wrote to him in June. it he had been doing
his job properly he would not have needed
a letter from me. The fact that Joker had
won a prize In the Greater Union Awards at
the Sydney Film Festival should have in-
dicated that it may have been worth asking
me for a print to view. To my knowledge he
has not contacted other filmmakers and
asked them for prints of their films with a
view to purchasing them.

Late in November, I delivered a print of
Joker to Mr Dean's office at his request.
After six weeks without word from him his
secretary told me that the assessors liked
the film but that the ABC could not
purchase it because it was in black and
white. This annoyed me considerably
because David Stone had seen the film in
December, 1973 —— 15 months before
color TV.

I asked to be notified of the ABC's deci-
sion in writing and. after four more phone
calls and a two-week wait, I received
letters from Colin Dean and David Stone.
In his letter David Stone writes:

"We have been considering and/or
purchasing very little by way of
monochrome television programs and I
am sorry to say that the fact that your film
is a black and white production con-
tributes substantially to a decision that we
do not wish to purchase television rights to
Joker."

After almost 20 years of black and white
television. black and white films are, In the
ABC's estimation. no longer acceptable to
the Australian public —- irrespective of
their quality.

in five years‘ time when color sets have,
to a large extent, replaced black and white
sets, and the public expects to see
everything in color. such an attitude might
be understandable. But to adopt such a
rigid policy during the transition period
seems a[...]pecially since the ma-
jority of Australians will not have color
television sets for many years yet.

E[...]ision sets I would still ques-
tion the wisdom of a decision to transmit
only color programs, since such a decision
is based on the erroneous assumption that
black and white is inferior to color.

It is neither necessary nor desirable that
all TV programs be shot in color. Such a
policy denies the fact that black and white
may be chosen in preference to color as a
matter of artistic choice. Surely the ABC
should be more concerned with the con-
tent of programs than with their color (or
lack of It).

I wonder if the many outstanding films
that have been made over the past 50
years are now unacceptable to the ABC
because they are not in color! (Dear Mr
Welles — We like citizen Kane very much
but regret that with the introduction of
color television . . .)

Because the commercial channels rely
on advertising for their continued ex-
istence it is difficult to sell them films that
do not have mass appeal. The maker of
non-commercial films is then left with the
ABC as his or her only television outlet in

Cinema Papers. March-April — 85

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (81)BYRON HASKIN

this country. This applies to both fiction
and documentary films.

Part of the ABC's function, surely, is to
provide the Australian public with diverse
programming and to‘ fill those gaps left by
the commercial channels - i.e. to cater for
minority audiences who want to see
something other than the formularised
soap-operas and cops and robbers shows
that dominate Australian television.

To achieve diversity in programming the
ABC should encourage the making of films
that are not being made or could not be
made by either the commercial channels
or the ABC - i.e. to recognise that in-
dependent filmmakers have a contribution
to make to Australian television. At present
such recognition does not exist.

For as long as the ABC retains its pre-
sent attitude the outlook for independent
filmmakers interested in making films for
television, is grim. it is time the ABC ceas-
ed its patronising and contemptuous at-
titude towards Australian filmmakers.

i speak not only for myself but for the
large number of other filmmakers who
have experienced similar frustrations in
trying to sell their films to the ‘ABC.

James Flicketeon.

Dear Sir,

in May 1974 the ABC previewed my film
Matchless and decided to buy it. Almost
five months later they confirmed the deci-
sion and the contract was signed. During
this five month period we received three
letters from a man who was not present at
the first screening stating that the film was
of poor quality, experimental, and suitable
only for late night viewing.

The first offer for the film was $5,250 —
we weren't surprised. On the day that offer
came it was announced that the film had
won a First Prize at an overseas film
festival. This. combined with the fact that a
prominent Australian (with various con-
tacts) was one of the festival judges, soon

had us receiving a second offer from the
ABC for $10,000.

That's all I need to say.
John Papadopouloa

OBITUARY

On 2 February, Norman Dawn, who flim-
ed the Australian epic For the Term of his
Natural Life (1927), died in Santa Monica,
California. Dawn had been seriously ill
since June last year, but four years
previous he had corresponded regularly
with Sydney writer and filmmaker Graham
Shirley on his work in Australia.

Dawn first filmed here in 1908, but his
best known local achievements were
between 1926 and 1931, when he made
For the Term of his Natural Life, The
Adorable Outcast and Showgirl’: Luck.

He is survived by his wife Katherine, who
appeared in and helped produce most of
his films from the early t[...]Papers, March‘-April

Continued from P.23

Yes, and that has gleaned
superlatives from certain quarters.

A few have commented that its dis-

advantage was in being released in the
same year as Kubric ’s “200l”.

Well, that and the elements that to
the outsider appear like something
out of Alice In Wonderland.

What were they?

The personal friction between
MGM and George Pal, the hatreds
you couldn’t believe were allowed to
operate on that film’s economy. And
it was not released with any fanfare.
It was grudgingly left to escape, with
everybody hoping it would flop
because they were trying to get rid of
Pa .

I didn’t think the film itself[...]ome
confused unless you aid very close
attention. But what id come across
very sharply was the terror of a man
who, step by inevitable step,‘ has his
own identity rip ed from under him
until finally he egins to doubt who
the hell he is. Here is a guy in a high

osition on a scientific project who

as an enemy that begins to strip him
of all his record background. Even to
the point where they go to investigate
his credits at the university and find
out he never even went there. That’s
pretty frightening to a person who is
a hero of the scientific world and
suddenly becomes nothing. He’s be-
ing pursued by a power, he doesn’t
know where it comes from, and the
tricky ending has him possessing the
goddamne[...]as fully prepared. I assisted
the writer John Gay in polishing one
or two points, but I had no authority
to change anything further. I felt that
a few things could have been
changed, but I didn’t go into it
because I was glad to be doing
something again.

One memorable effect has George
Hamilton spinning at a very high
speed away from the camera.

That was the conclusion, where we
had an effects monta e of himself
and the Power. We ha Hamilton lie
across a turntable and filmed him
with a zoom lens from the ceiling.

Have you ever encountered policy
clashes in special effects work?

No. I had complete say at Warner
Brothers for nine years and went the
way that was economically sound
and had the best dramatic effect.
There were hundreds of these films
and I can’t claim to have personally
worked on most of them. Later,
Go[...]on for War of the
Worlds at Paramount. I left him and
went to Fiji to make His Majesty
O’Keefe (1954), then visited
Australia, Tokyo and Okinawa, and
arrived back in Hollywood a week or

two before he finished.

So that “Captain Sinbad” provided
the rare exception.

That’s right.
What TV work have you done?

Quite a lot. The last TV I did was
The Outer Limits science fiction
series. I directed six and was on the
series without credit as associate
producer in order to supervise the
special effects. The producer, Joseph
Stefano, was also a fine writer and
had done the screenplay of Psycho
for Alfred Hitc[...]sible for the polish on
every one of the scripts, and in the
first year it really caught on. The
kids started talking back to the
monsters, and it was damn good.

As usually happens to the good
things in this venal business, some of
the network executives felt that the
series was becoming a little too
bizarre, and one of their number
started sending memos to Stefano
about things he did and didn’t like
about the scripts, and things he was
going to change. Stefano would read

_these with great interest, drop them

in the waste basket, and make the
films as he saw them. At the end of
the first year, when t[...]d
entered the hit category, the network
announced that they would renew —
but without Stefano. So they put in a
guy known to the trade as ‘Guillotine
Charlie’, and he guillotined the show.

What were your other series?

There was a Meet McGraw and
The Californians, but these are older.
I’ve concentrated mainly on movies.

Do[...]ifferent?

Vou notice the speed at which you
have to operate and the acceptance
of the mediocre which is fostered
upon you, and the untrue impression
that the image should contain
nothing but hit close-ups. It’s like
music, in that you can be so god-
damned corny in a way that is far
from dramatic. With TV you can
lean much more toward an
hysterical, extra tempo dramatic
effect, which in a movie has to be
modelled and made realistic, to be
developed and played on athat “It was a story of
child slave labor set in the South just after
the Civil War. The effort of trying to re-
create the Battle of Franklin was
something of a strain on our director, and
Sfteir contracting. kidney problems, he

re ”.

2. Scientist Albert Einstein and his wife were
being given a VIP tour of the Warner
Brothers lot.

3. I can fi[...]achievements for Haskin having

3 won this award in the 40’s. The Paramount
Transparency Department (under Farciot
Edouart) won awards in 1942 and 1943.

4. John Baxter, in ‘Science Fiction in the
Cinema’ (»Zwemmer Barnes, 1970).

5. Neith[...]N
FILMOGRAPHY
Born Portland, 2 April 1899. Father a school
teacher. Took liberal arts for three years,
enlisted asa Naval Aviation cadet in World
War I. Studied art, worked as a cartoonist for
San Francisco News. Summer vacation

employment with International Newsreel and
Pathe News.

FEATURES. AS
DIRECTOR

Matinee Ladies (Warner Brothers),
Irish[...]Columbia), Ginsberg the Great
(Warner Brothers).

To England for three years as a techni-
cian and production executive for
Herbert Wilcox. With Tom Walls
directed a series of films based on stage
hits, e.g. 0n Approval.

Gave up Warners position to accom-
pany Hal Wallis when the latter left the
Burbank studio and set up his own
producing organization to. make pic-
tures for Paramount release. Wallis
created him production assistant and
contract director. Second unit work on
Wallis‘ Technicolor feature Desert Fury
(I947) and director of Wallis’ I Walk
Alone (1947), Too Late for Tears
(I949), and The Crying Sisters.

To England for Disney’s Treasure
Island.

Under contract to Paramount for
whom he made three Technicolor Nat[...]—— Warpath (1951),
Silver City,_also released as High Ver-
million (1951) and Denver and Rio
Grande (1952) -— as well as George
Pal‘s War of the Worlds (1953).

OTHERS

Man-eater of Kumaon
Tarzan and the Jungle Queen.
His Majesty O’Keefe

The Nake[...]Silver

The Boss

The First Texan

From the Earth to the Moon
The Little Savage

Jet over the Atlantic[...]es Long John Silver; Meet McGraw,
The Califomians and The Outer Limits.

19[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (82)Why not let us put your
Movie on the right
track .3

EART[...]ING COMPANY

FULLY PROFESSIONAL 3 TRACK
RECORDING AND MIXING FACILITIES
INCORPORATING

"EARTH RECORDS"[...]has joined forces with another great culture.

So as well as full production, editing and theatrette

facilities, there is an extensive range of Kosher foods
nearby.

John Che[...]el
Viridiana

Love
R EA
I Can Jump Puddles

Tony and the Tick Tock Dragon
The Big Dig

100 aAustralian Council for the Arts)

FILM. RADIO AND TELEVISION BOARD

A CREATIVE
ADMINISTRATOR

The Film, Radio and Television Board
offers a senior executive with proven
administrative and financial experience a

unique and exciting challenge to act as
Director.

A knowledge of film, radio and television

is desirable; an interest in these media is
essential.

Salary: Negotiable to $19,300 (maximum)
Tenure: Three years
Closing Date: 7th April 1975

Applications including the names and
addresses of three referees to:

The Executive Officer
Australia Council

P.0. Box 302

NORTH SYDNEY 2060

inema
enter gr-oup

Above: (lelt) Waleri[...]of Mice Jane Pittman
Directed by John Korty

Ape and Super Ape

Directed by Bert Haanstra

Blanche

Di[...]rra. Telex:
62672. Phone: (062) 49 1932. 46 9721

SYDNEY: Academy Twin Cinema. 3A Oxford St. Pennington. NSW. 2010. Phone: ([...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (83)With this issue Cinema Papers
begins a series of columns aim-
ed at creating a flow of informa-
tion between the various guilds,
societies, councils, institutes,
unions and co-operatives in-
volved in movie production, dis-
tribution and exhibition in
Australia.

In following issues these pages
will provide an open forum for
the above organizations. All in-
terested parties are invited to
participate and enquiries should
be directed to:

The Columns Editor
Cinema Papers

143 Therry St[...]oduction Association of
Australia came into being in 1972 to
promote, foster and encourage the
production of films in Australia. Today, it
represents some 40 movie producing
companies and, by necessity, is
registered under the Australian Concilia-
tion and Arbitration Act in order that It
may represent its members in
negotiations on all industrial matters.

in 1973, most of its time and effort
went into negotiations with the Australian
Theatrical Amusement Employees
Association, in establishing a new
Theatrical Employees’ Motion Picture
Production Award, and with Actors’ Equi-
ty in establishing the Actors’ Television
Program Awa[...]xistent. Even though the latter
award was granted in late 1973, matters
relating to it are still under discussion.
The rights of repeats and residuals and,
in fact. the whole question of copyright of
performance w[...]legislation for the protection of per-
formers.

As producers, we are as vitally in-
terested ln this legislation as are the ac-
tors and writers. Our members are the
innovators and obtalners of finance for
commercial movie production and con-
sider the rights vested in the producer to
form a vital part of the packaging of a
project, in that a viable return must be
forthcoming to investors or there will be
no investment, hence no production.
However, It is agreed that the performer
and writer must be protected, as well as
the producer.

Another aspect of our association's
activity is in negotiations with govern-
ment departments. We had much to say
during the Tariff Enquiry of 1972-1973
and, more recently, with the Australian
Films Commission Bill. in certain sec-
tions of the Industry, the FPAA have been
blamed for the Initial failure of the Bill,
but I would remind readers that It is the
democratic right of all Australians and
organizations to put their point of view to

the best of their ability.

Basically, we believed that the finding
of the Tariff Board's impartial and con-
structive suggestions should have been
implemented in full and that the
Australian Films Commission should be
established with the structure,
membership and powers recommended
by the Tariff Board of Enquiry. in par-
ticular, in respect to the make up of

88 — Cinema Papers, March-April

@

membership of the Board, its powers
and ability to enquire into such matters
as exhibition-distribution in Australia and
the establishment of a short films quota.
We believe in a government-assisted
free enterprise movie production in-
dustry.

Our association is divided into four
divisions — Feature and Television
Series Division; Documentary Division:
Facilities Division and Television
Commercial Division. Over the past 14
years the production of television com-
mercials in Australia — thanks to the
foreslghted government legislation re-
quiring that ali commercials shown on
Australian television be produced in
Australia — has kept the industry viable
but with the worldwide trends towards
the much improved color videotape type
production. movie producers in Australia
must look towards increased feature and
television (I.e., series and documentary)
program production to survive.

FILM EDITORS’ GUILD OF
AUSTRALIA

The Film Editors‘ Guild consists of a
large body of people made up of senior,
junior and associate members. Senior
and junior members have to be engaged
currently in film editing and the associate
membership covers a large cross-
section of people working in the film in-
dustry. Although we welcome associate
members, it is basically an editors’ guild
and our object is to ensure that the true
value of film and sound editing is
recognized as a creative part of film
production.

The guild meets once a month and our
meetings are aimed at stimulating in-
terest conducive to the many technical
aspects an editor encounters in his field
of work.

At a recent meeting we screened the
results of the FEGA 1974 Workshop
Films. The FEGA Editing Workshop is
held every year, with assistance from the
Film and Television School. Assistant
editors in the guild are invited to take
part, at no cost to themselves. The
workshop is held over three weekends
and each student is given rushes of a
commercial and drama-comedy movie
segment. The first weekend is devoted to
the students editing the drama or com-
edy (whichever has been decided on by
the committee for that year). The second
weekend is devoted to editing the com-
mercial and the final weekend allows the
students time to lay the sound tracks for
mixing — which is done a few weeks
later. ,

During each weekend the committee
arranges for a senior editor to introduce
the students to their task and to answer
questions.

Briefly that is what the FEGA workshop

is about. Students who have taken part,

find that the basic grounding they receive

during the workshop weekends is of’

tremendous benefit when they continue
in their jobs as assistant film editors.
FEGA is planning another workshop this;
year. Committee member, Barry Fawcett,
is heading a sub-committee dealing with
the planning which is necessary to en-
sure that this year’s workshop is as
successful as those in the past.

The Film Editors’ Guild of Australia is
an active, viable guild and its activities
and involvement in the industry span a.
large area. it is hoped the guild will con-
tlnue to grow and play an importantparl:
in the Australian film industry. Enquiries
are welcome from people working the
film industry, who wish to join. Please

write to FEGA, P.O. Box 195, Flosevilie,
NSW. 2069.

THE AUSTRALIAN
WRITERS’ GUILD

The Australian Writers’ Guild has in-
troduced its first industry-wide Agree-
ment —- and is now beginning to realize
what the world ‘hassle’ means.

The guild is facing opposition from the
networks and the packagers in spite of
the fact that it is NOT claiming an in-
crease in rates for writers (with the ex-
ception of a few sections in some
categories — mainly radio).

This is in response to the Federal
government's general request to unions
for restraint in wage claims during
Australia's current inflationary period.

The guild feels that a demand for in-
creased fees at this time would be
irresponsible and would merely add to
the inflationary spiral.

However, it has not lost sight of the fact
that its main responsibility is to its
members, particularly the less establish-
ed majority stiii struggling to gain a
foothold in a competitive market.

Because of this, the guild committee
has introduced into the agreement a
system which splits the rate for each
category into three — as an additional in-
centive to producers to use new talent.
These rates are (a) Basic (b) Going, and
(c)_Bonus.

The going rate is taken as the stan-
dard or average rate currently being paid
to reasonably well-established writers.

The basic rate will apply to new or
less-experienced writers. This rate is
calculated at 25 per cent less than the
going rate.

The bonus rate applies to those writers
in a position, through their experience, to
negotiate fees with producers. This rate
will be[...]rate.

The agreement, which has been nine
months in the making, will take effect
from the date of signing and covers all
writers working for producers engaged
in the creation of all radio and television
programs as defined.

in the past, the guild has negotiated
separate agree[...]ers for different conditions at
various times — a number of them within
weeks of each other. Such a procedure is
not now, and probably never was, a prac-
ticaiity.

This agreement, however, will place all
producers on an equal footing, simplify
dealings with individual writers and stan-
dardize fees and conditions throughout
the country.

Unlike previous agreements, its
provisions are not negotiable. They
represent a realistic set of conditions to
bring the Australian industry into line
with basic principles accepted[...]eaking world.

For instance, the payment of local and
overseas residuals is not only accepted
as a fair return for the writer’s creativity; it
is a tenet recognized by international
copyright law.

The Industry-wide Agreement has the
support of Actors’ and Announcers’
Equity Association of Australia, the
Australian Theatrical and Amusement
Employees’ Association, the Australian
Broadcasting Commission Staff
Association, the Wr[...]rica West, the Writers‘ Guild of Great
Britain, and the Association of Canadian
Television and Radio Artists.

MELBOURNE FILMMAKERS’
CO-OPERATIVE

Many people are aware of the history
of the Melbourne Filmmakers’ Co-
operative and the crises it has experienc-
ed over the years — the moves to dis-
band it, take it over or just to destroy it.
However, that is the past and It's the
future that's important now.

The co-op —- heavily subsidised by the
Film and Television Board - is now
working towards becoming a self-
supporting organization. it's going to
take a long time before it is strong
enough to survive without grants from
the Government — but it's on the way.

The main thing, however, is that it will
survive and grow to fulfil its purpose of
bringing Australian movies to the public
and getting money back to the film-
makers.

The co-op operates in three areas —
the cinema, distribution and as a

resource centre. The cinema screens 14
sessions a week and the programs con-

slst mainly of Australian movies. in some
instances, we screen movies from
Bolivia, Cuba, Argentina, France, etc., inas distribution coming sharply into focus.

We have been trying to restrict the 8
pm session purely to Australian movies
such as Dalmas, 27A, come Out
Fighting, Yskkety Yak. if there are insuf-
ficient feature iength movies. a program
of a particular filmmaker’s work is
shown.

At the 10 p.m. session we usually
screen Third World movies coupled with
Australian shorts between five and 30
minutes long.

We hoped to run many short
Australian movies at a 6 pm session but
there Just weren't enough people coming
when we put them on. We haven't
scrapped the Idea yet but will wait till we
consolidate our 8 and 10 pm sessions
before venturing again into the 6 pm
sessions. Midnight sessions on Friday
and Saturday night are mainly overseas
movies, again coupled with Australian
movies. The overseas movies range from
Charlie Chaplin to Peter Watkins’
Gladiators or Adoifas Mekas' Going
Home back to Luis Bunuel’s Robinson
Crusoe.

Distribution suffered a few setbacks
last year due to lack of finance. However,
it's now back on its feet and working
towards a higher return to the
filmmakers. We're getting into the
schools and clubs and, hopefully in the
next few months, we'll be knocking on
the doors of a few television executives
and movie distributors to present them
with Australian movies that come up to
the requirements they believe are
necessary for them to be accepted by the
public. More information on this in the
next issue.

As a resource centre the co-op is
offering many services: Editing facilities
with t[...]pment; movlola.
pic sync, four gang sync with amp and
mixer, splicers (tape and cement), two
HKS viewers and assorted spilt reels,
spring locks etc. etc. all at cheap rates.
Files on where to hire equipment, talent.
technicians, writers etc.; files on where to
buy equipment (second hand or new,
overseas or in Australia). Assistance on
preparing budgets.- operating
equipment, laboratory processes and
pitfalls. f.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (84)We are also into getting a movie
workshop off the ground. Hopefully, we
will be running up to two of these each
year. if you are interested in joining (or
rejoining) the co-op, get in touch with
us. 1975 is going to be a big year for the
co-op so be part of it. After all it's there
for people who love films.

THE AUSTRALIAN
CINEMATOGRAPHERS
SOCIETY

The Australian clnematographers’
Society was formed 15 years ago and
was the first organization of its type to be
started within the local film industry. it is
controlled by a federal executive elected
from executive committees of the various
State bodies.

There is an affinity between the ACS
and similar bodies overseas such as the
American Society of Clnematographers
and the British Society of
clnematographers.

Whereas[...]d themselves with promoting the
exchange of ideas and cinematographic
standards between established
cameramen, the ACS has extended this
concept to include younger
clnematographers and assistants as well.
Other members of the film industry such
as laboratory experts, motion picture
engineering specialists, experienced
editors. etc., are encouraged and Invited
to join the society as associate members.

Regular monthly meetings are held
with the accent usually on assisting
younger[...]the
society's rapport with overseas
organizations and the continuing
overseas experience of some of the
society members, it has access to
current technical information.

The constitution of the ACS demands
that the society be non-profit making and

PPA5075

Possibly the latest electronic

Duoligh[...]om the Pathe
cockereli look like ugly ducklings,

but look at their capabilities:

The electronic double super 8 vers[...]m which after
processing becomes two hundred feet in

the super 8 format.

The 16mm version of the camera is

similar in design to the DS8.

Either camera will take an auxiliary
400 foot magazine with its own motor
and automatic camera connections that
will provide long running capability.

The new exposure meter has no moving
needle, but solid state electronics with LED
display. The CdS cell is behind the lens and
gives accurate measurement whether the
camera is running or not. it drives the lens

non-political. This has resulted in an un-
inhibited cross-fertilization of ideas
between members and between other
organizations.

To compare. maintain and raise
professional cinematographic standards
in the industry, the society conducts an
annual Milli Award event where awards
are presented for outstanding achieve-
ment in various fields of cinematography.

Members whose standard of
cinematography is of consistently high
nature, or who have shown outstanding
talent in a specific field of
cinematography, are honored by the
society with accreditation and are per-
mitted to use the letters ACS after their
names. In this way the society draws
attention to the standard of work of the
indlviduai—work whi[...]lm
industry.

One of the society's major concerns is
the lack of adequate formal training
facilities for cameramen in Australia.
Traditionally. training was achieved b[...]under practising
cameramen at the large studios. But as
most studios have closed down or have
become fragmented, this form of training
has almost ceased to exist. This will
ultimately lead to a lowering of cinematic
standards.

The society believes that facilities for
formal training should be urgently es-
tablished. either separately or in con-
junction‘ with the new Film and Television
School.

Since methods, techniques and
aesthetic ideas are constantly changing
in the industry. the society believes in the
practical feasibility of using as instruc-
tors distinguished, working
clnematographers — between com-
mltments — as in leading training
schools overseas.

The society also believes that the local
industry should be strong and viable and
capable of absorbing graduates from
such an institution.

extras to buy.

diaphragm automatically

through a servo motor, so
you can concentrate on filming.

The meter is also coupled with f.p.s.
control, the variable shutter opening and
film sensitivity (10-400 ASA).

The speed range is remarkable: 8, 18, 25,

48, 64 and 80 fps, forward or reverse, with
variable shutter opening for lap dissolves.
Two sync sound systems: A built—in pilot

tone, 50Hz at 25 fps for use with pilot tone
tape recorders and single frame pulse sync
for use with the new pulse systems. No

Lenses are interchangeable, using a three-
lens turret that takes standard C mount
lenses. You can also use some still camera
lenses with adapters. Choose a lens to create
the effect you want. You might like to start

COLUMNS

Back Issues

ISSUE 1: December 1973

e Exclusive, in-depth interview with Ken G. Hall
9 Script—wrlte[...]mson interviewed

0 Production Report on The Cars That Ate Paris
0 Special report: The Tarlii Board inqu[...]animator Willis
O‘Brien, creator of King Kong

a Production Report on The True Story of Eskimo
Nell

e Melbourne and Sydney Film Festivals reviewed.

9 Reviews of Zardaz, Don't Look Now and Crystal
Voyager.

. . . $1.50
plus postage‘[...]April 1974

0 Special Censorship issue featuring an interview
with Chief Censor Richard Prowse
0 Violence in the Cinema: Report by Patricia

Edgar
e Scriptwriter Frank Moorhouse interviewed
a Production Report on Between were
0 Nicholas Roeg[...]eport

0 $cript—writer Cliff Green interviewed

a Werner Herzog interviewed

9 Production Report on A Salute to the Great

, McCarthy

0 Perth Film Festival repo[...]f Between Were, Petersen, Amar-
cord, Yeketty Yak and others

. . . $1.50
plus postage‘

LIMITED NUMB[...]Pathe introduce two
craftsman cameras-

DS8 and 16mm.

Both are professional.

with Angenieux's new f1.2 zoom lens, with
focal lengths from 6 to 80mm. That's a 13.3
to 1 zoom ratio.

Viewing is reflex through a ground glass
screen with hairlines. it also provides an
exposure indicator, battery charge level
indicator and TV framing limits. Compare
its compact dimensions and weight (7lbsI
with what you're carrying around.

Now which is the ugly duckling?

Write for literature. Or phone for a demon-
stration at Photimport (Austl Pty Ltd.
Melbourne: 69 Nicholson St, East

Brunswick. 38 6922. Sydney: 17 Alberta St.

26 2926. Brisbane: 244 St[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (85)A MATTER OF FACT

Continued from P.4 7

accepted it for real and behaved so completely
naturally that it was possible for us to get
beautiful and authentic pictures of Australian
fauna carrying on their normal lives. At play —
and in fear of their lives when men with guns came
to the glade.

I want the record on this film to be straight once
and for all, especially as to the work of two excep-
tional men who are unable to speak for
themselves, the late George Heath and J. Alan
(George) Kenyon. And that tribute to them does
not overlook in any way the contribution that
Shepherd, his staff and many others made.

The film has not so far been seen on TV in this
country because of some difficulty over rights and
this is unfortunate because the first two reels
stand up as a beautiful presentation of a section of
the fauna of this country behaving normally in
(apparently) natural surroundings.

The shooting[...]ite
straightforward. Knock off all the interiors, take
the company on location to Burragorang Valley
for the major exteriors leaving the bulk of the
studio space to be occupied by George Kenyon’s
carefully planned and drawn up setting. He used
the real thing all the[...]owing
bush, shrubs, trees etc., —- I still have an Illawarra
Lily growing in my garden that came from that
set built getting on for 40 years ago! The grass
was watered daily and actually grew because of
the heat from a number of two and five kw., lights
we had arranged to be turned on for periods each
day in order to accustom the animals to the ar-
tificial conditions.

The ’roos took to the setting like ducks to
water. They were soon playing around the glade,
drinking at the pool, living the life of Riley on a
lucerne diet.

When we brought the company in from location
we were finished with the cast and had the picture
in the bag ——- except for the all important opening
animal sequences.

Leo Cracknell, an old circus and vaudeville per-
former who, with his wife, had a whip-cracking
and sharp-shooting act, was in charge of the
animals. Leo had a prop list of the animals we’d
require — becau[...]g began on the film. He came
up with some we had not ordered and wherever
possible we worked them into the story.

I am frankly amazed that Bill Shepherd would
allow himself to be quoted as saying, “. . . I did
not know how it was going to work out until I’d
run all the footage and decided on how to cut one
shot with the next” (sic) “I hadn’t been given a
storyline for that section etc. . .”

That statement is just a bald untruth. He had
the script — 12 pages of it devoted to this se-
quence alone. The original story was written by
Australian authoress, Dorothy Cotterill, then liv-
ing in Miami, Florida, and published in McCaIls
Magazine. It was adapted to the screen by Ed-
mond Seward, then on the Cinesound staff having
been brought in from Hollywood. I had a lot to do
with the scripted story because I knew I had to br-
ing to life what was on paper and I did not want
any ‘impossible’ action written in by a man un-
familiar with Australian animals and what you
might possibly get them to do.

We shot the animal sequence to the scripted
storyline embellishing it where we could and the
animals would co-operate, and introducing new
animals as they became available.

But the story of Chut, the joey orphaned by a
shot from a hunter’s gun, was the same story on
the screen that Seward had written in the
screenplay the original of which I still have in my
possession.

There can be no ifs or buts about it, that’s the
way it was! There were additions and
embellishments as I have said but these did not
deviate from the original storyline.

Apart from the script — to which all
departments worked - Shepherd got ad-
ditionally, almost every day, notes I dictated to

90 — Cinema Papers, March-April

Jean Smith about the day’s shooting as well as the
notes she took in the normal course of her duties.
They indicated how and where incidents we had
managed to capture — often by good luck but
with a growing capacity on everybody’s part to
anticipate what the animals might be expected to
do in given circumstances —-— might be used.

Furth[...]iting which was proceeding
while we were shooting as is the case with all
properly organized feature films.

Is it conceivable — as Shepherd on his own
statement would have you believe — that Heath
and 1, two reasonably intelligent people, would go
on shooting, without plan or purpose, anything
and everything, willy nilly, until we had ac-
cumulated in excess of 6,000m of unrelated film
all of which was dumped in Shepherd’s lap with
tlfie suggestion, “Go on, make something out of
t at!”

Really that’s just too thick to be swallowed and
it weakens the man’s credibility all along the line.
The storyline was in the script all the time and
that is what Shepherd (ably assisted by Phyllis
O’Reilly and Terry Banks on this film) worked to.

A copy of the original script is in the National
Library, Canberra, where anybody can verify
what I have said.

Bill Shepherd did a good job of editing on
Orphan as he did on all films he edited for
Cinesound. But others also did splendid jobs as I
have tried to show in this factual story of what
really happened. George Heath, a creative
cinematographer, was shooting “on the fly” a lot
of the time on these animal sequences. You can-
not direct kangaroos — just as you don’t ‘direct’
Prime Ministers.

You place a carpet snake, for instance near a
joey and wait to see what will happen. You hope
the snake will menace the joey because that is
what the script calls for. But you don’t always get
what you want. The first time the snake slithers
past and the little ’roo, quite unafraid, merely
sniffs at the reptile’s body.

It took a lot of time, and patience to get the
snake to appear to be menacing the little ’roo. But
with good cross-cutting of c.u.'s of the snake and
’roo, plus a lucky mid-shot’ of the reptile curling
around the rods body (thanks to the smart work
of the always invaluable set-assistants Julian
Savieri and the late George Yates), we got what
we wanted.

George Heath was tremendously enthusi[...]eone else, might notice
one or more ’roos about to do something we could
use and signal George. He in turn would hand-
signal the electricians on the gantries and they
would have arcs struck and fives swung onto the
objective in no time at all. Frank Bagnall, assis-
tant camera, would have to make a snap judgment
on focus and we’d be rolling. That way we got
some marvellously natural pictures not only of
kangaroos but of dingoes, rabbits, snakes, and of
a rogue emu who, as soon as he was set free on the
set, began chasing the docs and joeys all over the
place, beating at them with his wings. And then,
to make our day, the Old Man Roo got fed up and
took to the emu, wrapping his forepaws round the
cranky bird’s neck and kicking him in the slats
with his powerful hind hoppers. And Heath’s
camera was on the action all the way. That was
not in the script but it is certainly in the picture.
Didn’t need much editing either. Went in prac-
tically ‘in one’.

The small crew on that sequence did a fantastic
job and in addition to those already mentioned
were, if memory serves me, Johnny McColl.and
Snow Launt on the lights.

Orphan of the Wilderness won the Film Critics
Award of 1937, was released in England, America
(as Wild Innocence) on the continent and ran on
American TV in the early fifties. It achieved all
that not because of the way it was edited,
photographed, designed or directed but because of
its sheer entertainment value and the novelty and

charm of animals behaving completely naturally

in what seemed to the audience to be their natural
habitat.

Two final things need comment in order to get
the record straight. The first has to do with
Smithy:

Shirley: Did you edit Smithy‘![...]ng the Pacific

flight. They were the main reels and Hall wanted me to

work on them. The description of the trip took ONE

PAGE IN THE SCRIPT and I estimated that it would
come out at 600 m.

That is just not true and leaves the im-
plication that Terry Banks was not capable of
editing the ‘two main reels’. The facts are that I
used Shepherd, in the absence of Ron Whelan, as
assistant director on Smithy. Terry Banks was
fi[...]the finished film urgently, I put Shepherd, by
now free of his other duties, onto the Pacific flight
reels.

For him to say “the description of the flight
took one page in the script and I estimated _it
would come out at 600m”, shows clearly that he is
having script trouble again. How does a produc-
tion crew get 600m, out of one page of script?

The facts are that the Pacific flight ALONE oc-
cupied l2 pages of script not counting any of the
numerous pages devoted to the lead up to and
aftermath of the flight. Here again what went
onto the screen was in the script.

Terry Banks got film editor credit on Smithy
because that was what he was! And no amount of
wild overstatement can alter any of[...]final thing needs attention. I quote
Shepherd: “In 1937-38 we started pressing for a
union in the industry and the only reason I wasn’t
sacked was because Cinesound couldn’t do
without me. We had a meeting attended by Hall,
the Cinesound employes and people from
Filmcraft. When we went back to work next
morning everybody was put on the mat and asked
why they had been at the meeting. We’d have got
an industry going then which would have been a
terrific thing . . .”

He fails to explain how giving the financial
principals union trouble and shooting up costs
would have got an industry going -— one was go-
ing anyway. But I can assure him with absolute
certainty that if he had been able to persuade his
colleagues to follow his lead, Cinesound, with the
world-war inevitably closing in and pessimism all
about, would have closed down in 1938 instead of
1940!

Shepherd has me at this meeting — which I did
not attend — but fails to explain how, next mor-
ning, I was suddenly able to change hats and put
everybody on the mat for being there!

“I was not sacked” says Shepherd, “because
Cinesound could not do without me.”

On that note -— and, very genuinely, more in
sorrow than in anger — I will rest this case which
is one for some of those members of the
Cinesound organization to whom the company,
and I, owe so much and to whom, in the Shepherd
interview, justice has not been done. 0

STILLS THIS ISSUE

Special thanks to Wendell Wntkl and the N.F.T.A.
Film Archive.

Anthony Buckley

CIC

Columbia

C[...]Pike

Eric Reade

Roadshow

Graham Shirley

South Australian Film Corporation
Terryrod Productions

Tra[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (86)SYDNEY UNIVERSITY FILM GROUP

% G.

FILMS AVAILABLE[...]ONTES

(1956) Max Ophuls' legendary last film — aand Anton Walbrook. French language with
English subt[...]olish director,
K. Zanussi — FAMILY LIFE (1972) and BEHIND
THE WALL (1972) — both 16mm prints with[...]WALKOVER (Skolimowski), WHITE NIGHTS
(Visconti), and others.

Write for catalogue to Sydney University Film Group, Box 28,
The Union, University of Sydney 2006, enclosing S.A.E. (11c
stamp + 4x9 env.) Tel.: 660 2365 a.h.

Sydney University Film Group screens twice weekly during
term at the Sydney University.

Membership $9 per year (non-students[...]or your supply of
Studio & Projection Lamps
Color and Lighting Correction Filters
Reflection and Diffusion Materials

Phone 870 5616 (Melbourne) a[...]oad,
Warranwood, 3134
Melbourne, Vic.

Your needs are our concern.
Our clients will tell you.

ASIAN CINEMA

A series of 10 illustrated
evening lecture-discussions
about the films

of KUROSAWA, FIAY

and others.

0 Course begins June 24
e Enrolment open now.

Enquiries:
Council of Adult Educa[...]_ _,:__ Eiki 16mm projector for sale.

Magnetic and optical sound plus spare parts. Serviced
b[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (87)[...]I havlitcigmwmed 3 Ium mu dlilzfi-3"-climate as an Liidepuiduut,
uu«tiw' tiu/wig 0 vi coilpanlu mouon plclufll induct/iy.
iiowevut, I now (ind iiigulfi at a c/Lieu-pabiz uilivie Ln mat to
Awtwlve, 1 iiiuat down! to be placed an an tvui and equal (outing
iuult ninja/t clwciu opt/mung in . .. in otheh noun, 1
The Gent/ui.L ilamgu, mu Abiubtaneaiu Iieteue Iabch OLUIUL oh

duve-on zhu.t/tee. I am not Mung (oh Itezuut began my appaabuan
eonipanalu, but I iaéunozacceptln (mm, Iiehueagte/i than. -
Lu 1[...]Further to my discussions with you some months ago and
subscnuent dates for" " " " and

" " programmes for our theatres.

You are aware that your cc-iiipnny's relationship with Kr.
over the past few years has not been one of any satisfaction

to either party. ihls as you may know, came about nmiist
iir. was screening your films at his

ihcatre and your company checked his figures, And he claims.[...]pngustly accused him In matters relating to Box Office Dockets. Dam SOL’ 3,¢p'fi'J¢b,y,¢‘Mmu":§'°:,.;“Mfl;¢. n¢'gu¢‘5¢c: ?aa gun that we wauu Janeen an a Alnubteneaua mu.
Mm, dymuslans Hm‘ You Md Hm] Mr‘ M npnue “fink” Yau a/te auafwme tho: wi_iu_i i 54./wt commenced Olit/i.lLC4.0rlA, lime 11% auumntzfintgdmameeuauuu A Olbfllgn
I was under the impression that you were prepared to takethat all box office docket: etc., in future would be loo: Lam haunt WM-M ‘"2 ‘ - L-msauull/tug’ u all mu

correct. we. understand that you have every right to do spot 0"’ “u an ad.“ wdepuduyt d/“YE-U-I than“ U-I - yugue 1 gh‘, ,1“c;mM',m¢[g ‘ 3 4,”; ' 1;, b an
checks, but your indication to me was that this would probably notand Certainly the" mu” bl M “U” for my utu ina.uily Maugiut ahaut by a Aiwuage as connr/tuai gain. some at (avou/t asa eiwu ouicuuax ‘can r. uiu_
arguments or discuss[...]F7"‘4‘¢¢- 7 Milt been Iuuinutg my Uiuxzig y in gt a vuig biublflfl V-VF”-""91: “ C” “*4” am‘. flu‘, “

' uiotii aeeand um (am. a. at/uught biiauiesa «Oiitnaaetwn and should be mu

It was with great alarm that I learnt that you had decided to - - bwyeq 0“? twywmpimud; hr do not WM “'2'. ‘new :3” 4 ‘
check ,4“ . "M":[...]fg.‘ Th/wugnouz the yell/L4, i have eiiduvauhed to henam an uutuutzd poiocwn to via inn: at up gum an mt. e aauhee M Z geneeuziy
Obviously, you decided not toto swig 2,1,? iii“ A» “M mm" “id
The feet that your checkers not only counted the cor: coming in flung ape-MAIN’ M I M! w3za'u‘v uhtuuu-d M an Upuuuan 0‘ (“M6 mung “E gm“ u cunvuuuch 0‘ 0 M that M My dumu
but also went amongst the cars counting the people in than did an dluwfut {hang and at “ mu 0‘ my 04'" 0'"

not make Hr. any happier a d s ltnow, h d Ided th - « » ~ i ”."-m,‘ “an ~ U-"9 - - v my: to

spot at 7:00 on last night to tuiie iheyfuiln off b:ce::e itvorzs G gvfllbzhtd[...]gag Ii::c;Lu¢:‘cfA‘g2Zl.d:«‘t‘$P‘.Li§a£oA ma ; an Mixing 150'! rid: ‘M ::fP rd;ai:AM¢u"4hMd;Al¢Vu M and
apparent your company did not with to operate in I norlui businesslike OM‘-‘Ce. I have bum able to must Add/auety haul and to In,“ a__

manner. it has not been the practice of other companies hezzoamzbte uvug and past: Main the thuwte, bwt heeuvtlq, the VGIIM (U-«UI6Ii-U-9.

to check this theatre for quite some years apart from the

upuuu 05 apehax/Jig the d/Live-in thtax/ze have Lnutenaed conaidviably.
occasional spot check which is common throughout the '

iiiizgu tool: like inmeu[...]industry. my uiizgu mu Z1/Utlllbly high and 7 have just been advised by my
accountants that the Iuz/tu and land mu fiazi. (has one «thta:/ie uulu.
Lnuitaae to $ .000 yen:/Lb].

i remain,

2.4:. The Gent/[...]ers concerning allegedly restrictive practices by a distributor.

February 27, 197»

-ir«.._.i.-.9 ‘ir-tiur.

ii is the intention of the exhibitors to go next inch with U
denutation tr) see iilm companies In Sydney and lilo the
"ristrictivc Trade Fractices Cr-nviissloner Hr. Bannerilun in

Wr nerra.
near ,

Bcihre t>-esr exhibitors take these delperaln Itlps, I tould re: andin my: this matter your inlnefliate attention and to

. L l L: 6 t 't t t k f I
w m « »«-«~~ it us to my .u.n-on W . mm or mm--n

Exhibitors nave had lerial opinion and have been advised that Independent exblhitors and our our stuff thet__vour company
your company cou[...]actices has sold the exclusive rights of the film to

Act in withholding from exhibitors in prints of the film >_ ‘r. ya“ awn.” ‘ha: ",1; is ¢0,,trav.,,.]mJ (5.

Vours sincerely, Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1

it . I ht t th ti ' tt tion that this film has

appa::nt)i;~:een :oide’(::)e "9 s 3 en who as you knw is This natter has been referred for legal opinion and we believe

a subsidiary of who in turn is a subsidiary of the that both yourselves Ind ll’! parties to I'll!
and that are 100% Australia" restriction. It is u gravely serious nutter also because

i_owned. It is severely effecting the iiidihood of some exhibitors ‘ '_ ' ' h Hm" I ' mm‘ M“
to have the est-)Liishad practice of school screenin[...]ool c.c. Hr. Exhibitors lssociatlon r

screenings to keep their theatre open. Hr. , lI¢'stlon Picture Distributo[...]°
.1,_ fi_J_ yang‘. truv-_-l some 2'‘ miles to a Village Theltre. The cot! 0f

on rrracticc of selling a film to a theatre chain for the effective transport and theatre admission for some of these schools

sci-ooi period is not only restricting the trade of |n:enen:e:;:' unites the excunslon quite lupoulble. In our own then!!!
it news; but It is aim‘ heavily increasing the cost 0 eac m _
_?per student and in many cases, aoubiinn and trebilng-the transport we charge hoe 50¢ per head (or uhlsslon to this fiirii.

costs for students where they are unable to go to a local
independent theatre, but have to travel -narw rilics to reach one of Your Office Manager. Ni‘. .0 h‘ ‘fin fm‘

the outlets. up with and they have refused to allot the print out of‘

their lumds.
This situation is also effecting travelling exhlkltors namely

‘cssrs. who have built no r circuit over the r ' M H
years and ale-endeavouring to maintain their Iivdihood. in on this is ‘aka!’ I" H" redflu‘ 6flv."x"" Q .[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (88)[...]oor, Crystal Palace Building,

590 George Street, Sydney, 2000.
Phone 61 2569 or 61 2604.

S IN FILM BOOKS AND MAGAZINES
(for Fans and Professionals)

DUII VAST STOCK NOW INCLUDES

INTERNATIONAL FILM GUIDE 1975. $3.95
THE HOLLYWOOD PROFESSIONALS, Vol. 3: Hawks, Borzage
and Ulmer, $2.95
FILM 73/74. (paperback) $5.95
THE CRITICAL INDEX, a bibliography of articles on film in
English 1946-1973. $8.25
DEVELOPMENT OF THE FILM. An interpretive history. By Alan
Casty. $8.20

AND IN THE SCIIEEN TEXTBDDK SERIES:

PHOTOGRAPHIC THEORY[...]larendon St, Artarmon NSW.
Phone 51 61066. Telex: Sydney AA 24545

Specialising exclusively in negative matching

NEGATIVE
CUTTING
SERVIC[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (89)[...]George Lugg Library welcomes en-
quiries on local and overseas films. On
request, photostat copies of[...]kiwi film companypty. ltd.

post pPQduCtiQm'SpeC|a|iStS articles, reyiews yvill _be forwarded.

fl[...]eclfic mformatlon. re-

ed:,g,p,§ ggggjs quired and send S.A.E. plus 50 cents ser-
sound l"eCOl"dlfig V1ce fee to;

preview theatre The George Lugg Library

83 miller street: north Sydney. 2060 P,O, Box 357
I h
te ep ONE 929 4111 E-l.l"l. 949 3228 Carlton South

Vic. 3053

The Library is operated with assistance
from the Film andand good
‘ F||_MMAKERS films of all types on 16mm and 35mm.
FELLOWSHIP‘

Some of our films include:
M[...]m & 35mm)
Hoyts Theatres Limited sponsor annually a Satyajit Ray's D|s1'AN'|' THUNDER (16mm)

F°"°WS!“P to enC°Ur%9e the etaniiard °f quality 0* Godard’s LETTER TO JANE & 'rou1' VA BIEN (16mm)
production of Australian motionpictures. I Peter Robinson-S ASYLUM (16mm)

The Fellowship IS for a training P6LrI0dA0f 'l5|X Remundo G|eyzer’s THE[...]H PETER (16mm)

Enquiries for the 1975 Fellowship are being .

specifically called_ir_om those people in the Motion Claude Faraldo 3 Bo“ (16mm)

Picture or Television Industry who have had and shortly:

experience in “Special Ellects” and who wish to Agnes var-da's L|oN’s LOVE (16mm)

gain further knowledge in this field. _ _ f i |

Applicants should be permanent residents of wme °' ""9 °' °'" °a 3 °9"°

Australia.

Enquiries should be directed to:—— ‘

The Assistant Director,

Film and Television School,
P.0. Box 245,

CHATSWOO[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (90)AUSTRALIAN

FILMS
from the

VINCENT LIBRARY

‘ I...‘
1...’? .

O0
,9

Australian Film Institute
I975 Catalogue Available ($2)

79-81 CARDIGAN STREET, 365A PITT STREET_

CARLTON SOUTH, 3053. SYDNEY, 2000

TELEPHONE: 347 6388 TELEPHONE; 61 2743

TE!-EGRAMS1 TELEGRAMS: FILMINSTITUTE/SYDNEY
FILMINSTITUTE/MELBOURNE

1975

GREATER UNION AWARDS
ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF
FILM AND VIDEO

Prize for Best Film in DOCUMENTARY Category: $1,000
“packed Prize for Best Film in FICTION Category: $1,000
useful material ,, Prize for Best Film in GENERAL Category: $1,000

Colin Bennett Presented in association with the

SYDNEY FILM FESTIVAL

' on June 1st, 1975
- ENTRY FORMS NOW AVAILABLE
I Eligible films must be under 1 hour in length, must be in-
dependently made, produced in Australia and completed since

April 18th, 1974.
Last date for[...]10.00 for schools). Tax deduqtable.

BOX 4934 GPO SYDNEY NSW 2001
Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[...]s sYoFEs'r svomsv
Association of Teachers of Film and Video,
C/o W. Levy, 11 Mercer Road, Armada[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (91)FILM & TV
COURSE

at The Film and Television School
Sydney

Applications are invited for the 1976 three-year course of the Sch[...]time
Program.

24 PLACES ARE OFFERED

The School is interested in attracting applicants who wish to work professionally in
creative areas of

FILM & TELEVISION and in EDUCATION
The Full-time Program offers intensive practically oriented training in production,
direction, writing, editing, cinematography. sound recording and production
management.

The training qualifies people to work in the Film and Television Industry.
It also qualifies people to work in EDUCATlON—as teachers of film, TV or media,
or in the production of educational films.

All students undertake a common first year course in all the craft bases of film and
television technique. The second and third years are devoted to increasing
specialisation and to extending the students’ professional and cultural knowledge
and awareness.

Living allowances are paid.

Training is conducted at the School’s premises at North Ryde, Sydney. There are no
rigid rules about age or educational qualifications, but people around 18 to 23 and
with the Higher School Certificate have an advantage.

Supporting material as evidence of creative ability is required. Applications must be
made on the School's official application form. Application forms and brochures
(containing detailed information) can be obtained by sending the coupon below to:

The Enrolments Officer
P.O. Box 245, Chatswood, N.S.W. 2067

or by phoning:
The Enrolments Officer
Sydney 412 1077.

APPLICATIONS CLOSE AT 5.00 PM, FRIDAY[...]IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

- To: The Film and Television School, P.O. Box 245, Chatswood, N.S.W[...]lete details about your 3-year, full~time course, and an =
I official application form. I understand it may be 10 days before this is posted I
I
I
I
I

I to me.
PFIINT IN BLOCK LETTERS. FT25

IIIIIIIIIIIIII
:9
o.
a.
'1
to
U!
V’
IIIIIIIIII

........................[...]ocation close
Clarendon Street.

RENTAL: $4.680 p.a.
TERMS: 10% deposit, bal. 60 days.

BARRIE M. GRI[...]m division lends award
winning shorts. no charge,
to recognised film societies.
-Ioh n Dixon:
Ballads of Men and Horses.
[4 mins.
Bilcock and Copping:
Count Basie in Allstralia.
I3 mins.
0rson Welles narrates:
The Last of The Wild
Mustangs. ll mins.
And others.
Enquiries: Corporate Affairs
Department.[...]3189

SHOWCAST

Actors Directory — 1975 Edition now available. 1500
entries $15.00

VARIETY

Entertai[...]CONTACTS

Information Directory — 1974 Edition now available.
3000 entries of who is who and where in the Entertain-

ment industry $5.00

sliow[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (92)OUR ASIAN NEIGHBOURS is
a programme of films which
aims to convey everyday life
in Asia. The first of the series,
covered Thailand. This series

I 7I—1 is devoted to Indonesia and
~ ‘ brings to life its people,
customs and their music.
Each film captures the
lifestyle of the people in their

own environment and vividly
identifies with the viewer.

These films are made so as to
stimulate interest in and to
promote a greater
understanding of our asian

TEN FILMS[...];fi
I: sounds recorded on location;

the actors are the people
themselves who live, work
and play in this absorbing
and fascinating region.

FILM AUSTRALIA

Eton Roa[...]tralia
Telephone no 3241
Telegrams ‘Filmaust’ Sydney
Telex 22734

British and US. enquiries
through Australian
Government Film _
Representatives:
Canberra House,

10-16 Maltravers Street,
The Strand,

London. WC2R 3EH.

Australian Information
Service,

636 Fifth Avenue,

New York, N.Y. 10020,
and at all Australian official
posts abroad.

DEPARTMENT OF THE MEDIA

TXT

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (93)Bolex announces the H 16 EL,

with anew kind of meter that
is ultra sensitive to light changes
and built for hard use.

A built-in light meter once turned even a The motor is electronically controlled. When

ruggedly built pro camera into a delicate you stop, it stops. And the shutter closes. You

instrument.[...]can use your original film without having to
Enter the H16EL, with a silicon cell instead of cut frames from both ends of each take.

the conventional CdS cell. Results: k Instant The viewfinder has high brightness and 13x

response to light variations. Shift from blinding magnification, plus built-in comfort with either
light to deep shadow with perfect results. 2. No eye. Two red light diodes in the viewfinder
sensitivity to temperature variations. 3. No[...]indicate correct aperture. No waiting for a
corrections needed, because of its straight
response curve. 4. Equally responsive to all needle to settle down. The diaphragm of the The Bolex Shoulder brace provides
colours from blue to red.
new Vario-Switar 12.5-100mm f2 lens is fully excellent stability with good weight
Manual light measurements are made through open for accurate focusing and closes down distribution, and frees the camera
the lens in the body of the camera so the automatically when you squeeze the button. man's hands to operate camera and
camera can be fitted with any optics, including Power is supplied by a Ni-Cd battery. Take lens.[...]gers.

tubes. For extreme changes of light, use a lens With the usual Bolex attention to detail, a

with built-in automatic exposure adjustment. full range of accessories is available, including a Contact Photimport in your state for

Bayonet lens mount for quick and precise removable 400 foot magazine that is used with further information or a demonstration,

changes. So strong that you can carry the a take-up motor providing constant film Photi[...]6

Film speeds 10-50 fps, single frame, reverse and The whole unit is built like a tank. It is a Sydney 26 2926

crystal control are electronically regulated and rugged and reliable piece of gear that is as fail Brisbane 52 8188
are coupled automatically to the meter, with a safe as Bolex know-how can make it, despite its Adelaide L H Marcus 23 2946
selector knob rated from 10 right up to 630ASA. light weight (about 71bs for body and power pack). Perth L Gunzburg 28 3377

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (94)The Film , Radio and Television Board
of the

AUSTRALIA COUNCIL

(form erly Australian Council for the A rts)
w ill hold

PUBLIC MEETINGS

in all states

so that proposed new policies
for its Creative Film and

Television Production Funds
can be discussed with
interested parties

SYDNEY BRISBANE[...]pril 10th 8.00 p.m. April 22nd 8.00 p.m.
Australian Government Centre Australian Government Centre Theatrette[...]Chifley Square

Watch daily media for dates and venues in other capital cities

The Board intends to abolish the current Experimental, It is also planned that orientation seminars followed by
and General Production Funds; to be restructured as: filmmaking workshops, and later, the provision o f 8mm
production equipment and film stock, will be offered to
THE BASIC PRODUCTION FUND inexperienced persons prior to them applying to the Basic
and[...]All applications to the Basic Production Fund will then[...]Copies o f the draft policy may be obtained prior to the
will continue under different criteria. meetings by writing to:[...]Film, Radio and Television Board,'[...]NORTH SYDNEY, 2060

Quarterly Assessments for applications to Creative Production Funds in 1975

CLOSE o n -- 24th March 23rd[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (95)[...]Television series. I

The South Australian Film Corporation
is a total film enterprise involved in

film research, production, marketing,
distribution and library services

established by the State Government
and operating both nationally and
internationally.

In the first two years of operations, film
o[...]total film, has been

produced (won Awards), and is being
sold by the South Australian Film
Corporation.

If you want to talk film, total or in part,
talk to us-- soon.

C ontact: The Director,

South Australian R lm G oiporation

64 Fuilarton Road, Norwood, S.A. Telephone 42 4973 (S.T.D. Gode 08)
G.P.O. Box 2019, Adelaide, S.A. 5001. Australia.

I enclose $6.00/$12.00 for 1[...]er.
Please make cheques or postal orders payable to Hightimes P/L
and cross them not negotiable.

Subscriptions, Name....
The Digg[...]iving more than the
next twelve months by paying now for the next two, three, four or
however many years you're willing to risk. We would stress that
these multiple year subs are speculative because we cannot guarantee
to fu lfil them!

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (96)[...]AS PECIAM STS[...]Royce Sm eal Film Productions.
Com plete 35m m and 16mm film[...]Color Video. Complete production
production and creative services.[...]Plus post production facilities in[...]cluding film to tape (35mm and[...]16mm), time code, editing and audio[...]facilities.

Paul Harris, G e n e ra l M a n a g e r,[...]Film Lighting. Everything from a tiny
Pty Ltd. Complete range of 35mm and[...]little inky dinky to a great big brute[...]Plus mobile blimped generators
16mm film cameras and accessories.[...]up to 1,000 amps.
Panavision. In fact everything -- from
a battery pack to a camera crane.[...]L FILM THEATRE OF AUSTRALIA
Box 1780 GPO, Sydney, NSW 2001.

SEASONS FOR APRIL-MAY[...]an Archives
% Carl Dreyer

USE FORM BELOW TO SUBSCRIBE NOW

S U R N A M E (S )............................Init. .......[...]I n i t ..............

PLEASE PRINT CAREFULLY to ensure correct delivery of notices.

Gro[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (97) A rticles and Interviews[...]Contributors

Disaster Films Philippe M o r a ........... ................................... .[...].................. 10 Sue Adler is a regular contributor ' to
D isasters' M r. Success: An interview with Jennings Lang[...]Cinema Papers. Tony Buckley is a film[...]producer and editor; vice-president of the
David St[...]...... ...............................14 Sydney Film Festival; ex-president of the
Byron Haskin:[...].... ..1 8 Australian Film Council and leading In
Surf Films: The Quiet Industry Albie Thoms .....[...]dustry spokesman. Virginia Duigan is a
W e know where we've been, but . . . Tony B u c k le y .........................[...]script-writer and ex-film critic for The[...]National Times. Patricia Edgar is a lec
Restrictive Trade Practices Legislation and The Film Industry turer in media sociology at La Trobe
Antony[...]University's Media Center. Ms Edgar is[...]y published book,
Raped, Slapped, Ignored: Women in the Movies Tritia Edgar.................... ....[...]Media She. Tony Ginnane is a Melbourne-
A M atter o f Fact Ken H a l l .................. ............. ............[...].............. 46 based film critic and independent
Brian Probyn: Director o f Photography Eric R e a d e ...........................................73[...]producer-distributor. Ken G. Hall is a[...]prominent Australian director of the
Ross Wood: Producer and Director o f Photography: An interview[...]Cinesound era. Mike Harris is resident
Graham Shirley ..........[...]................ 76 film critic for The Australian. Barrett[...]Hodsdon is an economist and has studied
F e a tu re s[...]film theory in Britain and America. He is[...]presently engaged in a series of research
The Quarter .................[...]............... 8 projects for the Film, Radio and Television
The 1974 Australian Film A w a r d s............................................[...].... 24 Board. Bruce Hodsdon is a tutor in film
Top 10 o f 1974 ...........................[...]... 42 with the Council o f Adult Education, a
Filmography: Charles Chauvel Andrew Pike .......[...]program co-ordinator for the NFTA , and
Index 1974: Supplem ent.........................[...].......... Centre Pages a regular contributor to various film socie
Picture Previews -- Inn of the Damned and Sunday Too Far Away ..............60[...]ty bulletins. Ross Lansell was a critic for
Production S u rvey..................[...]............. ................... 67 Nation and is now a script-writer. John
Columns ....................[...]........................v..............88 O'Hara is the Melbourne film critic for the[...]ABC and lectures in film at the RMIT.
F ilm R e v ie w s[...]Andrew Pike is an authority on Australian[...]film history and is currently conducting
Chinatown Ma[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (98)FILMS COMMISSION Carlton Hotel and a hospitality suite in Dates of the festival in each capital city All enquiries should be directed to The[...]with cassette and addresses for subscriptions are Secretary, Film, Radio and Television
The Australian Films Commission Bill playback equipment and translators, is listed below.[...]uncil, PO Box 302,
was adopted on March 6, after a long being provided. A group of Australian North Sydney, 2060.
and stormy passage through both producers is being flown to Cannes at SYDNEY -- August 9-17
Houses. But It has yet to receive Royal the AFDC's expense. These inclu[...]NOBODY'S PERFECT
The Bill now provides for the establish Purple and Alvin Rides Again); John La-
ment of a Commission aimed at en mond (Australia[...]Over the last 12 to 18 months film ex
couraging the promotion, production, (A Salute to the Great McCarthy); Paul[...]hibitors In Melbourne have been riding a
distribution and exhibition of Australian Witzig (Rolling Home) and Michael Caulf[...]movies like The Sting, Live and Let Die
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (99)[...]d sid erab le interest In `in tern atio n al' have invested in the seven filmed plays of of $85 million in the US and Canada,
a Delphic Oracle. But there'll be a swell productions.[...]the initial series: Edward Albee's A
job waiting for him when he comes[...]He pointed out, however, that in the re burn and Paul Schofield, directed by[...]with $83 million and Gone With the Wind[...]AG Universal expected to drop a million. Luther w[...]ey with (1939) with a mere $70 million. Close
GOLDEN REELS[...]David Stratton's in-depth interview Al[...]with Jennings Lang appears in this issue Pinter; E[...]Sting (1973) with $68
Presenting the 1974-5 Australian Film of Cinema Paper[...]ee Marvin, directed by
Institute Awards at the Sydney Opera[...]'s The million, and The Exorcist (1973) with $S6
House with Glenda[...]HG Homecoming with Cyril Cussack,
was a calculated attempt by the Institute[...]o's million.
to focus both local and international[...]Rhinoceros with Zero Mostel, directed by
a tte n tio n on th e now b u rg e o n in g[...]Tom O'Horgan and Kurt Weill; and Max Other "champs" at the top of this
Australian film industry.[...]Anderson's Lost in the Stars with Brock[...]year's listing are Love Story (1970), The
Im m ediate local me[...]Graduate (1968), Airport (1970), Dr.
What the international trade press will[...]teething troubles, due largely to com
think of the event remains to be seen.[...]puter booking foul-ups and alleged Zhivago[...]xpress, who
ing was marred by early projection and[...]with Landau and the French Canadian ture (1972), Butch Cassidy and the Sun
compere gaffes.[...]television were initially partners in the
Talk to a cinema manager or a dis joint venture. The series, in its second dance Kid (1969) and The Ten Com
The awards themselves (publishe[...]season in the US with a children's season
elsewhere in this Issue) were the subject tributor until recently about the film in on the way, is now run exclusively by[...]PB
of much discussion, as might be ex[...]Landau.
pected, but the only general thumbs dustry here and he would automatically[...]GAMMA RAYS AND SEX AIDS
down seemed to land on the choice of[...]links with the AFT
best screenplay which went to David assume you were referring to the exhibi organization are no doubt partially ex
Williamson's Petersen. Ho[...]plained by their vice-president Norman
was general approval for[...]B. Katz's previous position as head of
given to the South Australian Film Cor[...]Melbourne has acquired two new in
day Too Far Away.[...]dependent cinemas in the last month[...]Cinema until recently and you would be[...]bringing the number in the greater urban
There was also some discu[...]Initial reaction to the movies overseas area to 41. This is at least nine more than
rounding inclusion in the awards of forgiven for thinking the same. It's only has been varied but largely upbeat. The its northern neighbor Sydney, where
movies made specifically for television[...]main criticism has been their often restrictive licensing regulations have, un
and it was pointed out by some that the now that production has become a con stagey reverence for theater with a til recently, kept a closed door on the
TV industry already has its own award[...]capital T, but the massed talent on view[...]ne's high cinema stan
system (Logies, Penguins and TV Society sideration in `the trade's eye'. But the makes them eminently interesting to say dards have contributed to the increasing
Awards). However with productio[...]arity of local movie going. For com
Scenes from a Marriage, Duel etc. the doors are opening . . . slowly.
boundaries between TV and movies have For a producer to assess the marxet There will be only two matinees, two fort and modernity, Melbourne cinemas
definitely become[...]evening and two school performances of are world standard, unlike Sydney where
he intends to compete in he needs to the movies before they are returned to old barns still st[...]know its size and comparative figures. In[...]The Total, conceived as a live theatre by[...]Spain, Ger from 23 and 24 June. No individual[...]tickets will be sold, but season tickets will Gordon Barfield, was converted to a
Universal Pictures, Jennings Lang, made many and Japan and doubtless[...]cinema after a disastrous premiere run
some interesting points on the size and[...]of Guys and Dolls. Initially programmed
importance of Australia in the world elsewhere, gross box-office figures are The organizers s[...]well by Dendy Theatres as a matinee house
market.[...]for the day release of Benji and Th
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (100)[...]DISASTER FILMS

A t the end o f the film, after the last flame has the origin, the genre is here to stay. The physiognomy of disaster: These people are under stress for
been doused, Paul Newman surv[...]our entertainment. Disaster films, although not exactly an
hulk o f his skyscraper. He suggests allowing it to acting challenge, do require their stars to perform amazing
stand as "a monument to all the bullshit'' o f our catastrophe. For ex[...]War of the Worlds (1953), Titanic (1953), A Night contortions of facia[...]ed on permanent exhibition at the Smithso to Remember (1958) etcetera and ad infinitum.
nian for the same reason.[...]pictures" (as Variety calls them) and past disaster
-- Richard Schickel, Time, 6 Jan 1975 films is the clear formula running through the re[...]cent products. No training in mathematics is re
Poseidon Adventure, The Hindenburg, The quired to understand it.
Towering Inferno, Juggernaut, Airport 1975,
Earthquake . . . apart from total nonsense what Big star names + Absurd accident or
do these recent film subjects have in common? Outrageously improbable catast[...]k of cunning. They have been con difficult to rationalize the relationship between art
structed with the cinematic equivalent of and money in the film industry. However, recent
M achiavellian precision. They exude a disaster films leave no room for ambiguity. They
remarkable confidence in their almost total are quite clearly made to make money. Thus an
mastery of mass audience manipulation. The unexpected result of the new genre is a worldwide
audience is placed in the stance of a car accident flowering of abusive languge in film criticism.
voyeur eating popcorn. Here is a typical example:

But maybe this is taking things too seriously. " Movies like Airport 1975, with their furious
Perhaps it is the glossy kitsch which is mediocrity and their manifest cynicism about
their own mediocrity, represent American film-
appealing. For example, the climax of Earthquake
is Charlton Heston and Ava Gardner being
drowned in a sewer. That's entertainment!

Cecil B. de Mille, when[...]e continual
ly filmed biblical subjects said: "What else has
2000 years advance publicity?" A reasonable
,

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (101)[...]nimaginative, most every human muscle and organ had been stomped destructive power[...]on, cut, bashed, mauled and bloodied. However, let Hollywood have the last say in the
But once a particular film subject becomes ex Disaster films are the natural extension and form of these words by Jennings Lang, executive
tremely popular and prevalent and is in effect, a[...]of Earthquake:
new genre, then the critic's role is radically development of the screen violence of the last
diminished. What is the point of criticizing a "Take a picture like Sunshine, which is going to
James Bond film, a Carry On film or a Kung Fu years. There is nothing more violent than the con outgross Earthquake in revenue. It's about two
film? Likewise, disaster films are carrying on vulsions of a hostile fate in the form of fire, earth kids with cancer -- you could call it an internal
regardless. and water. The violence of the clenched fist has[...]disaster, I guess, but it doesn't fit any trends."
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (102)[...]DISASTERS* MR.SUCCESS

Jennings Lang: I got a report from Universal Studios'executive vi[...]s working with. There are certain
a friend named Paul Monash who I recently in Australia to promote The Front Page, and take a producer-director[...]ble movie tioning in all areas including costs,
Paul had seen the Na[...]checking out advertising and hiring
version of The Front Page in London[...]draftsmen. There are some who con
and raved about it. He asked if I 'd For many years Universal has maintained its reputation as centrate on the actual directing and
like to turn it into a movie using Joe one of the world's most shrewd and aggressive movie producing are more interested in the script
Mankiewicz. I knew Joe Mankiewicz[...]preparation and the casting . . . and
so I called him up to find out if he[...]there are others who are less in
was ready to write a script. He was The following interview,[...]tton terested in the script preparation and
interested in- the m aterial, but provides a revealing glimpse of the methods and attitudes of a more interested in the post produc
because of his faithfulness to Charley powerful Hollywood executive. Lang begins by describing how tion. So the labels overlap and-the
MacArthur and Ben Hecht he said The Front Page was set[...]duties change and vary.
he wouldn't dare write it. At which
poin[...]ether he'd be doing The Front Page -- it's a kind than he did on this one. In the movies On The Front Page I advised Billy[...]inder's fee. th a t I 'm labelled `executive Wilder and did anything he wanted
somebody who'd write and direct it[...]producer', the amount of effort I put me to do that he didn't want to do
and he said, "Not at all" . I then told In other movies where he is labell in generally depends on whom I'm alone. Billy and Izzy Diamond did
Paul Monash I would try to get Billy ed `producer' he does far more work[...]the writing of the movie. Needless to
Wilder to do it.[...]say he allowed me to read the script[...]. .. listened to certain suggestions . . .
Why did you pick Bi[...]then took some and discarded others.
think he is a great director, but his He was in final creative control. But
last two films -- "Avanti!" and he was a listening creative director.
"Sherlock Holmes" -[...]And when he disagreed he gave me
commercially succe[...]his reasons for it.

Well, there are certain things one[...]How is "The Front Page" running
is proud of. And one of the things[...]in the US?
I'm proud of is that I really don't
think a guy is as good as his last pic[...]I was trying to look in Variety. I
ture was successful. Take Coppola[...]about $6 million domestically
was a disaster at the box-office and[...]between Christmas and now --
although we don't know about God[...]which is very good although not in
father II, I can assure you it will be[...]f Earthquake, Towering
very, very successful. I know of no[...].
filmmaker who has made more than
two movies that hasn't had an un What did the movie cost?
successful one. If you go t[...]which includes an overhead of ours.
Wyler or Billy Wilder -- you'll find a And I would say that if the movie did
certain amount of unsuccessful[...]$10 million it's a success -- from
movies.[...]that point on everybody makes[...]Wilder because I
thought he was the best fellow to do[...]You're talking about the United
it -- and the best fellow is not often States and Canada?
the one who was involved in the most
successful movie.[...]If I was to guess I'd say that it would
"The Front Page" was produced[...]do $15 million in the world, before
by Universal. Was there any in[...]television -- which is a very
dent company or separate company[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (103)[...]Universal in a sense then suggested -- i.e. Clint Eastwood -- to take
"Earthquake" and "Hindenburg" to over the project.[...]he Filmmakers Group. It doesn't I'd like to move onto another area[...]work that way with Malpaso. which will' interes[...]Malpaso must be a different set up. you seen any recent Australian

Not true, Let's take the movie that movies?[...]Malpaso has just finished -- The No, the only movie I saw was one[...]this movie, in the shortest ver pany made here -- Sidecar Races.[...]sion I can give you, is that David It's felt in some quarters that

Brown, a partner in the Zanuck American companies take a lot of[...]Brown Company -- another in money out of the box-office in[...]Universal -- came across the book Australia and don't put- any money[...]The Eiger Sanction and suggested it back in through production. I noticed[...]to Universal, who in turn financed[...]the purchase of the book without in your list of credits that you were[...]ever contacting me directly but con involved in "Act of the Heart" which[...]tacted Clint Eastwood's agent. Clint was a Canadian movie with a Cana[...]Eastwoqd read the book and was in dian director and actors, and which[...]terested in it but would not commit was a big flop. Did you make it[...]until he'd seen a screenplay. At because of similar pressure in[...]is first movie Play Misty for which point Zanuck and Brown No. We made Act of the Heart
Me.[...]made a judgment not to make a com because a girl called Stevie Phillips, a[...]ith Clint Eastwood on the very good agent with CM A, came to[...]basis of his approval of the me and said: "You've always liked
jpany*, The Filmmakers Group and the movie. I was there in the actual screenplay, but made the decision to . Genevieve Bujold and it would be a
Universal. How do things work on a making of the movie as a creator, not
project like "Earthquake" -- which
was produced by The Filmmakers only as an executor.
Group -- or some of the movies that In connection with Hindenburg,
Clint Eastwood has m[...]I brought the property to Bob Wise.
Sd

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (104)[...]NG

necessarily." So, unfortunately we Are you likely to be looking at appeal to Australians; how much it an English movie, but in order to
came over to Paul's version of Act of scripts or being given scripts, while
the Heart and it was very un you are out here? would cost to make; how much of have an international audience in
successful -- but we didn't have that
much money in it so it wasn't a terri We're given scripts all the time. I that could be recouped in Australia; volved they used the best.
ble loss. haven't received any here and if I had
I wouldn't have the time to read and how much potential it has for the Now if I was to make the movie
Has that experience colored your them anyw ay. But th e re 's a rest of the world.
attitude or the company's attitude, marvellous story from an Australian we're talking about, based on an
towards backing completely in book about an older woman who is
digenous movies in other countries for in love with -- or at least cares for -- Australian novel, and I went with an
local distribution and the option on a young retarded man . . . that could
international release? make a fantastic success. But it Well, as you probably know A ustralian director, there'd be
would need a grown man to play the feature films are being made here at nobody in Australia that I could sell
We have had bad luck with movies retarded person, to sell the movie to the moment from anywhere between internationally the way I could sell
that have been made away from the the international market. It would $250,000 and about $400,000. Robert Redford in that role.
supervision, or at least the contact of make an exciting project using Currently there are a lot of scripts I'm for protecting the Australian
home office executives. The most Katherine Hepburn and Robert Red- that have been partly financed and filmmaker. I think the best way to
serious one was done in England, ford.
where we lost over $30 million. A producers are looking for the rest of protect a filmmaker is by letting him
marvellous guy from MCA got so in But then the point that would be the money. In this sort of situation make a very successful international
volved with the excitement and tradi made here is that it would no longer
tion of English moviemaking that he be an Australian movie. It would just how much control do you think movie. Of course, he must not be told
had forgotten about the international be one made in Australia.
market, -- and consequently he Universal would want? Presumably that he can only use Australians to
made movies that had a very restric Well then it's the wrong subject. they would want to put in an ex make it work. That's restricting him
tive kind of audience potential. They You'd have to find if the making of much more than we do in the US. If
never made any money . . . none of an Australian movie requires all the ecutive producer.
them. cast to be Australian -- then get a we think the best guy to play a cer
sub[...]I really don't know. I think tain role is Jean-Pierre Belmondo
"Charlie Bubbles?" What would your company's at
titude be to a project which had a Sidecar Racers could probably then we try to get him to make that
< Charlie Bubbles, Countess from good screenplay, an Australian
Hong Kong, Boom, Love is a Four writer, director and cast; one which provide the answer. The only movie. Or if we think Mastroianni is
Letter Word and on and on and on. I had been properly budgeted for
thought Privilege would have been a Australian conditions and which had difference was that there were two a better person to play a role then we
very successful movie had it been the'Support of the AFDC? If such a
released two years later. I think it project was put to you with a view to Americans involved as performers -- try to get him. As a matter of fact I
was ahead of its time. CIC* distribution in Australia -- and
first o[...]ardner was the best
I think "Charlie Bubbles" is a tion -- would you be interested?
magnific[...]But it had an American director. person to play an old movie star in
Oh yes. But I'm not an authority Earthquake . .. and she hadn't work
It's a marvellous movie and it got on what would happen. I presume
great reviews, but nobody went to see the judgment would be made on An American director and an ed in years.
it. These days we're taking a more whether or not the movie would I think the goals you have are
primitive stand. We're looking at[...]ve producer.
scripts, working out the best place to "Universal d is trib u te s th ro u g h C IC in great. I'm for that. If there is some
do them and then making them Australia. And it was finished in the US. It. Australian talent let's get it going.
there.[...]was edited and scored there.[...]Let's invest money in this guy to get[...]Yes; it was edited and scored in the him going. Let's get the right proper[...]hough there was some editing ty so it'll be not only a hit here but a[...]done here. The first cut was done and[...]then it was sent back -- which is not hit internationally. Rather than[...]unusual even if it's made in England. saying, "Well, we'll show them --[...]Would you consider it an the only way they can get The Sting[...]to play in the Australian theatres is if
Australian movie? they guarantee to put up $8 million[...]to make eight movies with only[...]k it's 90 per cent Australians, from top to bottom." I
Australian. We make movies in the[...]think that's going backwards -- in
US and Hollywood with Vanessa[...]Redgrave, or with an English direc tellectually, culturally as well as[...]tor -- for example Karel Reisz made In your position at Universal you[...]The Gambler recently with Jimmy are able to predict where American[...]movies are going. Universal is, at the
There's an interesting situation moment I think, the most su[...]here. A lot of talented filmmakers are producing company. Where do you[...]ment to take action to help the in Well, I think the motion picture[...]dustry get going. The feeling on a industry is in the position where it[...]has to compete with other events.[...]project like "Sidecar Racers" is that For many, many years the motion[...]the Australian filmmakers themselves picture was a habit. Now that habit[...]really benefit although the movie is has been removed and substituted by[...]the television habit, and along with

A very big problem exists in not te le v is io n th e r e a re v ery[...]understanding that movies are made sophisticated forms of audio enter[...]for the world. I think that as tainment -- which are also habits.[...]chauvinistic as we all are if our major The movie now has to be a special[...]objective isn't to make movies for event. Consequently in selecting the[...]ople all over the world then we're ingredients of a movie you have to

in the wrong business. ask what it is that will draw people[...]Now if in order to secure your jobs away from other entertainment. S[...]you have to threaten us -- the out think the future of movies[...]side world -- by not allowing the the ability of producers to make

Australian people to see movies that judgments ranging from the basic[...]are m ade elsew here, y o u 're piece of material to the way the'[...]retrogressing . . . going backwards. movie is made: To use stars that
T h at's building a wall around can't be seen on TV and to employ[...]yourselves. If I was a filmmaker in techniques-- like Sensurround --[...]Australia I would say: "How the hell that can only be experienced in a[...]der on the Orient Ex cinema. These judgments have to do
press in Australia?" -- then it with timing and the need to appeal to
becomes an Australian movie. Just a broad audience.[...]the same as even though Sidney A movie has to have an identity
Lumet, an American director, that people will want to get out and[...]directed Murder on the Orient Ex spend some money to see. And that's[...]press, it's predominantly an English-[...]made movie. It was made in England what we're looking for in our line up.
and had an international cast -- All our movies will have, we hope, a[...]sa Redgrave, Albert Finney special event and an unusual image[...]that will make people want to see
and many other people including Sir them. And I think that's the only
A thoughtful Walter Matthau, playing the managing-editor of a Chicago newspaper in The John Gielgud. It was predominantly[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (105)[...]Alone, Too Late for Tears and The Crying Sisters. Over the two[...]decades that followed, Haskin directed a number of films now
regarded as minor classics. Among them were War of the[...]Worlds, an updating of the H. G. Wells story combined with[...]of Charlton Heston's plantation by soldier ants; and
Robinson Crusoe on Mars, an effective transferral of the Defoe[...]original to a loneliest imaginable outer-space.[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (106)[...]he's made his living on for years bend over them and tie tiny knots electricians. And as I told Don him, one of them I Walk Alone
-- he'd talk-talk-talk-talk, and peo and it was a case of time meaning
ple had to break in on his lines. They money. If we opened out to the Siegel, a friend of mine that I started (1947). And then he loaned me out
thought that was great in New York. bigger scale, Five guys could work on
it and you got the thing finished in a as montage director, " It would be a for a thing called Man-eater of Ku-
Moving to a more technical week instead of a month. Besides,
approach, how did you become in you can't go below an inch with great joke on Warner Brothers to maon (1948), which was a hell of a
terested in effects? water action and have anything that
looks l[...]send my assistant onto the set and good picture. I went over to England,
I don't know, I just had a bent for
it. I remember driving by cliffs as a This is even using high-speed say I needed Bogie, or Cagney, or did Treasure Island (1950) for
kid and knowing that the rills left by photography?
water were a scaled-down reproduc Bette Davis, and make the damndest Disney, then I came back. I did a
tion of the Grand Canyon. I had a Yes, of course, and you become in
basic understanding of scale. stinctive about speed. In the Bobby film you ever saw" . There was no western and I did a Tarzan, which[...]ed from working eight times normal speed and burned question about what I was doing. I every director should have to do. Sol
with Herbert Wilcox in England, I up every Mitchell camera we use[...]n't Lesser had acquired the `Tarzan'
around town and went out to work in So with Air Force we had a
the W arners special effects Japanese plane attack at sea, and to believe, and I was putting through rights from MGM and this one
dep artm en t, doing process have any reality with the water we
photography. In other words, they had to move up to an inch scale. We literally millions of dollars a year by starred Lex Barker, with Dorothy
needed a lighting cameraman and it could have done this in our tank but I
was something to help recoup my heard that the Santa Barbara harbor salvaging time from the set. It was an Dandridge as the queen of an
broken fortunes. I started in the had a very reduced scale of tur
Effects Department under an old- bulence and an unbroken horizon. ideal situation. I was Finally given an African village.
timer called Fred Jackman. Fred had We got permission to use the harbor,
had much to do with the develop and by rigging wires to fly the planes office up front to tell the producers "War of the Worlds" (1953[...]your first science fiction film.
matte process, and I confounded entire sea action of Air Force. When what could and couldn't be done,
Einstein 2 with this damn thing. I we came to Action in the North which way to go, and wh^t
photographed him and his wife in a Atlantic, I knew exactly where to go
buggy, and half an hour later he with our full convoy. backgrounds to chose. George Pal and I collaborated on
came back by and I said: "Now I
have you Professor, come in''. We Action had started in Hollywood Did you strike trouble with the in that film and I rewrote half of it with
took him into the proj[...]Bacon, who's since troduction of color to effects work? Barre Lyndon. A recent writer on
and screened Einstein and wife in dead. Lloyd Bacon had reached one
horse and buggy travelling down the of those disagreeable points in his science fiction films4 has said that
street of a small town. He thought it career where he'd ma[...]Yes I did. The back projection was it was bad to have removed the story
was greater than relativity. money, but as an option was due on[...]new contract, Warner didn't want very limited and you were confined from its identifiable background. It
Back projection was just coming in to take it up at an increased Figure.
at that time and was replacing the Bacon could have gone on at the to shooting in front of a 1.82m was identifiable to Americans, and
old yellow key process. Jackman had Figure he was earning, but choos.ng
it so arranged that the company at this point in life to have a lot of screen. As a rebellion against this that's who we were making the pic
cameraman would get the day off professional pride, he decided to give
and our cameraman would take over the studio the goose. The picture, limitation, I invented and built and ture for. In making our choice, we
for the process scenes. which was to have been a big convoy
epic, was no longer the biggest thing received an Academy Award for the did as Orson Welles had done. We
When did you take over the in the world, and Bacon didn't help
department?[...]triple background projector. It transposed it to a modern setting,[...]fter I'd been there It was the big Fire scene and he enabled you to film on anything up hoping to regenerate some of the ex
for about a year. I didn't particularly hadn't even got into the story. It was
want the thing, and I tried to get completely out of control. Jerry to a 5.4m screen. citement that Welles had with his
Hans Koenekamp to take the job. Wald was producing it. He called me
He was a genius with special effects over and said: " My God, save my What was its principle? broadcast. UCLA asked to screen it
but he was very shy, and while he Was peck!" The editor didn't know what as a film definitive of its category,
hiding from the[...]doing. The Fire sequence was It was built on a wedge principle, and of course they laughed at the
said to me, " You take the job" , and I all chopped up, you couldn't tell who using three projectors. Two of the girl's costumes and at Gene Barry
did. was burning or what was happening. lamp-houses faced each other, the who in his first film was dreadful.[...]which by then cost other shot straight ahead, and you H. G. Wells' conception of the
Warners, l[...]million, was Finished, we fired had adjustments to ensure that the Martian spacecraft had been an old
studios at the time, repeatedly used the cutter and employed George three images stayed superimposed. tin-can with walls like a weather
rather familiar footage. Amy to take the film apart and com
ple[...]Didn't Farciot Edouart, from tower and long legs mechanically
You bet your life. I m[...]Paramount, have something to do jointed. This was not what the
tage for Twenty Thousand Years in The cutting in that fire sequence is with its invention? Americans were up to, so we created
Sing Sing (1935) which they used[...]an evolution of the flying saucer and
time after time. It was an illustrative
montage that they were going to use Well it was a joint effort. Amy was Yes, he did. By this t[...]t supported on luminous anti
on the main titles, but they didn't really good at this and I wasn't too reached a point of disastrous patent gravity legs. The craft had two
know what to do with the end of the bad myself. brawling,, and Herman Beatty, a weapons -- a ray which would dis
picture, so that's where it went. The Warners attorney, had engineered an solve anything into flames, and a-
`chase' I made for a picture called As department head I was in agreement between the 12 major blue dot-and-dash disintegration ray
San Quentin (1937) was used in 25 charge of budgeting and the choice of studios to enter into a patent pool. which brought about the destruction
pictures after that. God, it was the effect to be used. I picked anything The terms of the pool stated that all of Los Angeles. I'd originally intend
chase to end all chases -- under up to six alternative ways of doing signatory studios could share in one ed to use many more creatures, But
railroad trains and off cliffs, ex the effect and judged the value of studio's invention if t[...]up more
plosions, dynamite, everything. All that effort upon the story. I actually
the stunt guys in Hollywood got rich. had five special effects directors money toward its development. As than sufficient time and expense with
working for me. If anything became far as this project was concerned, I his one Martian.
What scale did you normally use tough on the set[...]say, " Forget it, we'll have special had a breadboard model built with We spent six months building that
effects do it" . I had a big expansion the three projectors bolted to a piece Martian. We called him Louis
This was a thing I established in a deal going, everything that goes into of wood. I needed to build a preci Lump-Lump. Charlie Gomorrah
picture called Air Force (1943). Peo making pictures. I had a laboratory, sion instrument on a single stand, worked him from the inside and
ple at that time generally built generators, a whole staff of with the three projectors as units could handle any number of
miniatures on a scale of
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (107)[...]Space was H askin's second film with George Pal, a producer who had considerable experience working with posed to be weightless and was[...]behind blue backing. As he leapt
Conquest of Space (1954): Superior visu[...]quest of Space (1954): " . . . the whole film was a series of impressive from the axis the guys in the jeep had
model work and high-speed photography.[...]funerals." to grab him, and it became quite a[...]Above: Long John Silver (1954): Shot in Australia purely for economy[...]and the English-speaking background. But the whole picture was a flop,[...]Left: Byron Haskin demonstrating the hula to an actress during the too intrusive. There[...]r (1954). balance between this and the internal[...]Yes, and our co-producer was[...]Macrea Freeman Junior, who in[...]sisted that we involve this incredible[...]father-and-son neurosis. In our[...]story; the father is in charge of the[...]Martian expedition and the son is[...]father loses his cool and his son[...]threatens and kills him, thus saving[...]the expedition. Now a person chosen[...]to be an astronaut is not going to[...]tested to prove that he's not the kind[...]of guy that would succumb to that[...]is lost in the lift-off toward the sun,[...]and if anything the whole film was a[...]I'd like to talk for a moment about[...]feature and TV series "Long John[...]Silver" (1955). Why was this shot in[...]Ideally, we needed a reduced[...]and wanted a locale with an English-[...]Joseph Kauffman travelled down to[...]Canberra, gave the politicians a load[...]of bullshit and then approached the[...]"yes" with a 100 per cent collateral.[...]added to the Commonwealth's ad[...]vance, and also investment from[...]other Australian contacts.[...]studios unoccupied but in fair con[...]dition, we refurbished them and[...]started out with the feature. I used a[...]used on His Majesty O'Keefe in Fiji.[...]Ross Wood and Carl Kayser5 were[...]two cameramen who seemed to have[...]left in Australia, while on the per[...]and his son Kit, who played Jim[...]Hawkins. As Israel Hands we cast a[...]Now it wasn't a good film, but as[...]an adventure film it wasn't too bad.[...]It ran into the general ill-fortune that[...]producer's chief neurosis was that he[...]at the uppermost point of a destruc[...]tive climax, that we were going to[...]deal after deal, and one day one of[...]his financiers reneged -- a since-[...]inmate of a US penitentiary called[...]deals were made at 9,140m over in[...]ternational water, and we ran up a[...]monwealth Bank. That was the[...]beginning of their taking the thing[...]over. We figured out later that hav-[...]Cinem a Papers, M arch-April -- 21
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (108) BYRON HASKIN

A lo fte U .S . a s tr o n a u t pitted against

ali the odds beyond this earth!One adventure
in a million that could happen- tomorrow![...]" For this I engineered over 300 special effects in the camera on Eastman-[...]ing started with a budget of in Munich called Captain Sinbad[...]$476,000, we had spent almost a (1963). For this I engineered over[...]million dollars on the feature and the 300 special effects in the camera on[...]a case of mortgaging the mortgages, While I w[...]or like building a bridge and having director in Vienna, the King Brothers[...]to mortgage the first half to build the hired the Academy Award winning[...]other. We never did get to shore with cameraman from The Hustler,[...]Eugen Schufftan. Now this rang a

In spite of this, were the conditions bell and I remembered we had sent[...]favorable at that time for production effects work across to a German guy
in Australia? called Schufftan in the twenties. I[...]there. All you needed was a good related to the old man" , and when it[...]professional guiding hand and to was time for him to arrive, it was the[...]know where you were headed. Kauff old m[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (109)[...]ction packed pirate story about thejlerring-do of a brave adven
turer, Burt Lancaster.

it forward again. But a great many of would be a quick giveaway, so he[...]R
the composites were done through matted in an orange-red color. The
the mirror. The hurricane that howl skies up in Death Valley were very,

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (110)[...]1974-75 AUSTRALIAN FILM AWARDS[...]An unprecedented sixteen feature films were among th[...]for the 1974--75 Australian Film Awards.[...]st international standards. Despite this, we feel that the
Australian cinema has reached a most exciting stage in its development.[...]Technically, quality dKproduction was at an international level. The[...]standard of cinematography, and the use of original music were[...]Scriptwriting remains the most obvhsqs weakness in Australian film[...]today, though there were somfesqotable exceptions to the[...]The judges noted a continuing preference for masculin&sjrotagonists[...]and male problems. Entries provided few significant r[...]We were impressed by the restrained and succinct use o f commentary[...]in the non-fiction subjects. The documentary preselectors detected a
new measure of assurance in works dealing with current, and often[...]contentious, social issues. It seems that Australian documentary film[...]makers can now be relied upon to pursue a commitment w ithout[...]jn to stridency and heavyhandedness.[...]r, the preseteetiSTrpaiielfor short fiction fe lt that the subjects .
explored in this section were concepY&aUyjyeak.

AUSTRALIAN FILM AWARDS[...]Advertising film preselectors reported th at Australian'c3m

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (111)[...]awaiian (1961): Hollywood
cashing in on the sixties surfing craze.

surfAtoms

The[...]Jarrett, Graham Shirley and Sue Adler.

There are currently about 15 surfing features being exhibited around Australia, half of which are
Australian productions. Four of these were produced last year with investment from the Australian
Film Development Corporation. In backing them the AFDC has acknowledged that the producers
are among the most experienced in the country -- responsible for 24 features since 1960 -- and the
only ones to have created an independent, vertically integrated film economy to control production,
distribution and exhibition.

It was from California that the first surf movies casional rental or percentage deal with an in Gidget and made Midget Goes Hawaiian (1961),
came, brought here in the late fifties by Bud dependent cinema, Evans discovered that for an featuring local surf champ[...]man Bob outlay of around $200 on rent and publicity he who the next year went on to win the World
Evans. could pocket as much as $1,000 a night. Championships in Hawaii.

Evans had been a surfboard rider from an early From a surf movie exhibitor it was a simple Evans eventually quit his job as a PR man and
age, and through a visiting American surf team, step to become a producer. Evans bought some[...]vies Hawaiian equipment, established a contra deal subsidy for out a feature a year between 1960 and 1971.2
air tickets1and took off for Hawaii where he shot
Memories (1945) and The Big Surf (1943).[...]erness of other
Evans paid for Browne's visit and arranged to the first all-Australian surf movie, Surf Trek to Australian producers over deals where dis[...]tributors take all their expenses off the top and
exhibit them in beachside surf clubs. For most[...]leave the producers with nothing. He is equally
Australians it was their first glimpse of the giant Back in Australia, Surf Trek was put onto the[...]als with foreign-owned exhibition
Hawaiian waves that have made `The Islands' a circuit that had been established with Browne's groups and would prefer that the Australian
mecca for surfers.[...]Government channeled its efforts to establish a
producing a magazine called Surfing World.[...]isting producers gain access
Evans soon found that he was attracting as to the large number of public halls that cover the
many as 800 people a night to see Browne's This was all at the time of the surfing craze in suburbs and coastlines.
movies and realized he had discovered a large and California when the Beach Boys and Jan and
Dean began to top the charts with their songs
expanding market among the thousands of about surfing lifestyles, and Hollywood came up
kids involved in the surfing culture. By renting[...]with Gidget Goes Hawaiian. Evans capitalized on
what licensed halls he could, and making an oc

M uscle Beach Party (1964): a manifestation o f the fad popularity o f the surf[...]grew into a multi-million dollar industry. Cinem a Papers, M arch-April -- 27

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (112)[...]SURF MOVIES

Poster for Rolling Home. An example of a hard-sell campaign The success of Morning of[...]f Crystal Voyager. $20,000 from the AFDC led to Crystal Voyager surf features for TV. Peter Thomson and Bill[...]Fitzwater for the ABC in the sixties; Tim Burstall,
This view is shared by Paul Witzig, another[...]who covered the 1971 Australian Championships;
force in the early surf film industry, and was the Initially intended as a short to support the and John Phillips who covered the 1971 Smirnoff
basis of a submission to the Tariff Board enquiry summer release of Morning of the Earth, Crystal Championships in Hawaii. None of these have
into the Motion Picture Industry in 1972. Witzig Voyager has since becom[...]rated highly with the surf movie audience in spite
told the enquiry of screenings in halls being acclaimed surf movie ever produced in Australia. of the fact that they are highly crafted.
stopped after complaints from local cinema
owners, who initially refused to exhibit a movie, Since Crystal Voyager, David Elfick has sold It is the personal involvement of the filmmakers
then later wanted as much as 60 per cent of the his interest in Tracks to move into the production that has accounted for the success of surf movies
g[...]of non-surfing documentaries and features. in Australia. The commitment of the producers[...]However his brief stint as a surf movie producer exceeds anything known in the rest of the industry
Witzig was introduced to surf movies by Bob revolutionized the Australian surf film industry, and has parallels only in the dedication of so call
Evans. Like Evans he became involved ^distribu and has forced other producers to adopt higher ed `underground' filmmakers who have used
tion and exhibition. After meeting Bruce Brown in standards and hard-sell promotional campaigns. similar production techniques and marketing
California he brought Barefoot Adventure and procedures.
Slippery Wet to Australia. He also helped Brown In the past, Australian producers have dis
shoot footage for the Endless Summer which tributed their surf movies internationally through While most Australian surf movies have not
became a world box-office smash, grossing over reciprocal arrangements with their production revealed sophisticated approaches to the craft of
$10 million in the'US alone. counterparts overseas. But following the disap film, nor made any technical advances that could
pointing run of Morning of the Earth in the US, be considered innovatory (with the exception of
Witzig distributed the Endless Summer in Elfick took.Crystal Voyager to Cannes4, signed George G reenough's w ork)5, they have
Australia and went on to make his own feature, an agreement with Hemdale, (the British com greatly extended the range of pictorial images in
*Life in the Sun (1966), which was released for a pany) and secured the release of a new 35mm ver Australian film, and closely observed Australian
year, then re-cut, added to and re-released as The sion in London. life[...]other filmmakers.
Hot Generation -- with just as much success.
Paul Witzig is also heading for Cannes this year It is not enough to see one surf movie and to
In 1969 Witzig again trod the international sur with Rolling Home, and it seems likely that Bob assume one has seen them all. They must be look
fing path and came up with Evolution. The movie Evans will follow suit with Drouyn. ed at as a body of work, and the evolutions and
was a success around the world, grossing more[...]changes in them seen as part of the general growth
than $150,000 in the US. Evans' $50,000 budget for Drouyn (half of of both Australian surfing and Australian film-
which came from the AFDC) is a long way from making. They are, without doubt, the most
Since then Witzig[...]the maximum cost of his early movies, but today significant indigenous film development in this
and recently Rolling Home which takes a Leyland his grosses are smaller and he notes that distribu country for many years.
Brothers-type expedition around Australia. tion and exhibition costs now consume some 80[...]per cent of his total box-office compared to about Footnotes
Alb[...]50 per cent 10. years ago.
World as a photographer and layout artist and in[...]more than 50 per cent of
1967 went with Evans to South Africa to work on Evans is currently involved in the production of production expenses on Evans' and other Australian' surf
The Way We Like it. 40 half-hour programs for a TV surfing series. movies.[...]However, he is uncertain about making another
However, Falzon had ambitions to publish his surf feature. 2 With the exception of Ride A White Horse (1967) -- a com
own surf magazine and produce his own features.[...]m his earlier movies, scripted by Ted Roberts,
In 1970 he founded Tracks with Paul Witzig's While Evans managed to sell his first nine Ride A White Horse was enlarged to 35mm and distributed
brother John (a former editor of Surfing Inter features to TV, he is bitter about the low prices by BEF.
national) and Go Set editor David Elfick. paid, particularly in the light of repeated
screenings in popular viewing time. Witzig, on the 3 Morning of the Earth has grossed $200,000 in 16mm on the
Following Evans' example, Falzon and Elfick other hand, held out on TV[...]the pop local market.
-used the magazine to help produce and promote ularity of surfing movies on the cinema-roadshow
their first feature Morning of the Earth -- the circuit he is probably right in assuming that they 4 Crystal Voyager grossed $120,000 in its initial 16mm run in
biggest grossing Australian surf movie to date.3 could draw big audiences on TV. However, the Australia and was released in London with Fastastic Planet.
' With Elfick as producer, Falzon as director- maximum price paid so far for a surfing feature, is In the first three months the movie had grossed 50,000
photographer and a gold award winning sound $5,000 --- low for a color feature. pounds arid is expected to go as high as 100,000 pounds. It
track by G. Wayne Thomas, Mo[...]has also been sold for distribution in Germ any, Canada,
had a production slickness beyond anything[...]Spain and South Africa.
previously seen in surfing movies.[...]posite: Morning o f the Earth: Chris Brock; (top) and[...]Nat Young in Falzon and Greenough's Crystal Voyager: the most highly-acclaimed surf movie ever produced in[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (113)[...]32). directed by Ken G. Hail. The most successful and prodyctive erad.n Australian cinetyia ---the v[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (114)[...]ssibly the world's first feature film.

-The only really positive thing about the mission Bill appears to have completed its tor- Australian pop and serious music on radio: there
Australian cinema is at least we know where tuojiis and protracted path through Parliament. are reasonable quotas to encourage local televi
we've been. But do we have a plan and a policy for the future? sion shows, but there is nothing to ensure the
Unfortunately the answer is NO." production of Australian films. The Film and
We know that Johnson and Gibson's Kelly[...]on Board receive $2 million from the
Gang (1906) is possibly the world's first feature In 1975, the production of Australian films is Council for the Arts, The Film and T.V. School
film, and that Raymond Langford made the same as it has always been, an ad hoc situation

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (115)Restrictive Trade Practices Legislation
and the Film Industry - Part I

By ANTONY I. GINNANE

In a two-part article Antony Ginnane examines the Australian exhibition and distribution system, its
ownership, attitudes and practices. The local industry is found to be a giant duopoly fiercely antagonistic to
competition. Legislative attacks on the vertically integrated film industry are already history in the United

States and the United Kingdom. Attempts have been made in Australia in the past to break up the industry
status quo and indeed the Tariff Board Report recommended divorcement of distribution and exhibition in
terests and the divestiture by the chains of some of their theatre holdings. These proposals have been shelv[...]w Federal Restrictive Trade Practices Legislation and the effects it may have

on the industry.

THE AUSTRALIAN FILM INDUSTRY - A DUOPOLY IN

DISTRIBUTION AND EXHIBITION

The Australian film industry, like film industries The oth[...]tion sources -- the major Warner Brothers and
was originally an Australian theatre group, the mini-major American-International Pictures).
all over the world operates at a three-tier level -- known as Union Theatres. It is now 50 per cent GUO appears to hold only 33-1/3 per cent in the[...]sh conglomerate, the Rank Village Group, but many of Village's exhibition
production, exhibition and distribution. Organisation, and is the largest distribution- outlets are operated on a joint venture basis with
exhibition group in Australia. Directly or indirect GUO. Village mai[...]hes of the industry ly it controls the release in this country of films liaison with GUO, but state that they regard the[...]ount Pictures, MGM, Universal Pic latter as their day-to-day competitors.
have tended to operate as a vertically integrated tures, W alt Disney P r[...]Distributors and the Rank Organisation. Through Victoria, too, has the small Dendy Group, as an
il'nit until courts or legislatures have chosen,[...]m Distributors, it main independent outlet, but of late they have been in
tains an almost total monopoly of English films volved in joint ventures with Village Theatres.
reasons which will be examined, to intervene. ^ imported.[...]Until the Tariff Board Report, there was no! in[...]dependent activity of any sort in NSW. Even
In Australia the production side of the industry In Victoria, it is associated with the indepen Village, much to their chagrin, were prevented[...]irtually non control the output of the only two other produc from breakihg in. Table I sets out the major,[...]links:
existent until recently when it has begun to

reappear quite spectacularly in a fit of

government-led sponsorship and tentative private

financing. It is thus only marginally relevant to

this introductory section, but it will be argued

later that the origins of the ownership of the dis

tribution and exhibition sections of the industry

have In fact been responsible for the non-existence

of production; and that the absence of a visible

production industry until recently is one major TABLE 1: DISTRIBUTOR-EXHIBITO R L[...]ribution duopoly.

Two overseas-owned companies in effect con Major distribution compan[...]GUO
trol the exhibition-distribution scene in Australia. 1. CIC (distributing Paramount,[...]MGM and Universal)
One, the smaller of the two, Hoyts Theatres Ltd is Village and GUO[...]GUO
65 per cent owned and controlled by Twentieth (distribut[...]ures) Village and GUO
Century Fox Film Corporation of America. It[...]Hoyts v
thus has exclusive access to Fox films in this int.) Dendy Theatres

territory and has distribution arrangements with ; 4. BEF[...](distributing Disney
Avco Embassy Pictures and control of the library Productions)

of the now defunct ABC Films and the largely 5. Roadshow[...]6. United Artists
defunct (at least as a production entity) Cinerama 7. Seven Keys[...]franchises for exhibition with United Artists and

Columbia Pictures, which latter, Twentieth Cen

tury Fox handles in Australia since !, January,

1975. It controls over 60 cinemas and drive-ins in

the Commonwealth and books for another dozen

or so. , rjV[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (116)[...]CAL PRODUCTION: T A B L E 2: AUSTRALIAN DISTRIBUTORS AND[...]T H E I R PRODUCT
Australia had a substantial production industry Distributor
in the silent era, and in 1900 made the first full- Product distributed in Australia
length film. During the 1920's the industry ex
perienced difficulty in raising finance for larger Fox 20th Century Fox, Columbia
scale and then sound productions. At the same[...]bassy Films
time it found itself faced with more and more United Artists[...]alt Disney
Report on the Motion Picture Industry in Roadshow Warner Brothers: American
Australia1referred "to the lack of success of most International and Independent product.
Australian pictures; the limited return available[...]Universal, Paramount, MGM
from the local market, and the need to secure in Seven Keys I[...]Independent product
however, "that although most of the distributing
companies in Australia were connected with Of these seven, Filmways and Seven Keys are Further, film hire terms (i.e. the[...]gross takings payable as hire by exhibitor to dis
in existence exercising `a stranglehold' over the totally Australian operations. The Roadshow tributor) between independent exhibitors and the
local industry" .[...]distributors are excessive as opposed to deals done[...]with associated theatre groups. BEF may sell a
In the early thirties Australia ventured into[...]film to a GUO theatre on a 90/10 deal, which
sound production and the Australian production Roadshow Distributors which handles American means that after the theatre expenses (which in
company, Cinesound, enjoyed a unique clude a built-in profit to the associated exhibitor)
relationship with the major Australian theatre International and independent releases, and the have been deducted, the film hire is to be split 90
chain, Union Theatres. Cinesound produced a per cent to the distributor and 10 per cent to the
series of continuous features -- a string of tightly joint venture, Roadshow Inter[...]exhibitor. There would, of course, be a minimum
budgeted, largely folksy dramas hnd come[...]percentage payable, say 25 per cent, with a rising
and Union Theatres gave them a guaranteed city handles the Warners releases, and accounts for formula in the event the theatre expenses were not
release and suburban runs.2[...]utput. s the same film may be sold to an independent sub
In 1937, however, the production oriented head
of Union Theatres, Stqart Doyle, retired and was Filmways is run by a small group of indepen urban or country cinema for a minimum film hire
replaced by Sir Norman Rydge, who in one of his
reorganization moves closed Cinesound (osten dent Victorian exhibitors who own or control at of 50 per cent.
sibly for the duration of the War, in fact for[...]began its accumulation of least six cinemas in the Melbourne area, and who
theatre real estate, and over the next decade the for profit, and must pay an exorbitantly high film
Rank Organisation bought up its issues capital. are still developing their outlets.4 hire regardless of how the film performs. The dis
The same year saw Fox acquire their interest in tributors have attempted to justify this situation
Hoyts Theatres. Seven Keys is a privately-owned venture which on the grounds that independent exhibitors have a[...]tendency to `cheat' in their film takings returns,
For the next 20 years or[...]has recently branched into theatre operation in but the independents argue that many of them
abstained from any major filmmaking in have been forced to understate their returns to
vestment. The industry stagnated and ossified. Melbourne and Sydney and operates closely with stay in business.6 (See Appendix C).
Both Hoyts and Greater Union now had not only
a guaranteed source of exploitable foreign box of[...]he distributors have frequently
fice product for their theatres, but moreover a
duty to protect the box-office potential of their Roadshow was initially started by the Village provided long clearance periods after which a film
overseas owners' productions. Thus, not only was[...]centive for the exhibitors or associated group to provide them with direct access to the independents. Fox or UA may release a film
distributors to invest in further local production, to Hoyts city theatres where it may run for 10
but there was a positive incentive to keep the local foreign product and has been spectacularly weeks. At the conclusion of the run in the city, it
industry nonexistent.[...]may transfer immediately to a suburban"Hoyts[...]successful. Although the local industry does not cinema, or wait until it is programmed there,
Thus, if local production is in the public in which may be up to six to 10 weeks. Follow
terest3 then some modification to the present disclose its figures, it is believed that overseas con
exhibition-distribution structure m[...]theatres, it will then rest for three to six weeks
OTHER EFFECTS OF THE[...]account for over 80 per before it plays an eight drive-in Hoyts splash for
STATUS QUO:[...]cent of box-office takings in Australia. one week. Then a further period of weeks,
Another disturbing effect of the present in generally four, must elapse before it is available to
dustry structure is the fate of exhibitors (and, to a When dealing with independent exhibitors (i.e. an independent exhibitor; by which time, of
lesser[...]utors) outside the net of the
two major concerns and the business dealings exhibitors not operated or controlled by their course, its money making potential is severely
which they must, perforce, have with th[...]tributors. The distributors fill the central role in overseas owners) the foreign distributors use a
the film industry in that they obtain the product[...]The Tariff Board Report7 commented as
from filmmaking sources and hire it to exhibitors "Standard Form of Contract" which is, to say the
for screening in cinemas.[...]least, an imposition of grossly inequitable terms (Motion Picture Distributors Association of
Overseas, a distributor is generally deeply in Australia -- no Australian distribution company
volved financially in funding film production. In on the exhibitor party to the contract. This con has membership) that, bad debtors apart, no ex
Australia, as the majority of films screened are hibitor is ever denied access to a film. In theory
from overseas sources, the distributor is virtually tract is too lengthy to be reproduced, but the this may be so, but other evidence shows that in
an agent, and little more, for the foreign[...]ittle chance of exhibiting
producer-distributor. Only Roadshow in clauses referred to in this article are reproduced in
Australia has, since the Tariff Board Report,[...]a film within a reasonable period of its first
become engaged in a full-scale production Appendix A. release. One owner of an independent suburban
program, although Filmways and BEF have now
ventured into funding. There are about 30 dis Clause 1 purports to set up an offer and accep drive-in quoted the example of the film The Secret
tribution companies in Australia but only seven of[...]toria which he contracted for after
them provide a significant flow of `product' to the tance for formation of a contract, but it seems in seeing the initial previews. It was subsequently
commercial film industry. These distributors and played for three months in the city, and was `held
the product they handle are set out in Table 2: reality that an exhibitor is presented with a short[...]over' for a further six months before being releas
*Cinesou[...]Rudd M P (1940). list of films available at a certain rate of hire and ed to the suburbs (in this case to Hoyts). After

36 -- Cinema Papers, March-April his signature obtained to the contract schedule im that suburban release there was a further delay of[...]he deeming of the signing of the eight to 10 weeks before it was released to the in[...]dependent for showing at his drive-in." (App.D)
schedule as an offer is a fiction that is belied by[...]Since the Tariff Board Report a number of dis
the wording of a typical letter of acceptance from[...]tributors, notably CIC, Roadshow/'Columbia and
a distributor which is set out along with the rele

vant contract schedule in Appendix B. The ex

hibitor has no choice in the films or terms offered

him, as he will only be able to obtain similar films[...]Clause 3 and 4 refer to termination or suspen

sion on breach by exhibitor and distributor

respectively; but there are no reported examples

of the latter, although a number of controversies[...]concerning alleged exhibitor breaches are on[...]the standard form of contract: the right to check.

Further clauses concerning deficiencies in th

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (117)[...]IVE TRADE PRACTICES

UA, have relaxed this rule to the extent that many TABLE 4: PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF CINEMAS INDEPENDENT
independents are now granted access to a film IN 1966-67 (MELBOURNE)
prior to its drive-in splash. Only Roadshow,[...]1974
however, has allowed access of independents to a
title while it is still playing its first city run, the Albany All now operated All now operated
normal pattern in the US and UK save for `hard[...]Century (now Swanston) a subsidiary of a subsidiary of
Australia (now Australia 1) Village Theatres Village
Further distribution sales methods to in Curzon (now Australia 2)
dependents include the procedure known as `block Palladium (now Eastend 1 Independent Operated in
booking'. This is a method used to `move' the less and Eastend 3) Operated in association association with
successful films on the distributor's books along Embassy (now Eastend 2) with Village Village
with the more successful ones. It is defined as Capitol
"where the right to exhibit one feature is con Star
ditional upon the licensee's taking of one or more
other features" . The three main Australian chains in fact con[...]trol over 75 per cent of the city locations in
Cinema Center Group, a Canberra independent Australia and as these account for the vast ma Sydney, which was vetoed after Greater Union
exhibitor comments: "Conditions frequently in jority of first release houses, they have a strong in lodged an objection with the Commission10, is an
clude a requirement for `block booking' or the fluence in the exhibition field. In the past three example of their alleged bias. They operate in vir
acceptance of a `package'. The `package' in years Melbourne has acquired three new indepen tual secrecy, and do not make annual reports.
dent first release houses, Sydney two, Adelaide
variably consists of one or more successful box-of one and H obart one. The three major, One major effect as a result of the duopoly
fice films grouped with an[...]programming policies is that much less choice is
an indifferent to poor rating at the box-office."8 chains have acquired three each in Brisbane, available to filmgoers in a particular week than[...]se. Village's blanket
Independent city houses are in a similar Sydney and Perth, two in Melbourne and one in release policy in Victoria -- yirtually one
situation. The tying-u[...]all available Hobart. This trend towards an increase in the program a week on its drive-in circuit -- has,
product for the major chains means that there is number of city locations controlled by the three
in fact virtually no competition for films in the major companies appears to be further on the in perforce, been followed by Hoyts (which used to
Australian market. As I stated in my evidence to crease if plans already announced for 1975-76 provide a choice of three different- programs).
the Tariff Board concerning the Capitol Theatre, come to fruition. Table 5 shows the actual number Thus, instead of the choice of six to eight
which was then a Melbourne independent house of cinema seats controlled by the majors and is a programs which the public had to choose from in
with a prime location and an excellent box-office further indication of their strength. an average week when the independent Bix 6
record:9 " Subsequent to the amalgamation of[...]e competing with Village or Hoyts,
MGM with BEF (in July 1971) it has been im there is now a mere two or three.
possible for this theatre to obtain first release
MGM products any longer. It is impossible in fact TABLE 5: C I NE M A SEATS IN CAPITALS CONTROLLED BY
for the Capitol Theatre to acquire any product[...]any source. Four weeks ago, Capitol
Theatre did not know what film it would be show City[...]ontrolled
ing next. Fortunately it chased up the Australian
film Barry McKenzie and now it has a film to go Melbourne 20,125[...]." Sydney 21,068 2[...]95
In the past 12 months Prudential Theatres, the[...]011 58
Capitol Theatres operators, were forced to tie Brisbane 6,678 3,865 100
their interests to Village Theatres in a complex Hobart 6[...]6,242 100
deal which gave Village a 50 per cent interest and[...]2,300
city theatre ceased to exist.
Further, it is claimed that the effects of the Further, the power of the duopoly has forced a
Discriminatory terms and indeed outright Theatres and Films Commission in NSW continuous stream of reactionary thinking con
refusal to deal have been reported by various in (allegedly to be abolished in 1974) and in cerning cinema activities on the Australian public.
dependent exhibitors. Many Victorian indepen Queensland -- the former run by a former ex They used every means at their disposal to prevent
dent exhibitors have, for example, built a sizeable ecutive of Greater Union, Mr Hayward and the the introduction of the `R' certificate legislation;
business in the past few years by screening, either la[...]they fought against the introduction of daylight
in theatres or in school premises, film versions of McKechnie -- has aggressively supported the saving; and they fought against the introduction
texts prescribed for upper secondary English and status quo. Both these bodies administe[...]ments of the Cinematograph were unable to open before 8.30 p.m. on Sun
JlKS bought into the school screenings market and Films Acts of their respective states. They are days). They have resisted moves towards 16mm
have attempted to secure exclusive use of various concerne[...]requirements for cinema installation. In short, they initially opposed many
text movies. Documentation concerning two ex operation (in Victoria, SA and WA the field is of the progressive moves that have been mooted in
amples of such practice are provided in Appendix wide open). The notorious exam[...]recent years in the Australian film industry.
ed cinema in the Oxford Square Development,
As a result of such activities, the number of
Australian-owned cinemas has decreased rapidly
as Table 3 indicates. Table 4 compares the present
ownership of those Melbourne cinemas indepen
dent in 1966-67 with their ownership in 1971-72
and their ownership in 1974. The trend in
ownership patterns is similar in other capital

cities.

*Industry term for an anticipated high grossing release.

TABL[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (118)RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

OVERSEAS REACTION TO FILM INDUSTRY MONOPOLIES

-T H E UNITED STATES[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (119) Top: Rider on the Rain: W omen are By Patricia Edgar
present as background extras to
forbear, be ignored, slapped or raped.

Ce[...]ll-male world of mythical rugged
creatures who are either indifferent or

hostile to women.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (120)[...]GNORED

Hepburn met Spencer Tracy or Cary Grant and 12 to 1 in current American films is worth deeper
Bogart met Bacall. In fact the prostitute seems to study. How can we explain the dominance of men
be the only type of contemporary woman
scriptwriters and directors are now comfortable and the disappearance of women in American
with. She is the only female who has been allowed films today?
to become the romantic interest in film roles with
some depth -- Jane Fonda in Klute, Barbra Strei V IOLENT adventure films have always
sand in The Owl and the Pussycat, Julie Christie been popular with audiences. Our
in McCabe and Mrs. Miller. These women are the tolerance of scree[...]n
remnants of the tough heroines of the thirties and doubtedly increased over t[...]of the popular myths has been that
women and violence don't, or should not, mix. So
Until now every period in cinema history has
had its female heroines such as Mae Marsh and is the increase in films of violence part of the ex
Lillian Gish, M[...]n planation? The Western and Gangster genres have
Arthur, Carole Lombard, Jea[...]is, Joan usually treated women as ornaments but they are
Crawford, Lana Turner, Barbara Stanwyck,
Susan Hayward, Rosalind Russell/They played now being written out of these films altogether --
virgins, vamps, adulteresses, neurotics and
murderesses in parts that would not be unless of course they are needed to be murdered
appropriate today, but they were worthy of a
competent actress. Today's actresses are not so or raped more viciously than[...]substitute for the m atching of
fortunate. They are not even today's sex symbols.[...]minds that occurred when Bogart met Bacall.
Streisand drools over Redford's body in The Way Are women slowing down the action in such
We Were and Jack Nicholson has the centre of films? According to David Denby, women are be
the screen, while Faye Dunaway's head lies ad
miringly at the edge of the frame in the bedroom ing written out to "avoid any slowing down of the While some women are pushing strongly for
scene in Chinatown. slam-bang stuff'. Such an argument doesn't social changes which[...]wash. Not today when we have the Rose relationships between the sexes and having some
Above: Barbra Streisand, a popular songbird. Dugdales, the Price sisters, the Leila Khaleds, success, men and women are uneasy. Whether it is
Top: Liza Minnelli in Cabaret: a foil for the vitality of her Ulrike Meinhofs, th[...]Army and Patricia Hearst: hi-jacking, kidnap a conscious or unconscious response by film[...]ale co-star. ping, robbing banks and art galleries, throwing makers it is a most opportune time to promote
bombs. There is ample evidence for scripwriters masculine[...]e myth represents the
I T has become fashionable to make the that women in Western society can hold their own
claim that women are neglected in current and get to the top in crime. fantasy some men want to retain. Whereas once
movies, Joan Melle[...]we believed firmly in marriage, motherhood and
Molly Haskell, Margaret Walters, David[...]don't-commit-violence' myth has the family, now we believe in rugged in
Denby and Colin Bennett1have all done so not been shattered yet, other myths have. dividualism, man against the world and. love
relatively recently.[...]Conventional relationships, happy endings and between men.
It has become unpopular, too. It's always been marriage are definitely out and since women are
easier to send up the feminists' claims than to con usually associated with all thos[...]is
tribute further analysis which might add some in out too. Romance is gone but sex is in. Sexual appearance of women and exaltation of men is no
sight.[...]much to look forward to, for when the filmmakers
from a desire to have screen roles with the wit and wisecracks of the old romance films turn their attention to women there will be so
women winning all the poi[...]n't assume have become redundant. A Touch of Class tries to much virgin territory for the creation of new
that the filmmakers automatically endorse the[...]myths.'
values represented in many of the films men revive romance with a realistic modern touch; the
tioned. It doesn't see a conspiracy as the ex liberated woman takes on a lover for her own con One area is the Western. Jenni Calder in her
planation. venience and satisfaction. While the film is enter new book4 on the realities and myths behind the
The fact that male roles outnumber female by taining in parts, it is unconvincing. We are ex women of the Old West discusses the pot[...]pected to believe that the vicious confrontation legends that have been overlooked in the Western
between Glenda Jackson and George Segal, and genre.
what it reveals, is forgotten once the two fall into[...]versatile. She does as well as the hostess in an
T HIS so-called new realism in films is evening gown as she does on a horse, and she's
simply a new myth. It is more `honest' to[...]socially at ease with State governors and cow[...]because that's the way it is. It is more boys. But when the crunch comes she's the symbol[...]of community and conformity.[...]The hero, fighter and drifter, has to ride off[...]womanless to retain his integrity, for the effect of[...]`honest' to make films about corruption, alitehnea Western heroine's influence can only be
tion and the complexity of life, for that's the life paralyzing. In the history of the West, of course,[...]about us. But the `realism' portrayed is just as there were women who did not negate their men.
fake as the myths that have long been shattered. Their stories are untold on film and they must[...]he America of Easy Rider, Midnight Cowboy provide a bonanza for filmmakers. They are
.and other male epics is `nowhere land', where men necessary to regenerate the Western and only
are sublime when they are pathetic and noble women who share the mythic potency will pro[...]when they are absurd. The increased blood, the legend.[...]obscenities, grubbiness, sweat and tears in these[...]films provide a cloak of neo-realism, but it's simp with a knowledge of their own
ly covering a new myth. Part of the myth is the history and a political sense of the
depiction of a world without women; a vacuum present become in[...]masculine intimacy; where men are somehow be a change. But the change will not come w[...]effort. Women need to articulate and establish a[...]than women can ever be. claim to what is also rightfully theirs. If this is[...]done we can look forward to a new screen iden
Why is this new myth so popular? It's hard to tity, and with it, perhaps, some fun will return to
believe that women's liberation can be respon
sible, that it "has paralyzed the film com films.[...]panies''3 as David Denby claims. Looking from[...]Australia it's even more difficult to accept that

claim. No one has proposed here that Barry

McKenzie, Alvin Purple and Petersen represent a FOOTNOTES:[...]Australian women. Australian women haven't 1. Mellen, Joan, Women and Their Sexuality in the New Film,[...]Yet it is ironic that at a time when many women Haskell, Molly, From Reverence to Rape, H olt, R inehart[...]and W inston, 1974
have seized on a more productive and self-[...]industry has turned away from reflecting it in any No. 25, pp. 36-38[...]Female Bunch and The Doll Squad. On another wom an" , The Age, August 17, 1973[...]we have the masochism of Diary of a . Mad 2. Denby, David, op. cit., p.5[...]Housewife, Play It as It Lays and Such Good 3. Ibid., p.54[...]4. Calder, Jenni, There Must be a Lone Ranger, Ham ish[...]Cinema Papers, M arch-A pril -- 41

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (121)[...]In 1974 well over 300 movies were released in Melbourne and Sydney -- NOVEMBER[...]many of which have never been seen anywhere else in the world outside Lon
1- The Baby (T. Post) don's West End, New York and Paris. A large proportion of these were[...]on) (J.P. Melville) cheap skin flicks. In fact, 1974 saw a number of well established cinemas[...]Hellhouse (J. Hough) switch to showing exclusively " R" releases and a record was set for the 199. Frustrated Wives (Arnold)
4. Fever (A. Bo)[...]200. Pictures at an Exhibition
5. Lady Ice (T. Gries) number of soft and medium core movies on our screens.[...]inema attendances were once again on the increase and the
7. Kid Blue (J. Crawley)[...]latest figures from overseas indicate that Australia is now America's third 203. Baxter (L. Jeffries)
9. A Gunfight (L. Johnson) most important market after Britain and France (moving up from fifth place[...]n from the East (Clucher) in 1973).[...]h Sexy Go Round (Fleury) As the number of entries in this year's Australian Film Awards vividly il 207. Dirty Money (Melville)
13. Sex in the Office[...]lustrates (see pages 24 and 25) 1974 saw a dramatic increase in the production 209.[...]of Australian feature movies, documentaries and shorts. Although some of[...]these have been released both theatrically and on television -- with varying[...]ampire (Davidson) new industry in 1975. 214. Love in the Suburbs
17. la m Curious Yellow (V. Sjoman) In this special feature Cinema Papers has invited Au[...]dy Kung Fu (Klang) to make a selection of the top 10 movies of 1974 from a listing of all theatrical 217. Horror Hospital (Batch)
20. Quiet Days in Clichy (Thorsen) releases as well as through festivals and other non-theatrical screenings. 218. World Sex Report
21. The Amazons (A. Bradley)[...]s been reproduced below. It should be pointed out that because 220. Bunny[...]ase patterns, many of the movies on this list may not have been 221. Newm[...]ist (Verhoeven) released in some capital cities.[...]reta (Walker) 98. My Name is Nobody 144. Er[...]145. Alj The Way Boys (Clucher) 229. Investigation of[...]ion of Mimi (Wertmuller) 231. Maris in Lace (Novak)
34. Dear Parents (Salerno)[...]103. Please Don't Touch me I'm a Virgin 149. Wet Dreams (Multip[...]106. The Teacher (Avldls) 152. Busting (H y a m s ) 236. Detroit 9000
36. Tombs of the Blind Dead (A. De Ossorio)[...]risoner of Frankenstein (C. Brown) 107. 27A (Storm)[...]Truck Stop Women (M.L. Lester) 237. That's Entertainment (Haley Jnr.)
40. Venus in Furs (Damiano) 109.[...]an Called Noon (Collinson) 240. Girls with Open Lips
43. The Other Canterbury Tales ([...]242. Raw Meat (Sherman)
45. Ooh You Are Awful 114. The[...]244. Barry McKenzie Holds His Own (Beresford)
47. Day for Night (Truffaut)[...]ri) 117. Carry on Girls (Rogers) 165. Marij[...]119. Diary of a Nymphomaniac (Brown) 167. B[...]170. Roommates (A. Marks) 254. The Odessa[...]affner) 123. Maid in Sweden 171. Class of 77 (A. Marks) 255. Piaf (Casaril[...](Hardy) 172. Cars That Ate Paris (P. Weir) 256. Nurses R[...]Pete's Sake (P. Yates)
57. Guess Who's Sleeping in my Bed 126. Schlock[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (122)[...]Australian[...](Bunuel) Don't Look Now (Roeg) The Sting (Hill)
The Last D[...]The Conversation (Coppola) Don't Look Now (Roeg)
Save the Tiger (Avildson)[...]The Last Detail (Ashby)
Don't Look Now (Roeg)[...]The Exorcist (Friedkin)
Electra Glide in Blue (Guercio) Ladies and Gentlemen: The Rolling Goalie's Fear of Penalty[...]Stones (M. Spector) Love in the Afternoon (Rohmer) The Great Gatsby (Cla[...]The Three Musketeers (Lester)
27A (Storm)[...]t- Ivan Hutchinson

MRROR AUSTRALIAN TELEGRAPH PUBLICATIONS[...]Love (Makk) Don't Look Now (Roeg)
Mike Harris[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (123)[...]ymond Longford The Moth of Moonbi (1926): A rom antic m elodram a in which ty), Albert C. Winn (Sheik Abu), Kenneth Brampton (German Of
and Ken G. Hall as one of the three great a young country girl sets off to discover life in the city. After ficer), John Fleeting (Captain Gordon), Harry Abdy (Paul Rouget),
Australian directors of commercial entertainment many bitter experiences she returns to her lover at Moonbi Norman Maxwell[...]aude Turton (Othman), Theo Lianos (Abdul),
small and spread over a period of nearly 30 years, Station.[...]a Emmett, Vera
Chauvel emerged after World War 2 as the only[...]Kandy, Iris Kennedy, Joy Hart (Dancing Girls). 99 mins.
director of any note to persevere with production Produced, directed and written by Charles Chauvel; based on the
in the repressive context of increasing foreign con poem" 77!e Wild Moth" by M. Forest; Photography, A1 Burne; During the war, Chauvel directed four short propaganda
trol of Australian cinemas. He maintained this Presented by Australian Film Productions Ltd. Actors: Marsden films under contract to the D epartm ent o f Inform ation:
struggle until his death in 1959. Hassall (Tom Resoult)[...]Tauchert Soldiers Without Uniforms, The Power to Win, While There is[...]Rodger Down), Charles O'Mara Still Time, and A Mountain Goes to Sea. H e also assembled
Chauvel was born in 1897 in rural Queensland. (Ferris), Darla Townend[...]rtin Brooks), footage.
ties before going to Sydney to study art and Bille Stokes (Josephine).
drama. In Sydney he found work as a stable hand[...]The Rats of Tobruk (1944): A tribute to the Australian fighting
on two Australian `westerns' -- The Shadow of Greenhide (1926): A rom antic m elodram a which is alm ost the spirit.
Lightning Ridge and The Jackeroo of Coolabong reverse of The Moth of Moonbi. A city socialite visits her
-- made by Snowy Baker. father's property in the bush and falls in love with the m anager Produced and directed by Charles Chauvel. Screenplay, Charles and[...]vel. Photography, George Heath. Sound, Jack Bruce and
When Baker went to Hollywood, Chauvel[...]itor, Gus Lowry. Musical Direction, Lindley Evans in
followed him and spent two years writing articles Written and directed by Charles Chauvel. Photography, A1 Burne. association with Willy Redstone and Charles MacKerras. Settings,
on A ustraliana and doing minor jobs in Assistant Director, Edward Lyon. Titles and Art Titles, Frank Edmund Barrie. Filmed at the Studios of Commonwealth Film
Hollywood studios -- as an extra in Fly by Night White. Art Furnishings, Arabian Art Salon. Presented by Australian Laboratories Pty Ltd. Panophonic Raycophone recording. Special
and The Man From the Desert and as a hand in Film Productions Ltd. Actors: Elsie Sy[...]ton), Designs, Eric Thompson. Assistants to the Director, Harry Freeman
the property departm[...]de), Frank Thorn (Tom Mullins), Alfred and Roy Sebastian. Unit Management, George Barnes. Commen
became assistant director to Fred Niblo on Greenup (Bill Mullins)[...], Major G. K. Austin. Assistant Army Liaison, Lt. A. F.[...]Dunbar, M.M., and Lt. G. Woods. Miss Garrick's Costumes, Cur-
Chauvel returned to Australia in 1923 and[...]Bebarfalds. Presented by Chamun Produc
resolved to direct his own films. By 1925 he had In the Wake of the Bounty (1933): Partly a narrative tions. Actors: Gra[...], George Wallace, Joe Valli, John Sherwood,
This and his next film, Greenhide, were produced[...], Robert Carlyle, Joe
under makeshift conditions in the Queensland Bounty, and partly a docum entary on life on Pitcairn Island Anderson, Toni Valla. 105 mins.
bush and in a small Brisbane studio. where the[...]Sons of Matthew (1949): An epic story o f a pioneering family.
After developing his skills on three more Directed and written by Charles Chauvel. Photography, Tasman
productions, he reached maturity as a director Higgins. Monologue, Arthur Greenaway. Musical Director, Lionel Produced and directed by Charles Chauvel -- original screenpla[...]hepherd. Sound engineers, Arthur Charles and Elsa Chauvel, inspired by the books Green Mountains
and The Rats of Tobruk, both dramatically tight Smith and Clive Cross. Cinesound recording. Presented by Ex and Cullenbenbong by Bernard O'Reilly; Collaboration by Maxwell
and visually spectacular productions.[...]Dunn. Directors of Photography, Bert Nicholas and Carl Kayser.[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (124)[...]G r e a t e s t ep ic of[...]OF THE FAMOUS A .I .F .!

Above: Outdoor script conference in southern
Queensland for Sons of Matthew (1949). Left
to Right: Gwen Meredith (writer of Blue
Hills), Chauvel, Maxwell Dunn and Elsa
Chauvel.

Right: A script session on Forty Thousan
Horsemen with E. V. Timms (right), Charh
Chauvel. Elsa Chauvel is seated in t'
foreground.[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (125) A M atter of Fact

------------[...]all ------ --

The December issue of C inem a Papers carried an interview between Bill Shepherd, credit is due -- these people made tremendous
veteran Australian film editor, and Graham Shirley, which simply must be contributions to the success of Cinesound on all
challenged.*[...]its films. Their most notable achievement, in my[...]ndid recording of the operetta
I am concerned only with the sections relating to Cinesound where there are so many sequences of Broken Melody. There they controll
inaccuracies and gross distortions of the truth that -- with very genuine reluctance -- I ed -- in one operation -- more than 50 members
am compelled to endeavor to put the record straight. Individually and in the sum total of the Sydney Symphony Orchestra jammed into
Bill Shepherd's statements leave a totally incorrect impression of the Cinesound a space underneath the first floor dressing rooms
organization of the thirties and forties, who was in it and how it worked. There are in with the studio lavatories on one side and the
stances also where some individuals -- and I do not include myself among them -- got[...]estra was
no credit at all for the work they did and are not even mentioned in the recital. This[...]the concrete floor and the dressing rooms provid[...]ed us with a wooden roof. The Sydney Male Choir
Anything I have to say is not intended as pointless criticism of Bill Shepherd. I have of about 40 voices was in the studio proper and the
always had, and still have, a genuine regard for him and a full appreciation of the work soloists in another section of it, all walled in by
he did for Cinesound as its chief film editor on all features, except Smithy, and after three-ply fla[...]It was an incredible, almost impossible set-up.
But if what Shepherd, now in his eighties, has to say is left unchallenged it will go But it worked. They made it work, recording all[...]gether,
down into the history of film production in this country as fact. And so much of it is just finding balance, light and shade and the real beau
NOT fact.[...]ty of Alfred Hill's original music.

C inem a Papers is now the only record, to my knowledge, of film production in Shirley:[...]Broken Melody?
thirties have reacted to Shepherd's interview and would want to have the facts on the Shepherd: Only in getting the playback tracks ready.
historical record with credit fairly apportioned to those who earned it.[...]Clive Cross brought Playback and all the
I propose dealing only with major matters, discarding many minor incorrect details of how to use it back to Australia in the
statements.[...]mid-thirties. He was in Hollywood (at his own ex[...]pense) in 1935 while I was there seeking back-
S[...]projection. Clive was able to work for months at[...]MGM, in the sound department, and of course
Shirley: M alcolm gets a co-editor's credit on Shepherd takes a side-swipe at the efforts of every[...]ughter. Arthur Smith and Bert Cross to get sound on did examples now showing around the world in
Shepherd: I know but he didn't cut a foot of it. film, at the beginning of the thirties, by talking of That's Entertainment, were made on playback.[...]them disparagingly, as "mucking about" with the
That is an untrue statement. Malcolm got problem. Their successful wrestle with the dif It was the fact that, through Clive Cross, we
first editing credit on that film because that is ficulty made it possible to found Cinesound and now had all the necessary gen on Playback, in
what he was. I worked with them both right[...]r cluding rhythm-punching,** that influenced me
through the editing period, as I did on all my Cinesound, three for Chauvel, two for Harry greatly in deciding to make Broken Melody.
films, and there is no doubt that Malcolm did the Southwell, one each for Beau Smith and Joe Lipp- Looking back, it was quite a shocking risk to take
major job and more. He went right through to the man, besides innumerable `shorts' and 1,300 back in 1937 -- to make a film with a major
fine cut, with Shepherd doing the sequences weekly newsreels up to the time I left Cinesound musical sequence upon which it was entirely
allotted to him of course, and was engaged with in 1956.[...]for its climax. If the musical section
Shepherd and Phyllis O'Reilly, cutting assistant, did not work we had no film. It had not been
in matching the negative to the edited work print All said and done that seems to me to be a attempted in Australia before nor has it since.
when he was stricken with a serious respiratory satisfactory piece of mucking about.
problem which troubles him to this day. Shepherd[...]Clive Cross marked up all the playback tracks
and Phyllis. O'Reilly went on to finish the neg. Shirley: What was your feeling about the use of loca on Broken Melody. If that film had failed we
matching, made very difficult[...]would have been dead ducks. But it did not fail
edge-numbers, especially in some bushfire scenes Shepherd: With all due respect I think you lose a lot of due to the work of the whole team and especially
shot without slate markings because of difficulty atmosphere by trying to use an alternative. Tall Arthur Smith and Clive Cross.
and sometimes danger.[...]In fact it's probably the best outdoor sound that's ever Pre~preproduction
Bill Shepherd was still finding his feet in film been done anywhere.
editing at that time. He had had no previous ex Shirley: Why was that? Shirley: How involved were you with pre-production?
perience[...]He Shepherd: Because it was done in the clear blue yonder Shepherd: I usually estimated the footage and we had a
developed, I believe, into a first class film editor[...]oduction conference of all concerned. There'd be
and eventually became probably the best in the This, apart from the obvious over-[...], cameraman, soundman, myself -- all the
country in the thirties. But he learned his trade at that it was "the best outdoor sound ever done key members o f the crew -- and we'd talk about the
Cinesound as we all did. And surely there is anywhere" , overlooks the fact that all Cinesound script and the. film as a whole.
nothing shameful in acknowledging the truth of outdoor sequences, with the exception of a Shirley : Were the shots planned before Hall went out to
that. Wallace musical, were recorded in the clear blue shoot?[...]yonder. Looping or post-syncing were at that time Shepherd: Oh yes, we all had a rough idea to start with.
I endeavored to give George Malcolm, whose not available to us or to anyone else I should
pioneering work in so many branches of think. The major factor in the recording of Tall Now let's have the facts. There were NO pre-
Australian film production has not been suf Timbers was the brilliant and frightening sound production confe[...]or his work on On on the Timber Drive. This was a manufactured ture with the single exception of Smithy, and that
Our Selection and Squatter's Daughter and on sound made, not in the clear blue yonder but in
matters like building up from scratch the first pro the studio and environs through the resource and (Footnote) Rhythm-punching is the method under which the
jection printer in the country, in a previous issue ingenuity of Clive Cross and his assistant, Alan sound engine[...]s. Anderson, how of Film Australia. The sound unit tracks with a set o f three, or four, punches equally spaced in[...]nder the overall control of order to get rhythm so that the clapper sync marks can be.
*Cinema Papers -[...]punches, and there can be six or even more'rn one number, is[...]worked out with the director and put into the places where[...]he expects to change angles.

46 -- Cinema P

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (126)[...]A MATTER OF FACT

Production stills from Ken H all's Orphan of t[...]al
bone of contention between Hall and editor Bill Shepherd.

was abortive. The gener[...]he " bushland" sets for Orphan of the W ilderness as so
*does not work. The discussions invariably get realistic that the animals behaved completely naturally, making it possible to
side-tracked up a dozen blind alleys. Inter
departmental rivalry is almost always injected -- get " authentic" shots of Australian fauna.
like the never ending war between camera and
sound departments that has been going on in m and 7,000 m, and I didn't really know how it was go by the production crew. That must stand as a self-
studios all around the world since sound films ing to work until I'd run the footage and decided how to evident fact.
began. Instead of time-wasting big conferences[...]creative two reels were without a story but I certainly hadn't If I were asked to nominate the technical star of
departments duri[...]oduction period. been given a storyline for that section beyond knowing the film I would cert[...]ike set the way it was going to start and end. We had footage whose photography stands up as really splendid
design and camera for instance. The film editor of a frog. right to this day. I am sure I would be supported
was given the script to time -- as far as any script We had the ostrich being attacked by the kangaroo, the in this by all living members of the old crew --
can be timed -- and two or more staff men, ex rabbits being frightened by the hawk*, and while there with apparently one exception. C[...]staff in the Art and Special Effects Department,
whoever was going to be dialogue director, sat in created a bushland setting complete with waterfall
to read the dialogue scenes at the right, or at least, This is sheer stuff and nonsense. All films are and pool, which was so realistic that all the
likely to be used, tempo. the result of a combined effort and a film editor animals were completely taken in by it. They[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (127)[...]INDEX KEY

1. Film titles appear in bold type. Magazine, play and book

titles appear in italics.

2. The following appear after index i[...]appear after page numbers (where applicable)
a -- articles
i -- interviews
f -- filmogra[...]Solaris 61-62 (r)
NFTA 136-137 (a) Zardo[...]Notes on Comic Strips and Cinema 28-29
Sanford Lelberson 171-173 (I)[...]Jim and Hal McElroy (p), Peter Weir (d) 20-21 (I)
Francis Birtles -- cyclist, explorer, Kodaker 31-35 (a) Jim McElroy (p) 21-22 (I)[...]John McLean (c). Tony Tegg (t) 22-24 (i)
Not Suitable for Children.[...]Melb and Sydney Film Festivals 1974 227-234 (r)
Esben Storm (d) and Hadyn Keenan (p) 64-65 (i) Richard F[...]Franklin and Monton 253 (!)[...]aker (p, d) 356-359 (I)
Peter Weir (d) 16-17 (a)
CLARKE, JOCELYN[...]Sound In Cinema 157-159
Book review 379
COOPER, ROSS[...]graphy 51 O'Brien 211-215.
W. Franklin Barret Filmography 164-165
Towards an Australian Film Archive 217 (a) PIKE, ANDREW
Harry Davidson 21[...]Tokyo Story 161-163
McDonagh Sisters 261 (a)
EDGAR, PATRICIA[...]L, KEN
US Surgeon-General's Report on Causes and Preven Frank Moorhouse (sc) 138-140 (I)[...]Pat Hanna 129-130 (a)
The Adventures of Dot 259 (a)
Film Archives -- the Edmondson Report 343-3[...]Dirty Pix -- a Report of Film Censorship Meeting,
Melville,[...]Canberra 1970 110-111
The Cars That Ate Paris 275 (r)
Crystal Voyager 277 (r)[...]Promised Woman 204-206 (a)
Between Wars 367-368 (r)[...]Ed Lewis (p) 152-156 (i)

Jim and Hal McElroy (p), Peter Weir (d) 20-21 (I) T[...]oy (p) 21-22 (I) A Portrait of John Papadopoulos 207-209
John M[...]Ray Harryhausen 13-15, 70 (i)
Franklin and Monton 253 (I)
David Baker (p, d) 356-359 (I[...]Nicholas Roeg (d) 175-177 (I)
H O D S D O N ,B A R R E T T TITTENSOR[...]Alvin Purple 179 (r)
A State of False Consciousness -- Australian Film 126- Exorcist 183 (r)
Don't Look Now 271 (r)
127[...]W ASSON, M. T.
Genre -- A Review 338-341 R[...]r (d) 167-169 (I)

MACKIE, FIONA
Tidikowa and Friends 235 (r)[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (128)[...]Comic Strips and Cinema 28-9 Earth 315
A[...]Earth Versus the Flying Saucers 13, 70
Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein 15[...]rd 117 Easy Rider 341
Above and Beyond 80[...]Edeson, Arthur 212
Across Australia in the Track of Burke and Wills 33, 34 Blatty, Peter 264 Conditioned Response in Cinema 159
Across Australia with Frances Birtles[...]Conner, Bruce 381
Actors and Acting 54-5, 184-85[...]onson Report -- film archives 342-47
Admiral Was A Lady, The 152[...]Blue GUm Romance, A I65(cr); Cooper,[...]Coorab in the Island of Ghosts 33, 34, 35
Adventures of Do[...]6 Egg and I, The 302
Agents -- Hollywood 170[...]Electronic music in cinema 157, 159
Airport '75 334 Bonnie and Clyde 341[...]Bono, Sonny and Cher 264 Cra[...]Bookseller that Gave Up Bathing, The 103 Cra[...]Cries and Whispers 249[...]Bout de Souffle, A 66 Cross,[...]Enfants du Para'dis, Les 228
All Turks Are Called Ali 239[...]Boys in The Band 263, 266[...]Dad and Dave Come to Town 85, 86, 90 (cr), 300
Amin 239, 307[...]253 (Cr); 333-34
And Hope to Die 41[...]Eureka Stockade 135
An Eye for an Eye, a Tooth for a Tooth 111 / Breaking of the[...]Every Man For Himself and God Against All 317, 319,
Answer to October, The 168[...]320
Ants.in His Pants 86, 133 (st)[...]Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex But
Apache 339 Brennan, Richard (p) -- and Peter Weir, 16, Homesdale Dawn. Norman 297[...]Were Afraid to Ask 365
Arabian Nights, The 376-7 (st)[...]Evil Touch, The 64
Archive -- Australian Film 216-17, 342-47[...]Death of a Flea Circus Director 304 Experimental Film Fund 17, 93
Arsenic and Old Lace 331, 379[...]e Emden, The 72, 77; 221; 222 (st)
Arthur Chubb and the Widow 31[...]Brother Can You Spare A Dime 171 Delgado, Vic[...]Fairfax, Marlon 212
A u s tra la s ia n P h o to -R e v ie w , T h e 32[...](Family Life 65; 373
Australian by Marriage, An 51 (cr) Buchanan R[...]Demonstretor 125
Australian Film 126-7 (a)[...]Devil in Miss Jones, The 313, 334[...]Dexter Bob 74, 81
Back projection and early Australian films 83 Burke and Wills 33 Diary of a Chambermaid 332[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (129)[...]IN D E X VOL 1, 1974

Friends of Eddie Coyle, The[...]hall, Bill 299
Funny. Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum, A 177 Hopgood, Alan 179, 246[...]33 Land of Silence and Darkness 314, 315, 319; 320(cr)
How McDougal Topped the Score 259 L[...]eter 17 How Willingly You Sing 350(cr) L[...]Matatabi 162(st), 163
Game in the Sand 320(cr)[...]The 239 Mated in the Wilds 297[...]J. 212 Last Tango In Paris 106; 109; 263 Meale,[...]Menace, The 298
Genre -- A Review 338-41[...]League of Nation's and censorship 121 Message from Mars, A 165 (cr)
Gentlemen of the Road -- Captain Starlight, A 51(cr) Hurley, Frank 33; 74, 81, 83[...]John 154 Learn to Swim 220[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (130)IN D E X VOL 1, 1974

One Minute to Zero 16 Ride[...]Two Minutes' Silence 261 (cr)
Orphens In the Wilderness 134 R[...]2001: A Space Odyssey 263
Oshima 155[...]Underground Film: A Critical History 381
Our Mother's House 324, 370; and violence 328-30[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (131)" 'THE NIGHT PORTER'
IS ROMANTIC

PORNOGRAPHY...

a hectic love affair. Among
the film's various definitions
of decadence is a strong
preference to do on a floor
what most other people would
do on a chair, table or bed...
what a kinky turn-on!"

--V in c e n t C a n b y. N e w Y o rk T im es

m*

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (132)CHINATOWN a few good lines register, and the customary red Dunaway is shot. He is a defeated man, beaten by[...]the genre frustrate your involvement an ineffable and all-encompassing corruption.
Mark Randall[...]rather than demand it. Towne is outclassed by his " I t 's no use. N o[...]Chinatown," mutters an associate as he leads
At the end of Roman Polanski's China[...]Gittes away.
Faye Dunaway is shot in the head while escaping J.J. Gittes (read Sam Spade) played by Jack
from the police down a dark street in a flashy Nicholson, and the poor little rich girl (read Everything and everyone is crooked, we must
yellow convertible. A warning shot is fired, then a Brigid O'Shaughnessy) played by Faye Dunaway[...]been removed, we
shot at the car. The car slows to a stop, the horn are the Bogart and Mary Astor roles from The don't stand a chance, we give in. Sam Spade says:
starts to blare. Mal[...]" I won't because all of me wants to," and he[...]preserves his integrity, he makes his choice, he is
Held in a wide-shot that seems to last a long As an actor, Nicholson has some of the tension responsible for himself and others. Likewise,
time. It is the best moment in the picture -- Bogart could generate on[...]we when he shoots Terry Lennox at
simple, clean, and powerful. It is complete, but working deep inside the man, so many things not the end of Robert Altman's film The Long Good
Polanski moves in to mop up. shown, just echoes. He commands your attention bye. But J.J. Gittes is told: " It's Chinatown" , and
when he is on. We watch him closely in this one, he walks away. No choice, no integrity, no
He directs our attention to Dunaway's minced but he walks through it. A great deal of personal responsibility. It is the ultimate pessimism of our
back of head, then, not satisfied, he turns her over magnetism, but still a walkthrough. The script
for a close-up of an exploded eye. A lot of scream gives him nothing to play till the very end when age and this is the script's and film's bleary-eyed,
ing and breast-beating accompany what we see.[...]Faye Dunaway, the poor little rich girl in Roman Polanski's
None of this is new. It's all very fashionable to treatment of a thirties detective thriller Chinatown. Faye Dunaway is an actress with a capital `A'.
bleed a lot in action movies these days, but like She is always `turning it on'. Nicholson's
anything fas[...]economy and Dunaway's actorish, badly controll
and boring. Physical violence is fast losing its
heart-stoDDina value. A slight iolt -- what Pauline ed shifts in emotion -- "Which gear am I playing
Kael calls `zapping' the audience -- and in now?" -- sit uneasily side by side. Nicholson[...]always just is . . . Dunaway acts. It just doesn't
everyone settles down again to the story. jell.
To combat their loss of `zap' power -- and[...]When Huston finally appears in the film, you
Polanski has used it many times in the past -- the know things have really gone wrong; that no one
director pores lovingly over the human me[...]-- least of all Polanski -- really knows what sort
behind. Long after the `zap' we are still being in of film they are making. It is Polanski's ultimate
vited to appreciate blood-caked close-ups. We are self-indulgent conceit to cast Huston as
asked to find entertainment values in it. Enjoy, Dunaway's father, an embarrassing in-joke, and
enjoy! We are encouraged to watch with the am damaging to the film.
bivalent, Voyeuristic attitude of, "Oh[...]Huston is everybody's grandfather -- a jaun
yummy, how gory!''[...]diced Walter Brennan with a knowing twinkle in[...]the eye -- and no one can believe for a moment
Humor, or rather, cynicism passing for wit, is that here is a man denying water to hundreds of
often added as a palliative -- a spoonful of sugar[...]orange farmers, shaping the destiny of a city with
to make the medicine go down; something to City Hall in one pocket and the police department
render our feelings toward what we see even more in the other, and that he had made love to his
ambivalent. No matter, just detach and enjoy.[...]daughter. Dunaway tells Nicholson that her
Fr
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (133)ESKIMO NELL

direction does not create a mood, does not evoke English-speaking drinking world for the subtlety flashback used to pad a narrative already
the period for us (compare it[...]s spread too
superbly evocative The Conformist). In Chinatown of its suggested modes of sexual foreplay (Nell's thinly. What was needed, as script collaborators
the trappings are there, but not the skill or inclina capacious vagina can be readied only by a Franklin and Alan Hopgood should have realized,
tion to utilise them as anything more than proper preliminary gunshot) and for the bent Baron was more body or a shorter film.
ties.[...]grew sick as Deadeye's prick uncoiled along the As it stands Eskimo Neil's inadequacies in this
Polanski's direction is functional. He is content bar''.[...]effect of creating longish
most of the time just to keep the thing moving[...]periods of tedium out of episodes that would have
from one incident to the next. There is no feeling Those were the days (whenever they were) when responded well to crisper treatment and of robb
for pace or rhythm. The film just seems to plod ing the film, as a whole, of the necessary buildup
on. Where the script seems to falter or flag -- too men were men many times over, and a woman's to its final extended sequence in the saloon. It's
many talking heads speaking soggy dialogue -- place was on her back; and when, for such a fear rather like watching a man earnestly stepping
Polanski seizes the opportunity he can to `zap' the some and darkly romantic thing is sex, you could sideways when his goal lies straight ahead because
audience back to full alertness with violent sound never be sure that lurking somewhere in the future he doesn't know how he would cope if he actually
and/or violent visuals. was the womper who, in giving your life a pur reached the goal. (This in fact is precisely[...]e's reaction when he finally claps his eye
It is also a great way of giving the impression[...]on Nell; but it's doubtful that the film's structure
that the film is really starting to zing along. But all that is mere legend. The truth, it is meant to prefigure his dilemma as narrowly as
Polanski himself (playing a small uncredited sup appears, is to be found somewhere in a nineteenth this.)
porting role) cuts a spurting slit in Jack century Australia that has odd overtones of the
N icholson's nose with a flick-knife. This Wild West; and it will be revealed to us by For years Australian television has got away
guarantees him at least[...]Deadeye Dick (Max Gillies) himself and Mexico with inflating five-minute plots[...]concentration from his audience while they wait in
vain for something memorable to happen. Pete (Serge Lazareff) in the course of their travels shows, but this is a gambit with a limited future in
from town to town, from brawl to brawl, from bar the cinema: a 100-minute film that you get off
Chinatown is no advance on Polanski's earlier, to bar, from brothel to brothel until, in some your backside to see is expected to give a hell of a
more inventive, and visually richer work. It isn't remote and sleet-ridden mountain township, they lot more. Quite apart from which there is ho
memorable as -a detective thriller or as a serious reach the longed-for goal: Es[...]reason at all why commercial cinema should not
drama. It has elements of both, but it fails to be It'takes them 80 minutes or so to get that far, and be good cinema; and good cinema owes an obliga
either. The film is a hybrid, a bastard child with what follows is a bit of an anticlimax all round; tion to a craft of which sound scripting is an essen
no co-ordination. You remember the violence, but for a number of reasons, and it's gratifying to tial component.
you remember the bits that didn't work be able to say it, Eskimo Nell is not the utter waste
(Nicholson telling his associates a dirty joke while of time that, say, Alvin Purple was. Although, it Integral to the scripting of Eskimo Nell, too, is
they try to tell him Dunaway is standing behind should be said, its virtues reside more in what it a brand of more or less juvenile humor which,
him), and you remember the ruined, phony promises for the future than in what it delivers while never especially illuminating or open to in
`significant' ending, but very little else. now. novation, has already been done to death in local

When we finally make it to Chinatown in the In itself the story neither promises nor delivers films and drama: anality and debased eroticism
last five minutes of the film we are a little disap much at all, pointing up once again what is are no substitute for real wit, least of all when pur[...]he most nakedly obvious single sued to the virtual exclusion of all else.
on Street, only twice as wide and not as well lit. weakness in local commercial cinema: the un
After the countless ominous references to it abashed thinness of the scripting. There is no plot It's no longer inherently funny, if[...]e film we feel cheated. as such: the womper waiting at journey's end is no was, to watch people taking a piss or threatening,
more than an excuse for a series of escapades, in the most unambiguous terms, to cut each
Anyway, Dunaway is shot by a crooked cop. whose only connection is their chronological other's balls off. Being funny, as distinct from be
Nicholson walks off into[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (134)[...]NKENSTEIN

timism. On the professional level it is undoubtedly FLESH FOR FRANKENSTEIN[...]nstein's monster (Peter Boyle) out making friends in
the best local feature of its type yet to appear: the
direction has an assurance, and the cutting a and YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN[...]ks' latest comedy Young Frankenstein.
smoothness that augur well for their application
to more substantial and more deserving material. Sue Adler[...]The title reads Flesh For Frankenstein, and it is
While Vince Monton's color camerawork is a this `flesh-getting' that constitutes a lot of the ac
continuing high point, revealing an ability to get .1 wouldn't go as far as to say that Morrissey tion. The Baron and his assistant Otto trip about
the most out of ev[...]ping has taken Boris Karloff, cast him in a six-inch the countryside, snipping off[...]he cliched. Even the music plastic mould and for the sake of discretion of people's bits. One of the very funny but
(by Brian May) is good, which in itself must be slapped a fig leaf over his nuts and bolts -- the dubious scenes shows them t[...]. same way that purveyors of f

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (135)[...]lking too, The significant `new' thing that both these respectively). Regrettably -- and to some degree
and takes a positive age to die. Frankensteins of the seventies have in dommon, incomprehensibly -- all wer[...]apart from being funny, is sex. Undeniably there
The final effect, visually, is rather like a Rubens was a tacit sort of sexuality about Boris Karloff, Aldrich sold his studio and temporarily retire^
grouping with too many red tones. In fact there is but in the thirties it just wasn't done to be graphic from the field, badly in need of a project to
a strong sense of composition and grouping about it or even to explore it. Whether or not the
throughout the whole movie. Unlike the hand demystification of the sexual mystique in the resurrect his fallen star.[...]cinema is always a good thing is another question The irony of[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (136)[...]Machine: Burt Reynolds receives first aid during a break in the final moments o f the football match -- a violence and bloodshed. Long before Peckinpah[...]bloody clash between prisoners and guards. began rubbing our noses in gore, Aldrich has been[...]hitting audiences with heavy doses of violence as a[...]war feel. An early sequence has Jack Palance,[...]who has failed in a bazooka attack on a tank,[...]ground racked with pain, trying to fulfil his[...]promise to his dead psychotic Captain Eddie[...]Albert who sent Palance and his men to the front[...]pumping bullets into Albert's body which now lies[...]over Palance's corpse. The uselessness and insani[...]ty of war has only rarely been more excruciatingly[...]visualized than in these scenes.[...]The classic sequence in Kiss Me Deadly, where[...]Mike Hammer wakes after a vicious working over[...]to hear the screams of his girlfriend being tortured[...]and her naked legs flaying in the background,[...]presents an edge of futility peculiarly original in[...]The mania of war to total insanity comes over to[...]the conflict between Cliff Robertson and Michael[...]Caine in Too Late the New and permeates[...]Aldrich's most fafrious anti-war movie to date:[...]animalistic behavior and gratuitous vicarious[...]Perhaps now reestablished on the commercial[...]scene, he will be able to return to the bleak,[...]scarred lifestyle that his characters have until now[...]Produced by A lbert S. Ruddy. Production Com pany,[...]From a story by Ruddy. Photographed by Joseph Biroc.[...](Sam son), Pervis A tkins (M awabe), Dino W ashington[...]han Morris

Paul Crewe (Burt Reynolds) wrestles in the mud with a fellow prisoner in a scene from Robert Aldrich's The Mean The m[...]moraux appears to be whether Charlotte Alex
Machine.[...]andra, in the second of the tales, masturbates with[...]After serious consulta
jecting personal violence and nastiness onto the By downplaying the violence of the situation, tion with a friend who knows both films and[...]etables, I vote for the cucumber.
screen. It was that viciousness and gut hurt that hinted at, promised, but never shown, Aldrich's
burned off the screen in Attack, Kiss Me Deadly prisoners and guards both become basically nice These fine distinctions assume an unusual im
and simmered beneath the surface in The Big guys and the audience couldn't care less about the portance when you see a film which, in a most dis
Knife. This violence of style has reiterated struggle, save at a basic `Will Reynolds win?' concerting manner, combines an extraordinary
Aldrich's cynicism; given substance to his com level. Thus the amazing response in all quarters visual beauty with a thematic content of sheer
ment, his critique of the `win at all costs' syn labelling the movie as a comedy. There has always corn, it is jarring to even think of corny movies in
drome of American populist philosophy that been a caustic hip existential,flavor about the connection with the work of such a determinedly
permeates patriotishi, crime, war, sex and death. dialogue and behavior of Aldrich's characters, but regal director as W alerian Borowczyk.
Here Aldrich has copped out[...]t has been sub audiences chuckling with hilarity, as do most of[...]The film is a set of four stories, each the kind of
merged in an attempt to prop up the movie's the maimings during the climactic match. ,tale that is the stuff of rumor, myth and folklore.[...]They are linked only in that the film as a whole
superficial capital `S' significance: the rights of Sarris notes Aldrich's violence even in genres leads us through the conve[...]sex, masturbation, lesbianism/sadism (a persis
the individual and the dignity of the human spirit that subsist on violence. Not so here. Thus it is tent equation, that one) and then group sex com[...]bined with incest. There was originally a fifth tale
-- real Richard Brooks or Stanley Kramer harder than usual to follow the distaste with which along the lines of Beauty and the Beast, but that[...]was suppressed by Borowczyk himself.
material that. Capital letters choke The Mean local Aldr[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (137)IMMORAL TALES

tion with the past. A young man takes his " Lucrezia Borg[...]habits with poison, refuses some titudes to the medium in relation to his first long,
younger -- and therefore submissive -- cousin to biscuits which the Borgias proceed to eat under non-animated film Goto 1'ile d'amour; and neither
a deserted beach. He tells her that he is going to his hungry nose. But on the whole, the film Blanche nor[...]nstruction', which turns out collapses under a weight of solemnity which the
to be that she must suck him off while the tide tales can't carry; and in spite of the visual perfec evidence of a change in his ideas. He sees no fun
tion and th e. glorious music, the pomp and damental difference between his ani[...]ceremony of Borowczyk's filming, so successful in and films with actors; people, dolls or paper are
Blanche, works to just about destroy the film. all material to be worked on and controlled to
so that they are caught by the tide, but are on achieve total precision and coherence in the finish
some rocks where they will only be splashed when A clear case of this is Borowczyk's conception ed product. He achieves that all right, but his forte
the tide reaches its peak. While she s[...]tering for the pure
-- lengthily -- he gives her a lecture on the the film. He has drastically overdone the ob aesthete's delight in composition in the most
motions of the tide. He exerts self-control to viousness of his imagery, beginning with the first abstract sense. But why, then, "immoral tales"?
release his life-giv[...]the very moment of tired equation of sexuality and the sea. However How can a set of beautiful objects, exquisitely
high tide. He has a watch placed on the rocks to beautifully photographed, waves breaking during arranged, and beautiful people, harmoniously
be sure. This is what they do for the rest of the an erotic scene are still waves breaking once again placed or faultlessly moving on screen, have any
segment, and at the vital moment the young man's in another erotic scene.[...]atsoever?
shouts of ecstasy merge, appropriately and predic
After the first tale, the film is virtually a stately Borowczyk's technique worked brilliantly in
tably, with the crashing of the waves. procession of conventional phallic objects and Blanche, since the motivation of that film seemed
"Therese Philosophe" (Philosopher[...]ymbols -- organ pipes, crosses, to be partly to create an exercise in composition[...]cucumbers et al; the page-girl wields both pen and geared to an aesthetic polemic. Blanche sets out as
takes an 1890 newspaper report of a request for sword, the countess a riding-crop. From horses to though to defy all the books ever written this cen
the canonisation of a local girl who was raped by a stallions, specifically in "Lucrezia Borgia" where tury on the death of western tragedy, and com
tramp, and imagines how she spent the time the family laughs[...]ion erec
before the dreadful event. She has been in church, tions. Therese wears a white dress, but fondles a poses what might be a classical five-acter (with
is turned on by the seductive voice of God who scarlet religious sash -- she also wears a necklet just a tinge of gothic), complete with fatal flaw to
wants to "enter her" , and fingers the organ pipes. with a red jewel, as a close-up makes sure we tip off a perfectly traditional tragic denouement.
She is late home, and is locked in a room with notice. The wicked countess is wearing black Borowczyk succeeds because. Blanche is a con
only a couple of cucumbers for sustenance. Left when we first see her, but sports a scarlet boot. sistently and superbly irrelevant film. It doesn't
alone, she produces a pornographic book and The girls in the countess's bath-house scribble real[...]political concerns, and it certainly isn't the kind of
proceeds to masturbate heartily with a cucumber. obscenities on the wall; and she, with all the film that performs itself an obvious social func
She splits it open in her passion, but quickly sets serious grace imaginable, scrubs them off in tion or fulfils a need. It exists in a grand disloca
to with another. At the moment of climax, she[...]tion from everything else but the inevitabilities of
abandons the cucumber for fervent gazing and its own form.
clutching of a portrait of a man (no undiluted It is mainly this imagery which creates the cor
solita[...]Unfortunately you can't really bring a sense of
wipes the stains of cucumber from the eiderdown artists of all kinds are fond of making collections tradition and the eternal to explicitly sexual
and wanders outside, only to be seized by ugly of clich

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (138)[...]Young virgins swarm around the countess Erzsebet in a scene from Walerian Borowczyk's Contes Immoraux.

It could be argued that the titling of the film is folktales and the work of Pasolini.) But here again the opposite of those of Rohmer in almost every
ironic; that its effect of the-irrelevance-of-ethics- we come[...]he problem of the lack of respect. There is none of the anguished mulling
to-statues empties the word `immoral' of all humor. Clearly the film is interested in the ritual over of morals, none of the difficulty at con
meaning. But there is a seriousness about it that side of the traditional immorality -- from the ceiving, let alone performing, an `immoral' act
defies that hopeful suggestion. Part of what I have careful timing undertaken by the young man in that marks Ma Nuit Chez Maud or L'amour
called the coldness of the film is created specifical I'apres-midi; and instead of taking six long films
ly by the camera which is immobile for a con " La Mar

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (139)11 H ARR O W H O USE

cording to fancy. It's all very tasteful, etc; but
after an hour or so of lovely angles, you start to
feel just as jaded as if you had watched a dozen
identical skin-flicks in the same time -- because
the whole thing is so unmitigatedly joyless.

I wonder whether it's possible any more to
make a positive film about sexual behavior, which
doesn't humiliate women and doesn't reduce
human sexuality to one or two key organs, but
which is more than a classical exercise in form,
line and color. If there is such a film Contes Im-
moraux isn't it; it's beautiful, but just awfully, aw
fully dull.

CONTES IM M ORAU[...]c
zyk. With the first of four .sketches based on a story by Andre '
Pierre De Mandiargues. Photogra[...]urt, Guy Durban, Michel Zolat, Noel Very. Editing and art
direction by Walerian Borowczyk. Cost[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (140)[...]it -- and you might as well have named the[...]Still, I hope the exercise is a salutary one for[...]Aram Avakian. I hope it has taught him not to[...]listen to advice from his writer.[...]Art Murphy's review in Variety has this amus[...]ing not
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (141)[...]STORY: Outback drama depicting events
leading up to the 1956 shearers' strike.[...]Above: Foley (Jack Thompson) centre, enjoying a brief period of relaxation between shearing jobs, in '[...]a game of "Unders and Overs" .[...]ck (Peter Cummins) front, looks copfident when he and Foley (Jack Thomp[...]son) prepare to add another sheep to their `tally' in the race for honors as top shearer in the shed.[...]Above left: Moments of comic relief are few and far between in a shearer's life . . . Tom West (Robert[...]Bruning) prepares to give `Basher' (Jerry Thomas) a `short back and sides' with the sheep shears.[...]earing contractor Tim King (Max Cullen) waits for a young rousabout to open one of the[...]gates leading to the sheading shed.[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (142)THE FRONT PAGE

However, Jean is off to Vietnam and he leaves
his lonely wife in the safe keeping of the venerable
Mario (Alain Cuny) who tells her that "it's the
erection not the orgasm that counts" and takes
her out for a typical Saturday night's entertain
ment which proves to be both humiliating and
fulfilling. Here the film ends rather abruptly,
almost as though the director had said, "a la Dick
Lester, hold on we'd better not let them have too
much first time around; let's save something for a
sequel."

I can't say I found the film boring, not for one
moment. Others have found it so. Maybe t[...]n by Ms Kristel's winsome
charms. It's certainly a silly film -- not one worth
wasting much time and effort on. It really is like
flicking through the pages of some glossy soft
core magazine. The heroine seems to turn on
everyone she meets, male and female, and she in
turn seems perfectly happy to enter into any kind
of sexual combination. Brigitte Bardot would
never have dreamed of that!

The moment in the film that reached my libido
most strongly came early on when a baby-faced
young lady called Marie-Ange (Christine
Boisson) pulls out a photo of Paul Newman and
then masturbates -- in public, too. Hope
Newman gets to see the picture. How fantastic it

must be to rate that kind of immortality. Being
masturbated to (or at) in a French sex picture.

EM MANUELLE. Directed by Just Jaeckin. Produced by The boys in the criminal court pressroom have a final drink with Hildy Johnson (Jack Lemmon) afte[...]his retirement from the newspaper game in Billy Wilder's The Front Page.
F ilm s/O rphee P[...]ovel by Emmanuelle Arsan. Photograph image that every self-respecting journalist toxication of a reporter's life. Anyone who has in
ed by Richaed Suzuki, Marie Saunier. Edited by Claudine cherishes, nurtures and encourages brazenly. habited the newsroom attached to a major story
Bouche. Sound by Andre Hervee. Art Director, Baptiste After all, without it and its deep tap-roots, the knows that the genial, jokey companionship
Poirot. Music by[...]masks a very real and potent rivalry. To get onto
manuelle), Alain Cuny (Mario), Marika G[...]isson The causes of this purple reputation are set out smell of a scoop; the new angle; the unscrupulous
(M arie-A nge), Samantha (R eceptionist), Gaby Brian,[...]knavish tricks of the Judas sitting next to you.
Gregory. Eastmancolor. 92 mins. France 1974. in the movie with a raunchy, copybook elegance.[...]Newsgathering by its very nature is grubby, com Thus Hildy Johnson, managin[...]petitive, irreverent of people and places. It is also Burns' longtime ace reporter, is a man to be
an occasionally cut-throat affair. The slow but
Virginia Duigan steady decline of the printed word as a source of guarded, and if he seems like getting away (to
hard news means that Wilder's Front Page is, to become an adman in his future father-in-law's
One should say at the outset that anyone who some extent, a reconstruction of a world that has, bluechip agency in Philadelphia, for crissake) then
has ever served time as a journalist or wandered unhappily, f[...]eur.
into the deranged, grime-encrusted world of a dai Television and radio have cruelly usurped the all manner of scoundrelly skulduggery is in order
ly newspaper, will find this movie irresis[...]-- provided it is done with style. And if nothing
Hecht and Charles MacArthur's play The Front newspaper's preserve. His movies enable us to see else, Burns' fairy godmother endowed him with a
Page is one of the few attempts ever made to it how it was and still should be -- paunchy, plethora of that at birth.
capture this uniquely bloodshot atmosphere, and ruthless and crafty.
Billy Wilder has transferred their inspired version As the rascally Burns, Walter Matthau finds
to the screen with a tact and finesse comparable to But in the Chicago of 1928, with its prolifera hims[...]ting
Michael Blakemore's stage production---seen in tion of daily papers, the newspaper business was in he has had the good fortune to come across for
Australia during the recent tour[...]tarian and predatory. This is the blackly comic some time. His towering[...]funereal and intimidating pomposity, his small,
Finesse is, strictly speaking, misleading. From scenario of Hecht and MacArthur, and it is one sneaky shifts in expression . . . all are breathlessly
the opening titles, set against a frenzied collage of which Wilder has respected splendidly and in accurate. His maniacal lust for an exclusive is
newspapers belting off the rollers, the movie ex[...]matched only by Johnson's fanaticism, the kind of
plodes with[...]orce, manipulating its terpreted with a tactician's ingenuity. single-minded devotion to duty in the face of dis
captive audience with all the ink-stained guile of One has only to look at two main sets in the traught fiancee's pleas of which only the truly big-
the men it purports to satirize. time reporter is capable.[...]vie -- the magically disordered press room at
But my thesis, suitably seductive and insidious, the Chicago Criminal Court, and the main news To suggest that these men are unnatural,
will be that the movie is not so much a satire as a rapacious or blatantly untrustworthy is to miss
brilliantly distorting mirror, fastidiously[...]desk at Walter Burns' Chicago Examiner -- to
bellished, on an enclosed and incestuous world realise that reporters put up with some of the the point mulishly. In the newspaper half-light the
which to the uninitiated (represented here by the worst working conditions in the world. And to great operators are born, and rarely made. Like
wet-behind-the-ears new boy) depicts all the un realize that it doesn't matter, because they never Western heroes, they are a race apart; for whom
trammelled chaos of hell. The Front Page, for all notice. To put a journalist in a creative adman's
its exaggeration and flamboyance, ultimately office,[...]p-pile carpet, shiny pot plants, talk of morals is a patronising irrelevancy. As
wickedly enshrines the truth.[...]Well, such will be any ex-journalist's view, and heresy. every journalist's wistful dream -- a swell guy,
journalists are always ones to jealousy guard their Necessarily, the biggest items of furniture in a
reputation. As Hecht and M acA rthur one of the boys -- and when it comes to the nitty
appreciated, it is a curious fact that the status of a newsroom are desks, typewriters, filing cabinets gritty, a swaggering, swindling bastard.'
newspaperman in any country, though low, is in and rubbish bins. The supporting props are equal
variably endowed with a certain frisson. ly indispe[...]er, The true villains of the piece are neither Burns
Reporters, in the public eye, are faintly risque, phones, old poker sc[...]nor Johnson, and certainly not the unfortunate
profane -- or in the words of Molly Malloy, the cig[...]sses with solidified whisky waifs Williams and Malloy. They are, naturally,
big-hearted whore in The Front Page, `a lot of[...]the Sheriff of Chicago (Vincent Gardenia, with a
crummy hoboes full of dandruff and gin.' It is an dregs.[...]Again, in any press room -- especially this one and his Mayor (Harold Gould, suave and[...]Machiavellian), who are as collectively bitter and
carrion are gathered to report on the imminent ex twisted as their folklore archetypes. Hecht and[...]ecution of cop-murderer Earl Williams.-- there is MacArthur were certainly getting^at corrupti[...]a deceptively languid, wisecracking atmosphere.[...]the laconic surface the subsoil crackles with and their tribe of artlessly ingenuous reporters[...]provide both a focus for the action and a slippery
intrigue. This movie architects that slovenly,[...]shambling allure. It also captures the cramped in smoke screen for the real targets. Screenwri[...]I. A. L. Diamond and Billy Wilder have had the

62 -- Cinema[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (143)[...]ANDREI RUBLEV

wit to see this, and their additions to the original the icons. His movie reflects the transparent This sort of rhythm in the movie's composition
unobtrusively place the[...]ity of the icon painters' world: the sacred works in two ways: it lends a formal strength and
action takes place entirely in the press room. figuresj the horses, birds, rocks and mountains; gravity to the narrative, as though you're seeing
the chalice, bread and crucifix. It brings to life through the eyes of the painter what happens to
The screenplay is studded with gems -- fast, and dramatizes, through one fable after another, the men and women around him, as well as his
frenetic and visually4nventive. The merger of play the inner experience of suffering, faith and joy country; it also leads to an understanding of the
and movie has been achieved with such that gives significance to these figures. And it's
smoothness that it is almost impossible to guess clear why the Soviet government for so long bann spiritual energies that enrich the art.
where one starts and the other leaves off. Hecht ed the movie. It explains, with frightful clarity, the
and MacArthur's outrageous use of coincidence[...]he even kills a man. Yet he neither goes mad nor
into the press room when Johnson, about to join Tarkovsky shows us the suffering and personal turns to despair.
his fiancee, is the sole occupant) has been matched anguish that gives strength and authority to those
with the occasionally wildly exaggerated extem marvellous faces in the icons -- many of them il Instead he takes a vow of silence and retreats to
pore sequence (Earl's wounded psychiatrist slid[...]tions of scenes from the New Testament. a monastery in a small village. Then, in the
out of the back of an ambulance and hurtles along[...]movie's final sequence he meets a young lad, the
the street on a stretcher, dodging a phalanx of The film is shot in an epic style that immediate
police cars, for example) but the excesses, as a ly brings to mind Eisenstein, although there are son of a bell-caster whose father had died in the
rule, are forgiveably in character.[...]plague. The son discloses that his father passed on[...]the secret of bell-making before he died and is
But if all this is inclined to make one maudlin, significant differences as well. Characters are shot carried off to cast a bell for the Duke. The boy
nostalgic for a past where ethics are in no danger against empty space, the wide plains, endlessly
of triumphing, there is solace at hand. Today's big flowing ri[...]searches alone for the right sort of clay and trusts
stories may not quite compare with the florid ex black and white photography stresses the simple, to a secret instinct that he will cast the bell.
travaganza of a hanging, but for the encirtling everyday materials like timber, rock, snow, paints
newshounds there is the same scene of blood, the[...]Rublev watches the preparations and finally the
same sleight of hand. All is not lost. And in its bell turns out a masterpiece. The boy collapses
glorification of such essentially human and brushes -- even apples. You're not so much and reveals, sobbing, that his father had in fact
fascinations, The Front Page may finally be view aware of these things as objects, but in a more never told him the secret. Rublev's own faith is
ed as a tranvestite romance, a flagrantly apposite deliberately artistic way, Tarkovsky captures restored and they establish a pact: he will paint
paean of praise in the guise of a devilishly sly dig
at the forces of evil. their texture, as though concentrating a richness icons and the boy will cast bells.

THE FRONT PAGE. Dire[...]the most simple materials. The episode is intensely moving. This is ex
Paul Monash. Executive Producer, Jennings Lang. A Univer
sal Pictures production. Screenplay by Billy Wilder, I. A. L. Peasants munch rotten apples (the only food they perienced in the nerVous energy of the boy and the
Diamond. From the play by Ben Hecht, Charles MacArthur. have); monks chop down wood and stack vast
Photographed by Jordan S. Cronenweth. Edited by Ralph E. walls of timber; an artist slowly extinguishes a epic quality in reconstructing the process of bell,
Winters. So[...]casting. And to make it complete there is the
Bumstead. Set decoration, James W. Payne. Music Super flame by wrapping his hand round a torch -- all brilliant photography, with[...]ildy Johnson), these momentary shots create a complex impres
Walter Matthau (Walter Burns), Carol Burnett (Mollie sion of a simple, yet profound urgency, of lives liv contrasts between the earth and the day; the blaz
Malloy), Susan Sarandon (Peggy Grant), Vincent Gardenia ed close to the bone. ing fires and molten silver.
(Sheriff), David Wayne (Bensinge[...]ms), Charles Durning (Murphy), The contrasts in lighting reinforce this sense of From this sequence the movie passes into a full
H erbert Edelman (Schw artz), M artin Gabel (Dr a spare, yet dramatic, existence. Much of the[...]moves slowly across a range of figures, brilliantly
(Jacobi), Dick O'Neill (McHugh), Jon Korkes (Keppler), Lou movie is shot in grey half tones, against drifting colored and perfectly composed. The authority
Frizzel (Endi[...]smoke or falling snow or rain. But there are and strength they represent is irresistible, and you[...]rilliant clarity, of sunlight dazzling begin to feel that you understand something of the
ANDREI RUBLEV[...]across snow or lighting up the interior of a experience that underlies this gravity and pity.[...]luminous quality of the icons themselves, and es The style and sweep of the film creates an im
tablish a visual and pictorial tension. The camera pression of th[...]nding commercial returns often to long close-ups of deeply ex long and bloody history of oppression and suf
releases, Andrei Rublev, lasted just one week in pressive faces, and these pauses break up the fering. But Tarkovsky hasn't simply reproduced a
Melbourne, and according to its distributors, was restless sequence of violent and barbarous events. surface of social history. He has concentrated on a
a total box-office disaster. Even so, it's 10 years[...]religious and deliberately artistic form, a
late coming to Australia. Made by Andrei Similarly many sequences give way to long-shots profound response to the stress of famine, inva
Tarkovsky in 1966, it was shelved by the Soviet
government fo[...]of water flowing or rain sweeping over the sion and disbelief.
posedly `unhistorical'. When it was released by
Columbia in the US, nearly a quarter of the movie countryside. This is quite unlike the sharp
was cut, although even at[...]rhythms of Eisenstein's editing, and the effect is to ANDREI RUBLEV. Directed by Andrei Tarkovsky. Pr[...]dissolve each episode of Rublev's life into a more tion Company, Mosfilm. Screenplay by Andrei Mikhalkov-
Andrei Rublev is the greatest of the Soviet icon abstract and complete reconstruction. These Koncha[...]ographed by Vadim
painters, although very little is known about him. Yusov. Editor, not available. Sound by I. Zelentsova. Music
He lived in the early fifteenth century under bar photographic and editing rhythms, together with
baric conditions ofplague, famine and Tartar in
vasion. The movie, of nis life and times, is made in sudden richly toned black and white colors, help by Vyacheslav Ovchinnik[...], which fall between the years 1400 to unify apparently random and often chaotic ex Tcherniaiev. Players, Anatoly Solonitsyn (Andrei Rublev),
and 1423, with the four central stories taking perience.[...]irill), Nikolai Grinko (Daniel the Black),
place in one year. It's not a documentary, a[...]phanes the Greek), Irma Raush(Deaf-
biography or a tribute to social realism, but con Slowly, throughout the film, Tarkovsky draws and-Dumb Girl), Nikolai Burlyayev (Boriska), Rolan Bykov
centrates on moments in the life of the artist in[...], Yuri Nikulin (Patrikey), Mikhail Kononov
order to understand his art. Tarkovsky illustrates, together different influences and incidents in
at the most profound and moving levels, the kind
of bitter personal experience, the suffering that's which Rublev's own religious faith was forged. (Fomka), Yuri Nazarov (Grand Duke). Part in color. 146
necessary to faith, the inner life of the artist that His rival is the icon painter, T-heophanes the mins. Original running time 185 mins. U SSR 1971.
issues in the most finely achieved painting.[...]emphasizes the justice of God,
It's difficult to account for the overwhelming
authority of the movie, its power to evoke com an overbearing, relentless, even cruel figure.
passion and pity and to order these feelings into a
sense of destiny, unless the movie is related to the Rublev, though, comes to centre his art on man SCENES FROM A MARRIAGE
icons themselves. and to stress qualities of love and forgiveness. His

Tarkovsky has created a work of art on screen struggle is to break down the rigid traditional
that reproduces the rhythms and composition of pieties and artistic conventions that stand between Ross Lansell

his painting and his experience of Soviet history

and society. Ibsen wrote A Doll's House in 1879; a com

So the movie constantly recurs to scenes that patriot Ingmar Bergman's Scenes from a

are highly dramatic or even tragic, and yet very Marriage (1973) is a variation almost 100 years[...]r instance, raid the later on the original trials and tribulations of[...]town of Vladimir, the people flee to the church. Nora Helmer, the women's libber befor[...]The Tartars swing a battering ram against the This time aro[...]door, while inside swarms a throng of distraught Pankhurst, Ms Germaine Greer and the

men, women and children. The camera slowly `Monstrous Regiment',[...]pans across the crowd, picturing them in attitudes Marianne (the marvellous Liv Ullman, if only un

of supplication and terror. The massed horror of der Bergman's and Jan Troell's direction and no

the scene makes formal, for a moment, the kind of others) has made some partial progress at least in,

grouping that might remind you of Brueghel. The her liberation[...]doors then burst open and the camera picks up at Torrald Helmer, one Johan (Erland Josephson, a

ground level the charging horses as the Tartars Swedish stage actor). . . but with some significant[...]composed scene is broken down and several in In her present reincarnation Goethe's `Eternal[...]dividual threads in the epic are taken up again. Feminine' has become a 35-year-old divorce

Rublev kills a Tartar attempting to rape a lawyer in the making and to rub in the irony, in

woman; a peasant is vilely tortured after the in the words of her 42-year-old `psycho-technician'[...]vaders melt down a.crucifix into boiling lead. Jiusband, a pretty obscure person all round.[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (144)SCENES FROM A MARRIAGE[...]the author of the Poetics. But it works, provided[...]that the audience is patient and prepared to do[...]It could be argued that Scenes from a Marriage[...]is sophisticated soap opera. Its actual television[...]origins are indeed significant. Bergman originally[...]conceived the project as a television series, in six[...]of Scenes from a Marriage: its claustral, but not[...]transforms it into an extended essay rather than a[...]It's no Doll's House in other words, nor for that[...]matter a masterpiece. The two leading characters[...]are just not cast in the heroic mould, in spite of[...]their comparative verbal fluency. They are just[...]discoursing almost ad libitum as television allows,[...]indeed encourages, in order to try and fill in the[...]Scenes from a Marriage basically is an acting[...]tour de force for Ms Ullmann as Bergman's Anna[...]Karenina (rather than Nora Helmer) as Stig[...]Bjorkman* has characterized her. It's an in[...]vestigation of (her) feminine psychology as she

Liv Ullman and Erland Josephson in Ingmar Bergman's Scenes from a Marriage. metamorphoses from a 35-year-old dutiful wife,[...]mother and career woman into -- much to her
Events indicate, if not vindicate, her `Innocence `real wedlock' with her by now ex-husband of a screen husband's obvious displeasure, then
and Panic', or more to the point, her `Art of rather peculiar sort. They have experienced so chagrin and wounded male chauvinist pride -- a
Sweeping under the Carpet' (two of Bergman's much together that it becomes obvious they can
early title cards) -- in one of several key close-ups[...]other nor without each other
by spectacles, she is shocked to her core when her . . . only being able to get together in hotels or a resources, able eventually to stand on her own
philandering screen husband shows his true colors clandestine weekend at a friend's hideaway -- `In feet.
the Middle of the Night in a Dark House
by disclosing that she's bored him stiff, especially Somewhere in the World' as Bergman's title-card Mr Josephson more than holds his own acting-
sexually, for the past four years. So much so that puts it. wise, particularly in the second part as he, too,

he's running off with a younger woman to Paris. In the meantime there has been no magical, metamorphoses -- or, rather, as his "machismo"
This connubial abandonment leads to some mutual transfiguration of souls -- just a image and self-esteem crack and collapse back
realization, and more importantly, an acceptance into the adolescent self-pity that was implicit at
serious stock-taking of Marianne's hitherto of their mutual limitations and shortcomings.
carefully fostered naivety which she eventually Like seeing your lover, not through the initial the outset.
rises above, though not quite transcends, to rose-colored spectacles any more, but warts and
emerge from middle-class chrysalis-coffin, to all, and still going on with the relationship. It could be argued that the `coming out'
become, in Ms Ullmann's description, Bergman's
`new woman' -- "a woman who is really free and Tolerance rather than compromise though. No character that Ms Ullmann created owes just as
can live without the help and support of a man" . great heights were ever really stormed in Scenes much to her own experiences of middle-class
from a Marriage, but rather the minutiae of every repression0 as to Bergman's methodical, clinical
But like her foremother Nora, she yearns not to script and restrained, sparse direction.[...]eadily , Yet, behind the anatomy lesson there's a new
do without men, save for procreative purposes in and sometimes (literally) painfully accumulate
the manner of the fabulous Amazons, but as Nora into a middle-aged Darby and Joan type of affair. lower-keyed, more specif[...]oriented' element in his work; but bereft of the
attains this psychological state 10 years later at Their eventual mutual accommodation, both
curtain fall but, in another of Bergman's mental and sexual, may be bland and prosaic, but metaphysical or theological scaffolding of b[...]deed ' even this `demi-hemi-semi-paradise' of a sort is, it seems more philosophical but less energized,
The Ultimate Irony of Marriage would've been a according to Bergman, unattainable within the less highly wrought and less dramatic.
more appropriate title, though in retrospect one marriage institution but needs the freedom, the air
suspects that at base the much married and of an extra-marital relationship -- at least in this We still don't really know, of course, what went
divorced Bergman doesn't care for the marri[...]lar instance. on in Johan and Marianne's minds, though we
institution at all.[...]have a fair idea of their strengths and weaknesses[...]rsus socie
Johan still remains the adolescent that he ty (to employ Denis de Rougemont's well-known after almost three hours of what amounts to
perhaps always was but Marianne has become, in polarity) in an eventually rather boring middle- group therapy with them, with the audience
stead of his lap-bitch, not some mythologically- class setting where the problem seems to be one of
dimensioned `Great Mother' but simply someone compassion rather than passion. The situation is necessarily as the would-be therapist. Admittedly
no longer pre[...]seemingly remorseless attention to detail.
class mores.[...]behavioristic details waiting to be interpreted, and
In the intervening century since Nora shut that The dramatic structure is perfunctory -- the[...]loses girl, boy gets girl walks out on Bergman. But most remain. Middle-
famous door at the end of Act III and so struck again, situation overladen with Bergman's prosaic
out for what she described as "the most wonderful[...]sed
thing of all" , some progress has been made: in particularity of quasi-behavioristic observation.
fact our 1973 heroine has her husband shut the[...]cters' by all these home truths. ;
door as he goes off after the other, woman. fl[...], or rather, prosaic semi-introspective
Marianne is compelled to go in for some `con *Sight and Sound Summer 1973.
science examining' and `consciousness-raising' via musings, as well as their pseudo-philosophical

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (145)[...]The Australian Film Developm ent
Corporation is proud to be associated[...]and THE REMOVALISTS
and w ishes them every success

Above: Jack! Weaver and Peter Cum
mins in The Removalists.

Right: Barry Humphries in The Great
Macarthy

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (146) TOTAL IN -H O U S E FAC ILITES

fp c m ^ ]|te J 6[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (147)[...]A full-length feature based on the 0/10 Network's[...]D ire c to r............................ . . David Den[...]Jeff St. Jo hn's magic chair is the vehicle for a Shooting January/February.[...]...... ..................Eastm an musical fantasy featuring[...]V. Udovenko Diddiey and Cookie Vee.[...]M usic D ire c to r............. . . . . Paul Ratclif[...]A n im a to rs ....................... .. Val Udovenk[...]END PLAY

D ir e c to r ........................................... ...[...].................... Hexagon
Production c o m p a n y ............. . . . .Quinkan Film s[...]A ssociate P r o d u c e r .......... .............[...]35mm IN PRODUCTION A ssistant D ire c to r.......... .......... R oss Dimsey[...]Director of
A ssistant D ire c to r.................... .......... M ichael Lake An animated film. A cubic from "Transversal"
Scrip t ............... , ............................. . . . Lew is B ayo n as goes to see ^he world -- visiting "Anglevllle",[...]"Letters" and " Numbers".[...]Cam era O p e r a to r............... .............Dan Burstail

Pho[...]Budget: $22,000.
2nd Unit p h o to g ra p h y .......... .......... John Rhodes[...]D ire c to r................................................[...].................Peter Conyngham C la p p e r/L o a d e r...............[...]....................................Gordon Much G a f f e r .........................................[...]Director of
Sound R e c o rd is t....................... . Laurie Fitzgerald[...]A ssistant D ire c to r................................ David Huggett A ssistant G rip ....................... . '. . . .[...].....................Gordon Much Sound R e c o rd is t.................. .................. Des Bone[...]...................Bill Hutchinson
Boom O p e ra to r......................... Max[...].......... s ; . . . .David Huggett Boom O p e ra to r.................... . . . . Graham Irwin[...]........................... Guy Furner
Technical A d v is o r.................... . Kenworth Tru cks[...]Graem e Mardell Cam era O p e r a to rs ............ ' . . . Flannagan B ro s.,[...]Sound R e c o rd is t.................... David M cConnachie
C a st: Jo hn Ew at, John W aters, Ju stin e[...]............. .............Tony Rooke

Story of a truck driver and a hitch-hiker on a long[...]Eddy Van Der Madden W ardrobe M a s t e r ...............[...]up ................................... . . . .L o is Hofenfels

Running time: Two hours (approximate[...]........................................... Eastm an Cast: George Mallaby (Robert[...]ark Gifford); Ken Goodlet (Superinten
Being shot in Panavision.[...]....................................Gordon Much T in g w e ll (D r . F a ir b u r n ) ; B e lin d a G ib lln[...]Based on John Cleary's book H elg a 's W eb,[...]about a Sydney cop who uncovers a massive[...]Eddy Van Der Madden Mai B rynning (P o lice P h o to g rap h er); B a rry[...]........BoDiddMiecyQueen (N ew scaster); Reg Gorm an (News
D ire c to r................................................[...]Script A s s is ta n t...........................................[...]Sound R e c o rd is t............................................. Ma[...].........APA novel beginning with the m urder of a young
Director of P h o to g rap h y.................... G ary Hansen[...]hitch-hiker on Melbourne's Maroondah Highway.

A feature film script in its final stages. No further LISTEN TO THE LION[...]D ire c to r................................................[...]Opening of the Opera House and the variety of[...]ob Hill entertainment and events celebrating it, as seen

D ire c to r.................................Don Crom by A surreal sci-fi study of a derelict's last two days through the eyes of Bo Diddiey. A m usical fan[...].......Anthony Buckley on earth and the day after. Set among a group of
Script . , . . .....................................................Jo an Long Syd ney m etho-heads and using the Van[...]D ire c to r .............................. . Brian Trenchar[...]Morrison song as a background.[...]D istrib u to r......................... .............B[...].. The Mbvie Company:
Based on the true story of a young woman and[...]Kong)

her two young children during the 1920's and the[...]............ . David Hannay,
Feature film on a $386,000 budget.[...]D ire c to r................................................[...]D ire c to r ...............................................[...]Brian Trenchard-Smith
CHILLA AND BERT[...]Production A s s is t a n t .......... Ingrid Hecheneerger Assistant Dire[...]........ ................................ Eastm an[...]on Much Secretary to P ro d u c e r......................... Veda Curr[...]C in e m a sco p e
D ir e c to r ...............................................[...].. LesBurns Photography .............
D istrib u to r................................................[...]Location M an a g e r.................................Ray Patters[...]Ron Williams
Production c o m p a n y .............................................[...]Unit M a n a g e r........................................ Gra[...]Cam pera O p e ra to r................................................[...]Sound R e c o rd is t..........[...]r ......................... ..
ends of the globe and their relationship.[...]David Wakely, Cam era A s s is ta n t.........................................Gr[...]Jim Money C la p p e r/L e a d e r................................... R oss Berrym an
Length: Feature[...].................. O scar Scheri G a ffe r............................[...]...................................Eastm an Key Grip ..................................[...]. .............................. G ary Pluckett C a st: Jim m y Wang Yu,- Hugh Keys-B yrn e, Ros[...]Sound R e c o rd is t................................................[...]Boom O p e ra to r................................... Mark Wastvta[...]......... Jo W eeks, The story of a Hong Kong cop coming to[...]Australia to extradite a prisoner.[...]....................................G arry Hardam an Editing stages.[...]N a rra to r............................ .......................M arcus Hale H a ird re sse r.....................................[...]A n im a to rs ....................... Eddy Van Der Madden,[...]Robin Ram say, Keith Lee and Graham Kennedy.[...]Above: Jack Thompson as Foley in Ken[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (148)[...]PROMISED WOMAN

D ire c to r.......................... ........... Peter[...]......... Terry Bourke 35mm AWAfTIMG R E L E A S E D ire c to r................................................[...]Production c o m p a n y............ B.C. Productions
P roduce[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (149)[...]In view of the rapid growth of[...]Australian production the co
D ire c to r.........................................Ken Han[...]r........................ Mike Thornhill D ire c to r.............................................Tim[...]he greatly assisted by in
Production c o m p a n y ................ South Australia Associate Pr[...]Production co m p a n y.................Hexagon Films[...]dividual producers and direc
Production M a n a g e r................... Hal McElroy Director o[...]tors sending their production
Film Development Corporation
P ro d[...]details and stills to:
Assistant P roducer............................[...]Unit M ana gSeer.c..r.e...t.a..r.y.....................................R..o..s..s...M....a..t.t.h..ePwosmOliveSMrouusndic
Photography ..[...]143 Therry Street,
Assistant D ire c to r......................Malcolm Smith[...]................................F...........r.....a.........Kn.......Ak.e..M.D..nd..MMia.rk.ivH.eaeo.[...]...................John Dingwall
Camera O p e ra to r......................Graham Scaife

C a st: Jack Thompson, Max Cullen, Robert
Bruning, J[...]s, John
Ewart, Sean Scully.

Events leading up to the 1956 Shearers' Strike. Sound Re-recordist ........................Peter Fenton An electrician goes to University and gets per[...]dgrave, Arthur Dignam, Judy sonally involved with a Professor and his wife.[...]is, Patricia Leehy, Gunter Meisner, Brian

35mm IN RELEASE[...]The life story of a doctor between World War I
and World War II. D ir e c to r /C o - p r o d u c e r /

ALVIN RIDES AGAIN[...]G a ffer..........................

Photography[...].. Andrew London
Camera O p e ra to r.........................................PeterBi[...]Horsfall.

A gangster-adventure story set around a casino[...]obert Service,
robbery. Graeme Bl'undeli returns to play the tri[...]about Dead-Eye Dick and Mexico Pete's search
ple roles of Alvin Purple, " Balls" McGhee, and[...]$240,000.

Budget: $250,000.

BAZZA HOLDS HIS OWN

P ro d u c e r/D ire c to r. . Bruce Beresford
Associate Producer[...]................ ........... Des Bond

C a st: Barry Crocker, Barry Humphries, Donald
Pleas[...]Little Nell, Nancy Blain, Prime
Minister Whitiam and wife.

Barry McKenzie's adventures in Europe, Paris
and behind the Iron Curtain. An original script

based on the comic strip character.

Above Left: A cheesecake pose from
Cheryl Rlxon, who plays the lead role of
Kelli Kelly In Plugg, the latest feature from

Terry Bourke.

Above Right: Mexican Peter and Dead Eye
Dick cover their tracks in a scene from
Richard Franklin's The True St[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (150)[...]................Andrew Jo nes

ANTONIO GAUDI -- TO A DANCING[...]............... CharlesPileso Cast: Michael Carm an, Sally Conabere, Debbie
D ire c to r....................................... Th

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (151)ranges, of vast deserts and plains, of perfect surf[...]E (V IC ) --
,on hidden beaches. Our journey was a quest into
the beyond; a search for new people, new places[...]Simon Scott FILM AND T E L E V IS IO N BOARD[...]Develop scripts for minimum of six 50-minute
and new experiences . . (Paul Witzig and Judy Photography..[...].......................... Scott Murray, FUND AND SCRIPT DEVELOPMENT.[...]E . C. HAM /A. K . F O W LE R (O LD ) -- Research

Budget: $7[...]and document source material and prepare

In release. Study of a young man's persistence in a one-way L IL IA S C A S T L E (N S W ) -- Supplementary grant[...]love relationship and his subsequent realization[...]slaughter of koalas in Queensland in the

SCHOOL'S OUT[...]A Y T E N K U Y U L U L U (N S W ) -- To direct and[...]RICHARD RUDD (OLD) -- Research and
Production ............................R[...]W ILLIAM EDGAR (WA) -- Research and[...]SIMON TO W N SEN D (N SW ) -- Supplementary
Camera . . .[...]grant to complete television pilot for children's[...]IAN BARRY (N SW ) -- To direct and produce[...]Dan the Dogger and synopses for subsequent
Gaffer/Grip .....[...]. S. Waddington Productions narrative feature S p a rks[...]script editor $850

Documentary about students and teachers trying SAPPsrrcosordodipucuictac.t.tie.oe..rn...P....Mr...o...a..d...n.u...a.c...g.e....er....r.................................................C.........h...J...a...a...r.mBJl.e.a.yes.nr.s.o.W.nK.B.ei.coZ.n.kd.anhDwneaauiytmvccik[...]Slteav(insGdioOnp$Rr1osD3de,Ou7ri2ceNe0s F I L M A N D T E L E V I S I O N BOARD
to break through the conditioning of traditional[...]G R A N T S : E X P E R IM E N T A L F IL M AND
education at three radical alternative schools in Stuart Parks B A L L A R A T P R O D U C T IO N S (NSW) -- To[...]T E LE V IS IO N FU N D.

Melbourne -- Brinsly Road, Collingwood and
Swinburne Community Schools.

Length: 40 minut[...]S to ry...............................................[...]ngar MacGJBOOrotehHngeyNorthrEBodnIRe D (VIC) -- To direct and produce Th is

D ire c to r................................................[...]............Susette White DON C A T C H L O V E ( N S W ) -- Develop[...]M U RRAY C L A R K (N S W ) -- Develop screenplay[...]................ Dunatta Graphics for one episode and story lines for subsequent
Continuity ..........[...]Territory and their lifestyles. Each episode ex[...]A. L. Badrock, $524; Martin Bartfield, $1,922;[...]$1,036; Felix Bosari, $1,290; Max
The longing of a woman to escape the rigid amines a different character, e.g. a cattleman, D A R Y L F R E E S T O N E ( N S W) -- Develop[...]Clayden, $1,870;
framework of her everyday world and the buffalo hunter, nurse etc.[...]Hamilton, $1,255; David King, $671; Ross
society and human relations.[...]M A RA LYN J . JO N E S (N SW ) -- Develop treat[...]Dickson, $1,200; Jan Murray, $2,071;
Direction and research........................Jane Oehr[...]00; Sister Marie Ryan, $369;
.Production company Australian Department of Pro[...]ol Sullivan
Education and Film Australia Assistant D i[...]na Kearns
Photography...............Mike Edols (and others) S c rip t......[...]............................. Eric Luighal RON H A R R ISO N (N S W ) -- Develop screenplay[...]00; Donald Shepherd,
Step by step examination of an experimental[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (152)[...]checks a light heading with a[...]quence for Plugg.

Brian Probyn is an English cameraman with an impressive list As a lighting cameraman, my real But when it comes to lighting
of credits which include Poor Cow, Downhill Racer and Innocent challenge is to go into black space, itself, again it is the mood that
Bystanders.[...]counts. In Inn of the Damned, I was[...]like a studio or hangar, and with a against the purely technical
Probyn has been in Australia recently shooting two features[...]te light -- because it
for Terryrod Productions, a local comoanv headed by director few pieces of cardboard and hessian, is color in itself -- and everything
Terry Bourke and editor Rod Hay. re-create a mansion or Babylonian has to be 3400

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (153)[...]Brian Probyn (far left) checks the path of a cloud during an early shoot on Plugg.

lights, and if it's all at 3400

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (154) place, and be in its right perspective. BRIAN PROBYN: Cameraman

There is a tendency these days for FILM OGRAPHY
directors -- and cameramen -- to BRIAN PROBYN AS DIRECTOR OF
work a lot in close-up.
PHOTOGRAPHY
I don't like to push in as close as
possible. I feel everything should be Jemima and Johnny (Lionel Ngakane) UK 1962
handled with restraint. But if there is Poor Cow (Kenneth Loach) UK 1966
a strong reason dramatically -- say
when someone is being shot and the A Long Day's Dying (Peter Collinson) Uk 1967
director wishes to see the horror in Downhill Racer (Michael Ritchie) US and Europe 1967
the actor's eyes -- then a tight close-
up is necessary, The R[...]Conquista (Michael Syson) UK 1971
In television one can go in much Badlands (Terrence Malick) US 1971
closer than for films. But it's
irritating to be too close in films for The Jerusalem File (John Flynn) Israel 1971
too long. I like to place people in the Straight On Till Morning (Peter Collinson) UK 1972
setting, so however close you go,
even on a wide screen, there's always Innocent Bystanders (Peter Collinson) Spain 1972
a' left and a right -- there are things Mutiny on the Buses (Harry Booth) UK 1972
in the room, or even something in the
background, to put the audience in a Frankenstein; Monster From Hell (Terence Fish[...]specific situation. Dracula is Dead and Well and Living (Alan Gibson) UK 1973
Dracula is Dead and Well and Living in London (Alan Gibson)
The opening shot in "Inn of the
Damned", of the Cobb & C o. coach[...]UK 1973
-- with horses at full gallop and Reg Man at the Top (Mike Vardy) UK 1973
Gorman hanging on grimly -- was an Inn of the Damned (Terry Bourke) Austr[...]lyse it, more than Top: Alex Cord in a scene from Inn of the
one shot went into the scene. There Damned. To capture the mood o f the period in
were subjective shots with the
camera on the[...]eels spinning, backed with clever
use of music. In fact the success of Centre: Shooting a travelling shot for Plugg
the sequence depended not so much
on lighting and exposure, as the presented Brian Probyn with a few problems, and
selection of camera positions. Here it forced soundman Phil Judd to ride in the boot
is essential to work closely with the (left). Gaffer Derek Jones had to lean out o f the
director, and Terry was very good at moving car to position his light (right). The
choosing exciting positions so that cameraman and director rode inside.
there were plenty of cuts to provide
the right type of action. When the[...]s Arabian dance sequence -- shot by
coach was on a straight run, a wide
horizon was used and bends came operator Frank Hammond with the help of grip
into their own in providing exciting Ralph Gosper -- is one of the main title se
visual effects.[...]the titles to be shot hand-held.
Many Australian photographers use
an Arriflex 35 BL but have many[...]pers, March-April -- 75
problems with its sound. What is your
opinion ofThe Arri?

We are using a 35 BL on Plugg
because perfect sound is not the most
important thing. The film is on a
tight budget and allows for only four
weeks' shooting. However, Plugg is a
visual picture and far greater scope is
provided by a hand-held camera. The
big thing about a 35 BL is that you
can hand-hold it in sync. You can
easily sit in cars, whereas to use a
heavy sync camera, an enormous rig
is required plus a large number of
people -- and that's an expense we

can't afford on this film. I feel
that the BL is most suited for
Australian conditions. If the film
was entirely in the studio I wouldn't
choose that camera because you have
to dolly, and here complete silence is
an advantage.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (155)[...]Ross Wood started as an office boy with Movietone News in 1933. During[...]the weekends he was allowed to carry equipment on location, and among[...]those he worked with were Bill Trerise and Wally Sully, who in the twenties[...]year-old Wood set up his first shot as cameraman. Between 1936 and 1939[...]Wood attended art school four nights a week at the East Sydney Technical[...]College. With few illusions about his ability as an artist, he claims the ex[...]perience gave him an essential grounding in tonal balance, composition and[...]irley

The camera floats subjectively through a towering kingdom of cups and Shooting Bitter Springs (1950) near Quorn S.A. Camera crew includes: Ralph Smart
silver tea-service; the camera as a billiard-ball whizzes subjectively across a (seated), Ross Wood, Chips Rafferty, Hans Wetzel, Mike Furlong, Jack Ricks, Michael

table; and at the deceptively real conclusion to an airline commercial, it soars Pate (as policeman).
beneath a model jet and into a sunset created by the artful dodging of con
dens[...]lving quality of this work stems from the in the early 1940s, Wood moved to Cinesound where he spent several[...]years as a war correspondent. In 1946 he joined Video Studios, a small con
expertise of veteran cameraman Ross Wood. As lighting cameraman of the cern founded by theatre showman Bill Maloney to produce television com
more distinctively Australian features of the fifties, as the winner of many mercials and short subjects: Among the documentaries, Wood sho[...]od Productions color film, Blue Water And Big Fish, on 16mm Kodachrome. He was director[...]sole venture into feature film production Strong Is
Ltd, and as co-director of that company and more recently an investor in the The Seed (1949), and operator to George Heath on Bitter Springs (1950). If
feature film Stone, Wood remains an intriguing blend of master-technician art school helped foster the basics of a good visual sense, then George Heath
and executive.[...]d considerably more with his knowledge of filters and lighting. Since that
time Wood has become an expert in this field, and some of the more realistic
An auspicious entry into his company's second decade came with the an effects have come from the way he's enhanced his image. A green-yellow
nual presentation by the Television[...]st December 8, of filter brought dominance to the tumbling skyscapes of Captain Thunderbolt,[...]roductions scooped coated lenses with a piece of nylon net.
the pool in that category, and much of it was thanks to the skill passed on by
Wood to Graham Lind.

The two milestones of Ross Wood's early work are the features he shot for
Cecil Holmes in the 1950s. The first was Captain Thunderbolt (1951), dress
ed into an exercise of considerable style from a basic `radio' script by

Creswick Jenkinson. As if seeking to peel the pasteboard from their players
and give every line a new emphasis, Holmes and Wood set their camera
prowling. Overall, the feeling of the film is starkness -- the moody dusk
shots, the bare trees among the boulders of the hillside -- and the interiors
are mostly low-lit, and shot from low angles. With its three episodes and
varying shades of naturalism, Three In One (1956) is less hurried than Cap
tain Thunderbolt and seems less out to impress. Undoubtedly the best seg
ment is A Load of Wood, remarkable for the night shooting achieved with a
minimum of equipment. Having established their depression-struck town by
day, Holmes and Wood opt for such night detail as looming barb-wire and
isolated weatherboard walls. One of the characters is startled to see a truck
creeping out of the evening mist like a white-eyed monster. Later as the
timber thieves freewheel downhill in a stalled truck, the forest around them

takes on horrendous proportions. Only back in town with its welcoming lights

and grateful widows, is the unease dispelled.

The Movietone News team, Sydney, c. 1935. Ross Wood standing on truck to right of Long John Silver (1954). From left to right: Manuel Del Campo, Carl Kayser, Ross Wood.[...]After Captain Thunderbolt came work as operator for Winton Hoch on
76 -- Cinema Papers,[...]Mark Robson's Return To Paradise, filmed in Samoa in 1952. Then came[...]King Of The Coral Sea, and John Heyer's award-winning Back Of Beyond

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (156)[...]Shooting Long John Silver (1954). From left to right: Kit Taylor, Bill Constable
(background[...]Haskin (in chair).

(1954). On his return `from Beyond, Wood signed on as an operator for Byron
Haskin's Long John Silver. Haskin planned to shoot a CinemaScope version,
a standard ratio version, and 26 half-hour episodes. Carl Guthrie was im
ported as director of photography, but had to return to the U.S. after two
months for another engagement. Wood now inherited Guthrie's position, and
with it the problems of CinemaScope. Nevertheless, many limitations were
overcome by Haskin's dedication and his background in special effects. A
miniature ceiling and an earthquake added interest to one of the episodes,
while high on the dunes behind the Pagewood Studio, cameras and characters
were tilted on a half-built ship to give the illusion of sloping decks. Fades and
dissolves were shot on location in the camera, but became even more difficult
when the ship's model[...]72 frames per second. The project took
two years and with its completion, Wood moved onto Three In One.[...]Ava G ardner and Gregory Peck in Stanley K ram er's On the Beach (1959), shot entirely in[...]Australia.

Som e of the cast and the crew of Three in One (1956). Includes: Bill Constable (behind Ross Wood: While I was still at they've got a big budget. We can't af
boom), Cecil Holmes (in chair) and Ross W ood (at right of cam era). Pagewood, I had the offer of good ford to work on the smaller ones.[...]money to take me across to Artran- Every documentary takes three
On Smiley (1956) and its sequel Smiley Gets A Gun (1957), Wood operated sa. I didn't knock it back. At months to shoot, and it's six months
for Anthony Kimmins and Ted Scaife. By the time Stanley Kramer arrived to Artransa I worked on Whiplash,[...]each (1959), Wood's extensive experience made him a natural second unit for The Flying Doctor You've got to wait that long for your
choice as operator for the film's director of photography G[...]hen I joined Visatone money. You can shoot an advertising
The first few months on the film were, as Wood put it, "bloody hard work" , Television and was mainly shooting film in one or two days and have it to
but quite consistent was his admiration for Stanley K[...]commercials. The industry was a bit air within two weeks.
Wood recalls, "a dogmatic sort of man who did his homework and never took shaky at that time, but there were a
`no' for an answer. But he was always looking for a different approach." group of us virtually running the What sort of documentary budget[...]ndigenous features started tp show a profit. We went up
dwindled to almost nothing. In spite of the more recent opportunities, one to management and asked if we It varies, of course, and depends to a
discovers with a sense of great loss that as lighting cameraman, Ross Wood c[...]join the company large extent on locations and how far-
has not shot a complete feature since 1956. Perhaps the emergence of Ross as a unit, but they didn't feel we you've got to travel. If you were
Wood Productions Limited is part of the reason. In this interview, Ross could handle it. I had the feeling that shooting at a factory in Sydney, it
Wood talks about the formation of the company, its operation and his plans they were trying to sell out. I think could cost you $20,000 for b[...]the parent company was in property 15 and 20 minutes' duration.[...]investment and they didn't want to
have any more to do with the film And for the commercials?[...]months. In October 1965 I gathered For a series of seven commercials,[...]the Visatone team together to form some of them can go' as high as[...]ctions. It's been $40,000. Certain others are made[...]quite difficult at times, but from below $1000, but you've got a good[...]quite turnover if you do two or three a[...]Sometimes it's almost week at between $4000 and $6000
come to the point of straightening each. We've got[...]nails. to pay, we pay Equity rates for[...]talent, and we either build our own[...]a day.[...]Yes, most of the time: We've done a[...]few documentaries, but documen We supply all the technical[...]taries have hit a bit of a plane out cameramen, sound recordist, editor[...]there. There's either the promotional -- and although our directors work[...]film or the government documen on a freelance basis, we like to have
tary, and the only time anyone comes three of them working here[...]to us with a promotional film is if one time. They're not obliged to stay[...]here. They can use the place as their[...]Cinema Papers, M arch-A pri! -- 77

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (157)[...]Do you think there's a tendency to Then I made a flip lens which[...]compromise on Australian produc- Graham used on Stone. We used th[...]distortion lens as well. I did some[...]shooting for Stone in the Domain,[...]No, I don't think we compromise and used the distortion lens in con
very much. We tend to compromise junction with a color infra-red film[...]by using lighter equipment, and this we imported from the US, By using a[...]more flexiole. We can use 12 filter, which is yellow and a weird[...]the camera more dynamically. one to start with, we turned the grass[...]red aqd the skies a richer blue.
What light-weight equipment are you Graham used the flip lens in a smok[...]here? ing scene, so that evey time they took[...]a drag the entire scene would start[...]although they're a bit noisy, are these combinations, but one critic
ideally suited to the zoom and can be said: "Other than a few trendy[...]The crane, which we made here, is cellent.''
really a hand crane. It's supported[...]from above and you can slide over You also won two award[...]the top of a table without encounter snorkel lens. What's the principle of[...]ing the difficulties of a dolly. I did a that?[...]down on a table and went tightly up It's like a periscope, but both the
to a kid's face as he picked up a piece snorkel and the camera are hung up
of bread. As he took a bite, we froze side down from the Gimbal. The

Ross Wood and Cecil Holmes behind the camera for Three in One (1956).

home and just walk in and out. In the
long run we'd like to work with as
many directors as possible. On the
technical side we're a bit camera-
minded. There's Graham Lind, John
Lowry and myself, and I shoot com
mercials if a client wants me to.

As a cameraman, how much visual
control do you have over the commer
cials you shoot?

That depends on the director. Some Above: Setti[...]es during the shooting o f Stone.
directors like to take full control, but
quite often I'll suggest we shoot a few more associate# with art directors on him. We had to be right over the Arriflex lens is down the far end, and
additional angles. In the case of a re and writers. These people are closer table to get that shot. There's no way inside you've got an aerial image lens
cent watch commercial, I suggested to the production than ever before, you could do that on a normal dolly. and a rfelay lens. It actually amounts
we shoot a transition from the watch and often they'll get out and form to a three-foot lens, and you lose
face to a polo ball. On the day of the their own little service agency. Some What other inventions have you work about three[...]polo game the director couldn't be of them are doing quite well. ed on? I've got a knob which controls a
there, so I directed that sequence[...]Meccano chain leading down to pull
myself. Normally, while shooting, I Speaking broadly, what is the best Well I work on them when I'm not focus. With an 18 mm lens I can
discuss the style with the dire[...]de up some distortion focus from within an inch to infinity.
This includes the movement, com[...]f? lenses which won a photographic In this way I can fill the screen with a
position and basic continuity. award. It's roughly similar to a postage stamp, then in a fraction of a
It's hard to say. I've been happy with vaselline effect, but there's distortion second, pull focus on your face.
The old idea of a `story-board' has some things. There are others I wish at the edges rather than a blurring. I
nearly disappeared. Where you used th e y 'd go out and bury. O c made one for the zoom, which is a What can you tell us about the
to stick rigidly to what the agency ar casionally,. something goes Wrong moftstrous thing but it works, and Overseas Telecommunications ad
tist had drawn, is now more often left with the last shot of the day, and the other one fits onto a two-inch that won the awards?--
to the initiative of the director, you'll be tempted to say, "Oh that'll lens. You can hand-hold the two-inch
producer and cameraman. You do -- it'll have to do." version and do all sorts of things. Well the billiard balls in that ad were
could always accurately cost your
production from a `storyboard', but
within the last 10 years this has
changed.

W[...]s changed?

Possibly economics. Also the trust
that builds when people have been
working together and can deliver the
goods. Usually you have a con
ference before you start Shooting.
The agency people sketch their ideas,
and I do a lot of drawing to illustrate
camera positions and framing. Then
we know how to get on with it.

What other aspects of film advertis
ing have changed?

The agencies themselves have chang
ed a lot. The film producer attached
permanently to the agency has
almost disappeared -- we're now

78 -- Cinema Papers, March-April

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (158)[...]How was it put into `Stone*? EI[...]When we spoke to Sandy Harbutt AS DIRECTOR OF[...]about our investing as well as supply PHOTOGRAPHY[...]ing crew and equipm ent, the[...]Australian Film Development Cor 1949 Strong is the Seed (Video Studios)[...]to contribute $38,000, then the 1951 Captai[...]Government came in with more Director: Cecil Ho[...]money. To start with, we didn't come[...]30 per cent and paid an additional Productions) Director: F[...]our responsibility but we didn't want 1954 King of the Coral Sea (Sou[...]a hold-up in production. When the national) Dir[...]were getting their 50. In this respect, Long John Silver (Treasure[...]the AFDC have been very good to tures) Director: Byron Haskin[...]1956 Three in One (Australian Traditional[...]Do you still intend to shoot features Films) Director: Cecil[...]1959-
Above: A camera is mounted on the back o f a motor cycle to capture some of the fast action I wouldn't mind doing a feature 60 Whiplash (Artransa Park Telev[...]in Stone. again. A series bores me a bit. A
series is usually under budget con Director: Cecil Holmes
marked with figures representing a Advertising Pty. Ltd., in Singa trol, and once you've set a pattern of 1966 The Broken Hill (Southern Films)
spaceman, the Eiffel Tower, and pore. Ian handles advertising for[...]other cameraman can
other landmarks like Big Ben and the Singapore Airlines, and in a very take over quite easily. Direc[...]Scott. (Awards:
Statue of Liberty. The idea was to tongue-in-cheek way, he had written:[...]Blue Ribbon at the 1966 American Film
show how OTC could bring "you and "Seeing you fellas seem to be able to What sort of feature would attract Festival. Received awards at Antwerp,
the world a little closer" . The OTC win awards all over the place, how you? and from the Australian Film Institute.
ball rolls up and stops exactly beside about having a couple ready for us[...]By 1970 had received 11 awards in six
the ball with `the world' map on it.[...]mber." We I wouldn't mind doing a western different countries.)
The snorkel allowed us to ride along thought there was no chance of style or a bushranger style of film. I 1973 Tomorrow a Mile (Australian Film and
behind the billiard balls, so that in getting anything, but we decided to did enjoy working on Captain[...]levision School) Director : Ross
stead of trying to separate things for try and get an award for him Thunderbolt, although it was a bit of Hamilton
the camera to move, we were gliding somewhere. a drag trying to get a horse to stand
through them with the lens. in the right place. But I like the ac AS CAMERA OPERATOR
Is `Stone' the first feature you've in tion, with all these coaches and the
The Americans have a system vested in? mad gallop[...]down. Below this Yes. Firstly, we saw it as an oppor Would this extend to financial in George Heath
they have a mirror which pivots to tunity for Graham Lind to do a bit of vestment?
give the effect of the camera tilting. feature work. Secondly, we felt that 1952 Return to Paradise (Aspen Productions)
They take a full second to get focus, being in the film business, we should Oh yes, and I wouldn't mind doing a . Director: Mark Robson; Director of
but mine takes a fraction of that put our money where our mouth was.[...]When we get a return from Stone, we on Hitchcock.[...]want to reinvest it in another money back on Stone we'[...]1956 Smiley (Twentieth Century Fox) Direc
And, of course, you must be pleased feature. But it won't be invested in ing around for suitable scripts.[...]1957 Smiley Gets a Gun (Canberra Films)
Well, Graham took the top a[...]of photography: Ted Scaife.
awards for `A Bigger Dobba Butter'
and `Ripple Sole', which I felt should[...]n the Beach (Stanley Kramer Produc
also have got an editing award. And[...]1973 Stone (Hedon Productions) Director:
and the best color award.[...]material. Director o f photography was
The color in that commercial has[...]Graham Lind.
something of a pastel quality.[...]AWARDS
It was a drink commercial for
Singapore Airlines. With th[...]Since their formation in October 1965, Ross
tion lens we got the necessar[...]Some of them are:
ment and blending of color. We were[...]1968 Television Society o f Australia --
using a high-key, dominantly white
background for our ex[...]Commercial Awards -- Section 2 --
but the print we owe to the[...]Wholly straight cinematography --
laboratory as much as to the applica[...]Television Society of Australia --
tion of color in the film.[...]`Point-of-View'.
competitions, but Lex Meredith* got[...]1969 N ational Television Com m ercial
a letter from Ian Batey of Batey[...]stival for the J. Walter Thompson-
*Lex Meredith is a co-director o f the com Filming the escape o f Charles Tingwell (Blake) from Cockatoo Island in Captain Thunder commissioned Kleenex `F[...]1969 Australian Film Awards, Australian[...]`And Then There Was Glass'.[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (159)HOLLYWOOD AND AFTER can only suggest, as antidotes, Sheldon Renan's As if to match the opulence of such descendants
Introduction to American Underground Film and as th e International Encyclopedia o f Film, has
Je[...]David Curtis's Experimental Cinema for basic in now opted for the inclusion of stills, advertising[...]formation and to Adam Sitney's recent Visionary matter, and in the wake of a December 1972
Geo. Allen and Unwin -- Recommended price: Film (reviewed in the last issue of Cinema Papers) deadline, an addenda. But in spite of these ad
Hard cover $13.60.)[...]become more `international' in his outlook. The[...]eplitz, for 20 years head of the television and film production, a brief survey of called `Shuffle Back to Burbank', for its cover
Polish film school at Lodz, is now director of the the cable and cassette revolution fails to provide contains a purely Hollywood pastiche from
Film and Television School in Sydney. He has any directions beyond the `leap into the un Walsh's The Thief of Baghdad to The Godfather,
previously written several books which have not known'. In a book ranging so widely over the and inside little attempt is made to tip the balance
been published in English, including a monumen American Cinema it would have been worth con away from America and the sort of film-
tal five-volume History o f Cinema as Art. sidering the implications of the technological buffoonery that might appeal to lovers of old
Hollywood and After apparently stems from revolutio[...]the American same flexibility for mass access as books and MGM,F//wi and Filming, and tiresome re-runs of
film scene during the sixties, both as researcher records.
and visiting professor at the Theatre Department,[...]the Marx Brothers and W. C. Fields. Australia, of
UCLA. The last chapter, in which some threads are course, has little chance beyond the usual[...]drawn together, is perhaps the most interesting in representation by Charles Chauvel, and Chips
The book opens with a brief survey of the the book, particularly with the notion that Rafferty, but if you're skimming the pages you
changing face o[...]film industry Toeplitz puts forward of a dialectical relationship might recognize expatri[...]rson,
following the demise of the studio system, and between the information-giving and myth-making Marie Lohr, or Rod Taylor.
des[...]jors progressively roles of commercial cinema and television. This,
passing into the hands of faceless, impersonal and however, is only sketchily developed and tails off In his introduction, Halliwell justifies continued
remote conglomerates, whose chief interest seem into a brief discussion of some independently publication with, " . . . it covers, however briefly, a
ed to be in the diversification of their operations made political films.[...]much greater range of subject matter than any
and the acquisition of existing assets rather than[...]other book, and because it is fun to read" . I can
in film production per se. Drastic cuts in produc The changing form of film narrative -- free only relate this to his precocious survey of such
tion allied with t[...]runaway' films wheeling, open-ended structures and the sym topics as bathtubs, nuns and nymphomaniacs, and
(American-financed productions shot outside the biosis of fictional and documentary material -- if you disregard this (as you should), there
US) are seen to have taken the centre of activity Toeplitz attributes to the influence of television remains only the most fashionable selection of
away from the Hollywood sound stages. commercials and the underground cinema,
propositions both in need of more detailed ex stars, directors, writers, the occasional producer,
Toeplitz argues that the weakening of the ma amination. No consideration is given to the in and even more occasional technician.
jors' monopoly and the end of what remained of teraction between the American and European
the old studio system is linked, not only with the cinema, particularly with the French `New Wave'. It's gratifying, at least, to notice that Halliwell
long-term effects of television and enforcement of is starting to recognise more work from the silent
anti-trust legislation (separating production'and In adopting a broad approach in Hollywood era, but at the other end of the scale we have his
distribution), but also with the failure of most of and After, Toeplitz has undertaken the difficult[...]expressed
the multi-million dollar blockbusters in the late task of establishing cross relations[...]with, " . . . I find few films of the seventies to my
sixties. the intention was to raise questions rather than to taste, their explicitness being no substitute for the[...]provide answers. What is disappointing about imagination and skill which were poured into the
Further, modestly budgeted films by indepen Hollywood and After, is the failure to explore any
dent producers -- of which Easy Rider is the of the questions in sufficient depth to ensure studio products of Hollywood's golden age" .
archetypal example -- are supposed to have large further engagement. While in some ways this is valid enough, the state- -
ly supplanted the blockbuster syndrome and there ment eliminates an approach to some of the more
has been a shift in the concentration of restraints THE FILMGOER'S[...]refreshing aspects of years gone by. Where, for in
from production to distribution. Evidence of this stance, are the names of Japanese director Tasaka ,,
has bee[...]Tomotaka, Hungarian director Felix Mariassy,
and medium budget films which have been inade[...]Armand Gatti or
quately distributed or `canned' in accordance with price: Hard cover $25; Paperback $4.95. Marcel Hanoun? A random and esoteric selection
the distributor's assessment[...]I'll admit, but they do appear in Peter Graham's
stratified market.[...]rley modest but useful A Dictionary o f the Cinema,[...]and in terms of recent films there are glaring
However, the recent difficulties of the larger in Three more editions have come to pass since omissions in the case of Makavejev, Gall, Has and
dependent production companies, ABC and 1965, when Alfred Hitchcock, in his foreword to most conspicuously, Fassbinder.
Cinema Centre, as well as unsuccessful attempts the first edition of The Filmgoers Companion,
by some producers to arrange distribution in wrote: " . . . the author has done his homework A Dictionary o f the Cinema and The Inter
dependently of the majors, seems to suggest a rather better than the villains in my films, who
rather different picture from that drawn in the always seem to get found out sooner or later." national Encyclopedia both haye a titles index,
book. David Gordon, in the autumn 1973 issue of The three subsequent editions have farmed out but instead of this much-needed starting point,
Sight and Sound, argues that the finance-produc quite a few errors, but author Leslie Halliwell's The Filmgoers Companion now gives us " My
tion-distribution nexus is still very much with us emphasis has remained resolutely on the film in favorite hundred films" and "Index of Actors arid
and Toeplitz^s conclusion that the monopoly posi dustries of Hollywood and Britain. As the Actresses featured in illustrations" . Halliwell
tion of the majors has been weakened now seems a forerunner of its field, The Filmgoers Companion claims that an index to enable cross-referencing
bit premature. in 1965 was welcome indeed. would double the size of his publication. In his[...]ook, Peter Graham has got away with 620
After a useful chapter on the changing If[...]t-up -- particularly through your local cinema and the cries of numbered entries in an index that occupies only a
in the roles of producer and director -- the central " Whatever happened to the film as art?" , quarter of his volume. By looki[...]Halliwell was certainly doing his best to give you entry for Outcast of the Islands, you[...]ur
sociological observation, critical evaluation and the birthdate of Doris Day, and to support your
data on the industry arid surveys the way in which lamentations that the heydays of Clarence Brown references which will lead to its director, star, co-
commercial cinema has reflected and projected and Carol Reed were long gone. The changes of star and producer. If you'd turned, simply with
political issues, sex and violence. The book the last decade have left Halliwell far behind. He title in hand, to The Filmgoers Companion, you
however, does not offer anything especially new or seems not to recognise that your local cinema would have had nowhere to look.
controversial. The chapter on the underground might be showing more substantial and varied
cinema resorts too often to assertion rather than fare -- such as a double-billing of Stolen Kisses As Graham's guide is now out of print, who
evaluation and is liberally supported by out-of- and Fellini-Satyricon -- and that while nostalgia would Halliwell see as his main competitors?
context quotes from such idiosyncratic observers is on the rise, more people are flocking to film
as Parker Tyler -- with the spectrum of films be festivals and giving commercial scope to the still Most certainly The International Ency[...]the poets, the observers etc.). One Truffaut, and Luis Bunuel.[...]which in its spare, blunt style, offers more infor[...]mation on specific careers, with a listing of their[...]films and their dates. Like Halliwell's book, it[...]lacks a cross-reference index, but it makes up for[...]this with a massive listing of features and shorts,[...]organizations, and alternative titles.

80 -- Cinema Papers[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (160)[...]OOKS

If again, for curiosity's sake, you go in search in opposition to the mainstream commercial NEXT ISSUE
of a reference to Australia, you'll find that under cinema, there is a perpetual problem of dis
`Flynn, Errol', Herman F. Erben and not Charles semination to a wide audience. Subversive cinema Political Cinema
Chauvel is credited with the direction of In the ranges from avant-garde formalist exercises to
Wake of the Bounty. Quite inaccurate, of course, anarchist and anti-puritan tracts to social and A special feature by John O'Hara which examines
but apart from an occasional lapse, The World political cr[...]notions of Political Cinema and explores the work[...]alienation or confrontation devices, they may not of Bernado Bertolucci, Costa Gavras.
Encyclopedia o f Film is refreshingly thorough. reach the audiences they would most like to
The Australian entry in The International En assault. Thus captive audiences are often those Also in the next issue:
disposed to a particular point of view expressed
cyclopedia o f Film occupies a full column. I went within a work.[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (161)[...]8. The five major companies were required to ed audience demands for cinema, and even[...]divest themselves of their exhibition holdings[...]moguls' heyday
provisions of the consent decrees as far as they
concern us here are set out in the Report of the[...]was over. Further divorcement gave rise to the
English Monopolies Commission into Films.20[...]9. Their exhibitor successors were required to great wave of independent producers in the late
They included:[...]fifties and sixties who would have never been able
1. Distributors may not stipulate admission[...]divest themselves of a considerable number of to flourish in pre-divorcement days.[...]cinemas; in some cases particular cinemas
prices.[...]were designated, and in others particular towns As to divestiture, the aim was to reduce the size
2. Distributors may not agree with other dis[...]were designated in which one or more cinemas[...]of the -circuits particularly to attack the closed[...]town situation, not to destroy them altogether.
tributors to `maintain a system of clearances'.[...]Control of booking methods was rather seen as a
The term `clearance' means the period of time[...]way to mitigate circuit booking power. The
which must elapse between runs within a par[...]Paramount case saw the introduction of a system
ticular area, or in specific theatres. The provi[...]ivorcing exhibition from production
sion does not outlaw clearances, but is aimed[...]bidding for available
at preventing anything in the nature of an and distribution was that all parts of the industry
agreed master list[...]films. The idea was that distributors would be
distributors and exhibitors.[...]were said to be effectively controlled by the five forced to accept the best bid made on a film and
3. Distributors may not enforce clearances `in ex[...]not discriminate in favor of a certain exhibitor.
cess of what is reasonably necessary to protect[...]ciseness of the different styles
the licensee in the run granted'; i.e. a clearance[...]each company owned a considerable number of[...]of bidding (higher percentages of box-office take;
must be reasonable and the burdening of[...]rantees; higher fixed
sustaining its legality is on the distributor.[...]payments) and the difficulty of comparison led the
4. Distributors may not "further perform any ex[...]court to largely withdraw from supervision. Some
isting franchise" or make any franchise in the[...]competitive bidding still takes place, but it is
future. A franchise is a licensing agreement[...]suggested its purpose is largely to prevent private
with an exhibitor covering more than one year,[...]to the other circuits for full national distribution.
and the purpose of this provision is to prevent[...]It was alleged that this was so important to the[...]n.
associations between particular exhibitors and film companies that each gave preference to films
particular distributors.[...]from other companies in order to avoid possible[...]Certainly theatre-by-theatre booking and com
5. D istrib u to rs may not m ake `m aster[...]petitive bidding have led to modernizations and
agreements' or `blanket deals'. These terms are reprisals against its own films. This system of improvements of cinemas (now that exhibitors
synonomous and mean licensing agreements[...]believe they can make a reasonable return on their
with whole circuits.[...]principal factor which in substituting competition investment); but some exhibitors claim dis
6. Distributors may not make the licensing of one[...]tributors use competitive bidding as a ruse for
film contingent upon the exhibitor taking[...]for co-operation enabled them to control the in
others (full line forcing).[...]dustry and prevent independents from breaking in[...]entals. Distributors, on the
7. Distributors may only offer to license a film to and competing. Although it was possible to out
an exhibitor `theatre by theatre', solely upon[...]ggest collusion between exhibitors
the merits and without discrimination in favor Justice felt that it was impossible to be certain may make for lower bidding and film hire. They
of affiliated theatres, circuit theatres and[...]about the motives of booking and the qualities of
others.[...]films, and the only way to break reciprocal also allege that theatre-by-theatre booking forces[...]the distributor to invest in more prints of a film[...]than might be strictly economical in order to[...]It has been argued that divorcement was largely secure a substantial splash release.[...]responsible for the decline in American film There seems to be some evidence that post-[...]production in the fifties by depriving producers of[...]Paramount booking methods are unsatisfactory[...]an assured market, just when they were beginning for a variety of reasons, but there is no doubt that[...]to feel the pinch of television. The `death' of the[...]the goal of competition is now a much more real[...]major studios and of the `star system' have been[...]that it was the advent of TV that radically chang

A p pendix A

MOTION PICTURE CINEMATOGRAP[...]Term ination (a) If the D istrib u to r
DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION EXHIBITOR[...]3 (a) U the Exhibitor[...]suspension (i) A fter notic e in w ritin g fa il to rem edy any b re a c h on the
.. OF AUSTRALIA[...]p a r t of the D is tr ib u to r of the p ro v isio n s oi ti^is A g re em en t[...](i) A lter notic e in w ritin g fail to rem edy any b rea ch by the by a s reg a rd s the offer of film s fo r selectio n (If app[...]E xhibitor of the provisio ns ol this A greem ent a s reg ard s[...]paym ent of m oneys d u e . fu rn ish in g r e tu r n s , in s u r a n c e , D istributor. the p[...]access to the th eatre and rec o rd s, copyright, ceasing
STANDARD FORM OF CONTRACT IN RELATION TO THE HIRING[...]hibition, on notice under c la u se 60. o b se rv a n o e of A cts, (ii) be guilty of p e rsisten t breaches of this A greem ent;
O F FILMS BY DISTRIBUTORS TO EXHIBITORS[...]o r m inim um a d m issio n p r ic e s (11 sp e cifie d ).
IN VICTORIA A N D/OR TASMANIA[...](iii) be guilty of any b reach going to the root of th is A greem ent;[...](li) c o m m it any b re a c h of th is A g re e m e n t a s r e g a rd s the p u rp o se ,
(Operative a s from 1st Septem ber 1967)[...]m anner, tim e, or place in, a t. or for which, any film may then in any of such ev en ts th e E x h ib ito r may by notic e in w ritin g e ith e r[...]or may not be used.[...]suspend the acceptance of all the film s to be supplied under any o r a ll of
A G REEM ENT m ade betw een th e D is tr ib u to r n a m ed In the Schedule h e re to of[...]this A greem ent and other film agreem ents (if any) between the sam e
th e one p a r t and th e E x h ib ito r n a m ed In the S chedule of th e o th e r p a rt (iii) be guilty of p e rs is te n t b re a c h e s of th is A g re e m e n t.[...]ied or may term inate
WHEREBY IT IS A G REED a s follow s: -[...]a ll o r any of th is A g re em en t and such o th e r film a g re e m e n ts (If a n y ).[...](iv) be guilty of any in e ac h going to th e ro o t of th is A g re em en t;
Form atio n 1. (a) The E x hibitor's signature to the said Schedule shall c o nstitute the[...](b) If the E x h ib ito r duly susp e n d the a cc ep ta n ce trf film s u nder
of d o c u m en t an o ffe r to h ir e film s on th e te r m s of th is A g re e m e n t.[...]insolvent o r be adjudicated bankrupt o r execute an th is c la u s e he may upon notic e in w ritin g by him to th e D is tr ib u to r red u c e[...]a s sig n m e n t foi th e ben efit of h is c r e d ito r s , o r in the c a s e the nu m b e r of film s to be supplied by th e nu m b e r w hich In th e o r d in a ry[...]of a com pany go in to liquidation o r su f fe r a r e c e iv e r to be c o u rs e w ould[...]appointed PROVIDED HOWEVER that w here a rec eiv e r or
c o n tra c t. (b) Such o ffe r s h a ll In c o n sid e ra tio n of th e p r o m is e by th e D is tr ib u to r liquidator is appointed he shall have the option (such option[...]he E x h ib ito r duly suspend d e liv e ry by re a so n of d e fa u lt
c o n tain e d In su b c la u s e (d) of th is c la u s e (n o tw ith sta n d in g su b se q u e n t n e g o tia tio n s to be n otified to the D istrib u to r w ithin fo u rtee n days of his h ereunder and such default continue fo r o r be not rem edied w ithin two
between the D istrib u to r and E xhibitor) be irrev o cab le by the Exhibitor and appointm ent) to accept responsibility under the A greem ent[...]sp e n sio n the E x h ib ito r may by n o tic e in
c ap a b le of a c c e p ta n c e by th e D is tr ib u to r f o r th e p e rio d of 14 d ay s a f te r th e (without p reju d ice to the liab ility th ereu n d er of the w riting to the D istrib u to r te rm in ate this A greem ent and all or any of such
da te of sig n in g of th e o ffe r by th e E x h ib ito r if th e o ffe r Is so sig n ed in the E xhibitor) and to c ai ry on without the A greem ent being[...]agreem ents.
m e tro p o lita n a re a of M elb o u rn e o r in th e c itie s of H o b art o r L au n cesto n o r[...]su sp e n d ed or te rm in a b le m e re ly by r e a so n erf h is appo in tm e n t
th e su b u rb an a r e a s th e re o f o r fo r the p e rio d of 21 d a y s a f te r the d a te of PROVIDED ALSO that the provisions ol this paragraph shall '~ 5 . T his A greem ent shall not operate so as to derogate from any rights
sig n in g of the o ffe r by the E x h ib ito r if th e o f fe r is so sig n e d in a n y o th e r p a rt n o t apply to a com pany w hich goes in to liquidation fo r the of th e E x h ib ito r o r the D is tr ib u to r , a s the c a s e m ay b e , a ris in g f ro m th e
of V ictoria or T asm an ia, unless the D istrib u to r before the expiry of the said[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (162)[...]courses of action has largely failed.. A meeting of 11. The Big 6 were a group o f independent suburban drive-in
Milgram v. Loews Inc.21 where the refusal of ma minds is still required, and parallel activity is of owners centred around the former Palladium-Tivoli city
jor distributors to license features first-run for a evidential value only. circuit which, save for Sandringham Drive-in which is still[...]r either by
newly-constructed Pennsylvania drive-in was held Finally in 1962 in US v. Loews Inc.2i an Hoyts or Village. They were forced out o f operation by the
to be a restraint of trade and a decree was issued attempt was made to block sell a series of feature two major circuits.
requiring the distributors to give the plaintiff an films for TV exhibition. It was held to be an illegal
equal opportunity with the operators of conven package transaction that violated the Sherman 12. 334 U S 131 (1948)
tional theatres to bid for pictures on first run. The Act[...]13. 282 U S 30 (1930)
evidence had included the fact that the district between films and TV here. Further it was noted 14.
managers of each of the distributors testified that that a price differential between films offered in 15. 310 U S 69 (1939)
their companies would not license first run dividually and as part of a package was only 16. " Federal Anti-Trust Law": Oppenheim S.C. and Weston
features to the Boulevard (the drive-in) even prohibited when "it has the effect of conditioning
should the plaintiff offer to pay a rental in excess the sale or licence of a film upon the sale or G.E. 1968 at p.281.
of that offered by one of the downtown theatres.[...]8)
Thus `consciously parallel practice' amounted to justified price differentials.[...](1944) 319 U S 231
On the other hand in Fanchon and Marco v.[...]19. 334 U S 131 (1948)
Paramount22tried in California before Mr Justice 1. " Motion Picture Films and TV Programs" : Tariff Board 20. "A report on the supply of films for exhibition in
Jankwich, where the complaint was the denial of[...]Report 1973 at p.32.
first runs by distributors to a modern cinema in a[...]p.100
suburban area of Los Angeles, it was held that on 2. The Night of the Living Dead: The Australian Film In 21. 192 F. 2d 279. (1951)
the facts the[...]dustry; Filmways Quarterly No. 6. Ginnane, A. at P.7. 22. 100 Fed Supp. 84 (1951)
were[...], can overcome 3. "Advantages of a Local Film Industry" : Showbusiness 24. 371 US 38 (1962)
a finding of reasonableness," the court said.[...]NEXT ISSUE
The Supreme Court in Theatre Enterprises v 4. Supr[...]ent on Roadshow Overseas reaction to film in
and Marco sort to explain denial of first runs to a[...]controversy. Reprinted Showbusiness: 7, 21, July, and 6, Australian Restrictive Trade
were discussed. "Conscious par[...]ractices legislation --
Justice Stone said, "has not yet read conspiracy 6. "Everything you wanted to know about film distribution emergence, growth and
out of the Sherman Act entirely." but were afraid to ask" : Burke, G.W. (Executive director, rele[...]Village Theatres:) Transcript o f seminar.
It is clear, therefore, that the attempt to extend 7. Supra fn 1 at p.50.
the meaning of `conspiracy' to cover parallel 8. Corresponde[...]Group and the author.[...]BBjwaaaa-- fc

A ppendix B A typical letter of acceptance from a distributor and contract schedule.

Dear Hr.[...]:_jit's'll___
ie ilare pleasure in advising the acceptance by our ____rr

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (163)[...]National Library falls far short in other knowledge of my letter but that if I would
significant, not only for the development of ways of the functions of a national film like to leave my telephone number my call
Readers[...]would have the National Film Collection but also for the archive as they are understood in most would be returned when the existe[...]noted with Interest the observations of the Australian film industry and for the study of other countries of the world.[...]onal Library's Film Archives Officer, film in Australia. I am confident that the in isolation of the National Library's collec determined.
Ray E d m o n d so n , p u b lis h e d in th e terest of and the contact with this vital and tion in Canberra, which has a tiny popula
December issue. The National Library con creative enterprise will continue to tion and no film industry, is not only un After a few days, in which I received no
tributed the major part of the expenses of stimulate the full and proper development democratic, it is a severe handicap to reply, I rang Mr White's office again and
M r Edm ondson's trip (one of th ree[...]iyal responsibilities of scholars, filmmakers and educationists. this time another secretary asked me to
overseas visits made by the Library's film the National Library in film and television. This handicap will become increasingly leave my name and address and details of
staff in the past two years) because it was obvious and a source of much frustration the film.
conscious of the need to become familiar G. Chandler, Director-General, National as our film industry and film education and
with both the more advanced practices of[...]ining develop. A month later (13, November), I received
film archives and the latest technology of[...]a letter from Colin Dean (Mr White's
film preser[...]Film archives overseas have played a assistant) asking for "more details of the
vations, especially of methods and techni vital role in the education and creative story line" before supplying them with an
ques usefully recorded in his report, will We were pleased to see the summary of stimulation of filmmak[...]ay Edmondson's report on film archives C in e m a th e q u e in P a ris , p u b lic ly audition print. I wrote to Mr Duckmanton
film archival activities of the Library. in the last issue of Cinema Papers. acknowledged by the creators of the New complaining that it had taken five months,
Indeed, several Idea[...]Wave as the major factor in their film two letters and two telephone calls to get
mondson are already being Implemented. W e are some of the members of a new education; the British Film Institute, with its any reply at ail from the ABC. A few days
body -- the Association for a National Film vital contribution to the intellectual and ar later I received a letter from David Stone
At the same time, the report is mis and Television Archive -- designed to en tistic life of the English; the Museum of claiming that he had not received the letter
leading in that its generally accurate, but courage the Government to set up a single Modern Art in New York, where Orson I wrote to him in June. If he had been doing
rather simple, desc[...]hensive national archive on the Welles and, many years later, Peter his job properly he would not have needed
of film archives suggests that these were lines of film archives as they are under Bogdanovich saturated themselves in a letter from me. The fact that Joker had
not previously known of in Australia nor stood and as they function elsewhere in films of the past before embarking on their won a prize in the Greater Union Awards at
being performed here, and in its assump the world. Our first activity has been to first features. the Sydney Film Festival should have in
tion that Australia should copy these ac present a submission to the Committee of dicated that it may have been worth asking
tivities without qualification. The report is Inquiry on Museums and National Collec The film archive should be in the largest me for a print to view. To my knowledge he
not revelationary to the Library, which is tions. centre of population and in the largest has not contacted other filmmakers and
already providing many of the general ser[...]ith regional asked them for prints of their films with a
vices of film archives and is aware of the The preservation of films and television branches in other capitals. Producers, view to purchasing them.
need to develop others. Film preservation programs in Australia is in urgent need of directors, scriptwriters, art directors,
has been a responsibility actively pursued overhaul and expert planning. At present costume designers, cameram en, film Late in November, I delivered a print of
by the Library for 35 years. What it has there is virtually no overall plan and policy, students, history students, film teachers Joker to Mr Dean's office at his request.
been able to achieve is largely dependent and no single location. Archives are should be able to go to the archive and use After six weeks without word from him hi[...]he its resources without the expense and secretary toid me that the assessors liked
by the Government.[...]Governm ent alone has the tim e-w as tin g of plane jou rn eys to the film but that the ABC could not
National Library, the Australian War Canberra and enforced stays overnight. purchase it because it was in black and
Readers may be interested to learn of Memorial, the Australian Archive, the Our filmmakers and their products are white. This annoyed me considerably
some recent developments undertaken Australian Broadcasting Commission, Film already suf[...]because David Stone had seen the film in
with the substantially increased resources Australia, the Film and Television School, access to archival films. December,[...]the CSIRO, and possibly others. The[...]l The logical centre for the archive is
Nitrate copying: The copying program is films. Bodies such as the Australian Film S yd n ey, w ith in itia lly a b ran ch in I asked to be notified of the ABC's deci
now running at 121,600m a year (costing Institute and the National Film Theatre Melbourne. The archive should also be in sion in writing and, after four more phone
$80,000). More trained staff are necessary hold film collections of their own. Produc proximity to the Film and Television calls and a two-week wait, I received
if this rate is to be lifted. tion units and private collectors hold School, because the School is concerned letters from Colin Dean and David Stone.
others. All these are separate from lending not just with the training of its 25 full-time In his letter David Stone writes:
Storage facilities: A convenient site in libraries. students per year, but with spreading
Canberra for a nitrate vault has been made know ledge and raising standards "We have been considering and/or
available to the Library. Plans are un The National Library in Canberra refers throughout the industry and all teaching purchasing very little by way of
derway for a design which will hopefully be to its historical collection as `the film bodies. monochrome television programs and I
built in 1975-76. The preservation acetate archive', and, thanks largely to the am sorry to say that the fact that your film
film is now held in a cool room (constant pioneering work of Rod Wallace, Larry We recognise that the National Library's is a black and white production con
14
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (164)BYRON HASKIN

this country. This applies to both fiction Continued from P.23[...]BYRON HASKIN
and documentary films.
Yes, and that has gleaned So that " Captain Sinbad" provided FILM OGRAPHY
Part of the ABC's function, surely, is to superlatives from certain quarters. the rare exception.
provide the Australian public with diverse[...]Born Portland, 2 April 1899. Father a school
programming and to' fill those gaps left by A few have commented that its dis That's right. teacher. Took liberal arts for three years,
the commercial channels -- i.e. to cater for advantage was in being released in the enlisted as a Naval Aviation cadet in World
minority audiences who want to see same year as Kubrick's "2001". What TV work have you done? War I. Studied art, worked as a cartoonist for
something other than the formular[...]San Francisco News. Summer vacation
soap-operas and cops and robbers shows Well, that and the elements that to Quite a lot. The last TV I did was employment with International Newsreel and
that dominate Australian television. the outsider appear like so[...]out of Alice In Wonderland. series. I directed six and was on the
To achieve diversity in programming the series without credit as associate FEATURES AS
ABC should encourage the making of films What were they? producer in order to supervise the D IR E C T O R
that are not being made or could not be[...]onal friction between Stefano, was also a fine writer and 1927: Matinee Ladies (Warner Brothers),
or the ABC -- i.e. to recognise that in MGM and George Pal, the hatreds had done the sc[...](Warner Brothers), The
dependent filmmakers have a contribution you couldn't believe were allowed to for Alfred Hitchcock. He was per Siren (Columbia), Ginsberg the Great
to make to Australian television. At present operate on that film's economy. And sonally responsible for the polish on (Warner Brothers).
such recognition does not exist. it was not released with any fanfare. every one of the scripts, and in the
It was grudgingly left to escape, with first; year it really caught on. The 1929: To England for three years as a techni
For as long as the ABC retains its pre everybody hoping it would flop kids started talking back to the cian and production executive for
sent attitude the outlook for independent because they were trying to get rid of monsters, and it was damn good. Herbert Wilcox. With Tom Walls
filmmakers interested in making films for Pal.[...]directed a series o f films based on stage
television, is grim. It is time the ABC ceas As usually happens to the good hits, e.g. On Approval.
ed its patronising and contemptuous at I didn't think the film itself was things in this venal business, some of
titude towards Australian filmmakers. too bad, although you could become the network executives felt that the 1947: Gave up Warners position to accom[...]ess you paid very close series was becoming a little too pany Hal Wallis when the latter left the
I speak not only for myself but for the attention. But what did come across bizarre, and one of their number Burbank studio and set up his own
large number of other filmmakers who very sharply was the terror of a man started sending memos to Stefano producing organization to. make pic
have experienced similar frustrations in who, step by inevitable step,, has his about things he did and didn't like tures for Paramount release. Wallis
trying to sell their films to the ABC. own identity ripped from under him about the scripts, and things he was created him production assistant and
until finally he begins to doubt who going to change. Stefano would read[...]ketson. the hell he is. Here is a guy in a high .these with great interest, drop them[...]position on a scientific project who in the waste basket, and make the (1947) and director of Wallis' I Walk
Dear Sir, has an enemy that begins to strip him films as he saw them. At the end of[...]of all his record background. Even to the first year, when the series had (1949), and The Crying Sisters.
In May 1974 the ABC previewed my film the point where they go to investigate entered the hit category, the network
Matchless and decided to buy it. Almost his credits at the university and find announced that they would renew -- 1950: To England for Disney's Treasure
five months later they confirmed the deci out he never even went there. That's but without Stefano. So they put in a Island.
sion and the contract was signed. During pretty frightening to a person \vho is guy known to the trade as `Guillotine
this five month period we received three a hero of the scientific world and Charlie', and he guillotined the show. 1951: Under contract to Paramount for
letters from a man who was not present at suddenly becomes nothing. He's be[...]hree Technicolor Nat
the first screening stating that the film was ing pursued by a power, he doesn't What were your other series?[...]- Warpath (1951),
of poor quality, experimental, and suitable know where it comes from, and the Silver City, also released as High Ver
only for late night viewing. tricky ending has him possessing the There was a Meet McGraw and million (1951) and Denver and Rio[...]power himself. The Californians, but these are older. Grande (1952) -- as well as George
The first offer for the film was $5,25[...]Worlds (1953).
we weren't surprised. On the day that offer Did you collaborate on the script?
came it was announced that the film had[...]ision vastly OTHERS
won a First Prize at an overseas film Very little. I came onto[...]different?
festival. This, combined with the fact that a when it was fully prepared. I assisted[...]1948: Man-eater o f Kumaon
prominent Australian (with various con the writer John Gay in polishing one You notice the speed at which you 1950: Tarzan and the Jiingle Queen-
tacts) was one of the festival judges, soon or two points, but I had no authority have to operate and the acceptance
had us receiving a second offer from the to change anything further. I felt that of the mediocre which is fostered 1953: His Majesty O'Keefe
ABC for $10,000. a few things could have been upon you, and the untrue impression 1954: The Na[...]changed, but I didn't go into it that the image should contain 1955: Conquest o f Space
That's all I need to say. because I was glad to be doing nothing but bit close-ups. It's like[...]something again. music, in that you can be so god Long'[...]damned corny in a way that is far 1956: The Boss[...]TUARY Hamilton spinning at a very high lean much m ore tow ard an The First Texan[...]o dramatic 1958: From the Earth to the Moon
On 2 February, Norman Dawn, who fil[...]effect, which in a movie has to be 1959: The Little Savage
ed the Australian epic For the Term of his That was the conclusion, where we modelled and made realistic, to be 1960: Jet over the Atlantic
Natural Life (1927), died in Santa Monica, had an effects montage of himself developed and played on a more
California. Dawn had been seriously ill and the Power. We had Hamilton lie behavioral[...]September Storm
since June last year, but four years across a turntable and filmed him[...]evious he had corresponded regularly with a zoom lens from the ceiling. FOOTNOTES:
with Sydney writer and filmmaker Graham[...]1963: Captain Sinbad
Shirley on his work in Australia. Have you ever encounter[...]clashes in special effects work? never-complete[...]iisoe on Mars f
Dawn first filmed here in 1908, but his 1923). Haskin recalls that "It was a story of
best known local achievements were[...]ete say at Warner child slave labor set in the South just after 19.67: The Power (co-directed with George
between 1926 and 1931, when he made Brothers for nine years and went the the Civil War. The effort of trying to re
For the Term of his Natural Life, The way that was economically sound create the B attle of Franklin was Pal).
Adorable Outcast and Showgirl's Luck. and had the best dramatic effect. something of a strain on our director, and[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (165)[...]AUSTRALIA COUNCIL

Movie to the right[...](formerly the Australian Council for the Arts)[...]FILM , RADIO A N D TELEVISION BOARD
track?[...]A C R E A T IV E
EARTH MEDIA RECORDING COMPANY[...]A D M IN IST R A T O R
FULLY PROFESSIONAL 8 TRACK
RECORDING AND MIXING FACILITIES[...]The Film, Radio and Television Board[...]offers a senior executive with proven
INCORP[...]administrative and financial experience a
" E A R T H RECORDS" unique and exciting challenge to act as[...]A knowledge of film, radio and television
Milsone Point, NSW[...]is desirable; an interest in these media is
Tel. 929 8669[...]Salary: Negotiable to $19,300 (maximum)[...]Applications including the names and[...]addresses of three referees to:[...]NORTH SYDNEY 2060

r,

sm a rtst films[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (166)[...]embership of the Board, its powers write to FEGA, P.O. Box 195, Roseville., MELBOURNE FILMMAKERS'
begins a series of columns aim and ability to enquire into such matters NSW. 2069.
ed at creating a flow of informa as exhibition-distribution in Australia and[...]arious guilds, the establishment of a short films quota.
societies, councils, institutes, We believe in a government-assisted THE AUSTRALIAN Many people are aware of the history
unions and co-operatives in free enterprise movie production in WRITERS' GUILD
volved in movie production, dis dustry.[...]of the Melbourne Filmmakers' Co
tribution and exhibition in The Australian Writers' Guild has in
Australia. Our association is divided into four troduced its first Industry-wide Agree operative and the crises it has experienc
in following issues these pages divisions -- Feature and Television ment -- and is now beginning to realize
will provide an open forum for Series Division; Documentary Division; what the world `hassle' means. ed over the years -- the moves to dis
the above organizations. All in Facilities Division and Television
terested parties are invited to Commercial Division. Over the past 14 The guild is facing opposition from the band it, take it over or just to destroy it.
participate and enquiries should years the production of television com networks and the packagers in spite of
be directed to: mercials in Australia -- thanks to the the fact that it is NOT claiming an in However, that is the past and it's the
foresighted government legislation re crease in rates for writers (with the ex
The Columns Editor quiring that all commercials shown on ception of a few sections in some future that's important now.
Cinema Papers Australian television be produced in categories -- mainly radio).
143 Therry[...]e
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000. but with the worldwide trends towards This Is in response to the Federal[...]video tape type government's general request to unions Film and Television Board -- is now
THE FILM PRODUCTION production, movie producers in Australia for restraint in wage claims during
ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA must look towards increased feature and Australia's current inflationary period. working towards becoming a self-
television (i.e., series and documentary)
The Film Production Association of program production to survive. The guild feels that a demand for in supporting organization. It's going to
Australia came into being in 1972 to creased fees at this time would be
promote, foster and encourage the FILM EDITORS' GUILD OF irresponsible and would merely add to take a long time before it is strong
production of films in Australia. Today, It AUSTRALIA[...]enough to survive without grants from
c o m p an ies and, by necessity, is The Film Editors' Guild consists of a However, it has not lost sight of the fact
registered under the Australian Concilia large body of people made up of senior, that its main responsibility is to its the Government -- but it's on the way.
tion and Arbitration Act in order that it junior and associate members. Senior members, particularly the less establish
m a y r e p r e s e n t its m e m b e r s in and junior members have to be engaged ed majority still struggling to gain a The main thing, however, is that it will
negotiations on all Industrial matters. currently in film editing and the associate foothold in a competitive market.
membership covers a large cross- survive and grow to fulfil its purpose of
In 1973, most of its time and effort section of people working in the film in Because of this, the guild committee
went into negotiations with the Australian dustry. Although we welcome associate has introduced into the agreement a bringing Australian movies to the public
Theatrical Amusement Employees members, it is basically an editors' guild system which splits the rate for each
Association, in establishing a new and our object is to ensure that the true category into three -- as an additional in and getting money back to the film
Theatrical Employees' Motion Picture value of film and sound editing is centive to producers to use new talent.
Production Award, and with Actors' Equi recognized as a creative part of film makers.
ty in establishing the Actors' Television production. These rates are (a) Basic (b) Going, and
Program Award which was previously[...]The co-op operates in three areas --
non-existent. Even though the latter The guild meets once a month and our
award was granted in late 1973, matters meetings are aimed at stimulating in The going rate is taken as the stan the cinem a, distribution and as a
relating to it are still under discussion. terest conducive to the many technical dard or average rate currently being paid
The rights of repeats and residuals and, aspects an editor encounters in his field to reasonably well-established writers. resource centre. The cinema screens 14
in fact, the whole question of copyright of of work.[...]sessions a week and the programs con
performance will no doubt be s[...]The basic rate will apply to new or
year with the scheduled government At a recent meeting we screened the less-experienced writers. This rate is sist mainly of Australian movies. In some
legislation for the protection of per[...]Films. The FEGA Editing Workshop is going rate.[...]held every year, with assistance from the
As producers, we are as vitally in Film and Television School. Assistant The bonus rate applies to those writers Bolivia, Cuba, Argentina, France, etc., in
terested in this legislation as are the ac editors in the guild are invited to take in a position, through their experience, to
tors and writers. Our members are the part, at no cost to themselves. The negotiate fees with prod[...]e programs -- all experimental or un
innovators and obtainers of finance for workshop is held over three weekends will be based on the going rate.
commercial movie production and con and each student is given rushes of a derground.
sider the rights vested in the producer to commercial and drama-comedy movie The agreement, which has been nine
form a vital part of the packaging of a segment. The first weekend is devoted to months in the making, will take effect The cinema will be the co-op's main
project, in that a viable return must be the students editing the drama or com from the date of signing and covers all
forthcoming to investors or there will be edy (whichever ha[...]hence no production. the committee for that year). The second in the creation of all radio and television
However, it is agreed that the performer weekend is devoted to editing the com programs as defined. as distribution coming sharply into focus.
and writer must be protected, as well as mercial and the final weekend allows the
the producer. students time to lay the sound tracks for In the past, the guild has negotiated We have been trying to restrict the 8
mixing -- which is done a few weeks separate agreements with indiv[...]erent conditions at pm session purely to Australian movies
activity is in negotiations with govern various times -- a number of them within
ment departments. We had much to say During each week'end the committee weeks of each other. Such a procedure is such as Dalmas, 27A, Come Out
during the Tariff Enquiry of 1972-1973 arranges for a senior editor to introduce not now, and probably never was, a prac
and, more recently, with the Australian the students to their task and to answer ticality. Fighting, Yakkety Yak. If there are insuf
Films Commission Bill. In certain sec questions.
tions of the ind[...]l place all ficient feature length movies, a program
blamed for the initial failure of the Bill, Briefly that is what the FEGA workshop producers on an equal footing, simplify
but I would remind readers that it is the is about. Students who have taken part, dealings with individual writers and stan of a particular film m aker's work is
democratic right of all Australians and find that the basic grounding they receive dardize fees and conditions throughout
organizations to put their point of view to during the workshop weekends is of the country. shown.
the best of their ability. tremendous benefit w[...]e
in their jobs as assistant film editors. Unlike previous a[...]m. session we usually
Basically, we believed that the finding FEGA is planning another workshop this provisions are not negotiable. They
of the Tariff Board's impartial and con year. Committee member, Barry Fawcett, represent a realistic set of conditions to screen Third World movies coupled with
structive suggestions should have been is heading a sub-committee dealing with bring the Australian industry into line
im p le m e n te d in full and th at the the planning which is necessary to en with basic p rin c ip le s a c ce p te d Australian shorts between five and 30
Australian Films Commission should be sure that this year's workshop is as throughout the English-speaking world.
e s ta b lis h e d w ith the s tru c tu re , successful as those in the past. minutes long.
membership and powers recommended[...]For instance, the payment of local and
by the Tariff Board of Enquiry. In par The Film Editors' Guild of Australia is overseas residuals is not only accepted We hoped to run m any short
ticular, in respect to the make up of an active, viable guild and its activities as a fair return for the writer's creativity; it
and involvement in the industry span a is a tenet recognized by international Australian movies at a 6 pm session but
large area. It is hoped the guild will con copyright law.
tinue to grow and play an important pari:[...]g
in the Australian film industry. Enquiries The Industry-wide A[...]e
are welcome from people working the support of Actors' and Announcers' when we put them on. W[...]film industry, who wish to join. Please Equity Association of Australia[...]Australian Theatrical and Amusement scrapped the idea yet but will wait till we[...]Employees' Association, the Australian[...]ission S taff consolidate our 8 and 10 pm sessions[...]Britain, and the Association of Canadian sessions. Mi[...]Television and Radio Artists.[...]and Saturday night are mainly overseas[...]movies, again coupled with Australian[...]Charlie Chaplin to Peter W atkins'[...]Home back to Luis Bunuel's Robinson[...]Distribution suffered a few setbacks[...]last year due to lack of finance. However,[...]it's now back on its feet and working[...]tow ards a higher return to the[...]schools and clubs and, hopefully in the[...]the doors of a few television executives[...]and movie distributors to present them[...]with Australian movies that come up to[...]the requirements they believe are[...]necessary for them to be accepted by the[...]public. More information on this in the[...]As a resource centre the co-op is[...]pic sync, four gang sync with amp and[...]mixer, splicers (tape and cement), two[...]HKS viewers and assorted split reels,[...]Files on where to hire equipment, talent,[...]technicians, writers etc.; files on where to[...]overseas or In Australia). Assistance on[...]equipment, laboratory processes and[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (167)[...]COLUMNS

We are also into getting a movie non-political. This has resulted in an un Back Issues
workshop off the g[...]cross-fertilization of ideas
will be running up to two of these each between members and between other ISS U E 1: December 197[...]ISSU E 2: April 1974
year. If you are interested in joining (or organizations. e Exclusive, in-depth interview with Ken G. Hall
rejoining) the co-op, get in touch with[...]e Special Censorship issue featuring an interview
us. 1975 is going to be a big year for the To com pare, maintain and raise e Production Report on The Cars That Ate Paris with Chi[...]y
for people who love films. in the industry, the society conducts an e Special effects animator Ray Harryhausen inter 9 Violence in the Cinema: Report by Patricia[...]Edgar
THE AUSTRALIAN are presented for outstanding achieve viewed.
CINEMATOGRAPHERS ment in various fields of cinematography.[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (168)A MATTER OF FACT

Continued from P.47 Jean Smith about the day's shooting as well as the in what seemed to the audience to be their natural
notes she took in the normal course of her duties. habitat.
accepted it for real and behaved so completely They indicated how and where incidents we had
naturally that it was possible for us to get managed to capture -- often by good luck but Two final things need comment in order to get
with a growing capacity on everybody's part to the record straight. The first has to do with
beautiful and authentic pictures of Australian anticipate what the animals might be expected to Smithy:
fauna carrying on their normal lives. At play -- do in given circumstances -- might be used.
and in fear of their lives when men with guns came[...]irley: Did you edit Smithy? I notice Terry Banks
to the glade.[...]editor's credit.
I want the record on this film to be straight once while we were shooting as is the case with all
and for all, especially as to the work of two excep properly organized feat[...]two reels containing the Pacific
tional men who are unable to speak for
themselves, the late George Heath and J. Alan Is it conceivable -- as Shepherd on his own flight. They were the main reels and Hall wanted me to
(George) Kenyon. And that tribute to them does statement would have you believe -- that Heath
not overlook in any way the contribution that and I, two reasonably intelligent people, would go[...]iption o f the trip took ONE
Shepherd, his staff and many others made. on shooting, with[...]and everything, willy nilly, until we had ac PAGE IN THE SCRIPT and I estimated that it would
The film has not so far been seen on TV in this cumulated in excess of 6,000m of unrelated film
country because of some difficulty over rights and all of which was dumped in Shepherd's lap with come out at 600 m.
this is unfortunate because the first two reels the suggestion, " Go on, make something out of
stand up as a beautiful presentation of a section of that!" That is just not true and leaves the im
the fauna of this country behaving normally in plication that Terry Banks was not capable of
(apparently) natural surroundings. Really that's just too thick to be swallowed and editing the `two main reels'. The facts are that I[...]credibility all along the line. used Shepherd, in the absence of Ron Whelan, as
The shooting plan on this film was quite The storyline was in the script all the time and assistant director on Smithy. Terry Banks was
that is what Shepherd (ably assisted by Phyllis film ed[...]of
straightforward. Knock off all the interiors, take O'Reilly and Terry Banks on this film) worked to. pressure we got from Columbia who were asking
the company on location to Burragorang Valley[...]ajor exteriors leaving the bulk of the A copy of the original script is in the National now free of his other duties, onto the Pacific flight
studio space to be occupied by George Kenyon's Library,[...]y can verify reels.
carefully planned and drawn up setting. He used what I have said.
the real thing all the time -- gras[...]For him to say "the description of the flight
bush, shrubs, trees etc., -- I still have an Illawarra Bill Shepherd did a good job of editing on took one page in the script and I estimated it
Lily growing in my garden that came from that Orphan as he did on all films he edited for would come out at 600m" , shows clearly that he is
set built getting on for 40 years ago! The grass Cinesound. But others also did splendid jobs as I having script trouble again. How does a produc
was watered daily and actually grew because of have tried to show in this factual story of what tion crew get 600m, out of one page of script?
the heat from a number of two and five kw., lights really happened. George Heath, a creative
we had arranged to be turned on for periods each cinematographer, was shooting "on the fly" a lot The facts are that the Pacific flight ALONE oc
day in order to accustom the animals to the ar of the time on these animal sequences. You can cupied 12 pages of script not counting any of the
tificial conditions. not direct kangaroos -- just as you don't `direct' numerous pages devoted to the lead up to and[...]aftermath of the flight. Here again what went
The 'roos took to the setting like ducks to onto the screen was in the script.
water. They were soon playing around the glade, You place a carpet snake, for instance near a
drinking at the pool, living the life of Riley on a joey and wait to see what will happen. You hope Terry Banks got f[...]the snake will menace the joey because that is because that was what he was! And no amount of
what the script calls for. But you don't always get wild overstatement can alter any of these facts.
When we brought the company in from location what you want. The first time the snake slithers
we were finished with the cast and had the picture past and the little 'roo, quite unafraid, merely One final thing needs attention. I quote
in the bag -- except for the all important opening[...]ptile's body. Shepherd: "In 1937-38 we started pressing for a
animal sequences.[...]union in the industry and the only reason I wasn't
It took a lot of time, and patience to get the sacked was because Cinesound couldn't do
Leo Cracknell, an old circus and vaudeville per without me. We had a meeting attended by Hall,
former who, with his wife, had a whip-cracking snake to appear to be menacing the little 'roo. But the Cinesound employes and people from
and sharp-shooting act, was in charge of the with good cross-cutting of c.u/s of the snake and Filmcraft. When we went back to work next
animals. Leo had a prop list of the animals we'd 'roo, plus a lucky mid-shot- of the reptile curling morning everybody was put on the mat and asked
require -- because the script called for them -- around the roo's body (thanks to the smart work why they had been at the me[...]e always invaluable set-assistants Julian an industry going then which would have been a
up with some we had not ordered and wherever Savieri and the late George Yates), we got what terrific thing . . . "
possible we worked[...]He fails to explain how giving the financial
I am frankly amazed that Bill Shepherd would George Heath was tremendously enthusiastic principals union trouble and shooting up costs
allow himself to be quoted as saying, " . . . I did on this sequence. I, or someone else, might notice would have got an industry going -- one was go
not know how it was going to work out until I'd one or more 'roos about to do something we could ing anyway. But I can assure him with absolute
run all the footage and decided on how to cut one use and signal George. He in turn would hand- certainty that if he had been able to persuade his
shot with the next" (sic) " I hadn't been given a signal the electricians on the gantries and they colleagues to follow his lead, Cinesound, with the
storyline for that section etc.. . " would have arcs struck and fives swung onto the world-war inevitably closing in and pessimism all
objective in no time at all. Frank Bagnall, assis about, would have closed down in 1938 instead of
That statement is just a bald untruth. He had tant camera, would have to make a snap judgment 1940!
the scrip t-- 12 pages of it devoted to this se on focus and we'd be rolling. That way we got
quence alone. The original story was written by some marvellously natural pictures not only of Shepherd has me at this meeting -- which I did
Australian authoress, Dorothy Cotterill, then liv kangaroos but of dingoes, rabbits, snakes, and of not attend -- but fails to explain how, next mor
ing in Miami, Florida, and published in McCalls a rogue emu who, as soon as he was set free on the ning, I was suddenly able to change hats and put
Magazine. It was adapted to the screen by Ed set, began chasing the does and joeys all over the everybody on the mat for b[...]ng place, beating at them with his wings. And then,
been brought in from Hollywood. I had a lot to do to make our day, the Old Man Roo got fed up and "I "was not sacked" says Shepherd, "because
with the scripted story because I knew I had to br Cinesound could not do without me."
ing to life what was on paper and I did not want took to the emu, wrapping his forepaws round the
any `impossible' action written in by a man un cranky bird's neck and kicking him in the slats On that note -- and, very genuinely, more in
familiar with Australian animals and what you sorrow than in anger -- I will rest this case which
might possibly get them to do. with his powerful hind hoppers. And Heath's is one for some of those members of the[...]camera was on the action all the way. That was Cinesound organization to whom the company,
We shot the animal sequence to the scripted not in the script but it is certainly in the picture. and I, owe so much and to whom, in the Shepherd
storyline embellishing it where we could and the Didn't need much editing either. Went in prac interview, justice has not been done.

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (169) SYDNEY UNIVERSITY FILM GROUP[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (170)R E ST R IC TIV E T R A D E PR A C TIC E S Continued from P.83

Appendix C[...]I have endeavouned to nun t h is d r iv e -in theatne as an independent,[...]w ith o u t bothering othen companies in th e motion p ictu re in d u stry .

F u rth e r to my d iscu s sio n s w ith you some months ago and[...]However, I now iin d m y stli

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (171)[...]Phone 51 61066. Telex: Sydney AA 24545[...]590 George Street, Sydney, 2000. Specialising exclusively in negative matching[...]N EG A TIV E
FAMED SPECIALISTS IN FILM BOOKS AND MAGAZINES
(for Fans and Professionals) CUTTING

OUR VAST STOCK NOW INCLUDES[...]T SUBJECTS
and Ulmer, $2.95
FILM 73/[...]DOCUMENTARIES
THE CRITICAL INDEX, a bibliography of articles on film in COMMERCIALS[...]SERVICES PTY LIMITED
DEVELOPMENT OF THE FILM. An interpretive history. By Alan[...]Telephone (02) 922 3607

AND IN THE SCREEN TEXTBOOK SERIES:[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (172)[...]specialists quiries on local and overseas films. On[...]rding quired and send S.A.E. plus 50 cents ser
preview theatre vice fee to:

8te3lemphilolenres tre e t north Sydney. 2060 The George Lugg Library[...]P.O. Box 357
8294111 a.h.9493228 Carlton[...]The Library is operated with assistance
from the Film and Television Board.
FELLOWSHIP[...]NEACTION
Hoyts Theatres Limited sponsor annually a DISTRIBUTES
Fellowship to encourage the standard of quality of
production of Australian motion pictures. Avant-Garde, Third World, Radical, Feminist and good
films of all types on 16mm and 35mm.
The Fellowship is for a training period of six
months in the Twentieth Century Fox Los Angeles[...](16mm & 35mm)
Enquiries for the 1975 Fellowship are being Satyajit Ray's DISTANT THUNDER (16mm)
specifically called from those people in the Motion
Picture or Television Industry who have had Godard's LETTER TO JANE & TOUT VA BIEN (16mm)
experience in " Special Effects" and who wish to Peter Robinson's ASYLUM (16mm)
gain further knowledge in this field.[...]G WITH PETER (16mm)
Enquiries should be directed to:--[...]The Assistant Director,
Film and Television School, and shortly:
P.O. Box 245,[...]

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (173)[...]AUSTRALIAN[...]A ustralian Film In stitu te[...]365A PITT STREET,
CARLTON SOUTH, 3053.[...]SYDNEY, 2000
TELEPHONE: 347 6888[...]TELEGRAMS: FILMINSTITUTE/SYDNEY

r uuuuu-^FILMINSTITUTE/MELBOURNE[...]FOR AUSTRALIAN
FILM AND VIDEO[...]Prize for Best Film in DOCUMENTARY Category: $1,000[...]Prize for Best Film in FICTION Category: $1,000[...]Prize for Best Film in GENERAL Category: $1,000[...]Presented in association with the
SUBSCRIBE[...]SYDNEY FILM FESTIVAL
Three issues of the magazine pl[...]on June 1st, 1975

N a m e ................................................. ...................... ENTRY FORMS NOW AVAILABLE
Address.............................[...]Eligible films must be under 1 hour in length, must be in
Association of Teachers of Film and Video, dependently made, produced in Australia and completed since
C /o W. Levy, 11 Mer[...]BOX 4934 GPO SYDNEY NSW 2001[...]TELEGRAMS SYDFEST SYDNEY

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (174)[...]winning shorts, no charge,
at The Film and Television School[...]to recognised film societies.[...]
Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (175)[...]OUR ASIAN NEIGHBOURS is
a programme of films which
NEIGHBOURS aims to convey everyday life
SENES in Asia. The first of the series,[...]is series
T E N E IIA 4S is devoted to Indonesia and
PRODUCER E y brings to life its people,
I I I A4 A I M E S I I I customs and their music.
Ea[...]lifestyle of the people in their
own environment and vividly
i[...]These films are made so as to
stimulate interest in and to
promote a greater
u[...]The stories are told with
visual impact and the music
is, in most cases, the actual[...]the actors are the people[...]ive, work
and play in this absorbing
and fascinating region.[...]Telegrams 'Filmaust'Sydney
Telex 22734

British and U.S. enquiries
through Australian
Governmen[...]2R 3EH.

Australian Information[...]Y. 10020,
and at all Australian official[...]

MD

[...]oad one copy of this item for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person this material.
Issues digitised from original copies in the collection of Ray Edmondson

Cinema Papers Pty Ltd, Richmond, Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (March-April 1975). University of Wollongong Archives, accessed 17/03/2025, https://archivesonline.uow.edu.au/nodes/view/5014

Cinema Papers no. 5 March-April 1975 (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Sen. Ignacio Ratke

Last Updated:

Views: 6252

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Ignacio Ratke

Birthday: 1999-05-27

Address: Apt. 171 8116 Bailey Via, Roberthaven, GA 58289

Phone: +2585395768220

Job: Lead Liaison

Hobby: Lockpicking, LARPing, Lego building, Lapidary, Macrame, Book restoration, Bodybuilding

Introduction: My name is Sen. Ignacio Ratke, I am a adventurous, zealous, outstanding, agreeable, precious, excited, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.